植物学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (4): 509-514.DOI: 10.11983/CBB19101 cstr: 32102.14.CBB19101
所属专题: 逆境生物学专辑 (2019年54卷2期)
收稿日期:
2019-05-29
接受日期:
2019-06-11
出版日期:
2019-07-01
发布日期:
2020-01-08
通讯作者:
徐云远
Dongfeng Liu,Yongyan Tang,Shengtao Luo,Wei Luo,Zhitao Li,Kang Chong,Yunyuan Xu()
Received:
2019-05-29
Accepted:
2019-06-11
Online:
2019-07-01
Published:
2020-01-08
Contact:
Yunyuan Xu
摘要: 高效准确鉴定苗期耐寒性是水稻(Oryza sativa)耐寒研究的前提。基于流动水浴温度均一这一特性, 建立了一种恒温水浴鉴定水稻幼苗耐寒性方法。该方法中环境温度设定为20°C, 水浴温度设定为4°C。根据对2个水稻亚种不同材料的处理结果, 总结出几种常见品种的低温处理时间与存活率参考值, 并对操作过程中的一些注意事项进行了说明。
刘栋峰,唐永严,雒胜韬,罗伟,李志涛,种康,徐云远. 利用低温水浴鉴定水稻苗期耐寒性. 植物学报, 2019, 54(4): 509-514.
Dongfeng Liu,Yongyan Tang,Shengtao Luo,Wei Luo,Zhitao Li,Kang Chong,Yunyuan Xu. Identification of Chilling Tolerance of Rice Seedlings by Cold Water Bath. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2019, 54(4): 509-514.
图1 水稻种子萌发、播种和幼苗培养方式 (A) 水稻种子萌发状态; (B) 萌发种子在96孔板上的放置方式; (C) 三叶期幼苗(Bar=2 cm)
Figure 1 Germination and sowing of rice seeds, and the way of seedling culture (A) Germination of rice seeds; (B) Placement of germination seeds in 96-well plates without bottom; (C) Trefoil stage seedlings (Bar=2 cm)
图2 幼苗低温水浴处理示意图 (A) 水浴箱24小时内温度检测结果; (B) 低温水浴箱冷处理三叶期幼苗; (C) 幼苗在低温水浴箱中放置局部放大图; (D) 低温水浴箱中幼苗放置和固定方式
Figure 2 The diagram of low temperature water bath treatment of rice seedlings (A) The temperature of water bath within 24 h; (B) Seedlings under chilling treatment in 4°C water bath; (C) Partially enlarged detail of the seedlings in the cold water bath tank; (D) A diagram of the fixation pattern of seedlings in cold water bath
图3 冷水淹没深度对水稻低温耐受性的影响 红色箭头指示茎尖生长点的位置, 该部位在处理I、II和III中分别处于水深的不同位置(虚线为水面)。图中百分数表示恢复生长7天后幼苗的存活率。以28°C水浴作为对照(左图)。Bars=6 cm
Figure 3 Effect of submerged depth of cold water on low temperature tolerance of rice Red arrow indicated the site of shoot apical meristem under different water depth in chilling treatment I, II and III. Dotted lines represent the water surface. The survival rates were indicated on the top of the seedlings recoveried for 7 days. Treatment with 28oC water was used as control (left). Bars=6 cm
图4 不同水稻材料的苗期耐寒鉴定结果 (A) Dongjin (DJ)、日本晴(NIP)和明恢86 (MH86)幼苗4°C处理96小时并恢复7天(28°C)后的表型及存活率(平均值±标准差, n≥30, 3次重复); (B) ZH10和OX8低温处理(28°C)后恢复50天28°C的表型。Bars=2 cm
Figure 4 The evaluation of cold tolerance for different rice varieties at seedling stage (A) Phenotypic response to chilling in DJ, NIP and MH86, the survival rate was determined after cold-water treatment at 4°C for 96 h and subsequent recovery at 28°C for 7 days (means±SD, n≥30, three replicates); (B) The phenotype for seedlings of ZH10 and OX8 after the chilling treatment at 4°C for 120 h, subsequently at 28°C for 50 days. Bars=2 cm
Subspe- cies | Cultivars | Survival rate (>50%) | Survival rate (<10%) |
---|---|---|---|
japonica/ geng | KY131, Kitaake | 60-80 h | 96-120 h |
DJ, HY | 72-84 h | 120-144 h | |
ZH10, NIP | 72-96 h | 120-144 h | |
YD | 96-144 h | 168-192 h | |
indica/ xian | ZF802, GLA4, IR64 | 12-28 h | 40-60 h |
93-11, MH86 | 24-40 h | 48-60 h |
表2 籼稻和粳稻常见品种苗期不同存活率的建议处理时间
Table 2 The recommended treatment time for different survival rates of cultivars of indica/xian and japonica/geng
Subspe- cies | Cultivars | Survival rate (>50%) | Survival rate (<10%) |
---|---|---|---|
japonica/ geng | KY131, Kitaake | 60-80 h | 96-120 h |
DJ, HY | 72-84 h | 120-144 h | |
ZH10, NIP | 72-96 h | 120-144 h | |
YD | 96-144 h | 168-192 h | |
indica/ xian | ZF802, GLA4, IR64 | 12-28 h | 40-60 h |
93-11, MH86 | 24-40 h | 48-60 h |
[1] | Andaya VC, Tai TH ( 2006). Fine mapping of the qCTS12 locus, a major QTL for seedling cold tolerance in rice. Theor Appl Genet 113, 467-475. |
[2] | Baba S, Takahashi Y ( 1956). Water and sand culture. In:Togari Y, Matsuo T, Hatamari M, Yamada N, Horada T, Suzuki N, eds. Sakumotsi-Shiken-ho (Laboratory Manual in Crop Science). Kyokai, Tokyo: Nogyo-Gijitsu. pp. 157-185. |
[3] | Bonnecarrère V, Borsani O, Díaz P, Capdevielle F, Blanco P, Monza J ( 2011). Response to photoxidative stress induced by cold in japonica rice is genotype dependent. Plant Sci 180, 726-732. |
[4] | Ma Y, Dai XY, Xu YY, Luo W, Zheng XM, Zeng DL, Pan YJ, Lin XL, Liu HH, Zhang DJ, Xiao J, Guo XY, Xu SJ, Niu YD, Jin JB, Zhang H, Xu X, Li LG, Wang W, Qian Q, Ge S, Chong K ( 2015). COLD1 confers chilling tolerance in rice. Cell 160, 1209-1221. |
[5] | Yoshida S, Forno DA, Cock JH, Gomez KA ( 1976). Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice. Las Banos, Laguna: IRRI. pp. 62. |
[6] | Zhang X, Guo XP, Lei CL, Cheng ZJ, Lin QB, Wang JL, Wu FQ, Wang J, Wan JM ( 2011). Overexpression of SlCZFP1, a novel TFIIIA-type zinc finger protein from tomato, confers enhanced cold tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Mol Biol Rep 29, 185-196. |
[1] | 叶灿, 姚林波, 金莹, 高蓉, 谭琪, 李旭映, 张艳军, 陈析丰, 马伯军, 章薇, 张可伟. 水稻水杨酸代谢突变体高通量筛选方法的建立与应用[J]. 植物学报, 2025, 60(4): 1-0. |
[2] | 赵凌, 管菊, 梁文化, 张勇, 路凯, 赵春芳, 李余生, 张亚东. 基于高密度Bin图谱的水稻苗期耐热性QTL定位[J]. 植物学报, 2025, 60(3): 342-353. |
[3] | 李新宇, 谷月, 徐非非, 包劲松. 水稻胚乳淀粉合成相关蛋白的翻译后修饰研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2025, 60(2): 256-270. |
[4] | 李建国, 张怡, 张文君. 水稻根系铁膜形成及对磷吸收的影响[J]. 植物学报, 2025, 60(1): 132-143. |
[5] | 姚瑞枫, 谢道昕. 水稻独脚金内酯信号感知的激活和终止[J]. 植物学报, 2024, 59(6): 873-877. |
[6] | 连锦瑾, 唐璐瑶, 张伊诺, 郑佳兴, 朱超宇, 叶语涵, 王跃星, 商文楠, 傅正浩, 徐昕璇, 吴日成, 路梅, 王长春, 饶玉春. 水稻抗氧化性状遗传位点挖掘及候选基因分析[J]. 植物学报, 2024, 59(5): 738-751. |
[7] | 黄佳慧, 杨惠敏, 陈欣雨, 朱超宇, 江亚楠, 胡程翔, 连锦瑾, 芦涛, 路梅, 张维林, 饶玉春. 水稻突变体pe-1对弱光胁迫的响应机制[J]. 植物学报, 2024, 59(4): 574-584. |
[8] | 周俭民. 收放自如的明星战车[J]. 植物学报, 2024, 59(3): 343-346. |
[9] | 朱超宇, 胡程翔, 朱哲楠, 张芷宁, 汪理海, 陈钧, 李三峰, 连锦瑾, 唐璐瑶, 钟芊芊, 殷文晶, 王跃星, 饶玉春. 水稻穗部性状QTL定位及候选基因分析[J]. 植物学报, 2024, 59(2): 217-230. |
[10] | 夏婧, 饶玉春, 曹丹芸, 王逸, 柳林昕, 徐雅婷, 牟望舒, 薛大伟. 水稻中乙烯生物合成关键酶OsACS和OsACO调控机制研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2024, 59(2): 291-301. |
[11] | 朱宝, 赵江哲, 张可伟, 黄鹏. 水稻细胞分裂素氧化酶9参与调控水稻叶夹角发育[J]. 植物学报, 2024, 59(1): 10-21. |
[12] | 方妍力, 田传玉, 苏如意, 刘亚培, 王春连, 陈析丰, 郭威, 纪志远. 水稻抗细菌性条斑病基因挖掘与初定位[J]. 植物学报, 2024, 59(1): 1-9. |
[13] | 贾绮玮, 钟芊芊, 顾育嘉, 陆天麒, 李玮, 杨帅, 朱超宇, 胡程翔, 李三峰, 王跃星, 饶玉春. 水稻茎秆细胞壁相关组分含量QTL定位及候选基因分析[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(6): 882-892. |
[14] | 戴若惠, 钱心妤, 孙静蕾, 芦涛, 贾绮玮, 陆天麒, 路梅, 饶玉春. 水稻叶色调控机制及相关基因研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(5): 799-812. |
[15] | 田传玉, 方妍力, 沈晴, 王宏杰, 陈析丰, 郭威, 赵开军, 王春连, 纪志远. 2019-2021年我国南方稻区白叶枯病菌的毒力与遗传多样性调查研究[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(5): 743-749. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||