植物学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (3): 354-362.DOI: 10.11983/CBB24182 cstr: 32102.14.CBB24182
许庭旸1,2,†, 刘雨辰2,†, 王万鹏2, 苏航2, 苏昆龙2, 吴振映2, 吕明2, 李福利2, 王小山1,*(), 付春祥2,*(
)
收稿日期:
2024-11-28
接受日期:
2025-02-09
出版日期:
2025-05-10
发布日期:
2025-02-08
通讯作者:
*E-mail: wanggrass@163.com;
fucx@qibebt.ac.cn
作者简介:
†共同第一作者
基金资助:
Xu Tingyang1,2,†, Liu Yuchen2,†, Wang Wanpeng2, Su Hang2, Su Kunlong2, Wu Zhenying2, Lϋ Ming2, Li Fuli2, Wang Xiaoshan1,*(), Fu Chunxiang2,*(
)
Received:
2024-11-28
Accepted:
2025-02-09
Online:
2025-05-10
Published:
2025-02-08
Contact:
*E-mail: wanggrass@163.com;
fucx@qibebt.ac.cn
About author:
†These authors contributed equally to this paper
摘要: 植物生长调节剂是天然或人工合成的化学物质, 它们不仅对作物的生长发育具有重要调节作用, 还能提高植物的抗逆性。为研究不同植物生长调节剂对盐碱胁迫下小麦(Triticum aestivum)生长发育的影响, 探索提高盐碱地作物产量的方法, 在2023-2024年间, 于黄河三角洲农业高新技术产业示范区的盐碱地开展小麦喷施试验。试验分为4组, 包括蒸馏水对照组、0.5%褐藻寡糖组、植物黄金组以及0.5%褐藻寡糖与植物黄金的混合喷施组, 分别于2024年3月28日、4月12日、4月28日和5月12日对小麦进行喷施。结果表明, 喷施褐藻寡糖与植物黄金的混合物后, 小麦的穗粒数和百粒重显著增加。特别是混合喷施组, 其盐碱地小麦的产量达每公顷1 174.5 kg, 较单独喷施褐藻寡糖组和植物黄金组分别提高了14.4%和46.9%。综上表明, 褐藻寡糖与植物黄金联合应用能显著提高小麦在盐碱地的适应性, 显示出其在盐碱地小麦生产中的重要应用潜力。
许庭旸, 刘雨辰, 王万鹏, 苏航, 苏昆龙, 吴振映, 吕明, 李福利, 王小山, 付春祥. 喷施不同植物生长调节剂对盐碱地小麦生长发育的影响. 植物学报, 2025, 60(3): 354-362.
Xu Tingyang, Liu Yuchen, Wang Wanpeng, Su Hang, Su Kunlong, Wu Zhenying, Lϋ Ming, Li Fuli, Wang Xiaoshan, Fu Chunxiang. Effects of Different Plant Growth Regulators on Wheat Growth and Development in the Saline-alkali Land. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2025, 60(3): 354-362.
图1 植物生长调节剂处理对盐碱地小麦表型的影响 Control: 蒸馏水(对照); AO: 0.5%褐藻寡糖处理; PG: 1:1000稀释植物黄金处理; Mixture: 0.5%褐藻寡糖与1:1000稀释植物黄金混合处理。Bars=10 cm
Figure 1 Morphological characterization of wheat in the saline-alkali land after treatment with plant growth regulators Control: Distilled water; AO: 0.5% alginate oligosaccharide treatment; PG: 1:1000 diluted Plant Gold treatment; Mixture: 0.5% alginate oligosaccharide mixed with 1:1000 diluted Plant Gold. Bars=10 cm
图2 植物生长调节剂处理对盐碱地小麦生理与性状相关指标的影响 (A) 株高; (B) 穗数; (C) 穗粒数; (D) 百粒重。数据为3个小区(每区1 m × 1 m)试验结果的平均值±标准误(n=3)。不同小写字母表示各处理间差异显著(单因素方差分析, LSD检验, P<0.05)。Control、AO、PG和Mixture同图1。
Figure 2 Effects of plant growth regulators on physiologically and traits related indicators of wheat grown in the saline-alkali land (A) Plant height; (B) Number of ears; (C) Number of grains per ear; (D) 100-grain weight. Values are means±SE (n=3) of 3 sample plots (1 m × 1 m per plot). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments (one-way ANOVA, LSD test, P<0.05). Control, AO, PG, and Mixture are the same as shown in Figure 1.
图3 不同植物生长调节剂喷施处理的盐碱地小麦籽粒表型 Control、AO、PG和Mixture同图1。Bars=1 cm
Figure 3 Morphological characterization of wheat grains grown in the saline-alkali land after treatment with plant grow- th regulators Control, AO, PG, and Mixture are the same as shown in Figure 1. Bars=1 cm
图4 植物生长调节剂喷施处理对盐碱地小麦单位面积内理论产量的影响 数据为3个小区(每区1 m × 1 m)试验结果的平均值±标准误(n=3)。不同小写字母表示各处理间差异显著(单因素方差分析, LSD检验, P<0.05)。Control、AO、PG和Mixture同图1。
Figure 4 Effects of theoretical yield per unit area of wheat grown in the saline-alkali land after treatment with plant grow- th regulators Values are means±SE (n=3) of 3 sample plots (1 m × 1 m per plot). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments (one-way ANOVA, LSD test, P< 0.05). Control, AO, PG, and Mixture are the same as shown in Figure 1.
图5 植物生长调节剂喷施处理对盐碱地小麦籽粒营养成分的影响 (A) 淀粉含量; (B) 脂肪含量; (C) 蛋白质含量。数据为3个小区(每区1 m × 1 m)试验结果的平均值±标准误(n=3)。不同小写字母表示各处理间差异显著(单因素方差分析, LSD检验, P<0.05)。Control、AO、PG和Mixture同图1。
Figure 5 Effects of plant growth regulators on nutrition facts of wheat grains grown in the saline-alkali land (A) Starch content; (B) Fat content; (C) Protein content. Values are means±SE (n=3) of 3 sample plots (1 m × 1 m per plot). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments (one-way ANOVA, LSD test, P<0.05). Control, AO, PG, and Mixture are the same as shown in Figure 1.
[1] | Dang Y, Chen HB (2014). Guidelines for the Health of Grain. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers. pp. 27-28. (in Chinese) |
党毅, 陈虎彪 (2014). 五谷养生指南. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社. pp. 27-28. | |
[2] | Han RF, Ma WH, Dong XY, Fang TT, Zhang SH (2024). Effects of different plant growth regulators on the root growth of winter wheat seedlings stage. Humic Acid (3), 42-47. (in Chinese) |
韩锐锋, 马文豪, 董向阳, 方甜甜, 张书红 (2024). 不同植物生长调节剂对冬小麦苗期根系生长的影响. 腐植酸 (3), 42-47. | |
[3] | Hu J, Peng SH, Zhang YQ, Wei JQ, Mao JL, Qiu J, Hu YL, Hou LJ, Ye Q (2024). Effects of algal oligosaccharides on soil-nutrients, wheat-growth and rhizosphere microbial diversity. Mol Plant Breed https://link.cnki.net/urlid/46.1068.S.20240220.1347.009. (in Chinese) |
胡静, 彭守华, 张玉琴, 尉继强, 毛积磊, 邱杰, 胡怡林, 侯丽娟, 叶全 (2024). 褐藻寡糖对土壤养分、小麦生长以及根际微生物多样性的影响. 分子植物育种 https://link.cnki.net/urlid/46.1068.S.20240220.1347.009. | |
[4] | Ji MH (1997). Seaweed Chemistry. Beijing: Science Press. pp. 318-329. (in Chinese) |
纪明候 (1997). 海藻化学. 北京: 科学出版社. pp. 318-329. | |
[5] | Li HT, Sui XQ, Yang J, Wang XY (2024). Regulatory effects of foliar sprays of plant growth regulators on endogenous hormones and carbon metabolism in alfalfa. Pratac Sci 41, 437-447. (in Chinese) |
李浩天, 隋晓青, 杨静, 王鑫尧 (2024). 叶面喷施植物生长调节剂对紫花苜蓿内源激素及碳代谢的调控效应. 草业科学 41, 437-447. | |
[6] | Li JZ (2019). Study on application effect of water-soluble fertilizer containing amino acids on wheat. Mod Agric Sci Technol (5), 14, 17. (in Chinese) |
李佳钊 (2019). 含氨基酸水溶性肥料在小麦上的应用效果研究. 现代农业科技 (5), 14, 17. | |
[7] | Li XY, Gu Y, Xu FF, Bao JS (2025). Research progress on post-translational modifications of starch biosynthesis- related proteins in rice endosperm. Chin Bull Bot 60, 256-270. (in Chinese) |
李新宇, 谷月, 徐非非, 包劲松 (2025). 水稻胚乳淀粉合成相关蛋白的翻译后修饰研究进展. 植物学报 60, 256-270.
DOI |
|
[8] | Liu XM (2019). Effects of water-soluble fertilizer containing amino acids on yield and economic benefits of wheat in saline-alkali land. Rural Econ Sci Technol 30(22), 133, 148. (in Chinese) |
刘雪梅 (2019). 含氨基酸水溶肥对盐碱地小麦产量和经济效益的影响. 农村经济与科技 30(22), 133, 148. | |
[9] | Liu YP, Ruan ZY (2024). Effects of different plant growth regulators and foliar fertilizer combinations on winter wheat. Anhui Agric Sci Bull 30(11), 19-23. (in Chinese) |
刘银萍, 阮赞誉 (2024). 不同植物生长调节剂与叶面肥组合对冬小麦的影响研究. 安徽农学通报 30(11), 19-23. | |
[10] | Ma LN (2020). Study on Soil Microbial Response Characteristics of Soda Saline-Sodic Soil Improved by Rice Cultivation in Northeast China. PhD dissertation. Changchun: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Aca- demy of Sciences). pp.1-3. (in Chinese) |
马丽娜 (2020). 东北苏打盐碱地种稻改良条件下土壤微生物响应特征研究. 博士论文. 长春: 中国科学院大学(中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所). pp. 1-3. | |
[11] | National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China, National Medical Products Administration (2016). National food safety standards Determination of fat in food: GB5009.6-2016. (in Chinese) |
中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会, 国家食品药品监督管理总局 (2016). 食品安全国家标准食品中脂肪的测定:GB 5009. 6-2016. | |
[12] | People's Education Press (2020). Senior High School Biology Optional Compulsory Edition 1. Beijing: People's Education Press. pp. 100. (in Chinese) |
人民教育出版社 (2020). 人教版高中生物选择性必修1 稳态与调节. 北京: 人民教育出版社. pp. 100. | |
[13] | Qu XC, Liu Z, Li J, Li JF (2024). Effect of foliar spraying of Shangluo Tiantai amino acid water-soluble fertilizer on the growth, development and yield of small green cabbage. Bull Agric Sci Technol (5), 134-137. (in Chinese) |
瞿晓苍, 刘峥, 李静, 李剑锋 (2024). 叶面喷施商洛天泰氨基酸水溶肥对小青菜生长发育及产量的影响研究. 农业科技通讯 (5), 134-137. | |
[14] | Shao YF, Zhu DW, Yu J, Fang CY, Mou RX, Hu XQ, Zhu ZW, Chen MX (2022). Development of certified reference materials for the determination of apparent amylose content in rice. Molecules 27, 4647. |
[15] | Sun CC (2024). Biological Preparation of Alginate Oligosaccharides and its Application in the Resistance of Sesuvium portulacastrum to Salt Stress. Master's thesis. Dalian: Dalian Ocean University. pp. 7-9. (in Chinese) |
孙晨晨 (2024). 褐藻寡糖的生物法制备及其在海马齿(Sesuvium portulacastrum)抗盐胁迫中的应用. 硕士论文. 大连: 大连海洋大学. pp. 7-9. | |
[16] | Tang KT, Zhang FF, Wang XZ, Yue YF, Lu WH, Ma CH (2018). Study on the hay yield and nutrition of ten alfalfa varieties in different fall dormancy classes in northern Xin- jiang. Chin J Grassl Sci 40(3), 43-48. (in Chinese) |
唐开婷, 张凡凡, 王旭哲, 岳亚飞, 鲁为华, 马春晖 (2018). 北疆10个不同秋眠级紫花苜蓿引进品种产量与营养品质研究. 中国草地学报 40(3), 43-48. | |
[17] | Wang H, Cao JY, Hou J, Zhao L, Han XY (2023). Effect of spraying algal oligosaccharide on drought resistance of tea plant. Shandong Agric Sci 55(12), 63-70. (in Chinese) |
王恒, 曹佳茵, 侯剑, 赵丽, 韩晓阳 (2023). 喷施褐藻寡糖对茶树抗旱性的影响. 山东农业科学 55(12), 63-70. | |
[18] | Wang HS, Zhang LF, Liu HY, Wang J, Gu XJ, Zheng CP, Liu MX, Li YK (2025). Rapid determination of oil content in tobacco seeds by serial Soxhlet extraction. J Yunnan Minzu Univ (Nat Sci Ed) 34, 46-50. (in Chinese) |
王华顺, 张玲芳, 刘华银, 王晋, 顾学娇, 郑朝胚, 刘铭心, 李银科 (2025). 串联索氏提取法快速测定烟草种子中油脂质量分数. 云南民族大学学报(自然科学版) 34, 46-50. | |
[19] | Wang ZQ (1993). Saline Soils in China. Beijing: Science Press. pp. 538-542. (in Chinese) |
王遵亲 (1993). 中国盐渍土. 北京: 科学出版社. pp. 538-542. | |
[20] | Wang ZY, Lu YC (2024). Effects of amino acid spraying and seed coating on growth and cold-tolerance of maize seedlings. Chin Sugar 46(3), 10-17. (in Chinese) |
王子钰, 路运才 (2024). 氨基酸喷施和种子包衣对玉米幼苗生长及抗冷性的影响. 中国糖料 46(3), 10-17. | |
[21] | Xie L (2024). Salt and alkali desert is also a mountain of gold and silver. Consumption Daily. 2024-09-24. (in Chinese) |
解磊 (2024). 盐碱荒滩也是金山银山. 消费日报. 2024-09- 24. | |
[22] | Xu M (2018). Effects of a Compound Amino Acid Preparation on Stress Resistance of Chinese Cabbage and Cotton. Master's thesis. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. pp. 4-7. (in Chinese) |
许猛 (2018). 复合氨基酸制剂对小白菜和棉花抗逆性的影响. 硕士论文. 北京: 中国农业科学院. pp. 4-7. | |
[23] | Zhang XY, Zhou JK, Li ZM, Qin YM, Yu RT, Zhang HW, Zheng YH, Zhu JW, Zhang DM, Fu L (2019). The qualitative electrochemical determination of multiple components in seaweed fertilizer. Int J Electrochem Sci 14, 6283-6291. |
[24] | Zhang ZH (2018). Regulatory Effects of Different Amino- Acid Foliar Fertilizers on High Temperature Stress at Flowering Stage in Maize. Master's thesis. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University. pp. 12-14. (in Chinese) |
张志辉 (2018). 氨基酸叶面肥处理对玉米开花期高温胁迫的调控效应研究. 硕士论文. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学. pp. 12-14. |
[1] | 唐远翔, 熊仕臣, 朱洪锋, 张新生, 游成铭, 刘思凝, 谭波, 徐振锋. 长期氮添加对四川盆地西缘常绿阔叶林优势树种凋落叶产量及碳氮磷归还的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(5): 720-731. |
[2] | 刘笑, 杜琬莹, 张云秀, 唐成名, 李华伟, 夏海勇, 樊守金, 孔令安. NO3-缓解小麦根部NH4+毒性机理(长英文摘要)[J]. 植物学报, 2024, 59(3): 397-413. |
[3] | 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 杨淑斌, 黄雨茜, 关攀锋, 郑兴卫, 赵佳佳, 乔玲, 李晓华, 刘维仲, 郑军. 山西小麦籽粒叶黄素含量变异及遗传特性分析[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(4): 535-547. |
[4] | 刘建新, 刘瑞瑞, 刘秀丽, 贾海燕, 卜婷, 李娜. 外源硫化氢对盐碱胁迫下裸燕麦光合碳代谢的调控[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(3): 374-388. |
[5] | 严语萍, 俞晓琦, 任德勇, 钱前. 水稻穗粒数遗传机制与育种利用[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(3): 359-372. |
[6] | 白明义, 彭金荣, 傅向东. 赤霉素和油菜素内酯信号通路双重调控助力小麦新一轮“绿色革命”[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(2): 194-198. |
[7] | 叶卫军, 张阴, 王沛然, 张玲玲, 田东丰, 吴泽江, 周斌. 绿豆5个产量相关性状的QTL分析[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(1): 150-158. |
[8] | 刘晓龙, 季平, 杨洪涛, 丁永电, 付佳玲, 梁江霞, 余聪聪. 脱落酸对水稻抽穗开花期高温胁迫的诱抗效应[J]. 植物学报, 2022, 57(5): 596-610. |
[9] | 王雷, 种康. 鱼和熊掌的选择: 反向重复序列变异介导的玉米环境适应与产量平衡[J]. 植物学报, 2022, 57(5): 555-558. |
[10] | 孔令让. 另辟蹊径破解小麦条锈病的基因密码[J]. 植物学报, 2022, 57(4): 405-408. |
[11] | 熊淑萍, 曹文博, 曹锐, 张志勇, 付新露, 徐赛俊, 潘虎强, 王小纯, 马新明. 水平结构配置对冬小麦冠层垂直结构、微环境及产量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(2): 188-196. |
[12] | 孙佳欢, 刘冬, 朱家祺, 张书宁, 高梅香. 小麦-玉米轮作农田土壤螨多样性空间分布格局[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(12): 22292-. |
[13] | 孙浩哲, 王襄平, 张树斌, 吴鹏, 杨蕾. 阔叶红松林不同演替阶段凋落物产量及其稳定性的影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(6): 594-605. |
[14] | 周俭民. 免疫信号轴揭示水稻与病原菌斗争的秘密[J]. 植物学报, 2021, 56(5): 513-515. |
[15] | 王泽义, 张恒嘉, 王玉才, 陈谢田, 巴玉春. 亏缺灌溉对板蓝根叶片光合生理特性及产量的影响[J]. 植物学报, 2020, 55(6): 705-714. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||