万寿菊再生体系的建立及优化

doi:10.11983/CBB20062

植物学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (6): 749-759.DOI: 10.11983/CBB20062

万寿菊再生体系的建立及优化

王亚琴¹^,², 韦陆丹¹, 王文静¹, 刘宝骏¹, 张春玲¹, 张俊卫¹, 何燕红¹^,^*()

¹华中农业大学园艺林学学院, 园艺植物生物学教育部重点实验室, 武汉 430070
²武汉市汉阳市政建设集团有限公司, 武汉 430050

收稿日期:2020-04-16 接受日期:2020-08-26 出版日期:2020-11-01 发布日期:2020-11-11
通讯作者: 何燕红
作者简介:*E-mail: hyh2010@mail.hzau.edu.cn
基金资助:
中央高校基本科研业务费专项(2662019PY072);国家自然科学基金(31672181)

The Establishment and Optimization of a Regeneration System for Marigold (Tagetes erecta)

Yaqin Wang¹^,², Ludan Wei¹, Wenjing Wang¹, Baojun Liu¹, Chunling Zhang¹, Junwei Zhang¹, Yanhong He¹^,^*()

¹Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology, Ministry of Education, College of Horticulture and Forestry Sciences, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
²Wuhan Hanyang Municipal Construction Group Co, Ltd, Wuhan 430050, China

Received:2020-04-16 Accepted:2020-08-26 Online:2020-11-01 Published:2020-11-11
Contact: Yanhong He

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以40个不同基因型万寿菊(Tagetes erecta)叶片为外植体, 在相同条件下诱导不定芽分化, 获得最佳再生基因型; 然后分析不同激素组合、外植体切口方式、固化剂及蔗糖对万寿菊再生和玻璃化影响; 最后对不同类型的伸长培养基进行探索。结果表明, 最佳再生基因型为里程碑·黄色; 最佳再生培养基为MS+0.2 mg·L^‒1 TDZ+0.5 mg·L^‒1 IBA+8 g·L^‒1琼脂+40 g·L^‒1蔗糖, 再生率达70%, 玻璃化率降低至16%; 最适再生的小叶部位为全小叶; 最适伸长培养基为MS+8 g·L^‒1琼脂+30 g·L^‒1蔗糖, 伸长率达91.3%。该研究建立了高效稳定的万寿菊再生体系, 解决了万寿菊再生过程中严重的玻璃化问题, 可为万寿菊的遗传改良和基因功能研究奠定基础。

关键词: 万寿菊, 再生, 基因型, 玻璃化

Abstract:

In this study, marigold (Tagetes erecta) leaves of 40 different genotypes were used as explants to induce adventitious buds formation to select the best regenerating genotype. In addition, main factors impacting the selected genotype’s regeneration and vitrification were analyzed, including hormone combinations, the way of explant incision, curing agent and sucrose, etc. Finally, different types of elongation medium were explored. The best regenerated genotype was marigold Milestone·Yellow. The best regeneration medium was MS media supplied with 0.2 mg·L^‒1 TDZ, 0.5 mg·L^‒1 IBA, 8 g·L^‒1 agar, and 40 g·L^‒1 sucrose, in which the regeneration rate was 70% and the vitrification rate was reduced to 16%. Whole leaflet was the most suitable explant among different leaflet segments; the best performing elongation medium was MS media supplied with 8 g·L^‒1 agar and 30 g·L^‒1 sucrose, and the elongation rate was 91.3%. This study establishes an efficient and stable regeneration system of marigold, and solved the serious vitrification problem commonly found during regeneration. It laid a foundation for marigold genetic improvement and gene function research.

Key words: marigold (Tagetes erecta), regeneration, genotype, vitrification

王亚琴, 韦陆丹, 王文静, 刘宝骏, 张春玲, 张俊卫, 何燕红. 万寿菊再生体系的建立及优化. 植物学报, 2020, 55(6): 749-759.

Yaqin Wang, Ludan Wei, Wenjing Wang, Baojun Liu, Chunling Zhang, Junwei Zhang, Yanhong He. The Establishment and Optimization of a Regeneration System for Marigold (Tagetes erecta). Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2020, 55(6): 749-759.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.chinbullbotany.com/CN/10.11983/CBB20062

https://www.chinbullbotany.com/CN/Y2020/V55/I6/749

图/表 9

参考文献 28

[1]	陈兵先, 黄宝灵, 吕成群, 杨来安, 陈文军, 任苓, 王劲松 (2011). 植物组织培养试管苗玻璃化现象研究进展. 林业工程学报 25, 1-5.
[2]	陈思, 张君, 黄洲, 饶微微, 薛施施, 庞基良 (2016). 非洲冰草快速繁殖及试管苗玻璃化的影响因子. 植物生理学报 52, 1491-1497.
[3]	侯文胜, 郭三堆, 路明 (2002). 利用转基因技术进行植物遗传改良. 生物技术通报 (1), 10-15.
[4]	黄烈健, 王鸿 (2016). 林木植物组织培养及存在问题的研究进展. 林业科学研究 29, 464-471.
[5]	姜福星, 黄远祥, 周鹏, 孙晓兰, 赵婕, 文好雨, 陈其兵 (2018). 植物叶片再生的探究. 分子植物育种 16, 6832-6839.
[6]	李娜, 陶承光, 王平, 吴志刚, 张玉静 (2013). 色素万寿菊试管苗玻璃化现象及防止研究. 北方园艺 (4), 108-110.
[7]	刘莉, 钱琼秋, 张忠炎 (2004). 不同植物生长调节剂对莴苣愈伤组织的诱导与植株再生的影响. 浙江农业科学 (4), 173-174.
[8]	齐迎春, 叶要妹, 刘国锋, 包满珠 (2005). 不同基因型孔雀草高效植株再生体系的建立. 中国农业科学 38, 1414-1417.
[9]	孙庆春, 郑成淑, 丰震 (2009). 菊花玻璃化苗与正常苗的生理特性比较. 山东农业科学 (5), 45-47.
[10]	吴丽芳, 田雪莲, 魏晓梅, 路小春, 钱绍方, 桂宝林 (2020). 色素万寿菊试管苗玻璃化控制的研究. 热带作物学报 41, 110-115
[11]	谢启鑫, 黄美连, 吴晓萍, 庄东红 (2008). 君迁子叶片培养再生植株的研究. 中国农业科学 41, 607-612.
[12]	张德双, 金同铭, 徐家炳, 赵岫云 (2000). 几种主要营养成分在大白菜不同叶片及部位中的分布规律. 华北农学报 15, 108-111. DOI URL
[13]	张红, 王万新 (2008). 香石竹组培中的玻璃化现象及防止. 北方园艺 (8), 196-197.
[14]	张志扬, 陈信波, 张瑜, 龙松华, 高原, 刘爱玲 (2007). 亚麻组织培养高频不定芽诱导体系. 植物学通报 24, 629-635.
[15]	赵鹏雪 (2018). 万寿菊类胡萝卜素合成途径关键基因PSY和CCS的克隆及其再生体系的建立. 硕士论文. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院. pp. 39-42.
[16]	赵鑫闻, 梁德军 (2017). 甜杨离体再生中玻璃化苗的发生与预防. 中国农学通报 33, 71-75.
[17]	赵子刚, 曾丽, 唐克轩, 季春娟, 孙佳, 杨帆 (2010). 色素万寿菊叶片再生体系的建立及优化. 园艺学报 37, 655-660.
[18]	Bespalhok JCF, Hattori K (1998). Friable embryogenic callus and somatic embryo formation from cotyledon explants of African marigold (Tagetes erecta L.). Plant Cell Rep 17, 870-875. DOI URL PMID
[19]	Bosma TL, Dole JM, Maness NO (2003). Optimizing marigold ( Tagetes erecta L.) petal and pigment yield. Crop Sci 43, 2118-2124. DOI URL
[20]	Espinoza PEV, Benítez-García I, Peralta AL, Paredes- López O, Del Villar-Martínez AA (2017). Somatic embryogenesis from leaf explants of Tagetes erecta L. Plant Biotechnol 34, 187-192. DOI URL
[21]	Gupta V, Rahman LU (2015). An efficient plant regeneration and Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of Tagetes erecta. Protoplasma 252, 1061-1070. DOI URL PMID
[22]	Kataeva NV, Alexandrova IG, Butenko RG, Dragavtceva EV (1991). Effect of applied and internal hormones on vitrification and apical necrosis of different plants cultured in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 27, 149-154. DOI URL
[23]	Kumar KR, Singh KP, Jain PK, Raju DVS, Kumar P, Bhatia R, Panwar S (2018). Influence of growth regulators on callus induction and plant regeneration from anthers of Tagetes spp. Indian J Agric Sci 88, 970-977.
[24]	Kumar KR, Singh KP, Raju DVS, Bhatia R, Panwar S (2019). Influence of genotypes, growth regulators and basal media on direct differentiation of shoot buds from leaf segments of marigold ( Tagetes spp.). Indian J Exp Biol 57, 30-39.
[25]	Nuoendagula, Narushima M, Uesugi M, Murai Y, Katayama Y, Iimura Y, Kajita S (2017). In vitro regeneration and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of male-sterile marigold (Tagetes erecta L.). Plant Biotechnol 34, 125-129. DOI URL
[26]	Pal SL (2019). Role of plant growth regulators in floriculture: an overview. J Pharmacogn Phytochem 8, 789-796.
[27]	Vanegas PE, Cruz-hernández A, Valverde ME, Paredes- López O (2002). Plant regeneration via organogenesis in marigold. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 69, 279-283. DOI URL
[28]	Vasudevan P, Kashyap S, Sharma S (1997). Tagetes: a multipurpose plant. Bioresour Technol 62, 29-35. DOI URL

No.	Genotype	Phenotype		Regeneration rate (%)		Source	Regeneration type
1	Perfect·Golden	Short-height plant, yellow-oran- ge color, double petal		54.21±12.11 a		Chunhe Gardening (F₁)	Easy
2	Milestone·Yellow	Short-height plant, yellow color, double petal		51.44±8.29 ab		Sainuo Gardening (F₁)	Easy
3	Proud·Orange-yellow	Short-height plant, yellow-oran- ge color, double petal		41.47±6.12 abc		Dannuo Gardening (F₁)	Moderate
4	Chrysanthemum marigold·Orange	Short-height plant, orange color, double petal		36.23±11.95 abcd		Huaxianzi Gardening (F₁)	Moderate
5	Xunlei·Yellow	Short-height plant, yellow color, double petal		33.48±13.73 abcde		Chunhe Gardening (F₁)	Moderate
6	Galore·Yellow	Medium-height plant, yellow co- lor, double petal		31.95±18.22 abcdef		Hongyue Gardening (F₁)	Moderate
7	Proud·Golden	Short-height plant, yellow-oran- ge color, double petal		30.50±10.33 abcdef		Dannuo Gardening (F₁)	Moderate
8	Double marigold· Light beige	Medium-height plant, yellow color, double petal		22.01±14.56 bcdefg		Jinqiu Gardening (F₁)	Difficult
9	DC	Short-height plant, orange color, double petal		21.33±13.66 cdefgh		Self breeding (inbred line) *	Difficult
10	Youyi·Yellow	Short-height plant, yellow color, double petal		18.00±1.83 cdefgh		Chunhe Gardening (F₁)	Difficult
11	Miracle·Yellow	Short-height plant, yellow color, double petal		13.29±9.62 cdefghi		Huaxianzi Gardening (F₁)	Difficult
12	Old Inka·Orange	Medium-height plant, orange co- lor, double petal		13.24±10.50 defghij		Hongyue Gardening (F₁)	Difficult
13	Liberty·Yellow	Short-height plant, yellow color, double petal		12.95±8.82 defghij		Huaxianzi Gardening (F₁)	Difficult
14	6210	Medium-height plant, yellow-oran- ge color, double petal		10.00±11.08 fghij		Self breeding (inbred line) *	Difficult
15	F8	Medium-height plant, orange co- lor, simple petal		9.33±5.96 efghij		Self breeding (inbred line) *	Difficult
No.	Genotype		Phenotype		Regeneration rate (%)	Source	Regeneration type
16	Fengsheng·Orange		Short-height plant, yellow-orange color, double petal		7.11±7.70 ghij	Shijie seed (F₁)	Difficult
17	AJ		Short-height plant, yellow-orange color, double petal		7.02±13.41 ghij	Self breeding (inbred line) *	Difficult
18	Inka·Orange-yellow		Short-height plant, yellow-orange color, double petal		5.11±7.87 ghij	Chunhe Gardening (F₁)	Difficult
19	S3		Medium-height plant, yellow color, simple petal		4.92±2.75 ghij	Self breeding (inbred line) *	Difficult
20	S12		Short-height plant, yellow color, simple petal		4.67±10.43 hij	Self breeding (inbred line) *	Difficult
21	S5		Short-height plant, yellow-orange color, simple petal		4.67±5.06 ghij	Self breeding (inbred line) *	Difficult
22	SW2		Medium-height plant, yellow color, double petal		4.67±10.43 hij	Self breeding (inbred line) *	Difficult
23	Hawaii		Medium-height plant, yellow-oran- ge color, double petal		4.22±5.87 ghij	Thailand (F₁)	Difficult
24	6170		Medium-height plant, yellow-oran- ge color, double petal		2.89±1.62 ghij	Self breeding (inbred line) *	Difficult
25	Jindun·Yellow		Short-height plant, yellow color, double petal		2.71±4.36 hij	Sainuo Gardening (F₁)	Difficult
26	GFR		Medium-height plant, orange color, double petal		1.92±1.75 hij	Self breeding (inbred line) *	Difficult
27	DH		Short-height plant, yellow color, double petal		1.33±1.83 ij	Self breeding (inbred line) *	Difficult
28	Vanilla		Medium-height plant, yellow-w- hite color, double petal		0.91±2.03 ij	Thailand (F₁)	Unable
29	Double Chrysanthe- mum marigold·Orange		Short-height plant, yellow-oran- ge color, double petal		0.71±1.60 ij	Jinqiu Gardening (F₁)	Unable
30	6155		Medium-height plant, yellow color, double petal		0.00±0.00 j	Self breeding (inbred line) *	Unable
31	9905		Medium-height plant, yellow-oran- ge color, double petal		0.00±0.00 j	Self breeding (inbred line) *	Unable
32	Antigua·Orange		Short-height plant, yellow-orange color, double petal		0.00±0.00 j	Huaxianzi Gardening (F₁)	Unable
33	Discovery·Orange		Short-height plant, orange color, double petal		0.00±0.00 j	Sainuo Gardening (F₁)	Unable
34	Double cut flower marigold·Lemon		Tall-height plant, yellow color, double petal		0.00±0.00 j	Jinqiu Gardening (F₁)	Unable
35	Double marigold·Golden		Medium-height plant, yellow color, double petal		0.00±0.00 j	Jinqiu Gardening (F₁)	Unable
36	Marigold·Deep orange		Tall-height plant, orange color, double petal		0.00±0.00 j	Jinqiu Gardening (F₁)	Unable
37	MB		Short-height plant, yellow color, double petal		0.00±0.00 j	Self breeding (inbred line) *	Unable
38	New Fengsheng·Yellow		Short-height plant, yellow color, double petal		0.00±0.00 j	Sainuo Gardening (F₁)	Unable
39	S13		Medium-height plant, yellow color, double petal		0.00±0.00 j	Self breeding (inbred line) *	Unable
40	Yingtai·Golden		Medium-height plant, yellow color, double petal		0.00±0.00 j	Shijie seed (F₁)	Unable

No.	Genotype	Phenotype		Regeneration rate (%)		Source	Regeneration type
1	Perfect·Golden	Short-height plant, yellow-oran- ge color, double petal		54.21±12.11 a		Chunhe Gardening (F₁)	Easy
2	Milestone·Yellow	Short-height plant, yellow color, double petal		51.44±8.29 ab		Sainuo Gardening (F₁)	Easy
3	Proud·Orange-yellow	Short-height plant, yellow-oran- ge color, double petal		41.47±6.12 abc		Dannuo Gardening (F₁)	Moderate
4	Chrysanthemum marigold·Orange	Short-height plant, orange color, double petal		36.23±11.95 abcd		Huaxianzi Gardening (F₁)	Moderate
5	Xunlei·Yellow	Short-height plant, yellow color, double petal		33.48±13.73 abcde		Chunhe Gardening (F₁)	Moderate
6	Galore·Yellow	Medium-height plant, yellow co- lor, double petal		31.95±18.22 abcdef		Hongyue Gardening (F₁)	Moderate
7	Proud·Golden	Short-height plant, yellow-oran- ge color, double petal		30.50±10.33 abcdef		Dannuo Gardening (F₁)	Moderate
8	Double marigold· Light beige	Medium-height plant, yellow color, double petal		22.01±14.56 bcdefg		Jinqiu Gardening (F₁)	Difficult
9	DC	Short-height plant, orange color, double petal		21.33±13.66 cdefgh		Self breeding (inbred line) *	Difficult
10	Youyi·Yellow	Short-height plant, yellow color, double petal		18.00±1.83 cdefgh		Chunhe Gardening (F₁)	Difficult
11	Miracle·Yellow	Short-height plant, yellow color, double petal		13.29±9.62 cdefghi		Huaxianzi Gardening (F₁)	Difficult
12	Old Inka·Orange	Medium-height plant, orange co- lor, double petal		13.24±10.50 defghij		Hongyue Gardening (F₁)	Difficult
13	Liberty·Yellow	Short-height plant, yellow color, double petal		12.95±8.82 defghij		Huaxianzi Gardening (F₁)	Difficult
14	6210	Medium-height plant, yellow-oran- ge color, double petal		10.00±11.08 fghij		Self breeding (inbred line) *	Difficult
15	F8	Medium-height plant, orange co- lor, simple petal		9.33±5.96 efghij		Self breeding (inbred line) *	Difficult
No.	Genotype		Phenotype		Regeneration rate (%)	Source	Regeneration type
16	Fengsheng·Orange		Short-height plant, yellow-orange color, double petal		7.11±7.70 ghij	Shijie seed (F₁)	Difficult
17	AJ		Short-height plant, yellow-orange color, double petal		7.02±13.41 ghij	Self breeding (inbred line) *	Difficult
18	Inka·Orange-yellow		Short-height plant, yellow-orange color, double petal		5.11±7.87 ghij	Chunhe Gardening (F₁)	Difficult
19	S3		Medium-height plant, yellow color, simple petal		4.92±2.75 ghij	Self breeding (inbred line) *	Difficult
20	S12		Short-height plant, yellow color, simple petal		4.67±10.43 hij	Self breeding (inbred line) *	Difficult
21	S5		Short-height plant, yellow-orange color, simple petal		4.67±5.06 ghij	Self breeding (inbred line) *	Difficult
22	SW2		Medium-height plant, yellow color, double petal		4.67±10.43 hij	Self breeding (inbred line) *	Difficult
23	Hawaii		Medium-height plant, yellow-oran- ge color, double petal		4.22±5.87 ghij	Thailand (F₁)	Difficult
24	6170		Medium-height plant, yellow-oran- ge color, double petal		2.89±1.62 ghij	Self breeding (inbred line) *	Difficult
25	Jindun·Yellow		Short-height plant, yellow color, double petal		2.71±4.36 hij	Sainuo Gardening (F₁)	Difficult
26	GFR		Medium-height plant, orange color, double petal		1.92±1.75 hij	Self breeding (inbred line) *	Difficult
27	DH		Short-height plant, yellow color, double petal		1.33±1.83 ij	Self breeding (inbred line) *	Difficult
28	Vanilla		Medium-height plant, yellow-w- hite color, double petal		0.91±2.03 ij	Thailand (F₁)	Unable
29	Double Chrysanthe- mum marigold·Orange		Short-height plant, yellow-oran- ge color, double petal		0.71±1.60 ij	Jinqiu Gardening (F₁)	Unable
30	6155		Medium-height plant, yellow color, double petal		0.00±0.00 j	Self breeding (inbred line) *	Unable
31	9905		Medium-height plant, yellow-oran- ge color, double petal		0.00±0.00 j	Self breeding (inbred line) *	Unable
32	Antigua·Orange		Short-height plant, yellow-orange color, double petal		0.00±0.00 j	Huaxianzi Gardening (F₁)	Unable
33	Discovery·Orange		Short-height plant, orange color, double petal		0.00±0.00 j	Sainuo Gardening (F₁)	Unable
34	Double cut flower marigold·Lemon		Tall-height plant, yellow color, double petal		0.00±0.00 j	Jinqiu Gardening (F₁)	Unable
35	Double marigold·Golden		Medium-height plant, yellow color, double petal		0.00±0.00 j	Jinqiu Gardening (F₁)	Unable
36	Marigold·Deep orange		Tall-height plant, orange color, double petal		0.00±0.00 j	Jinqiu Gardening (F₁)	Unable
37	MB		Short-height plant, yellow color, double petal		0.00±0.00 j	Self breeding (inbred line) *	Unable
38	New Fengsheng·Yellow		Short-height plant, yellow color, double petal		0.00±0.00 j	Sainuo Gardening (F₁)	Unable
39	S13		Medium-height plant, yellow color, double petal		0.00±0.00 j	Self breeding (inbred line) *	Unable
40	Yingtai·Golden		Medium-height plant, yellow color, double petal		0.00±0.00 j	Shijie seed (F₁)	Unable

No.	6-BA (mg?L^-1)	IAA (mg?L^-1)	Regeneration rate (%)
1	3	1.0	37.50±15.00 b
2	3	1.5	40.00±14.14 b
3	3	1.8	35.00±5.77 b
4	3	2.0	52.50±5.00 ab
5	3	2.5	47.50±17.08 ab
6	3	3.0	65.00±12.91 a

No.	6-BA (mg?L^-1)	IAA (mg?L^-1)	Regeneration rate (%)
1	3	1.0	37.50±15.00 b
2	3	1.5	40.00±14.14 b
3	3	1.8	35.00±5.77 b
4	3	2.0	52.50±5.00 ab
5	3	2.5	47.50±17.08 ab
6	3	3.0	65.00±12.91 a

No.	ZT (mg?L^-1)	IAA (mg?L^-1)	Regeneration rate (%)
1	0.3	0.5	37.50±9.57 bc
2	0.3	1.0	35.00±10.00 bc
3	0.3	2.0	22.50±12.58 c
4	0.6	0.5	67.50±9.57 a
5	0.6	1.0	40.00±8.16 bc
6	0.6	2.0	55.00±10.00 ab
7	1.8	0.5	52.50±15.00 ab
8	1.8	1.0	55.00±19.15 ab
9	1.8	2.0	27.50±22.17 c

万寿菊再生体系的建立及优化

The Establishment and Optimization of a Regeneration System for Marigold (Tagetes erecta)

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 28

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

No.	TDZ (mg?L^-1)	IBA (mg?L^-1)	Regeneration rate (%)
1	0.5	0.3	62.50±12.58 ab
2	0.5	0.5	55.00±17.32 ab
3	0.5	1.0	67.50±15.00 a
4	1.0	0.3	40.00±14.14 bcd
5	1.0	0.5	57.50±20.62 ab
6	1.0	1.0	47.50±9.57 abcd
7	1.5	0.3	32.50±12.58 cd
8	1.5	0.5	52.50±9.57 abc
9	1.5	1.0	27.50±9.57 d

No.	TDZ (mg?L^-1)	IBA (mg?L^-1)	Regeneration rate (%)
1	0.1	0.25	22.50±15.00 c
2	0.1	0.50	40.00±8.16 ab
3	0.2	0.25	35.00±12.91 ab
4	0.2	0.50	62.50±12.58 a
5	0.3	0.25	35.00±12.91 ab
6	0.3	0.50	47.50±12.58 ab
7	0.4	0.25	35.00±12.91 ab
8	0.4	0.50	32.50±17.08 ab

Code	Treatment	Explant No.	Elongation rate (%)	Status
MS1	No hormone	46	91.30	Strong; elongate 4-5 cm
MS2	0.1 mg·L^?1 TDZ; chang to 0.01 mg·L^?1 TDZ after 15 days	60	65.00	Healthy; elongate 3-4 cm
MS3	0.3 mg·L^?1 6-BA+1.0 mg·L^?1 NAA	53	30.19	Weak; elongate 0-2 cm
MS4	0.6 mg·L^?1 6-BA+1.0 mg·L^?1 NAA	55	18.18	Weak; elongate 0-1 cm
MS5	0.9 mg·L^?1 6-BA+1.0 mg·L^?1 NAA	57	12.28	Weak; elongate 0-1 cm
MS6	0.2 mg·L^?1 6-BA+0.6 mg·L^?1 NAA	45	33.33	Weak; elongate 0-2 cm

Leaflet segment	Regeneration rate (%)	Status
Whole leaflet	66.67±11.55 a	Callus and buds differentiated at the incision
Basal segment	63.49±8.64 a	Callus were differentiated at both end incisions, but only adventitious buds were differentiated in basal wound
Top segment	29.84±11.75 b	Callus and buds differentiated at the incision

[1]	逯锦春, 曹丽娜, 佟冠杰, 王鑫颖, 张利英, 喻锌, 李荟芳, 李彦慧. 大花银莲花愈伤组织诱导及再生体系的建立[J]. 植物学报, 2022, 57(2): 217-226.
[2]	赵青平, 梁雨萍, 周方园, 赵翔. 植物幼苗玻璃化发生机制研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2022, 57(1): 90-97.
[3]	李孟悦, 刘柳, 刘艳, 张晓曼. 毛报春(Primula × pubescens)腋芽再生组织培养体系的建立[J]. 植物学报, 2021, 56(6): 732-739.
[4]	熊雅倩, 邓显豹, 张会会, 杨东, 孙恒, 刘娟, 杨美. 莲的离体快速繁殖技术[J]. 植物学报, 2021, 56(5): 605-613.
[5]	李艳敏, 蒋卉, 符真珠, 张晶, 袁欣, 王慧娟, 高杰, 董晓宇, 王利民, 张和臣. 芍药花药愈伤组织诱导及体细胞胚发生[J]. 植物学报, 2021, 56(4): 443-450.
[6]	罗钱, 张燕莎, 欧静. 郁金樱愈伤组织诱导及植株再生[J]. 植物学报, 2021, 56(4): 451-461.
[7]	夏正俊, 李玉卓, 朱金龙, 吴红艳, 徐坤, 翟红. 快速、无损大豆种子连续取样技术及其DNA制备[J]. 植物学报, 2021, 56(1): 56-61.
[8]	秦天姿, 任安芝, 樊晓雯, 高玉葆. 内生真菌种类和母本基因型对内生真菌-禾草共生体叶形状和叶面积的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(6): 654-660.
[9]	张冬瑞, 卜志刚, 陈玲玲, 常缨. 香鳞毛蕨的组织培养和快速繁殖体系构建[J]. 植物学报, 2020, 55(6): 760-767.
[10]	于良瑞, 朱政财, 潘晓云. 喜旱莲子草对同基因型邻体根系的表型可塑性: 入侵地和原产地的比较[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(6): 651-657.
[11]	赵睿, 卜红梅, 宋献方, 高融瑾. 再生水补给河道内芦苇的光谱特征及其对水体氮和磷含量的响应[J]. 植物学报, 2020, 55(6): 666-676.
[12]	罗虹, 温小蕙, 周圆圆, 戴思兰. 芳香堆心菊离体再生体系的建立[J]. 植物学报, 2020, 55(3): 318-328.
[13]	肖燕,王振兴,李东明,齐艳华,恩和巴雅尔. 羊草成熟胚诱导愈伤组织及植株再生系统的优化[J]. 植物学报, 2020, 55(2): 192-198.
[14]	赖先军,张义正,古英洪,颜朗. 转昆虫抗冻蛋白基因增强甘薯抗冻能力[J]. 植物学报, 2020, 55(1): 9-20.
[15]	张文婷,何燕红,舒宁,邢景景,刘宝骏,包满珠,刘国锋. 金黄花滇百合植株再生与离体快繁技术体系的建立[J]. 植物学报, 2019, 54(6): 773-778.