甜高粱育种研究进展及未来展望

doi:10.11983/CBB22153

植物学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (6): 774-784.DOI: 10.11983/CBB22153

所属专题：饲草生物学专辑 (2023年58卷2期、2022年57卷6期)

• ·评述· 饲草生物学专辑 • 上一篇下一篇

甜高粱育种研究进展及未来展望

郝怀庆¹, 张汝¹^,², 卢呈¹^,², 罗洪¹, 李志刚¹, 尚丽¹, 王宁¹, 刘智全¹, 吴小园¹, 景海春¹^,²^,³^,^*()

¹中国科学院植物研究所, 北方资源植物重点实验室, 北京 100093
²中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
³中国科学院植物研究所, 生态草牧业工程实验室, 北京 100093

收稿日期:2022-07-15 接受日期:2022-11-17 出版日期:2022-11-01 发布日期:2022-11-18
通讯作者: 景海春
作者简介:*E-mail: hcjing@ibcas.ac.cn
基金资助:
山东省重点研发计划(重大科技创新工程)(2021SFGC0303);国家自然科学基金(32072026);中国科学院国际合作局国际伙伴计划(151111KYSB20180049);国家重点研发计划(2019YFD1002701);中国科学院战略性先导科技专项A类(XDA260-50000)

Research Progress and Future Perspective of Sweet Sorghum Breeding

Huaiqing Hao¹, Ru Zhang¹^,², Cheng Lu¹^,², Hong Luo¹, Zhigang Li¹, Li Shang¹, Ning Wang¹, Zhiquan Liu¹, Xiaoyuan Wu¹, Haichun Jing¹^,²^,³^,^*()

¹Key Laboratory of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China
²University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
³Engineering Laboratory for Grass-based Livestock Husbandry, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China

Received:2022-07-15 Accepted:2022-11-17 Online:2022-11-01 Published:2022-11-18
Contact: Haichun Jing
About author:First author contact:†These authors contributed equally to this paper

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 甜高粱(Sorghum bicolor)具有耐盐碱、高生物量和高光合性能等特性, 茎秆富含汁液和糖分, 是一种发展潜力巨大的青贮饲草作物。深入解析甜高粱饲用和耐逆性状形成的分子基础, 改良和培育饲用甜高粱新品种对我国草牧业发展具有重要意义。该文总结了我国甜高粱基础研究和育种工作进展, 并分析了目前存在的问题, 为未来育种提供了对策, 旨在推动我国饲用甜高粱产业发展, 保障大粮食安全。

关键词: 育种, 种质资源, 草牧业, 青贮饲料, 甜高粱

Abstract: Sorghum bicolor has the characteristics of salinity tolerance, high biomass and high photosynthetic performance. The stem accumulates high amounts of juice and sugar, making it an important silage crop with development potential. In-depth analysis of the molecular basis underlying the formation of S. bicolor forage traits and stress tolerance traits, as well as improvement and breeding of S. bicolor new varieties for forage are of great significance to the development of pasture-livestock industry in China. This review summarizes the research and breeding progress of S. bicolor, analyzes the existing problems, and puts forward countermeasures for S. bicolor molecular breeding in the future, aiming to promote the development of forage S. bicolor industry and ensure the food security in our country.

Key words: breeding, germplasm resources, pasture-livestock industry, silage, sweet sorghum

郝怀庆, 张汝, 卢呈, 罗洪, 李志刚, 尚丽, 王宁, 刘智全, 吴小园, 景海春. 甜高粱育种研究进展及未来展望. 植物学报, 2022, 57(6): 774-784.

Huaiqing Hao, Ru Zhang, Cheng Lu, Hong Luo, Zhigang Li, Li Shang, Ning Wang, Zhiquan Liu, Xiaoyuan Wu, Haichun Jing. Research Progress and Future Perspective of Sweet Sorghum Breeding. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2022, 57(6): 774-784.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.chinbullbotany.com/CN/10.11983/CBB22153

https://www.chinbullbotany.com/CN/Y2022/V57/I6/774

图/表 2

参考文献 81

[1]	贾鹏, 王文丹, 吴天佑, 苏衍菁 (2021). 甜高粱青贮加工技术及其在反刍动物中的应用. 家畜生态学报 42(2), 86-90.
[2]	景海春, 刘智全, 张丽敏, 吴小园 (2018). 饲草甜高粱分子育种与产业化. 科学通报 63, 1664-1676.
[3]	景海春, 田志喜, 种康, 李家洋 (2021). 分子设计育种的科技问题及其展望概论. 中国科学: 生命科学 51, 1356-1365.
[4]	黎大爵, 廖馥荪 (1992). 甜高粱及其利用. 北京: 科学出版社. pp. 144.
[5]	刘杰, 黄学辉 (2021). 作物杂种优势研究现状与展望. 中国科学: 生命科学 51, 1396-1404.
[6]	刘宣雨, 王青云, 刘树君, 宋松泉 (2011). 高粱遗传转化研究进展. 植物学报 46, 216-223. DOI
[7]	路登佑, 李玉蓉, 赵文峰, 冯杰 (2011). 饲用甜高粱青贮制作技术. 贵州畜牧兽医 35(2), 53-55.
[8]	卢庆善 (1998). 甜高粱研究进展. 世界农业 (5), 21-23.
[9]	卢庆善 (2008). 甜高粱. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社. pp. 113-136.
[10]	卢庆善 (2011). 高粱种质资源的创新和利用. 园艺与种苗 (5), 1-4.
[11]	卢庆善, 邹剑秋, 朱凯, 张志鹏, 王艳秋 (2010). 高粱种质资源的多样性和利用. 植物遗传资源学报 11, 798-801.
[12]	盘道兴, 杨云, 韦继雯, 罗文, 王晓静, 钟正阳, 陈丽莎, 伏孟瑜, 李秋叶, 刘祖文, 蓬文超, 汪兴富, 黄太勇 (2018). 青贮饲料资源开发利用的研究现状. 粮食与饲料工业 (11), 52-57.
[13]	闫鸿雁, 付立中, 胡国宏, 霍福德, 栾天浩, 高敬伟 (2006). 国内外甜高粱研究现状及应用前景分析. 吉林农业科学 31, 63-65.
[14]	张园园 (2012). 高粱靶斑病菌致病机理及抗病基因分子标记定位. 博士论文. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学. pp. 3.
[15]	赵利铭, 刘树君, 宋松泉 (2008). 甜高粱再生体系的建立. 植物学通报 25, 465-468.
[16]	Adeyanju AO, Sattler SE, Rich PJ, Rivera-Burgos LA, Xu XC, Ejeta G (2021). Sorghum brown midrib19 (Bmr19) gene links lignin biosynthesis to folate metabolism. Genes (Basel). 12, 660.
[17]	Aguilar-Martínez JA, Poza-Carrión C, Cubas P (2007). Arabidopsis BRANCHED1 acts as an integrator of branching signals within axillary buds. Plant Cell 19, 458-472. DOI PMID
[18]	Bihmidine S, Julius BT, Dweikat I, Braun DM (2016). Tonoplast sugar transporters (SbTSTs) putatively control sucrose accumulation in sweet sorghum stems. Plant Signal Behav 11, e1117721.
[19]	Borrell AK, Mullet JE, George-Jaeggli B, van Oosterom EJ, Hammer GL, Klein PE, Jordan DR (2014). Drought adaptation of stay-green sorghum is associated with canopy development, leaf anatomy, root growth, and water uptake. J Exp Bot 65, 6251-6263. DOI PMID
[20]	Brenton ZW, Cooper EA, Myers MT, Boyles RE, Shakoor N, Zielinski KJ, Rauh BL, Bridges WC, Morris GP, Kresovich S (2016). A genomic resource for the development, improvement, and exploitation of sorghum for bioenergy. Genetics 204, 21-33. DOI PMID
[21]	Burks PS, Kaiser CM, Hawkins EM, Brown PJ (2015). Genome wide association for sugar yield in sweet sorghum. Crop Sci 55, 2138-2148.
[22]	Calviño M, Messing J (2012). Sweet sorghum as a model system for bioenergy crops. Curr Opin Biotechnol 23, 323-329.
[23]	Chen J, Zhu MJ, Liu RX, Zhang MJ, Lv Y, Liu YS, Xiao X, Yuan JH, Cai HW (2020). BIOMASS YIELD 1 regulates sorghum biomass and grain yield via the shikimate pathway. J Exp Bot 71, 5506-5520. DOI PMID
[24]	de Oliveira AA, Pastina MM, de Souza VF, da Costa Parrella RA, Noda RW, Simeone MLF, Schaffert RE, de Magalhães JV, Damasceno CMB, Margarido GRA, (2018). Genomic prediction applied to high-biomass sorghum for bioenergy production. Mol Breed 38, 49.
[25]	Doebley J, Stec A, Gustus C (1995). Teosinte branched1 and the origin of maize: evidence for epistasis and the evolution of dominance. Genetics 141, 333-346. DOI PMID
[26]	Du YL, Zhao Q, Chen LR, Yao XD, Zhang W, Zhang B, Xie FT (2020). Effect of drought stress on sugar metabolism in leaves and roots of soybean seedlings. Plant Physiol Biochem 146, 1-12.
[27]	Fernandes SB, Dias KOG, Ferreira DF, Brown PJ (2018). Efficiency of multi-trait, indirect, and trait-assisted genomic selection for improvement of biomass sorghum. Theor Appl Genet 131, 747-755. DOI PMID
[28]	Fujimoto M, Sazuka T, Oda Y, Kawahigashi H, Wu JZ, Takanashi H, Ohnishi T, Yoneda JI, Ishimori M, Kajiya-Kanegae H, Hibara KI, Ishizuna F, Ebine K, Ueda T, Tokunaga T, Iwata H, Matsumoto T, Kasuga S, Yonemaru JI, Tsutsumi N (2018). Transcriptional switch for programmed cell death in pith parenchyma of sorghum stems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115, E8783-E8792.
[29]	Girma G, Nida H, Seyoum A, Mekonen M, Nega A, Lule D, Dessalegn K, Bekele A, Gebreyohannes A, Adeyanju A, Tirfessa A, Ayana G, Taddese T, Mekbib F, Belete K, Tesso T, Ejeta G, Mengiste T (2019). A large-scale genome-wide association analyses of ethiopian sorghum landrace collection reveal loci associated with important traits. Front Plant Sci 10, 691. DOI PMID
[30]	Guo W, Chen LM, Herrera-Estrella L, Cao D, Tran LSP (2020). Altering plant architecture to improve performance and resistance. Trends Plant Sci 25, 1154-1170. DOI PMID
[31]	Han YC, Lv P, Hou SL, Li SY, Ji GS, Ma X, Du RH, Liu GQ (2015). Combining next generation sequencing with bulked segregant analysis to fine map a stem moisture locus in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). PLoS One 10, e0127065.
[32]	Hao HQ, Li ZG, Leng CY, Lu C, Luo H, Liu YM, Wu XY, Liu ZQ, Shang L, Jing HC (2021). Sorghum breeding in the genomic era: opportunities and challenges. Theor Appl Genet 134, 1899-1924. DOI PMID
[33]	Hayes CM, Weers BD, Thakran M, Burow G, Xin ZG, Emendack Y, Burke JJ, Rooney WL, Mullet JE (2016). Discovery of a Dhurrin QTL in sorghum: co-localization of Dhurrin biosynthesis and a novel stay-green QTL. Crop Sci 56, 104-112.
[34]	Lee S, Fu FY, Liao CJ, Mewa DB, Adeyanju A, Ejeta G, Lisch D, Mengiste T (2022). Broad-spectrum fungal resistance in sorghum is conferred through the complex regulation of an immune receptor gene embedded in a natural antisense transcript. Plant Cell 34, 1641-1665.
[35]	Lekgari AL (2010). Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci associated with bioenergy traits, and the assessment of genetic variability in sweet sorghum (Sorghum Bicolor (L.). Moench). Ph.D. thesis. Lincoln: University of Nebraska at Lincoln. pp. 58-77.
[36]	Li JQ, Tang WJ, Zhang YW, Chen KN, Wang CC, Liu YL, Zhan QW, Wang CM, Wang SB, Xie SQ, Wang LH (2018). Genome-wide association studies for five forage quality-related traits in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.). Front Plant Sci 9, 1146.
[37]	Li JQ, Wang LH, Zhan QW, Liu YL, Zhang Q, Li JF, Fan FF (2015). Mapping quantitative trait loci for five forage quality traits in a sorghum-sudangrass hybrid. Genet Mol Res 14, 13266-13273. DOI PMID
[38]	Lin ZW, Li XR, Shannon LM, Yeh CT, Wang ML, Bai GH, Peng Z, Li JR, Trick HN, Clemente TE, Doebley J, Schnable PS, Tuinstra MR, Tesso TT, White F, Yu JM (2012). Parallel domestication of the Shattering1 genes in cereals. Nat Genet 44, 720-724.
[39]	Liu YM, Wang ZH, Wu XY, Zhu JW, Luo H, Tian DM, Li CP, Luo JC, Zhao WM, Hao HQ, Jing HC (2021). SorGSD: updating and expanding the sorghum genome science database with new contents and tools. Biotechnol Biofuels 14, 165.
[40]	Luo H, Zhao WM, Wang YQ, Xia Y, Wu XY, Zhang LM, Tang BX, Zhu JW, Fang L, Du ZL, Bekele WA, Tai SS, Jordan DR, Godwin ID, Snowdon RJ, Mace ES, Luo JC, Jing HC (2016). SorGSD: a sorghum genome SNP database. Biotechnol Biofuels 9, 6.
[41]	Mathur S, Umakanth AV, Tonapi VA, Sharma R, Sharma MK (2017). Sweet sorghum as biofuel feedstock: recent advances and available resources. Biotechnol Biofuels 10, 146. DOI PMID
[42]	McKinley B, Rooney W, Wilkerson C, Mullet J (2016). Dynamics of biomass partitioning, stem gene expression, cell wall biosynthesis, and sucrose accumulation during development of Sorghum bicolor. Plant J 88, 662-680.
[43]	Morris GP, Ramu P, Deshpande SP, Hash CT, Shah T, Upadhyaya HD, Riera-Lizarazu O, Brown PJ, Acharya CB, Mitchell SE, Harriman J, Glaubitz JC, Buckler ES, Kresovich S (2013). Population genomic and genome- wide association studies of agroclimatic traits in sorghum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, 453-458.
[44]	Multani DS, Briggs SP, Chamberlin MA, Blakeslee JJ, Murphy AS, Johal GS (2003). Loss of an MDR transporter in compact stalks of maize br2 and sorghum dw3 mutants. Science 302, 81-84. DOI PMID
[45]	Murray SC, Rooney WL, Hamblin MT, Mitchell SE, Kresovich S (2009). Sweet sorghum genetic diversity and association mapping for brix and height. Plant Genome 2, 48-62.
[46]	Murray SC, Sharma A, Rooney WL, Klein PE, Mullet JE, Mitchell SE, Kresovich S (2008). Genetic improvement of sorghum as a biofuel feedstock: I. QTL for stem sugar and grain nonstructural carbohydrates. Crop Sci 48, 2165-2179.
[47]	Quinby JR, Karper RE (1954). Inheritance of height in sorg-hum. Agron J 46, 211-216.
[48]	Ribeiro MG, de Pinho Costa KA, de Souza WF, Cruvinel WS, de Silva JT, dos Santos Júnior DR (2017). Silage quality of sorghum and Urochloa brizantha cultivars monocropped or intercropped in different planting systems. Acta Sci. Anim Sci 39, 243-250.
[49]	Rice B, Lipka AE (2019). Evaluation of RR-BLUP genomic selection models that incorporate peak genome-wide association study signals in maize and sorghum. Plant Genome 12, 180052.
[50]	Ritter KB, Jordan DR, Chapman SC, Godwin ID, Mace ES, McIntyre CL (2008). Identification of QTL for sugar- related traits in a sweet × grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) recombinant inbred population. Mol Breed 22, 367-384.
[51]	Ritter KB, McIntyre CL, Godwin ID, Jordan DR, Chapman SC (2007). An assessment of the genetic relationship between sweet and grain sorghums, within Sorghum bicolor ssp. bicolor (L.) Moench, using AFLP markers. Euphytica 157, 161-176.
[52]	Salas Fernandez MG, Becraft PW, Yin YH, Lübberstedt T (2009). From dwarves to giants? Plant height manipulation for biomass yield. Trends Plant Sci 14, 454-461. DOI PMID
[53]	Sattler SE, Saballos A, Xin ZG, Funnell-Harris DL, Vermerris W, Pedersen JF (2014). Characterization of novel sorghum brown midrib mutants from an EMS-mutagenized population. G3 (Bethesda) 4, 2115-2124.
[54]	Savary S, Willocquet L, Pethybridge SJ, Esker P, McRoberts N, Nelson A (2019). The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops. Nat Ecol Evol 3, 430-439. DOI PMID
[55]	Shen JJ, Zhang YQ, Ge DF, Wang ZY, Song WY, Gu R, Che G, Cheng ZH, Liu RY, Zhang XL (2019). CsBRC1 inhibits axillary bud outgrowth by directly repressing the auxin efflux carrier CsPIN3 in cucumber. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116, 17105-17114.
[56]	Shiringani AL, Friedt W (2011). QTL for fibre-related traits in grain × sweet sorghum as a tool for the enhancement of sorghum as a biomass crop. Theor Appl Genet 123, 999-1011. DOI PMID
[57]	Shiringani AL, Frisch M, Friedt W (2010). Genetic mapping of QTLs for sugar-related traits in a RIL population of Sorghum bicolor L. Moench. Theor Appl Genet 121, 323-336. DOI PMID
[58]	Song YS, Li SM, Sui Y, Zheng HX, Han GL, Sun X, Yang WJ, Wang HL, Zhuang KY, Kong FY, Meng QW, Sui N (2022). SbbHLH85, a bHLH member, modulates resilience to salt stress by regulating root hair growth in sorghum. Theor Appl Genet 135, 201-216.
[59]	Su M, Li XF, Ma XY, Peng XJ, Zhao AG, Cheng LQ, Chen SY, Liu GS (2011). Cloning two P5CS genes from bioenergy sorghum and their expression profiles under abiotic stresses and MeJA treatment. Plant Sci 181, 652-659.
[60]	Sui N, Yang Z, Liu ML, Wang BS (2015). Identification and transcriptomic profiling of genes involved in increasing sugar content during salt stress in sweet sorghum leaves. BMC Genomics 16, 534. DOI PMID
[61]	Tao YF, Luo H, Xu JB, Cruickshank A, Zhao XR, Teng F, Hathorn A, Wu XY, Liu YM, Shatte T, Jordan D, Jing HC, Mace E (2021). Extensive variation within the pan- genome of cultivated and wild sorghum. Nat Plants 7, 766-773.
[62]	Tovignan TK, Adoukonou-Sagbadja H, Diatta C, Clément-Vidal A, Soutiras A, Cisse N, Luquet D (2020). Terminal drought effect on sugar partitioning and metabolism is modulated by leaf stay-green and panicle size in the stem of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). CABI Agric Biosci 1, 4.
[63]	Wallace JG, Rodgers-Melnick E, Buckler ES (2018). On the road to Breeding 4.0: unraveling the good, the bad, and the boring of crop quantitative genomics. Annu Rev Genet 52, 421-444. DOI PMID
[64]	Wang B, Smith SM, Li JY (2018). Genetic regulation of shoot architecture. Annu Rev Plant Biol 69, 437-468. DOI PMID
[65]	Wang LX, Lui ACW, Lam PY, Liu GQ, Godwin ID, Lo C (2020). Transgenic expression of flavanone 3-hydroxylase redirects flavonoid biosynthesis and alleviates anthracnose susceptibility in sorghum. Plant Biotechnol J 18, 2170-2172.
[66]	Wang TT, Ren ZJ, Liu ZQ, Feng X, Guo RQ, Li BG, Li LG, Jing HC (2014). SbHKT1;4, a member of the high-affinity potassium transporter gene family from Sorghum bicolor, functions to maintain optimal Na⁺/K⁺ balance under Na⁺ stress. J Integr Plant Biol 56, 315-332.
[67]	Watanabe K, Guo W, Arai K, Takanashi H, Kajiya-Kanegae H, Kobayashi M, Yano K, Tokunaga T, Fujiwara T, Tsutsumi N, Iwata H (2017). High-throughput phenotyping of sorghum plant height using an unmanned aerial vehicle and its application to genomic prediction modeling. Front Plant Sci 8, 421. DOI PMID
[68]	Wei XC, Liu LL, Lu CX, Yuan F, Han GL, Wang BS (2021). SbCASP4 improves salt exclusion by enhancing the root apoplastic barrier. Planta 254, 81.
[69]	Wu XY, Liu YM, Luo H, Shang L, Leng CY, Liu ZQ, Li ZG, Lu XC, Cai HW, Hao HQ, Jing HC (2022). Genomic footprints of sorghum domestication and breeding selection for multiple end uses. Mol Plant 15, 537-551.
[70]	Wu YY, Li XR, Xiang WW, Zhu CS, Lin ZW, Wu Y, Li JR, Pandravada S, Ridder DD, Bai GH, Wang ML, Trick HN, Bean SR, Tuinstra MR, Tesso TT, Yu JM (2012). Presence of tannins in sorghum grains is conditioned by different natural alleles of Tannin1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, 10281-10286.
[71]	Xie P, Shi JY, Tang SY, Chen CX, Khan A, Zhang FX, Xiong Y, Li C, He W, Wang GD, Lei FM, Wu YR, Xie Q (2019). Control of bird feeding behavior by Tannin1 through modulating the biosynthesis of polyphenols and fatty acid-derived volatiles in sorghum. Mol Plant 12, 1315-1324.
[72]	Xie P, Tang SY, Chen CX, Zhang HL, Yu FF, Li C, Wei HM, Sui Y, Wu CY, Diao XM, Wu YR, Xie Q (2022). Natural variation in Glume Coverage 1 causes naked grains in sorghum. Nat Commun 13, 1068.
[73]	Xu WW, Subudhi PK, Crasta OR, Rosenow DT, Mullet JE, Nguyen HT (2000). Molecular mapping of QTLs conferring stay-green in grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). Genome 43, 461-469. PMID
[74]	Xu YB, Liu XG, Fu JJ, Wang HW, Wang JK, Huang CG, Prasanna BM, Olsen MS, Wang GY, Zhang AM (2020). Enhancing genetic gain through genomic selection: from livestock to plants. Plant Commun 1, 2590-3462.
[75]	Yang Z, Zheng HX, Wei XC, Song J, Wang BS, Sui N (2018). Transcriptome analysis of sweet sorghum inbred lines differing in salt tolerance provides novel insights into salt exclusion by roots. Plant Soil 430, 423-439.
[76]	Yu H, Lin T, Meng XB, Du HL, Zhang JK, Liu GF, Chen MJ, Jing YH, Kou LQ, Li XX, Gao Q, Liang Y, Liu XD, Fan ZL, Liang YT, Cheng ZK, Chen MS, Tian ZX, Wang YH, Chu CC, Zuo JR, Wan JM, Qian Q, Han B, Zuccolo A, Wing RA, Gao CX, Liang CZ, Li JY (2021). A route to de novo domestication of wild allotetraploid rice. Cell 184, 1156-1170.
[77]	Yu XQ, Li XR, Guo TT, Zhu CS, Wu YY, Mitchell SE, Roozeboom KL, Wang DH, Wang ML, Pederson GA, Tesso TT, Schnable PS, Bernardo R, Yu JM (2016). Genomic prediction contributing to a promising global strategy to turbocharge gene banks. Nat Plants 2, 16150. DOI PMID
[78]	Zhang D, Tang SY, Xie P, Yang DK, Wu YR, Cheng SJ, Du K, Xin PY, Chu JF, Yu FF, Xie Q (2022). Creation of fragrant sorghum by CRISPR/Cas9. J Integr Plant Biol 64, 961-964. DOI
[79]	Zhang LM, Leng CY, Luo H, Wu XY, Liu ZQ, Zhang YM, Zhang H, Xia Y, Shang L, Liu CM, Hao DY, Zhou YH, Chu CC, Cai HW, Jing HC (2018). Sweet sorghum originated through selection of Dry, a plant-specific NAC transcription factor gene. Plant Cell 30, 2286-2307.
[80]	Zhao J, Mantilla Perez MB, Hu JY, Salas Fernandez MG (2016). Genome-wide association study for nine plant architecture traits in sorghum. Plant Genome 9, 1-14.
[81]	Zheng LY, Guo XS, He B, Sun LJ, Peng Y, Dong SS, Liu TF, Jiang SY, Ramachandran S, Liu CM, Jing HC (2011). Genome-wide patterns of genetic variation in sweet and grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Genome Biol 12, R114.

甜高粱育种研究进展及未来展望

Research Progress and Future Perspective of Sweet Sorghum Breeding

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 2

参考文献 81

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	方妍力, 田传玉, 苏如意, 刘亚培, 王春连, 陈析丰, 郭威, 纪志远. 水稻抗细菌性条斑病基因的挖掘与初定位[J]. 植物学报, 2024, 59(1): 0-0.
[2]	曾小宁, 王鹏行, 张梦帆, 苏静, 史志远, 高福玲, 李家美. 河南省野生木本植物名录[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(6): 22306-.
[3]	严语萍, 俞晓琦, 任德勇, 钱前. 水稻穗粒数遗传机制与育种利用[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(3): 359-372.
[4]	王琪, 吴允哲, 刘学英, 孙丽莉, 廖红, 傅向东. 类受体激酶调控水稻生长发育和环境适应研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(2): 199-213.
[5]	林克剑, 刘志鹏, 罗栋, 武自念. 饲草种质资源研究现状、存在问题与发展建议[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(2): 241-247.
[6]	邓娴, 李彤, 曹晓风. 基因编辑在饲草育种中的应用与展望[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(2): 233-240.
[7]	武晶, 汤沙, 王红霞, 常金华, 刘长友, 张凯旋, 刘永辉, 王彦楠, 韩渊怀, 刁现民. 我国杂粮种质资源创新研究: 现状与展望[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(1): 6-21.
[8]	李园, 常玉洁, 王兰芬, 王述民, 武晶. 普通菜豆镰孢菌枯萎病抗性种质资源筛选及全基因组关联分析[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(1): 51-61.
[9]	景海春, 王台, 林荣呈, 曹晓风, 种康. 加强饲草基础生物学研究，保障饲草种业与国家大粮食安全[J]. 植物学报, 2022, 57(6): 719-724.
[10]	侯新村, 滕珂, 郭强, 赵春桥, 高康, 岳跃森, 范希峰. 狼尾草属牧草研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2022, 57(6): 814-825.
[11]	洪军, 苏红田. 我国牧草种质资源保护工作进展与发展思路[J]. 植物学报, 2022, 57(6): 725-731.
[12]	王甜甜, 曹丽雯, 刘智全, 杨庆山, 陈良, 陈敏, 景海春. 黄河三角洲滨海草带建设的饲草基础生物学问题[J]. 植物学报, 2022, 57(6): 837-847.
[13]	王娜, 姜腾, 王彬锡, 牛丽芳, 林浩. 单倍体育种技术研究进展及其在苜蓿等豆科牧草中的应用[J]. 植物学报, 2022, 57(6): 756-763.
[14]	曹丽雯, 卢蕊, 范吉标, 胡龙兴, 陈良. 新型饲草开发利用的基础生物学问题[J]. 植物学报, 2022, 57(6): 826-836.
[15]	李宏伟, 郑琪, 李滨, 李振声. 长穗偃麦草分子育种基础研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2022, 57(6): 792-801.