Chinese Bulletin of Botany ›› 2016, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (2): 251-256.DOI: 10.11983/CBB15036 cstr: 32102.14.CBB15036
• TECHNIQUE AND METHOD • Previous Articles Next Articles
Fang Liu1,†, Yinghong Tang1,2,†, Youmei Yuan2, Qingquan Guo1, Fan Shen1, Jianrong Chen1,*()
Received:
2015-02-16
Accepted:
2015-05-11
Online:
2016-03-01
Published:
2016-03-31
Contact:
E-mail: About author:
First author contact:†These authors contributed equally to this paper
CLC Number:
Fang Liu, Yinghong Tang, Youmei Yuan, Qingquan Guo, Fan Shen, Jianrong Chen. Tissue Culture of the Succulent Plant Sedum clavatum[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2016, 51(2): 251-256.
Level | Factor (mg·L-1) | ||
---|---|---|---|
6-BA (A) | NAA (B) | KT (C) | |
1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 0.5 |
3 | 3.0 | 0.2 | 1.0 |
4 | 4.5 | 0.3 | 1.5 |
Table 1 L16 (43) orthogonal design for induction of callus derived from leaf explants of Sedum clavatum
Level | Factor (mg·L-1) | ||
---|---|---|---|
6-BA (A) | NAA (B) | KT (C) | |
1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 0.5 |
3 | 3.0 | 0.2 | 1.0 |
4 | 4.5 | 0.3 | 1.5 |
No. | Concentrations of plant growth regulator (mg·L-1) | Callus induction (%) | State of growth | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-BA (A) | NAA (B) | KT (C) | |||
1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 20.0 | Less calli could be induced; calli grew slowly and became yellow; lumps were small |
2 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 32.5 | Less calli could be induced; calli grew slowly and became yellow; lumps were small |
3 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 47 | Less calli could be induced; calli grew slowly and became light green; lumps were small |
4 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 32.3 | Less calli could be induced; calli grew slowly and became yellow; lumps were small |
5 | 1.5 | 0 | 0.5 | 71.8 | Less calli could be induced; calli grew quickly and became light green; lumps were small |
6 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 0 | 74.9 | Less calli could be induced; calli grew quickly and became light green; lumps were small |
7 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 76.7 | Less calli could be induced; calli grew quickly and became light green; lumps were small |
8 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 74.1 | Less calli could be induced; calli grew quickly and became light green; lumps were small |
9 | 3 | 0 | 1.0 | 83.9 | More calli could be induced; the way of callus induction is transverse expansion; calli grew quickly and became bright green; lumps were larger |
10 | 3 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 95.7 | More calli could be induced; the way of callus induction is transverse expansion; calli grew quickly and became bright green; lumps were larger |
11 | 3 | 0.2 | 0 | 85.6 | More calli could be induced; the way of callus induction is transverse expansion; calli grew quickly and became bright green; lumps were larger |
12 | 3 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 81 | More calli could be induced; the way of callus induction is transverse expansion; calli grew quickly and became bright green; lumps were larger |
13 | 4.5 | 0 | 1.5 | 82.1 | More calli could be induced; the way of callus induction is longitudinal expansion; calli grew quickly and became yellow green; lumps were larger |
14 | 4.5 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 83.3 | More calli could be induced; the way of callus induction is longitudinal expansion; calli grew quickly and became yellow green; lumps were larger |
15 | 4.5 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 70.0 | Less calli could be induced; calli could go into medium; calli grew quickly and became fuchsia; lumps were small |
16 | 4.5 | 0.3 | 0 | 55.0 | Less calli could be induced; calli could go into medium; calli grew quickly and became fuchsia; lumps were small |
Table 2 Effects of different plant growth regulators on induction of callus derived from leaf explants of Sedum clavatum (60 days after inoculation)
No. | Concentrations of plant growth regulator (mg·L-1) | Callus induction (%) | State of growth | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-BA (A) | NAA (B) | KT (C) | |||
1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 20.0 | Less calli could be induced; calli grew slowly and became yellow; lumps were small |
2 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 32.5 | Less calli could be induced; calli grew slowly and became yellow; lumps were small |
3 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 47 | Less calli could be induced; calli grew slowly and became light green; lumps were small |
4 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 32.3 | Less calli could be induced; calli grew slowly and became yellow; lumps were small |
5 | 1.5 | 0 | 0.5 | 71.8 | Less calli could be induced; calli grew quickly and became light green; lumps were small |
6 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 0 | 74.9 | Less calli could be induced; calli grew quickly and became light green; lumps were small |
7 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 76.7 | Less calli could be induced; calli grew quickly and became light green; lumps were small |
8 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 74.1 | Less calli could be induced; calli grew quickly and became light green; lumps were small |
9 | 3 | 0 | 1.0 | 83.9 | More calli could be induced; the way of callus induction is transverse expansion; calli grew quickly and became bright green; lumps were larger |
10 | 3 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 95.7 | More calli could be induced; the way of callus induction is transverse expansion; calli grew quickly and became bright green; lumps were larger |
11 | 3 | 0.2 | 0 | 85.6 | More calli could be induced; the way of callus induction is transverse expansion; calli grew quickly and became bright green; lumps were larger |
12 | 3 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 81 | More calli could be induced; the way of callus induction is transverse expansion; calli grew quickly and became bright green; lumps were larger |
13 | 4.5 | 0 | 1.5 | 82.1 | More calli could be induced; the way of callus induction is longitudinal expansion; calli grew quickly and became yellow green; lumps were larger |
14 | 4.5 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 83.3 | More calli could be induced; the way of callus induction is longitudinal expansion; calli grew quickly and became yellow green; lumps were larger |
15 | 4.5 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 70.0 | Less calli could be induced; calli could go into medium; calli grew quickly and became fuchsia; lumps were small |
16 | 4.5 | 0.3 | 0 | 55.0 | Less calli could be induced; calli could go into medium; calli grew quickly and became fuchsia; lumps were small |
K | 6-BA (A) | NAA (B) | KT (C) |
---|---|---|---|
K1 | 32.95 | 64.45 | 58.88 |
K2 | 74.38 | 71.60 | 63.83 |
K3 | 88.55 | 69.83 | 72.08 |
K4 | 72.6 | 60.60 | 71.70 |
R | 53.6 | 11.00 | 13.20 |
The optimum level | A3 | B2 | C3 |
The optimum assembly | A3B2C3 |
Table 3 Analysis of K of callus induction in Sedum clavatum
K | 6-BA (A) | NAA (B) | KT (C) |
---|---|---|---|
K1 | 32.95 | 64.45 | 58.88 |
K2 | 74.38 | 71.60 | 63.83 |
K3 | 88.55 | 69.83 | 72.08 |
K4 | 72.6 | 60.60 | 71.70 |
R | 53.6 | 11.00 | 13.20 |
The optimum level | A3 | B2 | C3 |
The optimum assembly | A3B2C3 |
Element | DEVSQ | Degree of freedom | F | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|
6-BA (A) | 6507.10 | 3 | 201.38 | * |
NAA (B) | 304.09 | 3 | 9.41 | * |
KT (C) | 493.44 | 3 | 15.27 | * |
Table 4 Variance analysis of callus induction in Sedum clavatum
Element | DEVSQ | Degree of freedom | F | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|
6-BA (A) | 6507.10 | 3 | 201.38 | * |
NAA (B) | 304.09 | 3 | 9.41 | * |
KT (C) | 493.44 | 3 | 15.27 | * |
No. | Concentrations of plant growth regulator (mg·L-1) | Differentiation rate (%) | |
---|---|---|---|
6-BA (D) | NAA (E) | ||
1 | 0 | 0 | 10.0 |
2 | 1 | 0 | 20.3 |
3 | 2 | 0 | 25.1 |
4 | 3 | 0 | 34.6 |
5 | 4 | 0 | 30.4 |
6 | 0 | 0.1 | 20.1 |
7 | 1 | 0.1 | 27.1 |
8 | 2 | 0.1 | 35.1 |
9 | 3 | 0.1 | 45.0 |
10 | 4 | 0.1 | 40.4 |
11 | 0 | 0.2 | 25.2 |
12 | 1 | 0.2 | 30.0 |
13 | 2 | 0.2 | 40.0 |
14 | 3 | 0.2 | 64.5 |
15 | 4 | 0.2 | 55.2 |
16 | 0 | 0.3 | 34.8 |
17 | 1 | 0.3 | 44.9 |
18 | 2 | 0.3 | 55.1 |
19 | 3 | 0.3 | 80.0 |
20 | 4 | 0.3 | 64.4 |
21 | 0 | 0.4 | 19.6 |
22 | 1 | 0.4 | 26.7 |
23 | 2 | 0.4 | 30.2 |
24 | 3 | 0.4 | 70.3 |
25 | 4 | 0.4 | 50.0 |
Table 5 Media design and results on bud induction of Sedum clavatum (45 days after inoculation)
No. | Concentrations of plant growth regulator (mg·L-1) | Differentiation rate (%) | |
---|---|---|---|
6-BA (D) | NAA (E) | ||
1 | 0 | 0 | 10.0 |
2 | 1 | 0 | 20.3 |
3 | 2 | 0 | 25.1 |
4 | 3 | 0 | 34.6 |
5 | 4 | 0 | 30.4 |
6 | 0 | 0.1 | 20.1 |
7 | 1 | 0.1 | 27.1 |
8 | 2 | 0.1 | 35.1 |
9 | 3 | 0.1 | 45.0 |
10 | 4 | 0.1 | 40.4 |
11 | 0 | 0.2 | 25.2 |
12 | 1 | 0.2 | 30.0 |
13 | 2 | 0.2 | 40.0 |
14 | 3 | 0.2 | 64.5 |
15 | 4 | 0.2 | 55.2 |
16 | 0 | 0.3 | 34.8 |
17 | 1 | 0.3 | 44.9 |
18 | 2 | 0.3 | 55.1 |
19 | 3 | 0.3 | 80.0 |
20 | 4 | 0.3 | 64.4 |
21 | 0 | 0.4 | 19.6 |
22 | 1 | 0.4 | 26.7 |
23 | 2 | 0.4 | 30.2 |
24 | 3 | 0.4 | 70.3 |
25 | 4 | 0.4 | 50.0 |
Sources of variation (mg·L-1) | Sum of squares | F | Signifi- cance | Level | Differentiation rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-BA (D) | 4433.71 | 32.61 | ** | 4 | 61.47 aA |
5 | 49.63 abAB | ||||
3 | 40.83 bcBC | ||||
2 | 30.68 cdCD | ||||
1 | 23.37 dD | ||||
NAA (E) | 2837.77 | 22.35 | ** | 4 | 58.15 aA |
3 | 47.35 bAB | ||||
5 | 39.78 bcB | ||||
2 | 33.73 cdBC | ||||
1 | 25.86 dC |
Table 6 Variance analysis of bud induction of Sedum clavatum
Sources of variation (mg·L-1) | Sum of squares | F | Signifi- cance | Level | Differentiation rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-BA (D) | 4433.71 | 32.61 | ** | 4 | 61.47 aA |
5 | 49.63 abAB | ||||
3 | 40.83 bcBC | ||||
2 | 30.68 cdCD | ||||
1 | 23.37 dD | ||||
NAA (E) | 2837.77 | 22.35 | ** | 4 | 58.15 aA |
3 | 47.35 bAB | ||||
5 | 39.78 bcB | ||||
2 | 33.73 cdBC | ||||
1 | 25.86 dC |
Number | NAA (mg·L-1) | Rooting rate (%) | The state of root | Growth performance |
---|---|---|---|---|
G1 | 0 | 0.00 dD | Rootless | Yellow leaves |
G2 | 0.01 | 53.32 cC | Short and thin | Secretary out some white root points; green leaf |
G3 | 0.02 | 68.67 bB | Short and thick | Secretary out some white root points; green leaf |
G4 | 0.03 | 94.89 aA | Long and thick | More roots at base; green leaf |
G5 | 0.04 | 59.53 cC | Short and thin | Information organization and a few root points at base; green leaf |
Table 7 Effects of various concentration of NAA on rooting (30 days after rooting)
Number | NAA (mg·L-1) | Rooting rate (%) | The state of root | Growth performance |
---|---|---|---|---|
G1 | 0 | 0.00 dD | Rootless | Yellow leaves |
G2 | 0.01 | 53.32 cC | Short and thin | Secretary out some white root points; green leaf |
G3 | 0.02 | 68.67 bB | Short and thick | Secretary out some white root points; green leaf |
G4 | 0.03 | 94.89 aA | Long and thick | More roots at base; green leaf |
G5 | 0.04 | 59.53 cC | Short and thin | Information organization and a few root points at base; green leaf |
Figure 1 Callus induction, bud induction and transplantation of Sedum clavatum (A)-(C) Callus induction of leaf; (D), (E) Differentiation of new bud from callus; (F) Plantlets rooting; (G), (H) Transplantation
[1] | 胡莹冰, 沈守云 (2013). 多肉植物的景观应用及发展趋势. 广东农业科学 40, 46-48. |
[2] |
黄宁珍, 付传明, 赵志国, 唐凤鸾, 石云平 (2010). 桂林小花苣苔离体快速繁殖技术. 植物学报 45, 744-750.
DOI |
[3] | 黄清俊 (2009). 多肉花卉短叶巨象(Gasteria brevifolia)的离体繁殖和种质保存. 安徽农业科学 37, 17353, 17361. |
[4] | 黄清俊, 丁雨龙 (2003). 多肉植物吹雪松微型繁殖研究初报. 江苏林业科技 30, 35-36. |
[5] | 黄清俊, 丁雨龙, 谢维荪 (2004). 水晶掌花葶离体培养及其试管苗无性系的建立. 上海农业学报 20, 19-23. |
[6] | 黄清俊, 肖祥春, 丁雨龙, 谢维荪, 季大方 (2003). 多肉植物米邦塔仙人掌微型繁殖. 江西林业科技 (1), 2-3. |
[7] | 黄献胜, 黄以琳 (2001). 多肉花卉观赏与栽培. 北京: 农村读物出版社. pp. 1-10. |
[8] | 刘与明, 张淑娟 (2012). 珍稀多肉植物种质资源组培保存和快速繁殖技术. 园林科技 (1), 8-11. |
[9] | 宋晓涛, 沈萌, 左志宇, 安晓云, 尹晓爽, 孙涛, 杨雪, 李德森 (2007). 十二卷属植物西山寿的组织培养与快速繁殖. 植物生理学通讯 43, 883-884. |
[10] | 王泉, 左志宇, 宋晓涛, 张耀, 张昊鹏, 尹晓爽, 安晓云, 杨雪, 孙涛 (2008). 百合科多肉植物美吉寿的组织培养与快速繁殖. 植物生理学通讯 44, 123-124. |
[11] | 张昊鹏, 宋晓涛, 张耀, 于明冉, 田露, 李昊阳, 左志宇, 安晓云, 杨雪, 孙涛 (2008). 白银寿的组织培养与快速繁殖. 植物生理学通讯 44, 951-952. |
[12] | 赵娟, 王玉国 (2003). 褐斑伽蓝的组织培养与快速繁殖. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版) 23, 338-341, 347. |
[13] | 赵娟, 王玉国, 孙朝霞, 温银元 (2005). 褐斑伽蓝的组织培养与快速繁殖. 植物生理学通讯 41, 65-65. |
[14] | 赵娟, 王玉国, 尹美强, 温银元, 孙朝霞, 王计平 (2009). 植物激素对褐斑伽蓝叶片分化的影响. 激光生物学报 18, 200-205. |
[15] | 左志宇, 李建希, 安晓云, 尹晓爽, 杨雪 (2007). 克里克特寿的组织培养与快速繁殖. 植物生理学通讯 43, 311-312. |
[1] | Liu Xiaofei, Sun Yingbo, Huang Lili, Yang Yuchai, Zhu Genfa, Yu Bo. Efficient Plant Regeneration via Somatic Embryogenesis in Alocasia reginula cv. ‘Black Velvet’ [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2023, 58(5): 750-759. |
[2] | Jiming Cheng, Huimin He, Hongyu Niu, Hongmao Zhang. Research progress on the effect of intraspecific personality differences on seed dispersal in rodents [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2023, 31(4): 22446-. |
[3] | Jinchun Lu, Lina Cao, Guanjie Tong, Xinying Wang, Liying Zhang, Xin Yu, Huifang Li, Yanhui Li. Establishment of Callus Induction and Regeneration System of Anemone silvestris [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2022, 57(2): 217-226. |
[4] | Mengyue Li, Liu Liu, Yan Liu, Xiaoman Zhang. Establishment of Tissue Culture System for Axillary Bud Regeneration of Primula × pubescens [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2021, 56(6): 732-739. |
[5] | Yaqian Xiong, Xianbao Deng, Huihui Zhang, Dong Yang, Heng Sun, Juan Liu, Mei Yang. In Vitro Rapid Propagation of Nelumbo nucifera [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2021, 56(5): 605-613. |
[6] | Qian Luo, Yansha Zhang, Jing Ou. Callus Induction and Plant Regeneration of Cerasus serrulata var. lannesiana cv. ‘Grandiflora’ [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2021, 56(4): 451-461. |
[7] | Xifu Yang, Hongmao Zhang, Zhibin Zhang. Mast seeding and its relationship to animal hoarding behaviour [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2020, 28(7): 821-832. |
[8] | Yan Xiao,Zhenxing Wang,Dongming Li,Yanhua Qi, Enhebayaer. Optimization of Tissue Culture and Plant Regeneration System of Mature Embryo of Leymus chinensis [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2020, 55(2): 192-198. |
[9] | Xianjun Lai,Yizheng Zhang,Yinghong Gu,Lang Yan. Transformation of Insect Derived Antifreeze Gene into Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas) and Enhanced Its Freeze-tolerance [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2020, 55(1): 9-20. |
[10] | Wenting Zhang,Yanhong He,Ning Shu,Jingjing Xing,Baojun Liu,Manzhu Bao,Guofeng Liu. Plant Regeneration and Rapid Propagation System of Lilium bakerianum var. aureum [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2019, 54(6): 773-778. |
[11] | Yue Xu,Yingping Cao,Yu Wang,Chunxiang Fu,Shaojun Dai. Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated Transformation System of Spinacia oleracea [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2019, 54(4): 515-521. |
[12] | Jia Guo,Yansu Li,Chaoxing He,Yan Yan,Xianchang Yu. Establishing a High-efficiency Regeneration System in Pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2019, 54(4): 539-546. |
[13] | Zheng Yunfeng, Zhang Xiaoman, Liu Xiao. Plant Regeneration by Inducing Axillary Buds of Sterile Seedlings of Primula denticulata [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2018, 53(5): 686-692. |
[14] | Li Ruixue, Li Jiqiang, Pu Tengfei, Zhang Xiaoli, Zhao Xiting, Li Junhua, Li Mingjun. Induction and Plant Regeneration of Protocorm-like Bodies in Dioscorea opposita [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2018, 53(3): 334-340. |
[15] | Ren Ruyi, Xue Jukun, Guo Huiyan, Wei Jicheng. Induction of Hairy Roots of Scrophularia buergeriana and Its Plant Regeneration [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2017, 52(6): 783-787. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||