普通菜豆抗菜豆象性状的全基因组关联分析

doi:10.11983/CBB22138

植物学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (1): 77-89.DOI: 10.11983/CBB22138

所属专题：杂粮生物学专辑 (2023年58卷1期)

普通菜豆抗菜豆象性状的全基因组关联分析

李晓明¹, 王兰芬¹, 唐永生², 常玉洁¹, 张菊香², 王述民¹, 武晶¹^,^*()

¹中国农业科学院作物科学研究所, 北京 100081
²曲靖市农业科学院, 曲靖 655000

收稿日期:2022-06-30 接受日期:2022-09-19 出版日期:2023-01-01 发布日期:2023-01-05
通讯作者: *E-mail: wujing@caas.cn
作者简介:^†共同第一作者
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(32072017);国家食用豆现代农业产业技术体系(CARS-08)

Genome-wide Association Analysis of Resistance to Acanthoscelides obtectus in Common Bean

Xiaoming Li¹, Lanfen Wang¹, Yongsheng Tang², Yujie Chang¹, Juxiang Zhang², Shumin Wang¹, Jing Wu¹^,^*()

¹Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
²Qujing Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qujing 655000, China

Received:2022-06-30 Accepted:2022-09-19 Online:2023-01-01 Published:2023-01-05
Contact: *E-mail: wujing@caas.cn
About author:^†These authors contributed equally to this paper

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 普通菜豆(Phaseolus vulgaris)具有丰富的营养价值, 菜豆象(Acanthoscelides obtectus)是危害菜豆的主要害虫, 利用抗虫种质资源防治菜豆象是最安全且经济有效的方法。该研究利用改良的室内人工接虫方法, 对625份普通菜豆种质资源进行2次菜豆象抗性重复鉴定, 筛选出2份抗性稳定且种子受害率均在10%以下的高抗种质。利用种子受害率和蛀孔总数的表型数据, 基于3 767 432个SNP标记进行全基因组关联分析, 鉴定出15个与种子受害率相关的显著关联遗传位点, 8个与蛀孔总数相关的显著关联位点, 解释了4.54%-5.56%的表型变异。在候选位点筛选出包括编码蛋白酶抑制剂、凝集素和过氧化物酶等在内的20个与抗虫防御相关的候选基因。

关键词: 普通菜豆, 菜豆象, 全基因组关联分析, 数量性状位点, 抗性基因

Abstract: Common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) have rich nutritional value, and Acanthoscelides obtectus are major pests during the storage. It is a safe, economical and effective method to control the damage of A. obtectus by screening the germplasm resources of bruchid resistance. In this study, a total of 625 common bean germplasms were identified for resistance to A. obtectus by using improved indoor artificial inoculation method. Among them, two germplasms showed stable resistance in both two repeated identifications, with the percentage of damaged seeds less than 10%. Genome-wide association analysis was conducted based on 3 767 432 SNP and phenotypic data of the percentage of damaged seeds and the number of perforations from 625 common beans. Fifteen significant QTLs were associated with the percentage of damaged seeds and 8 significant QTLs were associated with the number of perforations, explaining 4.54% to 5.56% of the phenotypic variation. A total of 20 candidate genes were screened from all loci, including the genes encoding protease inhibitors, lectin, peroxidase and so on, which were related to the defense of bruchids.

Key words: common bean, Acanthoscelides obtectus, genome-wide association analysis, quantitative trait locus, resistant genes

李晓明, 王兰芬, 唐永生, 常玉洁, 张菊香, 王述民, 武晶. 普通菜豆抗菜豆象性状的全基因组关联分析. 植物学报, 2023, 58(1): 77-89.

Xiaoming Li, Lanfen Wang, Yongsheng Tang, Yujie Chang, Juxiang Zhang, Shumin Wang, Jing Wu. Genome-wide Association Analysis of Resistance to Acanthoscelides obtectus in Common Bean. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2023, 58(1): 77-89.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.chinbullbotany.com/CN/10.11983/CBB22138

https://www.chinbullbotany.com/CN/Y2023/V58/I1/77

图/表 11

参考文献 54

[1]	江兆春, 张忠民, 耿坤, 余杰颖 (2018). 菜豆象入侵我国的风险性评价. 贵州农业科学 46, 47-50.
[2]	阮期平, 周立, 郑远旗 (2000). PGIP在植物抗病方面的研究进展. 植物学通报 17, 60-63.
[3]	申智慧, 刘春, 杨洪, 郑松, 罗全丽, 徐本刚 (2014). 菜豆象发生规律与防治措施. 耕作与栽培 3, 47-48.
[4]	宋凤鸣, 郑重, 葛起新 (1992). 富含羟脯氨酸糖蛋白在植物-病原物相互作用中的积累、作用及调控. 植物生理学通讯 28, 141-145.
[5]	孙海燕, 罗兵, 喻德跃 (2005). 次生代谢抗虫基因工程研究进展. 安徽农业科学 33, 1906-1907.
[6]	王辉, 李琳, 梁正, 吴一江 (2013). 菜豆象检疫及防治研究进展. 农业灾害研究 3(9), 8-12.
[7]	吴长松, 冯明义, 李海, 姜府文, 赵芳, 龙贵兴, 丁昭兵, 卢云昌, 彭瑶, 廖华刚, 张国升, 颜兴, 陶惠, 文静, 高强 (2019). 毕节市菜豆象疫情发生危害及储存期防控措施初探. 植物检疫 33, 59-61.
[8]	杨璐, 戴仁怀, 杨洪, 江兆春, 李敏, 杨燕琼 (2022). 甲酸乙酯和异硫氰酸甲酯混用对菜豆象的熏蒸活性研究. 山地农业生物学报 41, 79-83.
[9]	杨乃博, 伍苏然, 沈林波, 张树珍, 杨本鹏 (2014). 植物抗虫性研究概况. 热带农业科学 34(9), 61-68, 89.
[10]	周晓宇, 陈杰, 杨敬, 黄海涛, 宋翔 (2010). 植物凝集素及其在抗虫基因工程中的应用. 山地农业生物学报 29, 255-260.
[11]	Apostolova ED, Palagacheva NG, Svetleva DL, Mateeva AV (2013). Investigations on the resistance of some Bulgarian common bean genotypes towards bean weevil (Acanthoscelides obtectus Say). J Cent Eur Agric 14, 1547-1557.
[12]	Azizoglu U (2018). Biochemical properties of Turkish common beans and their resistance against bean weevil Acanthoscelides obtectus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Ar-thropod-plant Inte 12, 283-290.
[13]	Blair MW, Muñoz C, Buendía HF, Flower J, Bueno JM, Cardona C (2010a). Genetic mapping of microsatellite markers around the Arcelin bruchid resistance locus in common bean. Theor Appl Genet 121, 393-402. DOI URL
[14]	Blair MW, Prieto S, Díaz LM, Buendía HF, Cardona C (2010b). Linkage disequilibrium at the APA insecticidal seed protein locus of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). BMC Plant Biol 10, 79. DOI URL
[15]	Bradbury PJ, Zhang ZW, Kroon DE, Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y, Buckler ES (2007). TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23, 2633-2635. DOI PMID
[16]	Buchler ES, Holland JB, Bradbury PJ, Acharya CB, Brown PJ, Browne C, Ersoz E, Flint-Garcia S, Garcia A, Glaubitz JC, Goodman MM, Harjes C, Guill K, Kroon DE, Larsson S, Lepak NK, Li HH, Mitchell SE, Pressoir G, Peiffer JA, Rosas MO, Rocheford TR, Romay MC, Romero S, Salvo S, Villeda HS, da Silva HS, Sun Q, Tian F, Upadyayula N, Ware D, Yates H, Yu JM, Zhang ZW, Kresovich S, Mcmullen MD (2009). The genetic architecture of maize flowering time. Science 325, 714-718. DOI PMID
[17]	Chen KC, Lin CY, Kuan CC, Sung HY, Chen CS (2002). A novel defensin encoded by a mungbean cDNA exhibits insecticidal activity against bruchid. J Agric Food Chem 50, 7258-7263. DOI URL
[18]	Cormier F, Le Gouis J, Dubreuil P, Lafarge S, Praud S (2014). A genome-wide identification of chromosomal re-gions determining nitrogen use efficiency components in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 127, 2679-2693. DOI PMID
[19]	De Andrade EKV, Rodrigues R, da Costa Vieira Bard G, da Silva Pereira L, Baptista KEV, Cavalcanti TFM, Oliveira AEA, Souza TAM, Gomes VM (2020). Identifi-cation, biochemical characterization and biological role of defense proteins from common bean genotypes seeds in response to Callosobruchus maculatus infestation. J Stored Prod Res 87, 101580. DOI URL
[20]	Duan CX, Zhu ZD, Li WC, Bao SY, Wang XM (2017). Ge-netic diversity and differentiation of Acanthoscelides ob-tectus Say (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) populations in China. Agric For Entomol 19, 113-121. DOI URL
[21]	Duarte MAG, Cabral GB, Ibrahim AB, Aragão FJL (2018). An overview of the APA locus and Arcelin proteins and their biotechnological potential in the control of bruchids. Agri Gene 8, 57-62.
[22]	Gautam AK, Shrivastava N, Sharma B, Bhagyawant SS (2018). Current scenario of legume lectins and their prac-tical applications. J Crop Sci Biotechnol 21, 217-227. DOI
[23]	Goossens A, Quintero C, Dillen W, DeRycke R, Valor JF, De Clercq J, Van Montagu M, Cardona C, Angenon G (2000). Analysis of bruchid resistance in the wild common bean accession G02771: no evidence for insecticidal ac-tivity of Arcelin 5. J Exp Bot 51, 1229-1236. PMID
[24]	Gupta M, Sharma P, Nath AK (2014). Purification of a novel α-amylase inhibitor from local Himalayan bean (Phaseo-lus vulgaris) seeds with activity towards bruchid pests and human salivary amylase. J Food Sci Technol 51, 1286-1293. DOI URL
[25]	Hategekimana A, Erler F (2020). Fecundity and fertility inhibition effects of some plant essential oils and their major components against Acanthoscelides obtectus Say (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). J Plant Dis Protect 127, 615-623.
[26]	Huang XH, Zhao Y, Wei XH, Li CY, Wang AH, Zhao Q, Li WJ, Guo YL, Deng LW, Zhu CR, Fan DL, Lu YQ, Weng QJ, Liu KY, Zhou TY, Jing YF, Si LZ, Dong GJ, Huang T, Lu TT, Feng Q, Qian Q, Li JY, Han B (2012). Geno-me-wide association study of flowering time and grain yield traits in a worldwide collection of rice germplasm. Nat Genet 44, 32-39. DOI
[27]	Iturralde-García RD, Castañé C, Wong-corral FJ, Riu-davets J (2020). Biological control of Acanthoscelides obtectus and Zabrotes subfasciatus in stored dried beans. BioControl 65, 693-701. DOI
[28]	Jia MJ, Yang LJ, Zhang W, Rosewarne G, Li JH, Yang EN, Chen L, Wang WX, Liu YK, Tong HW, He WJ, Zhang YQ, Zhu ZW, Gao CB (2020). Genome-wide as-sociation analysis of stripe rust resistance in modern Chinese wheat. BMC Plant Biol 20, 491. DOI
[29]	Jiménez JC, de la Fuente M, Ordás B, Domínguez LEG, Malvae RA (2017). Resistance categories to Acanthosce-lides obtectus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius), new sources of resistance for dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) breeding. Crop Prot 98, 255-266. DOI URL
[30]	Joshi J, Pandurangan S, Diapari M, Marsolais F (2017). Comparison of gene families:seed storage and other seed proteins. In: de la Vega MP, Santalla M, Marsolais F, eds. The Common Bean Genome. Cham: Springer. pp. 201-217.
[31]	Kamfwa K, Beaver JS, Cichy KA, Kelly JD (2018). QTL mapping of resistance to bean weevil in common bean. Crop Sci 58, 2370-2378. DOI URL
[32]	Kornegay JL, Cardona C (1991). Inheritance of resistance to Acanthoscelides obtectus in a wild common bean ac-cession crossed to commercial bean cultivars. Euphytica 52, 103-111. DOI
[33]	Kump KL, Bradbury PJ, Wisser RJ, Buckler ES, Belcher AR, Oropeza-Rosas MA, Zwonitzer JC, Kresovich S, McMullen MD, Ware D, Balint-Kurti PJ, Holland JB (2011). Genome-wide association study of quantitative resistance to southern leaf blight in the maize nested as-sociation mapping population. Nat Genet 43, 163-168. DOI
[34]	Kusolwa PM, Myers JR (2011). Seed storage proteins ARL2 and its variants from the apalocus of wild tepary bean G40199 confers resistance to Acanthoscelides ob-tectus when expressed in common beans. Afr Crop Sci J 19, 255-265.
[35]	Kusolwa PM, Myers JR, Porch TG, Trukhina Y, González-Vélez A, Beaver JS (2016). Registration of AO- 1012-29-3-3A red kidney bean germplasm line with bean weevil, BCMV, and BCMNV resistance. J Plant Regist 10, 149-153. DOI URL
[36]	Li B, Chen SL, Qin C, Xiao J (2016). Research progress on germplasm resources of common bean. Agric Sci Technol 17, 2572-2577.
[37]	Li XM, Tang YS, Wang LF, Chang YJ, Wu J, Wang SM (2022). QTL mapping and identification of genes associated with the resistance to Acanthoscelides obtectus in cultivated common bean using a high-density genetic linkage map. BMC Plant Biol 22, 260. DOI
[38]	Macedo MLR, das Graças MachadoFreire M, da Silva MBR, Coelho LCB (2007). Insecticidal action of Bauhinia monandra leaf lectin (BmoLL) against Anagasta kuehniella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), Zabrotes subfasciatus and Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 146, 486-498. DOI URL
[39]	Mutungi C, Affognon HD, Njoroge AW, Manono J, Baributsa D, Murdock LL (2015). Triple-layer plastic bags protect dry common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) against damage by Acanthoscelides obtectus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) during storage. J Econ Entomol 108, 2479-2488. DOI PMID
[40]	Oliva MLV, Silva MCC, Sallai RC, Brito MV, Sampaio MU (2010). A novel subclassification for Kunitz proteinase in-hibitors from leguminous seeds. Biochimie 92, 1667-1673. DOI URL
[41]	Oliveira AS, Migliolo L, Aquino RO, Ribeiro JKC, Macedo LLP, Andrade LBS, Bemquerer MP, Santos EA, Kiyota S, de Sales MP (2007). Purification and characterization of a trypsin-papain inhibitor from Pithecelobium dumosum seeds and its in vitro effects towards digestive enzymes from insect pests. Plant Physiol Biochem 45, 858-865. DOI URL
[42]	Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MAR, Bender D, MallerJ, Sklar P, Daly MJ, Sham PC (2007). PLINK: a tool set for whole-ge-nome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet 81, 559-575. DOI PMID
[43]	Rakotoson T, Dusserre J, Letourmy P, Frouin J, Ratsimiala IR, Rakotoarisoa NV, Cao TV, Brocke KV, Ramanantsoanirina A, Ahmadi N, Raboin LM (2021). Genome-wide association study of nitrogen use efficiency and agronomic traits in upland rice. Rice Sci 28, 379-390. DOI
[44]	Santino A, Valsasina B, Lioi L, Vitale A, Bollini R (1991). Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seed lectins: a novel elec-trophoretic variant of Arcelin. Plant Physiol 10, 7-11.
[45]	Schmutz J, McClean PE, Mamidi S, Wu GA, Cannon SB, Grimwood J, Jenkins J, Shu SQ, Song QJ, Chavarro C, Torres-Torres M, Geffroy V, Moghaddam SM, Gao DY, Abernathy B, Barry K, Blair M, Brick MA, Chovatia M, Gepts P, Goodstein DM, Gonzales M, Hellsten U, Hyten DL, Jia GF, Kelly JD, Kudrna D, Lee R, Richard MMS, Miklas PN, Osorno JM, Rodrigues J, Thareau V, Urrea CA, Wang M, Yu Y, Zhang M, Wing RA, Cregan PB, Rokhsar DS, Jackson SA (2014). A reference genome for common bean and genome-wide analysis of dual domestications. Nat Genet 46, 707-713. DOI PMID
[46]	Schroeder HE, Gollasch S, Moore A, Tabe LM, Craig S, Hardie DC, Chrispeels MJ, Spencer D, Higgins TJV (1995). Bean α-amylase inhibitor confers resistance to the pea weevil (Bruchus pisorum) in transgenic peas (Pisum sativum L.). Plant Physiol 107, 1233-1239. PMID
[47]	Shade RE, Pratt RC, Pomeroy MA (1987). Development and mortality of the bean weevil, Acanthoscelides obtec-tus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae), on mature seeds of tepary beans, Phaseolus acutifolius, and common beans, Phaseolus vulgaris. Environ Entomol 16, 1067-1070. DOI URL
[48]	Smith MR, Rao IM (2021). Common bean. In: Sadras VO, Calderini DF, eds. Crop Physiology Case Histories for Major Crops. London: Academic Press. pp. 384-406.
[49]	Velten G, Rott AS, Cardona C, Dorn S (2007). The inhibi-tory effect of the natural seed storage protein Arcelin on the development of Acanthoscelides obtectus. J Stored Prod Res 43, 550-557. DOI URL
[50]	Visscher PM, Brown MA, McCarthy MI, Yang J (2012). Five years of GWAS discovery. Am J Hum Genet 90, 7-24. DOI PMID
[51]	Wu J, Wang LF, Fu JJ, Chen JB, Wei SH, Zhang SL, Zhang J, Tang YS, Chen ML, Zhu JF, Lei L, Geng QH, Liu CL, Wu L, Li XM, Wang XL, Wang Q, Wang ZL, Xing SL, Zhang HK, Blair MW, Wang SM (2020). Resequencing of 683 common bean genotypes identifies yield component trait associations across a north-south cline. Nat Genet 52, 118-125. DOI PMID
[52]	Yin LL, Zhang HH, Tang ZS, Xu JY, Yin D, Zhang ZW, Yuan XH, Zhu MJ, Zhao SH, Li XY, Liu XL (2021). rMVP: a memory-efficient, visualization-enhanced, and parallel- accelerated tool for genome-wide association study. Ge-nom Proteom Bioinf 19, 619-628.
[53]	Yuste-Lisbona FJ, González AM, Capel C, García-Alcázar M, Capel J, De Ron AM, Lozano R, Santalla M (2014). Genetic analysis of single-locus and epistatic QTLs for seed traits in an adapted × nuña RIL population of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor Appl Genet 127, 897-912. DOI PMID
[54]	Zaugg I, Magni C, Panzeri D, Daminati MG, Bollini R, Benrey B, Bacher S, Sparvoli F (2013). QUES, a new Phaseolus vulgaris genotype resistant to common bean weevils, contains the Arcelin-8 allele coding for new lectin-related variants. Theor Appl Genet 126, 647-661. DOI URL

Gene pool	Outside of China^a		Inside of China^b		All
Gene pool	BL	L	BL	L	All
Andean	33	16	27	206	282
Mesoamerican	64	11	20	248	343
All	97	27	47	454	625

Gene pool	Outside of China^a		Inside of China^b		All
Gene pool	BL	L	BL	L	All
Andean	33	16	27	206	282
Mesoamerican	64	11	20	248	343
All	97	27	47	454	625

Rating scale	PDS (%)	Resistant evaluation
1	≤10	Highly resistance (HR)
3	10<PDS≤35	Resistance (R)
5	35<PDS≤65	Medium resistance (MR)
7	65<PDS≤90	Susceptible (S)
9	>90	Highly susceptible (HS)

Rating scale	PDS (%)	Resistant evaluation
1	≤10	Highly resistance (HR)
3	10<PDS≤35	Resistance (R)
5	35<PDS≤65	Medium resistance (MR)
7	65<PDS≤90	Susceptible (S)
9	>90	Highly susceptible (HS)

Traits	Min	Median	Max	Mean	SD (%)	Kurtosis	Skewness	CV (%)
PDS I (%)	1.00	67.50	100	64.14	25.65	-0.71	-0.45	40.00
NP I	3.00	263.50	1224	294.12	181.20	1.48	0.96	61.61
PDS II (%)	0.00	72.00	100	66.44	27.17	-0.76	-0.62	40.89
NP II	0.00	329.00	1816	376.20	254.91	3.12	1.37	67.76
PDS-BLUE (%)	4.00	70.00	100	65.44	0.23	-0.63	-0.58	35.07
NP-BLUE	0.56	318.00	1126	335.55	174.94	1.56	0.92	52.02

普通菜豆抗菜豆象性状的全基因组关联分析

Genome-wide Association Analysis of Resistance to Acanthoscelides obtectus in Common Bean

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 54

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

Accession No.	Origin	100 seeds weight (g)	Repeat I		Repeat II
Accession No.	Origin	100 seeds weight (g)	PDS (%)	NP	PDS (%)	NP
Longyundou7	China-Heilongjiang	17.29	4	21	4	11
I2K03033	USA	17.34	10	30	6	24

Traits	Min	Median	Max	Mean	SD (%)	Kurtosis	Skewness	CV (%)
SW I (g)	10.80	34.21	80.40	34.95	12.93	-0.57	0.36	37.00
SW II (g)	7.08	31.62	70.23	33.18	12.35	-0.44	0.42	37.22
SL I (mm)	6.30	12.20	17.80	12.30	2.51	-1.01	0.05	20.40
SL II (mm)	6.25	13.89	15.25	14.94	3.02	-0.93	-0.06	20.19
SWI I (mm)	4.20	7.10	15.60	7.11	1.13	9.79	1.59	15.91
SWI II (mm)	4.88	8.70	13.50	8.66	1.40	-0.25	0.19	16.20
SH I (mm)	3.80	5.50	8.50	5.62	0.85	0.71	0.91	15.03
SH II (mm)	3.70	5.40	8.80	5.49	0.82	0.58	0.74	14.90

Traits	Locus	Peak SNP marker	Chromosome	Position (bp)	p-value	R² (%)
PDS	Loc_1	Pv01_43986475	Pv01	43986475	1E-07	5.24
	Loc_2	Pv01_49901915	Pv01	49901915	8.15E-07	4.54
	Loc_3	Pv03_1235524	Pv03	1235524	2.25E-07	4.97
	Loc_4	Pv03_6664019	Pv03	6664019	4.46E-07	4.74
	Loc_5	Pv03_11569042	Pv03	11569042	2.19E-07	4.98
	Loc_6	Pv03_37792879	Pv03	37792879	5.51E-07	4.67
	Loc_7	Pv05_522813	Pv05	522813	3.89E-07	4.79
	Loc_8	Pv05_5075510	Pv05	5075510	3.54E-07	4.82
	Loc_9	Pv05_22022919	Pv05	22022919	3.89E-08	5.56
	Loc_10	Pv06_19260606	Pv06	19260606	7.22E-07	4.58
	Loc_11	Pv07_386049	Pv07	386049	6.01E-07	4.64
	Loc_12	Pv08_13992928	Pv08	13992928	6.42E-07	4.62
	Loc_13	Pv08_43139505	Pv08	43139505	5.06E-07	4.70
	Loc_14	Pv10_9574825	Pv10	9574825	2.3E-07	4.96
	Loc_15	Pv11_11777960	Pv11	11777960	2.62E-07	4.92
NP	Loc_16	Pv02_36436725	Pv02	36436725	5.26E-07	4.74
	Loc_17	Pv03_23935240	Pv03	23935240	5.31E-07	4.74
	Loc_18	Pv04_9609212	Pv04	9609212	2.01E-07	5.07
	Loc_19	Pv04_10133957	Pv04	10133957	5.13E-07	4.75
	Loc_20	Pv04_44834996	Pv04	44834996	7.56E-07	4.62
	Loc_21	Pv10_8170537	Pv10	8170537	6.45E-07	4.68
	Loc_22	Pv11_13013375	Pv11	13013375	2.37E-07	5.01
	Loc_23	Pv11_19511385	Pv11	19511385	7.45E-07	4.63

Traits	Gene	Chromosome	Locus	Gene annotation or coding protein
PDS	Phvul.001G239200	Pv01	Loc_2	Concanavalin A-like lectin family protein
	Phvul.003G014200	Pv03	Loc_3	Hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein family protein
	Phvul.003G169100	Pv03	Loc_6	Bifunctional inhibitor/lipid-transfer protein/seed storage 2S albumin superfamily protein
	Phvul.005G005800	Pv05	Loc_7	WRKY DNA-binding protein 2
	Phvul.005G046000	Pv05	Loc_8	Peroxidase superfamily protein
	Phvul.006G073200	Pv06	Loc_10	Hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein family protein
	Phvul.008G113100	Pv08	Loc_12	Kunitz family trypsin and protease inhibitor protein
	Phvul.008G113900	Pv08		Bifunctional inhibitor/lipid-transfer protein/seed storage 2S albumin superfamily protein
	Phvul.010G057000	Pv10	Loc_14	S-locus lectin protein kinase family protein
	Phvul.010G057100	Pv10		S-locus lectin protein kinase family protein
	Phvul.010G057300	Pv10		S-locus lectin protein kinase family protein
	Phvul.010G057500	Pv10		S-locus lectin protein kinase family protein
	Phvul.010G057900	Pv10		WRKY DNA-binding protein 70
NP	Phvul.002G205700	Pv02	Loc_16	Defensin-like (DEFL) family protein
	Phvul.002G205900	Pv02		Defensin-like (DEFL) family protein
	Phvul.003G099300	Pv03	Loc_17	S-locus lectin protein kinase family protein
	Phvul.004G067300	Pv04	Loc_18	Sterol
	Phvul.004G068800	Pv04	Loc_19	Bifunctional inhibitor/lipid-transfer protein/seed storage 2S albumin superfamily protein
	Phvul.011G108700	Pv11	Loc_22	S-locus lectin protein kinase family protein
	Phvul.011G119200	Pv11	Loc_23	Concanavalin A-like lectin protein kinase family protein

[1]	武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 杨淑斌, 黄雨茜, 关攀锋, 郑兴卫, 赵佳佳, 乔玲, 李晓华, 刘维仲, 郑军. 山西小麦籽粒叶黄素含量变异及遗传特性分析[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(4): 535-547.
[2]	吕善武, 张昌伟, 侯喜林, 邓书林. 白菜类作物抗TuMV研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(2): 335-346.
[3]	李园, 常玉洁, 王兰芬, 王述民, 武晶. 普通菜豆镰孢菌枯萎病抗性种质资源筛选及全基因组关联分析[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(1): 51-61.
[4]	张琦, 张文静, 袁宪凯, 李明, 赵强, 杜艳丽, 杜吉到. 褪黑素对盐胁迫下普通菜豆芽期核酸修复的调控机制[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(1): 108-121.
[5]	金京波, 梁承志. 饲草基因组学研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2022, 57(6): 732-741.
[6]	谭文清, 陈军, 才宏伟. 黑麦草生物学研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2022, 57(6): 802-813.
[7]	宣伟, 徐国华. 植物适应土壤氮素环境的基因选择: 以水稻为例[J]. 植物学报, 2021, 56(1): 1-5.
[8]	陈孙禄, 詹成芳, 蒋红, 李琳涵, 张红生. 水稻籽粒灌浆速率的分子机制与遗传调控研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2021, 56(1): 80-89.
[9]	赵宇慧, 李秀秀, 陈倬, 鲁宏伟, 刘羽诚, 张志方, 梁承志. 生物信息学分析方法I: 全基因组关联分析概述[J]. 植物学报, 2020, 55(6): 715-732.
[10]	汪鸿儒, 储成才. 组学技术揭示水稻杂种优势遗传机制[J]. 植物学报, 2017, 52(1): 4-9.
[11]	杨行海, 农保选, 夏秀忠, 张宗琼, 曾宇, 刘开强, 邓国富, 李丹婷. 水稻糯性相关基因的全基因组关联分析[J]. 植物学报, 2016, 51(6): 737-742.
[12]	厉新民, 林鸿宣. 全基因组关联分析实现水稻粒型自然变异的分子解析[J]. 植物学报, 2016, 51(4): 411-415.
[13]	周镕, 王波, 杨睿, 李书, 樊琳琳, 曾千春, 罗琼. 粳稻子预44中稻瘟病数量抗性位点分析[J]. 植物学报, 2015, 50(6): 691-698.
[14]	严玫, 张新友, 韩锁义, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 刘华, 孙子淇, 张忠信, 汤丰收. 花生重要农艺及产量性状的全基因组关联分析[J]. 植物学报, 2015, 50(4): 460-472.
[15]	朱金燕, 杨梅, 嵇朝球, 王军, 杨杰, 范方军, 李文奇, 王芳权, 梁国华, 周勇, 仲维功. 利用染色体单片段代换系定位水稻芽期耐冷QTL[J]. 植物学报, 2015, 50(3): 338-345.