内蒙亚菊再生体系建立

doi:10.11983/CBB25144

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 内蒙亚菊(Ajania alabasica)为我国西北地区重要的野生菊花遗传资源, 具有良好的野化育种与抗性遗传研究价值, 但目前缺乏对其再生体系的研究。以内蒙亚菊野生植株的叶片和茎段为外植体, 进行再生体系研究。结果表明, 叶片较茎段更容易诱导出愈伤组织, 且不定芽分化率和繁殖系数较高。以叶片为外植体, 愈伤组织诱导和不定芽分化最适培养基为MS+1.0 mg∙L^-1 6-BA+1.0 mg∙L^-1 NAA, 接种15天愈伤组织诱导率可达100%, 接种30天不定芽分化率为92.22%, 繁殖系数达6.93。针对分化过程中的玻璃化现象, 研究发现0.3 mg∙L^-1 6-BA+0.05 mg∙L^-1 NAA为最优增殖培养基, 添加5 µmol∙L^-1 AgNO₃可缓解组培苗玻璃化。生根实验结果表明, 最佳生根培养基为1/2MS+0.2 mg∙L^-1 NAA, 生根率为100%, 移栽成活率达88%。该研究成功建立了内蒙亚菊高效再生体系, 为其遗传转化和基因功能研究奠定了基础。

关键词: 内蒙亚菊, 再生体系, 玻璃化

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Ajania alabasica is a wild species of the genus Ajania in the Asteraceae that is characterized by its remarkable drought resistance and ecological adaptability, making it a valuable genetic resource for breeding. Nevertheless, the absence of an effective in vitro regeneration system has impeded the advancement of rapid propagation and genetic transformation studies on this species.
RATIONALE: The utilization of appropriate explants constitutes a critical strategy for plant regeneration. The core of this methodology lies in optimizing the combinations of plant growth regulators (PGRs) and additives to balance differentiation and physiological disorders such as hyperhydricity. This study was conceived with the objective of systematically determining the effects of different explant types (leaves vs. stem segments) and PGRs, with a view to establishing a robust regeneration protocol for A. alabasica.
RESULTS: This study found that leaf explants exhibited significantly higher regeneration potential than stem segments. The results demonstrated that the optimal medium for callus induction and adventitious bud differentiation from leaves was MS basal medium supplemented with 1.0 mg∙L^-1 6-BA and 1.0 mg∙L^-1 NAA. Following the culture period, this resulted in a callus induction rate of 100% (at 15 days) and an adventitious bud differentiation rate of 92.22% with a multiplication coefficient of 6.93 (at 30 days). To address hyperhydricity, the optimal proliferation medium was identified as containing 0.3 mg∙L^-1 6-BA and 0.05 mg∙L^-1 NAA, with 5 µmol∙L^-1 AgNO₃ proving effective for alleviation. For the rooting phase, the optimal medium was identified as 1/2MS medium supplemented with 0.2 mg∙L^-1 NAA, which resulted in a rooting rate of 100% and a transplant survival rate of 88%.
CONCLUSION: This study successfully established for the first time a highly efficient and stable regeneration system for A. alabasica using leaf explants. The developed system, characterized by its high differentiation and survival rates, provides crucial technical support for subsequent genetic transformation and gene function analysis.

Key words: Ajania alabasica, regeneration system, hyperhydricity

郑萧岳, 孔丹睿, 邱悦, 赵惠恩. 内蒙亚菊再生体系建立. 植物学报, 2026, 61(5): 871-882.

Zheng Xiaoyue, Kong Danrui, Qiu Yue, Zhao Huien. Establishment of the Regeneration System of Ajania alabasica. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2026, 61(5): 871-882.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.chinbullbotany.com/CN/10.11983/CBB25144

https://www.chinbullbotany.com/CN/Y2026/V61/I5/871

参考文献

[1] 陈庆兵 (2024). 四个功能菊花品种高效增殖体系构建. 硕士论文. 郑州: 华北水利水电大学. pp. 9-54.
[2] 陈雪鹃, 吴珏, 李雪珂, 孙明, 张启翔 (2012). 芙蓉菊组培快繁技术的研究. 中南林业科技大学学报 32(7), 100-104, 127.
[3] 程越 (2014). 菊花脑再生体系建立的研究. 硕士论文. 南京: 南京农业大学. pp. 15-31.
[4] 廖敏凌, 蒲娅, 武晓云, 马朝峰, 王文奎, 戴思兰 (2023). 平潭野菊混合瓣型株系再生体系的建立. 植物学报 58, 449-460.
[5] 林文云, 王勇, 陈健妙, 于靖 (2023). 广藿香玻璃化组培苗恢复逆转的培养条件优化. 分子植物育种 21, 7842-7851.
[6] 刘丹, 陈天烺, 王容, 徐春光, 吴海峰, 赵鹏霞, 陈炜, 赫文韬 (2022). 盆栽小菊组培快繁体系的建立及玻璃化研究. 安徽农业科学 50(4), 44-47.
[7] 刘艳, 刘柳, 张璐, 李金凤, 张晓曼 (2024). 毛报春叶片组培快繁体系建立. 林业与生态科学 39, 448-457.
[8] 罗虹, 温小蕙, 周圆圆, 戴思兰 (2020). 芳香堆心菊离体再生体系的建立. 植物学报 55, 318-328.
[9] 内蒙古植物志编辑委员会 (1998). 内蒙古植物志, 第4卷(第2版). 呼和浩特: 内蒙古人民出版社. pp. 585-589.
[10] 曲晓慧 (2020). 几种菊属野生植物再生体系的建立. 硕士论文. 南京: 南京农业大学. pp. 11-42.
[11] 任江珊, 顾雪琪, 蒲娅, 黄河 (2021). 葫芦岛野菊舌状花再生体系建立. 现代园艺 44(24), 3-4, 7.
[12] 邵冰洁 (2018). 广义菊属牧草种质资源创新初步研究. 硕士论文. 北京: 北京林业大学. pp. 24-36.
[13] 滕如萍 (2022). 切花菊花瓣再生体系的建立与蔗糖处理对瓶插寿命及色泽的影响. 硕士论文. 杭州: 浙江大学. pp. 14-25.
[14] 王胜芳, 韩淑兰, 党士坤, 王慧梅 (2020). AgNO₃逆转的黄芩组培玻璃化苗的活性成分含量及其生物活性研究. 植物研究 40, 401-406.
[15] 王兴翠, 张晓艳, 裴华丽, 彭佃亮 (2020). 非洲冰菜组培苗防止玻璃化及快繁体系优化研究. 安徽大学学报(自然科学版) 44(2), 96-102.
[16] 吴丽芳, 田雪莲, 魏晓梅, 路小春, 钱绍方, 桂宝林 (2020). 色素万寿菊试管苗玻璃化控制的研究. 热带作物学报 41, 110-115.
[17] 吴琳 (2024). 菊花‘江陵金菊’和‘福白菊’组培快繁与再生体系的建立. 硕士论文. 武汉: 华中农业大学. pp. 15-43.
[18] 武晓云 (2023). 甘菊CYC2基因调控头状花序上两类小花发育的分子机制. 博士论文. 北京: 北京林业大学. pp. 41-44.
[19] 武晓云, 廖敏凌, 李雪茹, 舒梓淳, 辛佳潼, 张伯晗, 戴思兰 (2024). 毛华菊3种瓣型株系再生体系的建立. 植物学报 59, 245-256.
[20] 武颖 (2022). 菊花“粉十八”组织培养技术研究. 现代园艺 45(14), 13-15.
[21] 吴志苹, 高亦珂, 范敏, 高耀辉 (2020). 菊花‘金不凋’再生及遗传转化体系的构建. 分子植物育种 18, 150-158.
[22] 谢菲, 陈茹阳, 赵惠恩 (2015). 蒙菊(Chrysanthemum mongolicum)再生体系的建立. 江苏农业科学 43(11), 76-78.
[23] 易吉明 (2021). 黄花蒿再生体系优化及细胞学研究. 硕士论文. 长沙: 湖南农业大学. pp. 1-16.
[24] 张换换 (2021). γ-氨基丁酸对蓝莓玻璃化试管苗的恢复作用及机制研究. 硕士论文. 大连: 大连理工大学. pp. 16-24.
[25] 张艺萍, 张丽芳, 许凤, 王丽花, 苏艳, 杨秀梅, 蒋亚莲 (2023). 白花除虫菊高效再生体系的建立. 福建农业学报 38, 346-351.
[26] 赵青平, 梁雨萍, 周方园, 赵翔 (2022). 植物幼苗玻璃化发生机制研究进展. 植物学报 57, 90-97.
[27] Adedeji OS, Naing AH, Kim CK (2020). Protoplast isolation and shoot regeneration from protoplast-derived calli ofChrysanthemum cv. White ND. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 141, 571-581.
[28] Eisa EA, Tilly-Mándy A, Honfi P, Shala AY, Gururani MA (2022). Chrysanthemum: a comprehensive review on recent developments on in vitro regeneration. Biology 11, 1774.
[29] Jahan MT, Islam MR, Islam SS, Das P, Islam MM, Kabir MH, Mamun ANK (2021). Clonal propagation ofChrysanthemum morifolium Ramat using various explants obtained from field grown plants. GSC Biol Pharm Sci 16, 087-093.
[30] Jawhari FZ, Imtara H, El Moussaoui A, Khalis H, Es-Safi I, Saleh A, Al Kamaly O, Parvez MK, Bari A (2023). Effects of pre-treatments and conservation conditions on seed viability and germination of two varieties of an endangered speciesAnacyclus pyrethrum (L.) Link (Asteraceae). Horticulturae 9, 472.
[31] Kazeroonian R, Mousavi A, Jari SK, Tohidfar M (2018). Factors influencingin vitro organogenesis of Chrysanthemum morifolium cv. ‘Resomee Splendid’. Iran J Biotechnol 16, e1454.
[32] Li LJ, An QX, Wang QM, Liu W, Qi XY, Cui JG, Wang YC, Ke HF (2022a). The mechanism of bud dehyperhydricity by the method of ‘starvation drying combined with AgNO₃’ inLycium ruthenicum. Tree Physiol 42, 1841-1857.
[33] Li YJ, Cui YM, Wang BJ, Li Y, Zhang MM, Dai SL, Huang H (2022b). Genotype screening of recipient resources with high regeneration and transformation efficiency in chrysanthemum.Phyton 91, 869-888.
[34] Maurya RL, Kumar M, Sirohi U, Priya, Chaudhary V, Sharma VR, Yadav D, Yadav MK (2023). Effect of silver nitrate and thidiazuron on shoot proliferation, hyperhydricity and assessment of genetic fidelity of microplants in carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.). Cytol Genet 57, 87-94.
[35] Miler N, Tymoszuk A, Rewers M, Kulus D (2023). In vitro regeneration of chrysanthemum from ovaries and ovules treated with thermal and chemical stimuli: morphogenic and cytogenetic effects. Agriculture 13, 2069.
[36] Polivanova OB, Bedarev VA (2022). Hyperhydricity in plant tissue culture.Plants 11, 3313.
[37] Tymoszuk A, Miler N (2019). Silver and gold nanoparticles impact onin vitro adventitious organogenesis in chrysanthemum, gerbera and cape primrose. Sci Hortic 257, 108766.