2019-2021年我国南方稻区白叶枯病菌的毒力与遗传多样性调查研究

doi:10.11983/CBB22183

植物学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (5): 743-749.DOI: 10.11983/CBB22183

2019-2021年我国南方稻区白叶枯病菌的毒力与遗传多样性调查研究

田传玉¹^,², 方妍力¹^,², 沈晴³, 王宏杰¹^,², 陈析丰¹, 郭威¹, 赵开军², 王春连²^,⁴(), 纪志远²()

1.浙江师范大学生命科学学院, 金华 321004
2.中国农业科学院作物科学研究所/农作物基因资源与基因改良国家重大科学工程, 北京 100081
3.苏州市植物保护植物检疫站, 苏州 215006
4.中国农业科学院三亚国家南繁研究院, 三亚 572024

收稿日期:2022-08-03 接受日期:2023-02-09 出版日期:2023-09-01 发布日期:2023-09-21
通讯作者: *E-mail: wangchunlian@caas.cn;jizhiyuan@caas.cn
作者简介:第一联系人：
† 共同第一作者。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2021YFD1200501-5);国家自然科学基金(U20A2035);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(Y2022QC001)

Genotypic Diversity and Pathogenisity of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae Isolated from Southern China in 2019-2021

Tian Chuanyu¹^,², Fang Yanli¹^,², Shen Qing³, Wang Hongjie¹^,², Chen Xifeng¹, Guo Wei¹, Zhao Kaijun², Wang Chunlian²^,⁴(), Ji Zhiyuan²()

1. College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China
2. National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement (NFCRI), Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences (CAAS), Beijing 100081, China
3. Suzhou Municipal Plant Protection and Quarantine Station, Suzhou 215006, China
4. National Nanfan Research Institute (Sanya), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Sanya 572024, China

Received:2022-08-03 Accepted:2023-02-09 Online:2023-09-01 Published:2023-09-21
Contact: *E-mail: wangchunlian@caas.cn;jizhiyuan@caas.cn
About author:First author contact:
† These authors contributed equally to this paper.

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 种植抗病品种一直是防控水稻白叶枯病(bacterial blight, BB)最有效的措施。近年来, 白叶枯病在我国多地呈现“老病新发”态势。为查明近期白叶枯病成灾的原因, 2019-2021年间, 在南方8省(海南、云南、广西、广东、福建、湖南、浙江和江苏)病害重发生田块采集叶片, 分离获得野生白叶枯病菌(Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae, Xoo)。通过对主效毒性因子基因型tale (transcription activator-like effectors)进行Southern杂交检测, 将新分离的97株Xoo菌株划分为10个基因型, 其中基因型V是优势种群代表。选取各基因型的代表菌株, 剪叶接种携带主要抗病基因(R gene)的水稻(Oryza sativa)品种, 毒力测试结果显示, Xa3和Xa4等传统抗病基因对田间大部分菌株已经丧失抗性, Xa7和Xa23等优异抗病基因对白叶枯病仍具有广谱抗性。研究结果表明, 近期“老病新发”的主要原因可能是水稻新品种选育过程中忽视了优异抗白叶枯病基因资源的引入, 挖掘与利用优异抗病基因资源仍是防控白叶枯病最理想的途径。

关键词: 白叶枯病, 抗病基因, tale, 菌株毒力, 水稻

Abstract: Although resistant cultivars have been widely employed as the most economical and effective way to control bacterial blight (BB) in rice, the outbreak of BB reoccured in Southern China in recent years. In order to investigate the cause for the recent outbreak of BB in China, we collected the rice leaves with typical BB symptom from paddies in eight southern provinces (Hainan, Yunnan, Guangxi, Guangdong, Fujian, Hunan, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu) in 2019 to 2021. A total of 97 Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) strains isolated from the BB-diseased leaves were divided into 10 genotypes by Southern hybridization detection of transcription activator-like effectors (tale), of which genotype V was the representative of the dominant population. The representative strains of each genotype were applied to inoculated rice accessions with different resistance (R) gene. The inoculation results revealed that traditional major R genes such as Xa3 and Xa4 were only effective against a small number of the newly isolated Xoo strains, whereas Xa7 and Xa23 still had broad-spectrum resistance to all (or the majority of) these strains. We concluded that the cause for the recent outbreak of rice BB in Southern China is most likely the insufficient use of effective BB resistance genes in the new rice varieties. Exploring and utilizing excellent resistance gene resources is still the most ideal way to prevent and control BB.

Key words: bacterial blight, resistance gene, transcription activator-like effector, strain virulence, rice

田传玉, 方妍力, 沈晴, 王宏杰, 陈析丰, 郭威, 赵开军, 王春连, 纪志远. 2019-2021年我国南方稻区白叶枯病菌的毒力与遗传多样性调查研究. 植物学报, 2023, 58(5): 743-749.

Tian Chuanyu, Fang Yanli, Shen Qing, Wang Hongjie, Chen Xifeng, Guo Wei, Zhao Kaijun, Wang Chunlian, Ji Zhiyuan. Genotypic Diversity and Pathogenisity of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae Isolated from Southern China in 2019-2021. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2023, 58(5): 743-749.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.chinbullbotany.com/CN/10.11983/CBB22183

https://www.chinbullbotany.com/CN/Y2023/V58/I5/743

图/表 4

参考文献 23

[1]	张华, 姜英华, 胡白石, 刘凤权, 许志刚 (2008). 利用PCR技术专化性检测水稻细菌性条斑病菌. 植物病理学报 38, 1-5.
[2]	Antony G, Zhou JH, Huang S, Li T, Liu B, White F, Yang B (2010). Rice xa13 recessive resistance to bacterial blight is defeated by induction of the disease susceptibility gene Os-11N3. Plant Cell 22, 3864-3876. DOI URL
[3]	Boch J, Bonas U, Lahaye T (2014). TAL effectors-pathogen strategies and plant resistance engineering. New Phy- tol 204, 823-832.
[4]	Breia R, Conde A, Badim H, Fortes AM, Gerós H, Granell A (2021). Plant SWEETs: from sugar transport to plant-pathogen interaction and more unexpected physiological roles. Plant Physiol 186, 836-852. DOI PMID
[5]	Doyle EL, Stoddard BL, Voytas DF, Bogdanove AJ (2013). TAL effectors: highly adaptable phytobacterial virulence factors and readily engineered DNA-targeting proteins. Trends Cell Biol 23, 390-398. DOI PMID
[6]	Ji CH, Ji ZY, Liu B, Cheng H, Liu H, Liu SZ, Yang B, Chen GY (2020). Xa1 Allelic R genes activate rice blight resistance suppressed by interfering TAL effectors. Plant Commun 1, 100087. DOI URL
[7]	Ji ZY, Guo W, Chen XF, Wang CL, Zhao KJ (2022). Plant executor genes. Int J Mol Sci 23, 1524. DOI URL
[8]	Ji ZY, Ji CH, Liu B, Zou LF, Chen GY, Yang B (2016). Interfering TAL effectors of Xanthomonas oryzae neutralize R-gene-mediated plant disease resistance. Nat Commun 7, 13435. DOI
[9]	Ji ZY, Wang CL, Zhao KJ (2018). Rice routes of countering Xanthomonas oryzae. Int J Mol Sci 19, 3008. DOI URL
[10]	Ji ZY, Zakria M, Zou LF, Xiong L, Li Z, Ji GH, Chen GY (2014). Genetic diversity of transcriptional activator-like effector genes in Chinese isolates of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola. Phytopathology 104, 672-682. DOI URL
[11]	Niño-Liu DO, Ronald PC, Bogdanove AJ (2006). Xanthomonas oryzae pathovars: model pathogens of a model crop. Mol Plant Pathol 7, 303-324. DOI PMID
[12]	Nowack MK, Holmes DR, Lahaye T (2022). TALE-induced cell death executors: an origin outside immunity? Trends Plant Sci 27, 536-548. DOI URL
[13]	Oliva R, Ji CH, Atienza-Grande G, Huguet-Tapia JC, Perez-Quintero A, Li T, Eom JS, Li CH, Nguyen H, Liu B, Auguy F, Sciallano C, Luu VT, Dossa GS, Cunnac S, Schmidt SM, Slamet-Loedin IH, Vera Cruz C, Szurek B, Frommer WB, White FF, Yang B (2019). Broad- spectrum resistance to bacterial blight in rice using genome editing. Nat Biotechnol 37, 1344-1350. DOI
[14]	Perez-Quintero AL, Szurek B (2019). A decade decoded: spies and hackers in the history of TAL effectors research. Annu Rev Phytopathol 57, 459-481. DOI PMID
[15]	Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989). Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
[16]	Wang CL, Qin TF, Yu HM, Zhang XP, Che JY, Gao Y, Zheng CK, Yang B, Zhao KJ (2014). The broad bacterial blight resistance of rice line CBB23 is triggered by a novel transcription activator-like (TAL) effector of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Mol Plant Pathol 15, 333-341.
[17]	White FF, Yang B (2009). Host and pathogen factors controlling the rice-Xanthomonas oryzae interaction. Plant Physiol 150, 1677-1686. DOI URL
[18]	Xu ZY, Xu XM, Gong Q, Li ZY, Li Y, Wang S, Yang YY, Ma WX, Liu LY, Zhu B, Zou LF, Chen GY (2019). Engineering broad-spectrum bacterial blight resistance by simultaneously disrupting variable TALE-binding elements of multiple susceptibility genes in rice. Mol Plant 12, 1434-1446. DOI PMID
[19]	Xu ZY, Zou LF, Ma WX, Cai LL, Yang YY, Chen GY (2017). Action modes of transcription activator-like effectors (TALEs) of Xanthomonas in plants. J Integr Agric 16, 2736-2745. DOI URL
[20]	Yang B, Sugio A, White FF (2006). Os8N3 is a host disease-susceptibility gene for bacterial blight of rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 10503-10508. DOI URL
[21]	Zhang BM, Zhang HT, Li F, Ouyang YD, Yuan M, Li XH, Xiao JH, Wang SP (2020). Multiple alleles encoding atypical NLRs with unique central tandem repeats in rice confer resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Plant Commun 1, 100088. DOI URL
[22]	Zhou JH, Peng Z, Long JY, Sosso D, Liu B, Eom JS, Huang S, Liu SZ, Vera Cruz C, Frommer WB, White FF, Yang B (2015). Gene targeting by the TAL effector PthXo2 reveals cryptic resistance gene for bacterial blight of rice. Plant J 82, 632-643. DOI URL
[23]	Zhou JM, Zhang YL (2020). Plant immunity: danger perception and signaling. Cell 181, 978-989. DOI URL

tale genotype	Representative strains	Distribution	Number of strains	Frequency (%)	Putative tale gene
I	YN18-3	Yunnan, Guangxi	4	4.12	pthXo1, avrXa7, avrXa23
II	GX15-2, YN17-8	Yunnan, Guangxi	2	2.06	pthXo1, pthXo2, avrXa23, avrXa27
III	YN17-2, YN18-6	Yunnan, Guangdong	8	8.25	pthXo1, pthXo2, avrXa10, avrXa23, avrXa27
IV	GX15-4, GD3-153	Guangxi, Guangdong, Yunnan	18	18.56	pthXo1, pthXo2, avrXa23
V	ZJ1-121, HuN1-136	Zhejiang, Hunan, Jiangsu	27	27.84	pthXo1, pthXo2, avrXa23
VI	ZJ3-184	Zhejiang, Guangdong	5	5.15	pthXo1, pthXo2, avrXa23, avrXa27
VII	ZJ4-198	Zhejiang, Jiangsu	4	4.12	pthXo1, pthXo2, avrXa23, avrXa27
VIII	GD1-105, HN1-150	Guangdong, Hainan, Zhejiang, Guangxi	22	22.68	pthXo1, pthXo2, avrXa23
IX	FJ3-192	Fujian, Guangxi	4	4.12	pthXo1, avrXa7, avrXa10, avrXa23, avrXa27
X	JS2-103	Jiangsu, Zhejiang	3	3.09	pthXo1, pthXo2, avrXa7, avrXa10, avrXa23, avrXa27

tale genotype	Representative strains	Distribution	Number of strains	Frequency (%)	Putative tale gene
I	YN18-3	Yunnan, Guangxi	4	4.12	pthXo1, avrXa7, avrXa23
II	GX15-2, YN17-8	Yunnan, Guangxi	2	2.06	pthXo1, pthXo2, avrXa23, avrXa27
III	YN17-2, YN18-6	Yunnan, Guangdong	8	8.25	pthXo1, pthXo2, avrXa10, avrXa23, avrXa27
IV	GX15-4, GD3-153	Guangxi, Guangdong, Yunnan	18	18.56	pthXo1, pthXo2, avrXa23
V	ZJ1-121, HuN1-136	Zhejiang, Hunan, Jiangsu	27	27.84	pthXo1, pthXo2, avrXa23
VI	ZJ3-184	Zhejiang, Guangdong	5	5.15	pthXo1, pthXo2, avrXa23, avrXa27
VII	ZJ4-198	Zhejiang, Jiangsu	4	4.12	pthXo1, pthXo2, avrXa23, avrXa27
VIII	GD1-105, HN1-150	Guangdong, Hainan, Zhejiang, Guangxi	22	22.68	pthXo1, pthXo2, avrXa23
IX	FJ3-192	Fujian, Guangxi	4	4.12	pthXo1, avrXa7, avrXa10, avrXa23, avrXa27
X	JS2-103	Jiangsu, Zhejiang	3	3.09	pthXo1, pthXo2, avrXa7, avrXa10, avrXa23, avrXa27

Strains	tale genotype	IR24	JG30	IRBB3	IRBB4	IRBB5	IRBB7	IRBB21	IRBB27	CBB23	KΔSWEET	5024	4059	4064
YN18-3	I	2.17± 1.21 b	11.00± 1.25 a	0.50± 0.32 b	0.50± 0.69 b	0.50± 0.04 b	0.10± 0.00 b	0.50± 0.31 b	0.50± 0.01 b	0.30± 0.01 b	1.90± 0.40 b	0.10± 0.00 b	0.35± 0.01 b	0.35± 0.05 b
GX15-2	II	9.00± 0.69 b	14.00± 0.82 a	8.67± 2.75 b	7.17± 0.05 c	1.67± 0.02 c	2.50± 0.01 d	4.44± 0.45 c	0.10± 0.00 d	1.88± 0.03 d	2.13± 0.45 d	0.10± 0.00 d	0.11± 0.02 d	14.33± 1.25 a
YN18-6	III	9.83± 0.02 b	18.83± 0.96 a	15.67± 0.01 a	3.50± 0.03 c	0.40± 0.01 d	0.48± 0.17 d	0.50± 0.00 d	0.32± 0.01 d	0.10± 0.02 d	1.40± 0.01 d	0.20± 0.01 d	0.60± 0.01 d	2.42± 0.01 d
GD3-153	IV	8.17± 0.90 b	17.00± 2.58 a	8.67± 2.98 b	0.50± 0.01 d	0.10± 0.00 d	0.10± 0.02 d	3.38± 0.02 c	0.50± 0.02 d	0.10± 0.01 d	1.08± 1.92 d	0.10± 0.00 d	0.10± 0.01 d	7.00± 1.63 b
HuN1-136	V	9.50± 0.58 b	11.33± 2.08 a	5.17± 0.94 c	6.75± 1.34 c	0.10± 0.02 d	0.10± 0.01 d	14.83± 1.25 a	0.20± 0.01 d	0.10± 0.10 d	0.75± 0.22 d	3.50± 0.01 c	1.17± 0.02 d	9.92± 1.21 b
ZJ3-184	VI	6.33± 0.37 b	14.50± 1.83 a	7.75± 0.02 b	0.20± 0.03 c	0.10± 0.00 c	2.75± 0.02 c	0.10± 0.00 c	0.10± 0.00 c	0.88± 0.32 c	0.35± 0.15 c	0.10± 0.00 c	1.33± 0.01 c	2.50± 0.14 c
ZJ4-198	VII	9.50± 1.21 b	12.00± 1.07 a	6.67± 1.70 c	7.33± 1.61 c	1.75± 0.32 d	0.10± 0.01 d	2.42± 0.03 d	0.10± 0.00 d	0.10± 0.01 d	7.83± 0.21 c	0.10± 0.02 d	0.50± 0.01 d	5.83± 0.25 c
HN1-150	VIII	10.33± 0.69 b	17.17± 1.29 a	14.00± 0.94 a	6.17± 1.12 c	0.33± 0.01 d	0.53± 0.25 d	3.86± 0.01 d	8.67± 3.34 c	1.21± 0.24 d	1.10± 0.24 d	4.00± 0.95 d	4.83± 0.05 c	8.17± 0.14 c
FJ3-192	IX	6.67± 1.97 b	8.17± 1.34 ab	4.75± 1.15 bc	4.92± 0.69 bc	0.10± 0.00 c	5.08± 0.37 b	1.00± 0.01 c	0.10± 0.02 c	1.42± 1.28 c	1.50± 0.37 c	0.83± 0.01 c	2.67± 0.01 c	10.33± 0.17 a
JS2-103	X	4.83± 0.96 c	12.83± 0.75 a	7.17± 0.69 b	1.67± 1.18 d	0.50± 0.00 d	1.93± 0.07 d	2.17± 0.00 d	0.10± 0.00 d	0.25± 0.07 d	1.58± 0.43 d	0.50± 0.02 d	0.10± 0.00 d	4.83± 2.89 c

Strains	tale genotype	IR24	JG30	IRBB3	IRBB4	IRBB5	IRBB7	IRBB21	IRBB27	CBB23	KΔSWEET	5024	4059	4064
YN18-3	I	2.17± 1.21 b	11.00± 1.25 a	0.50± 0.32 b	0.50± 0.69 b	0.50± 0.04 b	0.10± 0.00 b	0.50± 0.31 b	0.50± 0.01 b	0.30± 0.01 b	1.90± 0.40 b	0.10± 0.00 b	0.35± 0.01 b	0.35± 0.05 b
GX15-2	II	9.00± 0.69 b	14.00± 0.82 a	8.67± 2.75 b	7.17± 0.05 c	1.67± 0.02 c	2.50± 0.01 d	4.44± 0.45 c	0.10± 0.00 d	1.88± 0.03 d	2.13± 0.45 d	0.10± 0.00 d	0.11± 0.02 d	14.33± 1.25 a
YN18-6	III	9.83± 0.02 b	18.83± 0.96 a	15.67± 0.01 a	3.50± 0.03 c	0.40± 0.01 d	0.48± 0.17 d	0.50± 0.00 d	0.32± 0.01 d	0.10± 0.02 d	1.40± 0.01 d	0.20± 0.01 d	0.60± 0.01 d	2.42± 0.01 d
GD3-153	IV	8.17± 0.90 b	17.00± 2.58 a	8.67± 2.98 b	0.50± 0.01 d	0.10± 0.00 d	0.10± 0.02 d	3.38± 0.02 c	0.50± 0.02 d	0.10± 0.01 d	1.08± 1.92 d	0.10± 0.00 d	0.10± 0.01 d	7.00± 1.63 b
HuN1-136	V	9.50± 0.58 b	11.33± 2.08 a	5.17± 0.94 c	6.75± 1.34 c	0.10± 0.02 d	0.10± 0.01 d	14.83± 1.25 a	0.20± 0.01 d	0.10± 0.10 d	0.75± 0.22 d	3.50± 0.01 c	1.17± 0.02 d	9.92± 1.21 b
ZJ3-184	VI	6.33± 0.37 b	14.50± 1.83 a	7.75± 0.02 b	0.20± 0.03 c	0.10± 0.00 c	2.75± 0.02 c	0.10± 0.00 c	0.10± 0.00 c	0.88± 0.32 c	0.35± 0.15 c	0.10± 0.00 c	1.33± 0.01 c	2.50± 0.14 c
ZJ4-198	VII	9.50± 1.21 b	12.00± 1.07 a	6.67± 1.70 c	7.33± 1.61 c	1.75± 0.32 d	0.10± 0.01 d	2.42± 0.03 d	0.10± 0.00 d	0.10± 0.01 d	7.83± 0.21 c	0.10± 0.02 d	0.50± 0.01 d	5.83± 0.25 c
HN1-150	VIII	10.33± 0.69 b	17.17± 1.29 a	14.00± 0.94 a	6.17± 1.12 c	0.33± 0.01 d	0.53± 0.25 d	3.86± 0.01 d	8.67± 3.34 c	1.21± 0.24 d	1.10± 0.24 d	4.00± 0.95 d	4.83± 0.05 c	8.17± 0.14 c
FJ3-192	IX	6.67± 1.97 b	8.17± 1.34 ab	4.75± 1.15 bc	4.92± 0.69 bc	0.10± 0.00 c	5.08± 0.37 b	1.00± 0.01 c	0.10± 0.02 c	1.42± 1.28 c	1.50± 0.37 c	0.83± 0.01 c	2.67± 0.01 c	10.33± 0.17 a
JS2-103	X	4.83± 0.96 c	12.83± 0.75 a	7.17± 0.69 b	1.67± 1.18 d	0.50± 0.00 d	1.93± 0.07 d	2.17± 0.00 d	0.10± 0.00 d	0.25± 0.07 d	1.58± 0.43 d	0.50± 0.02 d	0.10± 0.00 d	4.83± 2.89 c

2019-2021年我国南方稻区白叶枯病菌的毒力与遗传多样性调查研究

Genotypic Diversity and Pathogenisity of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae Isolated from Southern China in 2019-2021

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 23

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	朱宝, 赵江哲, 张可伟, 黄鹏. 水稻细胞分裂素氧化酶9参与调控水稻叶夹角发育[J]. 植物学报, 2024, 59(1): 0-0.
[2]	方妍力, 田传玉, 苏如意, 刘亚培, 王春连, 陈析丰, 郭威, 纪志远. 水稻抗细菌性条斑病基因的挖掘与初定位[J]. 植物学报, 2024, 59(1): 0-0.
[3]	贾绮玮, 钟芊芊, 顾育嘉, 陆天麒, 李玮, 杨帅, 朱超宇, 胡程翔, 李三峰, 王跃星, 饶玉春. 水稻茎秆细胞壁相关组分含量QTL定位及候选基因分析[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(6): 882-892.
[4]	戴若惠, 钱心妤, 孙静蕾, 芦涛, 贾绮玮, 陆天麒, 路梅, 饶玉春. 水稻叶色调控机制及相关基因研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(5): 799-812.
[5]	孙尚, 胡颖颖, 韩阳朔, 薛超, 龚志云. 水稻染色体双链寡核苷酸荧光原位杂交技术[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(3): 433-439.
[6]	金佳怡, 罗怿婷, 杨惠敏, 芦涛, 叶涵斐, 谢继毅, 王珂欣, 陈芊羽, 方媛, 王跃星, 饶玉春. 水稻叶绿素含量QTL定位与候选基因表达分析[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(3): 394-403.
[7]	严语萍, 俞晓琦, 任德勇, 钱前. 水稻穗粒数遗传机制与育种利用[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(3): 359-372.
[8]	刘裕强, 万建民. 寄主监控昆虫唾液蛋白平衡植物抗性与生长发育[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(3): 353-355.
[9]	王琪, 吴允哲, 刘学英, 孙丽莉, 廖红, 傅向东. 类受体激酶调控水稻生长发育和环境适应研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(2): 199-213.
[10]	刘晓龙, 季平, 杨洪涛, 丁永电, 付佳玲, 梁江霞, 余聪聪. 脱落酸对水稻抽穗开花期高温胁迫的诱抗效应[J]. 植物学报, 2022, 57(5): 596-610.
[11]	魏和平, 芦涛, 贾绮玮, 邓飞, 朱浩, 岂泽华, 王玉玺, 叶涵斐, 殷文晶, 方媛, 穆丹, 饶玉春. 水稻抽穗期QTL定位及候选基因分析[J]. 植物学报, 2022, 57(5): 588-595.
[12]	贾利霞, 齐艳华. 生长素代谢、运输及信号转导调控水稻粒型研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2022, 57(3): 263-275.
[13]	杨凯如, 贾绮玮, 金佳怡, 叶涵斐, 王盛, 陈芊羽, 管易安, 潘晨阳, 辛德东, 方媛, 王跃星, 饶玉春. 水稻黄绿叶调控基因YGL18的克隆与功能解析[J]. 植物学报, 2022, 57(3): 276-287.
[14]	叶涵斐, 殷文晶, 管易安, 杨凯如, 陈芊羽, 俞淑颖, 朱旭东, 辛德东, 章薇, 王跃星, 饶玉春. 水稻籽粒维生素E QTL挖掘及候选基因分析[J]. 植物学报, 2022, 57(2): 157-170.
[15]	王璐瑶, 陈謇, 赵守清, 闫慧莉, 许文秀, 刘若溪, 麻密, 虞轶俊, 何振艳. 水稻镉积累特性的生理和分子机制研究概述[J]. 植物学报, 2022, 57(2): 236-249.