Chinese Bulletin of Botany ›› 2019, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (1): 64-71.DOI: 10.11983/CBB18010 cstr: 32102.14.CBB18010
• EXPERIMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS • Previous Articles Next Articles
Yang Xian,Xin Dong,Xiaoman Xie(
),Dan Wu,Biao Han,Yan Wang
Received:2018-01-11
Accepted:2018-08-01
Online:2019-01-01
Published:2019-07-31
Contact:
Xiaoman Xie
Yang Xian,Xin Dong,Xiaoman Xie,Dan Wu,Biao Han,Yan Wang. Effect of Conservation Conditions on Restricting Conservation of Acer rubrum cv. ‘Somerset’[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2019, 54(1): 64-71.
| Treatment | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 | T7 | T8 | T9 | T10 | T11 | T12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Photoperiod (h) | 24 | 16 | 12 | 8 | 24 | 16 | 12 | 8 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| Light intensity (μmol·m-2·s-1) | 62.50 | 62.50 | 62.50 | 62.50 | 31.25 | 31.25 | 31.25 | 31.25 | 62.50 | 62.50 | 62.50 | 31.25 |
| Temperature (°C) | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 15 | 8 | 25/18* | 25/18* |
Table 1 Experimental design of in vitro conservation of Acer rubrum L. cv. ‘Somerset’
| Treatment | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 | T7 | T8 | T9 | T10 | T11 | T12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Photoperiod (h) | 24 | 16 | 12 | 8 | 24 | 16 | 12 | 8 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| Light intensity (μmol·m-2·s-1) | 62.50 | 62.50 | 62.50 | 62.50 | 31.25 | 31.25 | 31.25 | 31.25 | 62.50 | 62.50 | 62.50 | 31.25 |
| Temperature (°C) | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 15 | 8 | 25/18* | 25/18* |
Figure 1 Growth curve of Acer rubrum cv. ‘Somerset’ (A) Differentiation rate of explants; (B) Average number of shoots; (C) Average height; (D) Rate of rooting. T1-T12 see Table 1.
Figure 2 In vitro conservation for 182 days of Acer rubrum cv. ‘Somerset’ (A) T1; (B) T2; (C) T3; (D) T4; (E) T5; (F) T6; (G) T7; (H) T8; (I) T9; (J) T10; (K) T11; (L) T12. T1-T12 see Table 1. Bars=1 cm
| Conservation days | Significance testing of P and LI | Significance testing of Tm | Significance testing of DTV and LI | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | LI | P×LI | Tm | DTV | LI | DTV×LI | ||||
| Differentiation rate of explants | 7 | 0** | 0.018* | 0.002** | 0** | 0.05 | 0.84 | 0.589 | ||
| 14 | 0** | 0.004** | 0.036* | 0.005** | 0.914 | 0.009** | 0.115 | |||
| 56 | 0.002** | 0.075 | 0.001** | 0** | 0.771 | 0.283 | 0.302 | |||
| 182 | 0.297 | 0.907 | 0.01* | 0** | 0.322 | 0.86 | 0.564 | |||
| Average number of shoots | 7 | 0** | 0** | 0** | 0** | 0** | 0.695 | 0.248 | ||
| 14 | 0** | 0.003** | 0.002** | 0.009** | 0.013* | 0.772 | 0.008** | |||
| 28 | 0** | 0.236 | 0** | 0** | 0.8 | 0.488 | 0.479 | |||
| 49 | 0.017* | 0.248 | 0.033* | 0** | 0.003** | 0.244 | 0.563 | |||
| 98 | 0.129 | 0.113 | 0.237 | 0.001** | 0.036* | 0.209 | 0.574 | |||
| 147 | 0.167 | 0.011* | 0.193 | 0.006** | 0.383 | 0.217 | 0.992 | |||
| 182 | 0.057 | 0.001** | 0.008** | 0.131 | 0.016* | 0.03* | 0.063 | |||
| Average height | 14 | 0.589 | 0.516 | 0.751 | 0.081 | 0.071 | 0.641 | 0.680 | ||
| 35 | 0.113 | 0.322 | 0.942 | 0** | 0.845 | 0.077 | 0.744 | |||
| 91 | 0.021* | 0** | 0.004** | 0.002** | 0.464 | 0** | 0.670 | |||
| 126 | 0.733 | 0.002** | 0.039* | 0.004** | 0.636 | 0.016* | 0.422 | |||
| 154 | 0.207 | 0.291 | 0.093 | 0.003** | 0.646 | 0.549 | 0.501 | |||
| 182 | 0.187 | 0.294 | 0.182 | 0** | 0.009** | 0.034* | 0.185 | |||
| Rate of rooting | 21 | 0.004** | 0.041* | 0.213 | 0.037* | 0.541 | 0.025* | 0.504 | ||
| 28 | 0** | 0** | 0.002** | 0.001** | 0.225 | 0.004** | 0.658 | |||
| 35 | 0** | 0** | 0.012* | 0** | 0.409 | 0.008** | 0.885 | |||
| 42 | 0.885 | 0.35 | 0** | 0** | 0.896 | 0.003** | 0.336 | |||
| 49 | 0** | 0.002** | 0** | 0** | 0.018* | 0.006** | 0.415 | |||
| 56 | 0** | 0.001** | 0** | 0** | 0.005** | 0.036* | 0.905 | |||
| 63 | 0** | 0.329 | 0.004** | 0** | 0.01* | 0.49 | 0.432 | |||
| 70 | 0** | 0.156 | 0.001** | 0** | 0.054 | 0.448 | 0.423 | |||
| 182 | 0.015* | 0.284 | 0.007** | 0** | 0.09 | 0.713 | 0.901 | |||
Table 2 The influence of light and temperature on the in vitro conservation of Acer rubrum L. cv. ‘Somerset’
| Conservation days | Significance testing of P and LI | Significance testing of Tm | Significance testing of DTV and LI | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | LI | P×LI | Tm | DTV | LI | DTV×LI | ||||
| Differentiation rate of explants | 7 | 0** | 0.018* | 0.002** | 0** | 0.05 | 0.84 | 0.589 | ||
| 14 | 0** | 0.004** | 0.036* | 0.005** | 0.914 | 0.009** | 0.115 | |||
| 56 | 0.002** | 0.075 | 0.001** | 0** | 0.771 | 0.283 | 0.302 | |||
| 182 | 0.297 | 0.907 | 0.01* | 0** | 0.322 | 0.86 | 0.564 | |||
| Average number of shoots | 7 | 0** | 0** | 0** | 0** | 0** | 0.695 | 0.248 | ||
| 14 | 0** | 0.003** | 0.002** | 0.009** | 0.013* | 0.772 | 0.008** | |||
| 28 | 0** | 0.236 | 0** | 0** | 0.8 | 0.488 | 0.479 | |||
| 49 | 0.017* | 0.248 | 0.033* | 0** | 0.003** | 0.244 | 0.563 | |||
| 98 | 0.129 | 0.113 | 0.237 | 0.001** | 0.036* | 0.209 | 0.574 | |||
| 147 | 0.167 | 0.011* | 0.193 | 0.006** | 0.383 | 0.217 | 0.992 | |||
| 182 | 0.057 | 0.001** | 0.008** | 0.131 | 0.016* | 0.03* | 0.063 | |||
| Average height | 14 | 0.589 | 0.516 | 0.751 | 0.081 | 0.071 | 0.641 | 0.680 | ||
| 35 | 0.113 | 0.322 | 0.942 | 0** | 0.845 | 0.077 | 0.744 | |||
| 91 | 0.021* | 0** | 0.004** | 0.002** | 0.464 | 0** | 0.670 | |||
| 126 | 0.733 | 0.002** | 0.039* | 0.004** | 0.636 | 0.016* | 0.422 | |||
| 154 | 0.207 | 0.291 | 0.093 | 0.003** | 0.646 | 0.549 | 0.501 | |||
| 182 | 0.187 | 0.294 | 0.182 | 0** | 0.009** | 0.034* | 0.185 | |||
| Rate of rooting | 21 | 0.004** | 0.041* | 0.213 | 0.037* | 0.541 | 0.025* | 0.504 | ||
| 28 | 0** | 0** | 0.002** | 0.001** | 0.225 | 0.004** | 0.658 | |||
| 35 | 0** | 0** | 0.012* | 0** | 0.409 | 0.008** | 0.885 | |||
| 42 | 0.885 | 0.35 | 0** | 0** | 0.896 | 0.003** | 0.336 | |||
| 49 | 0** | 0.002** | 0** | 0** | 0.018* | 0.006** | 0.415 | |||
| 56 | 0** | 0.001** | 0** | 0** | 0.005** | 0.036* | 0.905 | |||
| 63 | 0** | 0.329 | 0.004** | 0** | 0.01* | 0.49 | 0.432 | |||
| 70 | 0** | 0.156 | 0.001** | 0** | 0.054 | 0.448 | 0.423 | |||
| 182 | 0.015* | 0.284 | 0.007** | 0** | 0.09 | 0.713 | 0.901 | |||
Figure 3 Recovering culture for 28 days of Acer rubrum cv. ‘Somerset’ (A) Average number of shoots and average height; (B) Differentiation rate of explants and rate of rooting. T1-T12 see Table 1.
| 1 |
兰伟, 陈发棣 ( 2010). 植物种质资源缓慢生长法保存研究进展. 阜阳师范学院学报(自然科学版) 27(2), 68-72.
DOI URL |
| 2 |
刘静波, 林士杰, 张忠辉, 谢朋, 蔡群, 张大伟, 勾天兵, 赵珊珊, 赵洪伟, 王志强 ( 2012). 槭属植物种质资源研究进展. 中国农学通报 28(25), 1-5.
DOI URL |
| 3 |
任桂萍, 王小菁, 朱根发 ( 2016). 不同光质的LED对蝴蝶兰组织培养增殖及生根的影响. 植物学报 51, 81-88.
DOI URL |
| 4 | 咸洋, 吴丹, 解孝满, 刘德深, 韩彪, 田莎莎, 刘丹 ( 2014). 一种红花槭的组培快繁方法. 中国专利, 201310493738.1. 2014-02-05. |
| 5 |
徐呈祥 ( 2012). 提高植物抗寒性的机理研究进展. 生态学报 32, 7966-7980.
DOI URL |
| 6 |
徐刚标 ( 2000). 植物种质资源离体保存研究进展. 中南林学院学报 20(4), 81-87.
DOI URL |
| 7 |
燕丽萍, 李丽, 刘翠兰, 吴德军, 王因花, 任飞, 赵梁军 ( 2016). 绒毛白蜡体胚诱导和植株再生. 植物学报 51, 807-816.
DOI URL |
| 8 |
杨博, 曹秀婷, 王政, 何松林 ( 2012). 昼夜温差对非洲菊试管苗生长的影响. 西北林学院学报 27(2), 88-92.
DOI URL |
| 9 |
张红岩, 吴小芹, 朱丽华, 谈家金 ( 2010). 抗病赤松组培丛生芽低温保存条件研究. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) 34(5), 7-11.
DOI URL |
| 10 | 郑卫杰, 郭子霞, 王政, 何松林 ( 2011). 昼夜温差对文心兰试管苗生长的影响. 西北林学院学报 26(4), 137-141. |
| 11 | 周逊, 向长萍 ( 2008). 植物种质资源缓慢生长离体保存研究进展. 中国蔬菜 ( 11), 39-42. |
| 12 | Ahmad N, Abbasi BH, Fazal H, Khan MA, Afridi MS ( 2014). Effect of reverse photoperiod on in vitro regene- ration and piperine production in Piper nigrum L.C R Biologies 337, 19-28. |
| 13 |
Jouve L, Franck T, Gaspars T, Cattivelli L, Hausman JF ( 2000). Poplar acclimation to cold during in vitro conservation at low non-freezing temperature: metabolic and proteic changes.J Plant Physiol 157, 117-123.
DOI URL |
| 14 |
Kozai T, Watanabe K, Jeong BR ( 1995). Stem elongation and growth of Solanum tuberosum L. in vitro in response to photosynthetic photon flux, photoperiod and difference in photoperiod and dark period temperatures.Sci Hortic 64, 1-9.
DOI URL |
| 15 | Salcedo-Morales G, Rosas-Romero G, Nabor-Correa N, Bermúdez-Torres K, López-Laredo AR, Trejo-Tapia G ( 2009). Propagation and conservation of Castilleja tenu- iflora Benth.Polibotánica ( 28), 119-137. |
| 16 |
Sarasan V, Cripps R, Ramsay MM, Atherton C, Mcmi- chen M, Prendergast G, Rowntree JK ( 2006). Conservation in vitro of threatened plants—progress in the past decade.In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 42, 206-214.
DOI URL |
| 17 | Silveira DG, Souza FVD, Pelacani CR, da Silva Souza A, da Silva Ledo CA, de Santana JRF ( 2009). Micropropagation and in vitro conservation of Neoglaziovia variegata (Arr. Cam.) Mez, a fiber producing bromeliad from Brazil. Braz Arch Biol Technol 52, 923-932. |
| [1] | Mengqi Wen, Yinghong Tang, Cancai Zhao, Ming Wu, Yiqian Zheng, Lu Luo, Jianrong Chen. Establishment of a Universal Tissue Culture System and Anatomical Structure Characteristics of Succulent Plants [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2026, 61(3): 506-518. |
| [2] | Yuyan Jin, Shuangshuang Chen, Jing Feng, Xintong Liu, Xiangyu Qi, Huijie Chen, Yan Dong, Yanming Deng. Establishment of a Regeneration System In Vitro for Hydrangea macrophylla ‘Chikushi-no-kaze’ [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2026, 61(3): 485-495. |
| [3] | Feng Shuaishuai, Qiao Feng, Li Aihua, He Xuan, Jiang Tingting, Han Wei , Yang Zong, Huang Ailing, Li Quanxi, Liu jin, Tan Deyun. Establishment of an In Vitro Regeneration System for Stem Segments of Blackberry ‘APF - 190T’ [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2026, 61(1): 136-145. |
| [4] | Liangliang Zhang, Xianting Wang, Yong Chen, Yifan Zhu, Xinyuan Lu, Zaitseva Svetlana Mikhailovna, Haiyun Yang. Establishment of Tissue Culture and Rapid Propagation System of Wild Plant Parrotia subaequalis Under National First Class Protection [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2026, 61(1): 114-122. |
| [5] | Ruxin Zhang, Chenrong Li, Tongxin Wang, Jie Li, Tingge Li, Huixian Xu, Meier Li, Ying Zhao, Ting Peng, Jian Wang. Establishment of a Regeneration System for Viola × wittrockiana [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2025, 60(6): 968-977. |
| [6] | Liru Zhou, Yan Ao, Jing Zhong. Adventitious Bud Induction and Browning Inhibition of Xanthoceras sorbifolium Seed Kernels [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2025, 60(6): 957-967. |
| [7] | Tong Li, Churan Li, Zhiyu Zhang, Xiaoman Fu, Yun Liu, Yingjun Zhang, Liying Yang, Ping Zhao. A Preliminary Study on Tissue Culture and Rapid Propagation Technology of Phyllanthus acidus [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2025, 60(4): 611-620. |
| [8] | Wen Feng, Yuguo Wang. Establishment of an In Vitro Regeneration System for Stem Segments of Cultivated Dioscorea polystachya [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2024, 59(5): 792-799. |
| [9] | Yuze Liu, Yifei Wang, Weizhen Ren, Hao Li, Bin Lu, Bingshe Lu, Xiaoyue Yu. Establishment of Immature Embryo Rescue and Regeneration System for Pyrus calleryana cv. ‘Cleveland’ [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2024, 59(5): 800-809. |
| [10] | Hao Zeng, Peifang Li, Zhihui Guo, Chunlin Liu, Ying Ruan. Establishment of a Regeneration System for Lunaria annua [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2024, 59(3): 433-440. |
| [11] | Shangwen Zhang, Shiyu Huang, Tianwei Yang, Ting Li, Xiangjun Zhang, Manrong Gao. Establishment of a Tissue Culture and Rapid Propagation System for Erythropalum scandens Based on Orthogonal Test [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2024, 59(1): 99-109. |
| [12] | Chungang Xie, Zhe Liu, Shusheng Zhang, Haitao Hu. Establishment of In Vitro Regeneration System of Citrus australasica [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2023, 58(6): 926-934. |
| [13] | Yefei Liu, Haixia Zhao, Xiping Jiang, Rui Qiu, Xinyue Zhou, Yan Zhao, Chunxiang Fu. Establishment of Highly Efficient Tissue Culture and Agrobacterium-mediated Callus Infection Systems for Hordeum brevisubulatum [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2023, 58(3): 440-448. |
| [14] | Jinchun Lu, Lina Cao, Guanjie Tong, Xinying Wang, Liying Zhang, Xin Yu, Huifang Li, Yanhui Li. Establishment of Callus Induction and Regeneration System of Anemone silvestris [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2022, 57(2): 217-226. |
| [15] | Mengyue Li, Liu Liu, Yan Liu, Xiaoman Zhang. Establishment of Tissue Culture System for Axillary Bud Regeneration of Primula × pubescens [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2021, 56(6): 732-739. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||