Chinese Bulletin of Botany ›› 2024, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (1): 99-109.DOI: 10.11983/CBB23040
• TECHNIQUES AND METHODS • Previous Articles Next Articles
Shangwen Zhang1, Shiyu Huang1, Tianwei Yang1, Ting Li1, Xiangjun Zhang1,*(), Manrong Gao1,2
Received:
2023-03-24
Accepted:
2023-07-06
Online:
2024-01-01
Published:
2023-07-25
Contact:
*E-mail: Shangwen Zhang, Shiyu Huang, Tianwei Yang, Ting Li, Xiangjun Zhang, Manrong Gao. Establishment of a Tissue Culture and Rapid Propagation System for Erythropalum scandens Based on Orthogonal Test[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2024, 59(1): 99-109.
Figure 1 Establishment of plant regeneration of cotyledons of Erythropalum scandens (A) Induction primary seedlings; (B) Callus induction of leaf (1) and stem (2); (C) Proliferation culture callus; (D)-(F) Callus differentiation; (G), (H) Cut single seedling culture; (I) Rooting culture; (J) Seedlings were transplanted; (K) Transplant and survive for 180 days (bar=10 cm); (L) Transplant and survive for 360 days (bar=35 cm). (A)-(J) Bars=2 cm
Treatment code | Leaf | Shoot | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBA (mg·L-1) | 2,4-D (mg·L-1) | 6-BA (mg·L-1) | IBA (mg·L-1) | 2,4-D (mg·L-1) | 6-BA (mg·L-1) | |
YZ-1 (JZ-1) | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.5 |
YZ-2 (JZ-2) | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.0 |
YZ-3 (JZ-3) | 0.1 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 1.5 |
YZ-4 (JZ-4) | 0.1 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 2.0 |
YZ-5 (JZ-5) | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.5 |
YZ-6 (JZ-6) | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 |
YZ-7 (JZ-7) | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 |
YZ-8 (JZ-8) | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 |
YZ-9 (JZ-9) | 1.0 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 |
YZ-10 (JZ-10) | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 |
YZ-11 (JZ-11) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 |
YZ-12 (JZ-12) | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 |
YZ-13 (JZ-13) | 2.0 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 |
YZ-14 (JZ-14) | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 |
YZ-15 (JZ-15) | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 |
YZ-16 (JZ-16) | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 |
Table 1 Orthogonal experimental design L16 (43) of callus proliferation using leaf and shoot of Erythropalum scandens
Treatment code | Leaf | Shoot | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBA (mg·L-1) | 2,4-D (mg·L-1) | 6-BA (mg·L-1) | IBA (mg·L-1) | 2,4-D (mg·L-1) | 6-BA (mg·L-1) | |
YZ-1 (JZ-1) | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.5 |
YZ-2 (JZ-2) | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.0 |
YZ-3 (JZ-3) | 0.1 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 1.5 |
YZ-4 (JZ-4) | 0.1 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 2.0 |
YZ-5 (JZ-5) | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.5 |
YZ-6 (JZ-6) | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 |
YZ-7 (JZ-7) | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 |
YZ-8 (JZ-8) | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 |
YZ-9 (JZ-9) | 1.0 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 |
YZ-10 (JZ-10) | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 |
YZ-11 (JZ-11) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 |
YZ-12 (JZ-12) | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 |
YZ-13 (JZ-13) | 2.0 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 |
YZ-14 (JZ-14) | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 |
YZ-15 (JZ-15) | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 |
YZ-16 (JZ-16) | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 |
Treatment code | IBA (mg·L-1) | 2,4-D (mg·L-1) | 6-BA (mg·L-1) | TDZ (mg·L-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
MZ-1 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.1 |
MZ-2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
MZ-3 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 |
MZ-4 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
MZ-5 | 0.4 | 0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
MZ-6 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2.0 |
MZ-7 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.1 |
MZ-8 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 |
MZ-9 | 0.6 | 0 | 1.5 | 2.0 |
MZ-10 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 |
MZ-11 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
MZ-12 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.1 |
MZ-13 | 1.0 | 0 | 2.0 | 0.5 |
MZ-14 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.1 |
MZ-15 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 |
MZ-16 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 |
Table 2 Orthogonal experimental design L16 (44) of induced differentiation of callus in Erythropalum scandens
Treatment code | IBA (mg·L-1) | 2,4-D (mg·L-1) | 6-BA (mg·L-1) | TDZ (mg·L-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
MZ-1 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.1 |
MZ-2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
MZ-3 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 |
MZ-4 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
MZ-5 | 0.4 | 0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
MZ-6 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2.0 |
MZ-7 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.1 |
MZ-8 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 |
MZ-9 | 0.6 | 0 | 1.5 | 2.0 |
MZ-10 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 |
MZ-11 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
MZ-12 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.1 |
MZ-13 | 1.0 | 0 | 2.0 | 0.5 |
MZ-14 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.1 |
MZ-15 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 |
MZ-16 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 |
Treatment code | 6-BA (mg·L-1) | IBA (mg·L-1) | AC (mg·L-1) |
---|---|---|---|
SG-1 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
SG-2 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 |
SG-3 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 0.2 |
SG-4 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.1 |
Table 3 Orthogonal experimental design L4 (23) of rooting and strong seedlings in Erythropalum scandens
Treatment code | 6-BA (mg·L-1) | IBA (mg·L-1) | AC (mg·L-1) |
---|---|---|---|
SG-1 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
SG-2 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 |
SG-3 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 0.2 |
SG-4 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.1 |
Treatment code | Contamination rate (%) | Survival rate (%) | Pollution causes |
---|---|---|---|
X-1 | 98.89±1.92 a | 0.00±0.00 d | Fungal contamination |
X-2 | 83.33±8.82 b | 13.33±5.77 c | Fungal contamination |
X-3 | 58.89±7.70 c | 35.56±6.94 b | Fungal contamination |
X-4 | 41.11±1.92 d | 48.89±5.09 a | Fungal contamination |
X-5 | 14.44±3.85 e | 8.89±1.92 c | Fungal contamination |
Table 4 Contamination rate and survival rate of shoots of Erythropalum scandens asepticized using HgCl2 at different times
Treatment code | Contamination rate (%) | Survival rate (%) | Pollution causes |
---|---|---|---|
X-1 | 98.89±1.92 a | 0.00±0.00 d | Fungal contamination |
X-2 | 83.33±8.82 b | 13.33±5.77 c | Fungal contamination |
X-3 | 58.89±7.70 c | 35.56±6.94 b | Fungal contamination |
X-4 | 41.11±1.92 d | 48.89±5.09 a | Fungal contamination |
X-5 | 14.44±3.85 e | 8.89±1.92 c | Fungal contamination |
Plant growth regulator | Mass concentration (mg·L-1) | Callus induction rate (%) | Callus condition | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Leaf | Shoot | |||
IBA | 0.1 | 13.33±5.77 b | 18.89±1.92 b | Milky white, translucent |
0.2 | 33.33±6.67 a | 22.22±5.09 b | Milky white, translucent | |
0.4 | 28.89±3.85 a | 38.89±3.85 a | Milky white, translucent | |
0.6 | 28.89±1.92 a | 36.67±5.77 a | Milky white, translucent | |
0.8 | 20.00±3.33 b | 35.56±8.39 a | Milky white, translucent | |
1.0 | 5.56±1.92 d | 4.44±1.92 cd | Milky white, translucent | |
1.5 | 5.56±1.92 d | 8.89±1.92 c | Milky white, translucent | |
2.0 | 3.33±3.33 d | 1.11±1.92 d | Milky white, translucent | |
2.5 | 0.00±0.00 d | 1.11±1.92 d | Stop growing | |
3.0 | 0.00±0.00 d | 0.00±0.00 d | Stop growing | |
2,4-D | 0.1 | 20.00±5.77 c | 17.78±1.92 d | Milky white, translucent |
0.2 | 22.22±6.94 c | 22.22±3.85 cd | Milky white, translucent | |
0.4 | 42.22±8.39 b | 25.56±5.09 cd | Milky white, translucent | |
0.6 | 47.78±3.85 b | 28.89±3.85 c | Milky white, translucent | |
0.8 | 42.22±3.85 b | 38.89±9.62 b | Milky white, translucent | |
1.0 | 48.89±8.39 b | 45.56±5.09 b | Milky white, translucent | |
1.5 | 27.78±1.92 c | 38.89±1.92 b | Milky white, translucent | |
2.0 | 75.56±6.94 a | 28.89±3.85 c | Albinism, variation | |
2.5 | 67.78±7.70 a | 61.11±3.85 a | Albinism, variation | |
3.0 | 1.11±1.92 d | 5.56±9.62 e | Albinism, variation |
Table 5 Callus induction rate of Erythropalum scandens leaf and shoot in different concentrations of IBA and 2,4-D treatments
Plant growth regulator | Mass concentration (mg·L-1) | Callus induction rate (%) | Callus condition | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Leaf | Shoot | |||
IBA | 0.1 | 13.33±5.77 b | 18.89±1.92 b | Milky white, translucent |
0.2 | 33.33±6.67 a | 22.22±5.09 b | Milky white, translucent | |
0.4 | 28.89±3.85 a | 38.89±3.85 a | Milky white, translucent | |
0.6 | 28.89±1.92 a | 36.67±5.77 a | Milky white, translucent | |
0.8 | 20.00±3.33 b | 35.56±8.39 a | Milky white, translucent | |
1.0 | 5.56±1.92 d | 4.44±1.92 cd | Milky white, translucent | |
1.5 | 5.56±1.92 d | 8.89±1.92 c | Milky white, translucent | |
2.0 | 3.33±3.33 d | 1.11±1.92 d | Milky white, translucent | |
2.5 | 0.00±0.00 d | 1.11±1.92 d | Stop growing | |
3.0 | 0.00±0.00 d | 0.00±0.00 d | Stop growing | |
2,4-D | 0.1 | 20.00±5.77 c | 17.78±1.92 d | Milky white, translucent |
0.2 | 22.22±6.94 c | 22.22±3.85 cd | Milky white, translucent | |
0.4 | 42.22±8.39 b | 25.56±5.09 cd | Milky white, translucent | |
0.6 | 47.78±3.85 b | 28.89±3.85 c | Milky white, translucent | |
0.8 | 42.22±3.85 b | 38.89±9.62 b | Milky white, translucent | |
1.0 | 48.89±8.39 b | 45.56±5.09 b | Milky white, translucent | |
1.5 | 27.78±1.92 c | 38.89±1.92 b | Milky white, translucent | |
2.0 | 75.56±6.94 a | 28.89±3.85 c | Albinism, variation | |
2.5 | 67.78±7.70 a | 61.11±3.85 a | Albinism, variation | |
3.0 | 1.11±1.92 d | 5.56±9.62 e | Albinism, variation |
Mass concentration (mg·L-1) | Callus differentiation rate (%) | Callus condition | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
6-BA | TDZ | 6-BA | TDZ | |
0.1 | 4.44±1.92 ef | 2.22±1.92 de | No change | Light green, 0-1 buds |
0.2 | 6.67±3.33 e | 10.00±5.77 e | No change | Light green, 0-1 buds |
0.6 | 27.78±1.92 c | 47.78±6.94 d | Light green | Light green, 0-2 buds |
1.0 | 54.44±3.85 a | 18.89±3.85 b | Light green, 1-2 buds | Light green, 0-3 buds |
1.5 | 35.56±3.85 b | 10.00±5.77 c | Light green, 1-2 buds | Light green,1-3 buds |
2.0 | 23.33±5.77 cd | 68.89±5.09 d | Light green, 2-3 buds | Partial albinism, 0-4 buds |
2.5 | 18.89±3.85 d | 68.89±1.92 a | Albinism, 3-6 buds | All albinism |
3.0 | 3.33±3.33 ef | 2.22±3.85 a | Albinism, 3-6 buds | Albinism |
3.5 | 3.33±3.33 ef | 0.00±0.00 e | Death | Death |
4.0 | 0.00±0.00 f | 0.00±0.00 e | Death | Death |
Table 6 Differentiation rate of Erythropalum scandens callus in different concentrations of 6-BA and TDZ treatments
Mass concentration (mg·L-1) | Callus differentiation rate (%) | Callus condition | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
6-BA | TDZ | 6-BA | TDZ | |
0.1 | 4.44±1.92 ef | 2.22±1.92 de | No change | Light green, 0-1 buds |
0.2 | 6.67±3.33 e | 10.00±5.77 e | No change | Light green, 0-1 buds |
0.6 | 27.78±1.92 c | 47.78±6.94 d | Light green | Light green, 0-2 buds |
1.0 | 54.44±3.85 a | 18.89±3.85 b | Light green, 1-2 buds | Light green, 0-3 buds |
1.5 | 35.56±3.85 b | 10.00±5.77 c | Light green, 1-2 buds | Light green,1-3 buds |
2.0 | 23.33±5.77 cd | 68.89±5.09 d | Light green, 2-3 buds | Partial albinism, 0-4 buds |
2.5 | 18.89±3.85 d | 68.89±1.92 a | Albinism, 3-6 buds | All albinism |
3.0 | 3.33±3.33 ef | 2.22±3.85 a | Albinism, 3-6 buds | Albinism |
3.5 | 3.33±3.33 ef | 0.00±0.00 e | Death | Death |
4.0 | 0.00±0.00 f | 0.00±0.00 e | Death | Death |
Treatment code | Callus number | Callus induction rate (%) | Callus condition |
---|---|---|---|
YZ-1 | 3.00±1.00 fghi | 10.00±3.33 fghi | Light green, compact |
YZ-2 | 5.33±1.15 efgh | 17.78±3.85 efgh | Milky white, compact |
YZ-3 | 9.33±1.15 bcd | 31.11±3.85 bcd | Milky white, compact |
YZ-4 | 6.67±0.58 def | 22.22±1.92 def | Light green, compact |
YZ-5 | 1.67±0.58 hi | 5.56±1.92 hi | Milky white, compact |
YZ-6 | 5.00±1.73 efghi | 16.67±5.77 efghi | Light green, more compact |
YZ-7 | 11.33±2.08 bc | 37.78±6.94 bc | Light green, compact |
YZ-8 | 9.33±3.79 bcd | 31.11±12.62 bcd | Light green, compact |
YZ-9 | 8.00±2.00 cde | 26.67±6.67 cde | Light green, compact |
YZ-10 | 18.67±3.21 a | 62.22±10.72 a | Light green, compact |
YZ-11 | 21.33±2.08 a | 71.11±6.94 a | Light green, compact |
YZ-12 | 12.67±3.06 b | 42.22±10.18 b | Light green, compact |
YZ-13 | 6.33±0.58 defg | 21.11±1.92 defg | Milky white, compact |
YZ-14 | 3.33±1.53 fghi | 11.11±5.09 fghi | Milky white, compact |
YZ-15 | 2.67±2.08 ghi | 8.89±6.94 ghi | Milky white, compact |
YZ-16 | 1.33±0.58 hi | 4.44±1.92 hi | Light green, compact |
Table 7 Effect of different plant growth regulators on callus induction of primary seedling leaf of Erythropalum scandens
Treatment code | Callus number | Callus induction rate (%) | Callus condition |
---|---|---|---|
YZ-1 | 3.00±1.00 fghi | 10.00±3.33 fghi | Light green, compact |
YZ-2 | 5.33±1.15 efgh | 17.78±3.85 efgh | Milky white, compact |
YZ-3 | 9.33±1.15 bcd | 31.11±3.85 bcd | Milky white, compact |
YZ-4 | 6.67±0.58 def | 22.22±1.92 def | Light green, compact |
YZ-5 | 1.67±0.58 hi | 5.56±1.92 hi | Milky white, compact |
YZ-6 | 5.00±1.73 efghi | 16.67±5.77 efghi | Light green, more compact |
YZ-7 | 11.33±2.08 bc | 37.78±6.94 bc | Light green, compact |
YZ-8 | 9.33±3.79 bcd | 31.11±12.62 bcd | Light green, compact |
YZ-9 | 8.00±2.00 cde | 26.67±6.67 cde | Light green, compact |
YZ-10 | 18.67±3.21 a | 62.22±10.72 a | Light green, compact |
YZ-11 | 21.33±2.08 a | 71.11±6.94 a | Light green, compact |
YZ-12 | 12.67±3.06 b | 42.22±10.18 b | Light green, compact |
YZ-13 | 6.33±0.58 defg | 21.11±1.92 defg | Milky white, compact |
YZ-14 | 3.33±1.53 fghi | 11.11±5.09 fghi | Milky white, compact |
YZ-15 | 2.67±2.08 ghi | 8.89±6.94 ghi | Milky white, compact |
YZ-16 | 1.33±0.58 hi | 4.44±1.92 hi | Light green, compact |
Treatment code | Callus number | Callus induction rate (%) | Callus condition |
---|---|---|---|
JZ-1 | 3.67±1.15 ef | 12.22±3.85 ef | Light green, compact |
JZ-2 | 4.00±1.73 ef | 13.33±5.77 ef | Light green, compact |
JZ-3 | 7.33±0.58 e | 24.44±1.92 e | Light green, compact |
JZ-4 | 7.33±0.58 e | 24.44±1.92 e | Light green, compact |
JZ-5 | 7.00±3.46 e | 23.33±11.55 e | Light green, compact |
JZ-6 | 8.33±1.53 de | 27.78±5.09 de | Light green, compact |
JZ-7 | 12.33±2.52 cd | 41.11±8.39 cd | Light green, compact |
JZ-8 | 16.00±3.61 bc | 53.33±12.02 bc | Light green, compact |
JZ-9 | 6.67±1.53 e | 22.22±5.09 e | Light green, compact |
JZ-10 | 21.00±6.00 a | 70.00±20.00 a | Light green, compact |
JZ-11 | 17.67±2.31 ab | 58.89±7.70 ab | Light green, compact |
JZ-12 | 21.00±1.73 a | 70.00±5.77 a | Light green, compact |
JZ-13 | 6.00±2.65 ef | 20.00±8.82 ef | Light green, compact |
JZ-14 | 7.00±1.73 e | 23.33±5.77 e | Light green, compact |
JZ-15 | 1.67±1.15 f | 5.56±3.85 f | Light green, compact |
JZ-16 | 4.67±2.08 ef | 15.56±6.94 ef | Light green, compact |
Table 8 Effect of different plant growth regulators on callus induction of primary seedling shoot of Erythropalum scandens
Treatment code | Callus number | Callus induction rate (%) | Callus condition |
---|---|---|---|
JZ-1 | 3.67±1.15 ef | 12.22±3.85 ef | Light green, compact |
JZ-2 | 4.00±1.73 ef | 13.33±5.77 ef | Light green, compact |
JZ-3 | 7.33±0.58 e | 24.44±1.92 e | Light green, compact |
JZ-4 | 7.33±0.58 e | 24.44±1.92 e | Light green, compact |
JZ-5 | 7.00±3.46 e | 23.33±11.55 e | Light green, compact |
JZ-6 | 8.33±1.53 de | 27.78±5.09 de | Light green, compact |
JZ-7 | 12.33±2.52 cd | 41.11±8.39 cd | Light green, compact |
JZ-8 | 16.00±3.61 bc | 53.33±12.02 bc | Light green, compact |
JZ-9 | 6.67±1.53 e | 22.22±5.09 e | Light green, compact |
JZ-10 | 21.00±6.00 a | 70.00±20.00 a | Light green, compact |
JZ-11 | 17.67±2.31 ab | 58.89±7.70 ab | Light green, compact |
JZ-12 | 21.00±1.73 a | 70.00±5.77 a | Light green, compact |
JZ-13 | 6.00±2.65 ef | 20.00±8.82 ef | Light green, compact |
JZ-14 | 7.00±1.73 e | 23.33±5.77 e | Light green, compact |
JZ-15 | 1.67±1.15 f | 5.56±3.85 f | Light green, compact |
JZ-16 | 4.67±2.08 ef | 15.56±6.94 ef | Light green, compact |
Treatment code | Coefficient of propagation | Bud induction rate of callus (%) | Growth |
---|---|---|---|
MZ-1 | 0.19±0.04 e | 18.89±3.85 e | Green, thin and high |
MZ-2 | 0.06±0.02 f | 5.56±1.92 f | Yellowish, thin and weak |
MZ-3 | 0.04±0.05 f | 4.44±5.09 f | Vitrification serious, thin |
MZ-4 | 0.01±0.02 f | 1.11±1.92 f | Vitrification serious, thin |
MZ-5 | 0.50±0.10 c | 40.00±10.00 c | Thick green, thick |
MZ-6 | 0.38±0.04 cd | 28.89±5.09 d | Green, thin and high |
MZ-7 | 0.04±0.02 f | 3.33±0.00 f | Vitrification serious, thin |
MZ-8 | 0.03±0.03 b | 3.33±3.33 f | Albino, thin |
MZ-9 | 3.04±0.20 f | 82.22±8.39 b | Green, strong |
MZ-10 | 0.34±0.08 d | 24.44±8.39 de | Green, strong |
MZ-11 | 0.03±0.03 f | 3.33±3.33 f | Vitrification serious, thin |
MZ-12 | 0.02±0.02 f | 2.22±1.92 f | Vitrification serious, thin |
MZ-13 | 3.33±0.09 a | 98.89±1.92 a | Green, strong |
MZ-14 | 0.29±0.15 de | 17.78±6.94 e | Green, high |
MZ-15 | 0.06±0.02 f | 5.56±1.92 f | Yellowing, thin and weak |
MZ-16 | 0.04±0.02 f | 4.44±1.92 f | Yellowing, thin and weak |
Table 9 Effect of different plant growth regulators on callus induction seedling of Erythropalum scandens
Treatment code | Coefficient of propagation | Bud induction rate of callus (%) | Growth |
---|---|---|---|
MZ-1 | 0.19±0.04 e | 18.89±3.85 e | Green, thin and high |
MZ-2 | 0.06±0.02 f | 5.56±1.92 f | Yellowish, thin and weak |
MZ-3 | 0.04±0.05 f | 4.44±5.09 f | Vitrification serious, thin |
MZ-4 | 0.01±0.02 f | 1.11±1.92 f | Vitrification serious, thin |
MZ-5 | 0.50±0.10 c | 40.00±10.00 c | Thick green, thick |
MZ-6 | 0.38±0.04 cd | 28.89±5.09 d | Green, thin and high |
MZ-7 | 0.04±0.02 f | 3.33±0.00 f | Vitrification serious, thin |
MZ-8 | 0.03±0.03 b | 3.33±3.33 f | Albino, thin |
MZ-9 | 3.04±0.20 f | 82.22±8.39 b | Green, strong |
MZ-10 | 0.34±0.08 d | 24.44±8.39 de | Green, strong |
MZ-11 | 0.03±0.03 f | 3.33±3.33 f | Vitrification serious, thin |
MZ-12 | 0.02±0.02 f | 2.22±1.92 f | Vitrification serious, thin |
MZ-13 | 3.33±0.09 a | 98.89±1.92 a | Green, strong |
MZ-14 | 0.29±0.15 de | 17.78±6.94 e | Green, high |
MZ-15 | 0.06±0.02 f | 5.56±1.92 f | Yellowing, thin and weak |
MZ-16 | 0.04±0.02 f | 4.44±1.92 f | Yellowing, thin and weak |
Treatment code | Rooting rate (%) | Average root number | Root condition |
---|---|---|---|
SG-1 | 56.67±6.67 c | 0.80±0.09 d | The root is white, short, thick |
SG-2 | 74.44±8.39 b | 1.17±0.10 c | The root is white, short, thick |
SG-3 | 100.00±0.00 a | 2.23±0.17 a | The root is white, long, thick |
SG-4 | 73.33±6.67 b | 1.40±0.03 b | The root is white, long, thick |
Table 10 Effect of different plant growth regulators on induced rooting of Erythropalum scandens
Treatment code | Rooting rate (%) | Average root number | Root condition |
---|---|---|---|
SG-1 | 56.67±6.67 c | 0.80±0.09 d | The root is white, short, thick |
SG-2 | 74.44±8.39 b | 1.17±0.10 c | The root is white, short, thick |
SG-3 | 100.00±0.00 a | 2.23±0.17 a | The root is white, long, thick |
SG-4 | 73.33±6.67 b | 1.40±0.03 b | The root is white, long, thick |
Media | Proportion of media | Survival rate (%) | Growth |
---|---|---|---|
Media I | River sand:vermiculite:perlite = 1:1:1 (v/v/v) | 65.56±5.09 b | Buds and light yellow leaves |
Media II | Yellow mud:vermiculite:perlite = 1:1:1 (v/v/v) | 73.33±10.00 b | Buds and light yellow leaves |
Media III | Small particle peat soil | 88.89±3.85 a | Strong new buds and darkgreen leaves |
Table 11 Transplanting and domestication of rooted seedlings
Media | Proportion of media | Survival rate (%) | Growth |
---|---|---|---|
Media I | River sand:vermiculite:perlite = 1:1:1 (v/v/v) | 65.56±5.09 b | Buds and light yellow leaves |
Media II | Yellow mud:vermiculite:perlite = 1:1:1 (v/v/v) | 73.33±10.00 b | Buds and light yellow leaves |
Media III | Small particle peat soil | 88.89±3.85 a | Strong new buds and darkgreen leaves |
[1] | 陈宝玲, 王华新, 陈尔, 林茂, 龚建英, 唐遒冥, 李冰, 农凤梅 (2014). 不同栽培基质对纹瓣兰组培苗生长的影响. 广东农业科学 41(20), 29-32. |
[2] |
戴逢斌, 刘丽萍, 李艾佳, 饶书培, 陈金焕 (2019). 多基因型黑果枸杞高效快繁体系的建立. 生物技术通报 35, 201-207.
DOI |
[3] | 冯旭, 李耀华, 梁臣艳, 唐慧勤, 牛晋英 (2014). 赤苍藤叶挥发油化学成分分析. 时珍国医国药 25, 1338-1339. |
[4] | 符策, 韦雪英, 刘连军, 谢君峰 (2019). 不同外源激素、基质处理对赤苍藤扦插生根的影响. 南方农业 13(5), 139-140. |
[5] | 郭品湘 (2020). 鸡粪和牛粪配施对赤苍藤产量和品质的影响. 硕士论文. 南宁: 广西大学. pp. 54-58. |
[6] | 黄桂华, 梁坤南, 周再知, 杨伟, 马华明 (2014). 不同基质配方对柚木组培苗移植效果的影响. 中南林业科技大学学报 34, 32-36. |
[7] | 黄诗宇, 张向军, 李婷, 张尚文 (2021). 广西新兴药食同源蔬菜赤苍藤产业发展现状与发展对策. 中国瓜菜 34(8), 109-115. |
[8] | 黄元河, 黎星星, 潘乔丹, 黎为能, 黄一能 (2017). 赤苍藤醇提物的急性毒性及对小鼠高尿酸血症的影响. 中国民族民间医药 26(5), 52-54. |
[9] |
李佳慧, 叶维雁, 朱鹏锦, 庞新华, 张继, 唐毓玮, 韦俏宇 (2022). 猫须草无菌短枝组织培养与快速繁殖体系的建立. 热带作物学报 43, 2063-2070.
DOI |
[10] | 梁臣艳, 张璐, 唐云丽, 黎炎燊, 甄丹丹 (2019). 赤苍藤化学成分的GC-MS分析. 广西中医药 42(4), 54-56. |
[11] | 梁臣艳, 张玄薇, 李耀华, 张伟 (2017). 腥藤化学成分的研究(I). 中药材 40, 2598-2600. |
[12] |
刘芳, 马道承, 王凌晖, 李乾林, 覃杰 (2022). 两种生长调节剂对赤苍藤生长特性的影响. 广西林业科学 51, 803-808.
DOI |
[13] | 隆卫革, 黎素平, 安家成, 朱昌叁 (2017). 森林蔬菜赤苍藤营养分析与评价. 食品研究与开发 38(24), 124-127. |
[14] |
逯锦春, 曹丽娜, 佟冠杰, 王鑫颖, 张利英, 喻锌, 李荟芳, 李彦慧 (2022). 大花银莲花愈伤组织诱导及再生体系的建立. 植物学报 57, 217-226.
DOI |
[15] |
卢庸, 覃凌薇, 李琳, 王凌晖 (2022). 不同光照处理对赤苍藤光合生理和生化特性的影响. 广西林业科学 51, 223-228.
DOI |
[16] |
吕秀立, 于泽群, 陈香波, 傅仁杰, 缪珊珊, 杜安 (2022). 粉美人萱草的快繁技术和大田种植. 植物学报 57, 350-357.
DOI |
[17] | 马道承, 田湘, 王凌晖, 滕维超, 覃杰, 邵家茵 (2023). 氮磷钾配方施肥对赤苍藤生长效应的影响. 中国土壤与肥料 (3), 55-64. |
[18] | 马道承, 余注光, 王凌晖, 林泳志, 潘媛媛 (2022). 氮磷钾配比施肥对赤苍藤生理及生物量积累的影响. 植物科学学报 40, 839-852. |
[19] | 潘乔丹, 黄元河, 莫绪秀, 谭文溚, 陆海峰 (2020). 赤苍藤茎化学成分预实验及薄层色谱分析. 中国民族民间医药 29(19), 16-21, 26. |
[20] | 潘乔丹, 黄元河, 唐海燕, 农静羽, 韦贤, 陆海峰, 黄锁义 (2016). 赤苍藤和密蒙花多糖的含量测定及抗氧化研究. 食品研究与开发 37(22), 6-9. |
[21] | 韦如萍, 胡德活, 刘星, 晏姝, 郑会全, 王润辉, 黄德积, 郭立业, 贺学志 (2018). 不同轻基质对杉木无性系组培苗生长的影响. 林业与环境科学 34(6), 28-33. |
[22] | 韦婉羚, 杨海霞, 何文, 李恒锐, 梁振华, 陈会鲜, 张秀芬, 蔡兆琴, 阮丽霞, 李天元, 兰秀, 黄珍玲, 朱艳梅 (2023). 基于转录组测序的赤苍藤根、茎和叶基因表达分析. 植物生理学报 59, 333-344. |
[23] | 许崇摇, 韦贵云, 朱丹, 王璐琪, 周秋妹, 蒋伟哲 (2019). 赤苍藤茎叶水提物抗痛风作用的实验研究. 中国药房 30, 3418-3422. |
[24] | 杨天为, 黄诗宇, 张尚文, 高曼熔, 张向军, 李婷, 庾韦花, 蒙平, 石前 (2023a). 药食同源蔬菜赤苍藤SCoT分子标记体系的优化及引物筛选. 中国瓜菜 36, 48-52. |
[25] | 杨天为, 黄诗宇, 张尚文, 高曼熔, 张向军, 李婷, 庾韦花, 蒙平, 石前 (2023b). 基于ISSR与SCoT分子标记的赤苍藤种质遗传多样性分析及DNA指纹图谱构建. 分子植物育种 21, 4710-4718. |
[26] | 张佳奇, 高玉福, 徐博, 李佳霖, 翁卓, 李新宇, 荣立苹 (2021). 长白山特有彩叶树种紫花槭的组培快繁. 植物生理学报 57, 1701-1707. |
[27] | 张尚文, 李婷, 石前, 潘颖南, 庾韦花, 蒙平, 张向军 (2020). 药食同源蔬菜赤苍藤新品种桂赤苍藤1号和桂赤苍藤2号的选育. 中国蔬菜 2010(10), 92-95. |
[28] | 张尚文, 杨天为, 黄诗宇, 张向军, 李婷, 高曼熔, 庾韦花, 蒙平, 石前 (2023). 低温贮藏对不同品种赤苍藤品质的影响. 食品工业科技 44, 370-377. |
[29] | 赵昊天, 祝建波, 杨有兴, 谭骏, 文国荣, 王冬梅 (2023). 赤苍藤RAPD-PCR体系的建立与应用. 分子植物育种 http://kn-s.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20230303.1628.015.html |
[30] | 郑希龙, 甘炳春, 孙伟, 杨云, 许明会, 李榕涛 (2014). “材”类黎药资源的传统利用. 世界科学技术-中医药现代化 16, 313-318. |
[31] | 中国科学院中国植物志委员会 (1988). 中国植物志, 第24卷. 北京: 科学出版社. pp. 46. |
[32] | 周玉洁, 韦雪芬, 申长青, 李焜钊, 孙朝辉, 黄久香 (2019). 濒危植物四药门花的组培快繁. 植物生理学报 55, 635-641. |
[33] | 邹亚丽, 王廷璞, 刘瑞媛, 马伟超, 李一婧 (2011). 2,4-D对小麦胚愈伤组织诱导及其形成的影响. 天水师范学院学报 31 (2), 33-35. |
[34] | Han SJ, Liu M, Wang YT, Chen J (2023). Tissue culture and rapid propagation technology for Gentiana rhodantha. Open Life Sci 18, 20220565. |
[35] |
Long Y, Yang Y, Pan GT, Shen YO (2022). New insights into tissue culture plant-regeneration mechanisms. Front Plant Sci 13, 926752.
DOI URL |
[36] |
Pirttilä AM, Podolich O, Koskimäki JJ, Hohtola E, Hohtola A (2008). Role of origin and endophyte infection in browning of bud-derived tissue cultures of scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 95, 47-55.
DOI URL |
[37] |
Zheng XL, Wei JH, Sun W, Li RT, Liu SB, Dai HF (2013). Ethnobotanical study on medicinal plants around Limu Mountains of Hainan Island, China. J Ethnopharmacol 148, 964-974.
DOI URL |
[1] | Xuping Tian, Kangjie Yue, Jiali Wang, Huixin Liu, Ziyin Shi, Hongwei Kang. Callus Induction and Plant Regeneration of Dracocephalum rupestre [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2024, 59(4): 0-0. |
[2] | Hao Zeng, Peifang Li, Zhihui Guo, Chunlin Liu, Ying Ruan. Establishment of a Regeneration System for Lunaria annua [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2024, 59(3): 433-440. |
[3] | Yefei Liu, Haixia Zhao, Xiping Jiang, Rui Qiu, Xinyue Zhou, Yan Zhao, Chunxiang Fu. Establishment of Highly Efficient Tissue Culture and Agrobacterium-mediated Callus Infection Systems for Hordeum brevisubulatum [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2023, 58(3): 440-448. |
[4] | Jinchun Lu, Lina Cao, Guanjie Tong, Xinying Wang, Liying Zhang, Xin Yu, Huifang Li, Yanhui Li. Establishment of Callus Induction and Regeneration System of Anemone silvestris [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2022, 57(2): 217-226. |
[5] | Churan Li, Ling Fu, Yun Liu, Xiaoqin Yang, Guolei Zhu, Sida Xie, Huancheng Ma, Ping Zhao. Optimization of Cell Suspension Culture Conditions of Vaccinium dunalianum [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2022, 57(2): 227-235. |
[6] | Yaqian Xiong, Xianbao Deng, Huihui Zhang, Dong Yang, Heng Sun, Juan Liu, Mei Yang. In Vitro Rapid Propagation of Nelumbo nucifera [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2021, 56(5): 605-613. |
[7] | Yanmin Li, Hui Jiang, Zhenzhu Fu, Jing Zhang, Xin Yuan, Huijuan Wang, Jie Gao, Xiaoyu Dong, Limin Wang, Hechen Zhang. Callus Induction and Somatic Embryogenesis in Anther Culture of Paeonia lactiflora [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2021, 56(4): 443-450. |
[8] | Qian Luo, Yansha Zhang, Jing Ou. Callus Induction and Plant Regeneration of Cerasus serrulata var. lannesiana cv. ‘Grandiflora’ [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2021, 56(4): 451-461. |
[9] | Pengfei Du, Yu Wang, Yingping Cao, Song Yang, Zhichao Sun, Decai Mao, Jiajun Yan, Daxu Li, Meizhen Sun, Chunxiang Fu, Shiqie Bai. Establishment of Biolistic Mediated Transformation System for Elymus sibiricus [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2021, 56(1): 62-70. |
[10] | Dongrui Zhang, Zhigang Bu, Lingling Chen, Ying Chang. Establishment of a Tissue Culture and Rapid Propagation System of Dryopteris fragrans [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2020, 55(6): 760-767. |
[11] | Jianfei Liu, Yan Liu, Kejian Liu, Yang Chi, Zhifa Huo, Yonghong Huo, Xiangling You. Optimization of the Regeneration System from Somatic Embryogenesis in Larix olgensis [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2020, 55(5): 605-612. |
[12] | Yan Xiao,Zhenxing Wang,Dongming Li,Yanhua Qi, Enhebayaer. Optimization of Tissue Culture and Plant Regeneration System of Mature Embryo of Leymus chinensis [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2020, 55(2): 192-198. |
[13] | Ying Feng,Lianwen Qian,Qingliang Lin. The Effect of Different Hormones on Explant Browning and Callus Browning in Cyclocarya paliurus [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2019, 54(5): 634-641. |
[14] | Xiaomei Liu,Lili Sun,Xiangdong Fu,Hong Liao. An Effective Method for the Rooting of Tea Cuttings [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2019, 54(4): 531-538. |
[15] | Zhang Xuhong, Wang Di, Liang Zhenxu, Sun Meiyu, Zhang Jinzheng, Shi Lei. Callus Induction and Establishment of a Plant Regeneration System with Lilium martagon [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2018, 53(6): 840-847. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||