白檀离体快繁技术

doi:10.11983/CBB18034

植物学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (5): 693-699.DOI: 10.11983/CBB18034

白檀离体快繁技术

安佰义¹, 郭才南¹, 包文慧¹, 李凤飞¹, 赵赫¹, 陈丽¹, 安丰云^2,^*()

¹吉林农业大学园艺学院, 长春 130118
²延边林业科学研究院, 延吉 133000

收稿日期:2018-02-28 接受日期:2018-06-22 出版日期:2018-09-01 发布日期:2018-07-04
通讯作者: 安丰云
作者简介:
† 共同第一作者。
基金资助:
长春市科技局项目(No.17DY014)、吉林省教育厅项目(No.JJKH20180665KJ)和吉林省科技厅重点科技攻关项目(No.20150- 204045NY)

Rapid Propagation of Symplocos paniculata In Vitro

An Baiyi¹, Guo Cainan¹, Bao Wenhui¹, Li Fengfei¹, Zhao He¹, Chen Li¹, An Fengyun^2,^*()

¹College of Horticulture, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China
²Yanbian Academy of Forestry, Yanji 133000, China

Received:2018-02-28 Accepted:2018-06-22 Online:2018-09-01 Published:2018-07-04
Contact: An Fengyun
About author:
† These authors contributed equally to this paper

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以白檀(Symplocos paniculata)幼嫩茎段为实验材料, 通过对启动培养、增殖、生根培养及移栽的影响因子进行研究, 初步建立了白檀的组织培养体系。结果表明: 白檀外植体最适灭菌方案为0.1%升汞3分钟, 无菌苗获得率达81%; 最适初代启动培养基为1/2MS+30 g∙L^-1蔗糖+8 g∙L^-1琼脂, 出芽率达86.83%; 增殖最适培养基为1/2MS+1.0 mg∙L^-1 6-BA+0.02 mg∙L^-1 IBA+30 g∙L^-1蔗糖+8 g∙L^-1琼脂, 增殖系数达3.57; 最适生根培养基为WPM+0.5 mg∙L^-1 IBA+0.5 mg∙L^-1 NAA+20 g∙L^-1蔗糖+2 g∙L^-1 AC+8 g∙L^-1琼脂, 生根率达93%; 炼苗后, 移入园土:草炭土=1:1 (v/v)的基质中, 成活率达83%。

关键词: 白檀, 外植体, 组织培养

Abstract:

With tender stem segments of Symplocos paniculata as the experiment material, the tissue culture system of S. paniculata was preliminarily established to research the key factors influencing initiation culture, proliferation, rooting culture and transplantation. Treatment with 0.1% HgCl₂ for 3 min was the optimum scheme for explant sterilization of S. paniculata; survival rate of sterile seedlings was 81%. The rate of germination of initiation culture was 86.83% in the medium with 1/2MS+30 g∙L^-1 sucrose+8 g∙L^-1 agar. The proliferation coefficient was 3.57 in optimum culture medium with 1/2MS+1.0 mg∙L^-1 6-BA+0.02 mg∙L^-1 IBA+30 g∙L^-1 sucrose+8 g∙L^-1 agar. The suitable rooting medium was WPM+0.5 mg∙L^-1 IBA+0.5 mg∙L^-1 NAA+20 g∙L^-1 sucrose+2 g∙L^-1 AC+8 g∙L^-1agar, and rooting rate reached 93%. After being acclimatized, the regenerated plants were transplanted into substrate of garden soil and peat soil (v:v=1:1), with survival rate of regenerated plants of 83%.

Key words: Symplocos paniculata, explant, tissue culture

安佰义, 郭才南, 包文慧, 李凤飞, 赵赫, 陈丽, 安丰云. 白檀离体快繁技术. 植物学报, 2018, 53(5): 693-699.

An Baiyi, Guo Cainan, Bao Wenhui, Li Fengfei, Zhao He, Chen Li, An Fengyun. Rapid Propagation of Symplocos paniculata In Vitro. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2018, 53(5): 693-699.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.chinbullbotany.com/CN/10.11983/CBB18034

https://www.chinbullbotany.com/CN/Y2018/V53/I5/693

图/表 6

参考文献 17

1	何承忠, 许昌慧, 王立苍, 江涛, 辛培尧 (2009). 马缨杜鹃壮苗与生根培养基的筛选研究. 湖北农业科学 48, 1042-1044, 1054.
2	刘立言, 宋航, 安佰义, 郭太君 (2016). 白檀种子发芽特性研究. 北方园艺 40(10), 78-81.
3	刘强, 尹翔, 杨艳, 陈景震, 蒋丽娟 (2015). 白檀自然居群遗传结构与遗传多样性研究. 植物遗传资源学报 16, 751-758.
4	孟德悦, 刘亮英, 李小芳, 刘光斌, 胡冬南 (2013). 白檀嫩枝扦插影响因素. 林业科技开发 27(4), 93-96.
5	彭少兵 (2012). 中国野生葡萄再生体系研究及抗病相关基因(VpGLOX、VpPR17、VpHSF1)的克隆与功能分析. 博士论文. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学. pp. 11.
6	孙清荣, 王金政, 薛晓敏, 孙洪雁 (2015). 欧洲李‘红艳1号’的组织培养与快速繁殖. 植物生理学报 51, 1024-1028.
7	孙姿 (2015). 夏蜡梅组织培养技术研究. 硕士论文. 南京: 南京林业大学. pp. 43-44.
8	王玉娇, 杨忠, 赵春莉, 董然, 赵和祥, 顾德峰 (2014). 兴安白头翁组织培养与快繁技术研究. 北方园艺 38(10), 84-87.
9	尹淑莲, 郭伟珍, 林艳, 马英 (2005). 基质理化性质对组培苗生根状况的影响. 辽宁林业科技(5), 18-19, 24.
10	尹翔, 杨艳, 刘强, 蒋丽娟 (2012). 油料植物白檀不同居群的物候期与形态多样性. 经济林研究 30(3), 55-60.
11	张存旭, 杨锋利, 袁秀平 (2005). 常春藤离体快繁技术. 浙江林学院学报 22, 241-245.
12	张洁茹 (2014). 萱草离体快繁技术体系的建立与研究. 硕士论文. 长春: 吉林农业大学. pp. 49.
13	周婧, 杨美纯, 岑秀芬, 韦鹏霄 (2011). 红腺忍冬外植体灭菌与芽诱导研究. 南方农业学报 42, 124-127.
14	左长清, 朱太平, 杜佳瑞 (1994). 关于白檀开发利用价值的研究. 江西水利科技 20, 68-72.
15	Aggarwal BB, Prasad S, Reuter S, Kannappan R, Yadev VR, Park B, Kim JH, Gupta SC, Phromnoi K, Sundaram C, Prasad S, Chaturvedi MM, Sung B (2011). Identification of novel anti-inflammatory agents from ayurvedic medicine for prevention of chronic diseases: “Reverse Ph- armacology” and “Bedside to Bench” approach.Curr Drug Targets 12, 1595-1653.
16	Gupta YK, Peshin SS (2012). Do herbal medicines have potential for managing snake bite envenomation?Toxicol Int 19, 89-99.
17	Yang Y, Jiang LJ, Tang YX, Li CZ, Tang J, Li YJ (2016). Organogenesis and regeneration of Symplocos paniculata from immature zygotic embryos in vitro. Northern Hor- tic 40(5), 119-123.

Sterilization time (min)	1	2	3	4	5
Acquisition rate (%)	46.0	70.0	81.0	45.0	10.8
Pollution rate (%)	50.0	25.0	18.2	16.7	14.0

Sterilization time (min)	1	2	3	4	5
Acquisition rate (%)	46.0	70.0	81.0	45.0	10.8
Pollution rate (%)	50.0	25.0	18.2	16.7	14.0

Culture medium	Average germination rate (%)	State of growth
WPM	43.30±5.03 eE	Sprouts grew generally, leaves were normal shape and color
Read	56.37±4.05 dD	Sprouts grew generally, leaves were normal shape but yellow
MS	14.13±5.00 fF	Sprouts grew poorly, leaves were narrow, curly, green
mMS	16.00±5.00 fF	Sprouts grew poorly, leaves were curly, green
1/2MS	86.83±5.53 aA	Sprouts grew well, leaves were flat and dark green
1/2mMS	54.33±4.51 dD	Sprouts grew well, leaves were curly, dark green
1/4MS	74.13±3.61 bB	Sprouts grew generally, leaves were curly, green
1/8MS	66.33±3.21 cC	Sprouts grew generally, leaves were curly and yellow

Culture medium	Average germination rate (%)	State of growth
WPM	43.30±5.03 eE	Sprouts grew generally, leaves were normal shape and color
Read	56.37±4.05 dD	Sprouts grew generally, leaves were normal shape but yellow
MS	14.13±5.00 fF	Sprouts grew poorly, leaves were narrow, curly, green
mMS	16.00±5.00 fF	Sprouts grew poorly, leaves were curly, green
1/2MS	86.83±5.53 aA	Sprouts grew well, leaves were flat and dark green
1/2mMS	54.33±4.51 dD	Sprouts grew well, leaves were curly, dark green
1/4MS	74.13±3.61 bB	Sprouts grew generally, leaves were curly, green
1/8MS	66.33±3.21 cC	Sprouts grew generally, leaves were curly and yellow

6-BA (mg∙L^-1)	IBA (mg∙L^-1)	Average proliferation coefficient	State of growth
0.06	0	1.33±0.21 kJ	Sprouted within 15 days in average, base of seedlings had few calli, lateral buds were weak
0.06	0.02	1.40±0.00 kIJ	Sprouted within 15 days in average, base of seedlings had very few calli, lateral buds were weak
0.06	0.05	1.47±0.15 kIJ	Sprouted within 15 days in average, base of seedlings had very few calli, lateral buds were weak
0.06	0.08	1.67±0.21 ijkHIJ	Sprouted within 16 days in average, base of seedlings had many calli, lateral buds were weak
0.3	0	1.63±0.23 jkHIJ	Sprouted within 15 days in average, base of seedlings had few calli, lateral buds were slender
0.3	0.02	1.57±0.12 jkHIJ	Sprouted within 22 days in average, base of seedlings had few calli, lateral buds were thick
0.3	0.05	1.57±0.29 jkHIJ	Sprouted within 15 days in average, base of seedlings had few calli, lateral buds were thick
0.3	0.08	1.90±0.20 hijGHI	Sprouted within 15 days in average, base of seedlings had very few calli, lateral buds were thick
0.3	0.2	2.43±0.12 fgDEF	Sprouted within 9 days in average, base of seedlings had few calli, lateral buds were brawny
0.3	0.5	1.70±0.17 ijkHIJ	Sprouted within 15 days in average, base of seedlings had many calli, lateral buds were thick
0.6	0	2.77±0.25 defCD	Sprouted within 13 days in average, base of seedlings had few calli, lateral buds were slender
0.6	0.02	2.03±0.06 hiFGH	Sprouted within 45 days in average, base of seedlings had many calli, lateral buds were thick
0.6	0.05	3.50±0.26 abAB	Sprouted within 13 days in average, base of seedlings had many calli, lateral buds were thick
0.6	0.08	2.93±0.15 cdCD	Sprouted within 16 days in average, base of seedlings had many calli, lateral buds were thick
0.6	0.2	2.60±0.20 defDE	Sprouted within 15 days in average, base of seedlings had very few calli, lateral buds were thick
0.6	0.5	3.17±0.29 bcBC	Sprouted within 15 days in average, base of seedlings had few calli, lateral buds were brawny
0.6	0.8	2.20±0.27 ghEFG	Sprouted within 13 days in average, base of seedlings had many calli, lateral buds were brawny
1.0	0	2.70±0.20 defCD	Sprouted within 12 days in average, base of seedlings had many calli, lateral buds were brawny
1.0	0.02	3.57±0.32 aAB	Sprouted within 5 days in average, base of seedlings had few calli, lateral buds were brawny
1.0	0.05	1.67±0.12 ijkHIJ	Sprouted within 5 days in average, base of seedlings had few calli, lateral buds were brawny
1.0	0.08	3.50±0.20 abAB	Sprouted within 14 days in average, base of seedlings had few calli, lateral buds were brawny
1.0	0.2	2.53±0.25 defgDE	Sprouted within 8 days in average, base of seedlings had very few calli, lateral buds were brawny
1.0	0.5	2.90±0.17 cdeCD	Sprouted within 9 days in average, base of seedlings had few calli, lateral buds were brawny
1.0	0.8	3.87±0.06 aA	Sprouted within 5 days in average, base of seedlings had few calli, lateral buds were brawny
1.0	1.1	2.93±0.32 cdCD	Sprouted within 4 days in average, base of seedlings had a great many calli, lateral buds were brawny

白檀离体快繁技术

Rapid Propagation of Symplocos paniculata In Vitro

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 17

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

IBA (mg∙L^-1)	NAA (mg∙L^-1)	Average rooting rate (%)	State of roots growth
0	0	2.86±0.60 hH	Rooted within 50 days in average, the number of taproots were 1-2, root length reached 1-2 cm
0.02	0.02	10.01±0.10 gG	Rooted within 41 days in average, the number of taproots were 1-2, root length reached 1-4 cm
0.05	0.05	25.13±0.23 fF	Rooted within 35 days in average, the number of taproots were 1-2, root length reached 1-3 cm
0.08	0.08	33.17±0.15 eE	Rooted within 25 days in average, the number of taproots were 3-4, root length reached 1.5-3 cm
0.2	0.2	88.00±1.73 dD	Rooted within 21 days in average, the number of taproots were 3-4, root length reached 1.5-3 cm
0.5	0.5	93.00±0.00 aA	Rooted within 21 days in average, the number of taproots were 6-7, root length reached 2.5-3 cm
0.8	0.8	92.03±0.06 bB	Rooted within 38 days in average, the number of taproots were 5-6, root length reached 1-2 cm
1.5	1.5	90.17±0.15 cC	Rooted within 60 days in average, the number of taproots were 3-4, root length reached 1-2 cm

Cultivation medium	Transplant number (individual plants)	Surviving number (individual plants)	Survival rate (%)
Garden soil:sand=1:1 (v/v)	30	23	77
Garden soil:peat soil=1:1 (v/v)	30	25	83
Peat soil:sand=1:1 (v/v)	30	21	70

[1]	逯锦春, 曹丽娜, 佟冠杰, 王鑫颖, 张利英, 喻锌, 李荟芳, 李彦慧. 大花银莲花愈伤组织诱导及再生体系的建立[J]. 植物学报, 2022, 57(2): 217-226.
[2]	李孟悦, 刘柳, 刘艳, 张晓曼. 毛报春(Primula × pubescens)腋芽再生组织培养体系的建立[J]. 植物学报, 2021, 56(6): 732-739.
[3]	罗钱, 张燕莎, 欧静. 郁金樱愈伤组织诱导及植株再生[J]. 植物学报, 2021, 56(4): 451-461.
[4]	邓莎, 吴艳妮, 吴坤林, 房林, 李琳, 曾宋君. 14种中国典型极小种群野生植物繁育特性和人工繁殖研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(3): 385-400.
[5]	罗虹, 温小蕙, 周圆圆, 戴思兰. 芳香堆心菊离体再生体系的建立[J]. 植物学报, 2020, 55(3): 318-328.
[6]	张文婷,何燕红,舒宁,邢景景,刘宝骏,包满珠,刘国锋. 金黄花滇百合植株再生与离体快繁技术体系的建立[J]. 植物学报, 2019, 54(6): 773-778.
[7]	唐凤鸾,赵健,赵志国,夏科,仇硕. 走马胎的组织培养与快速繁殖[J]. 植物学报, 2019, 54(3): 378-384.
[8]	咸洋,董昕,解孝满,吴丹,韩彪,王艳. 光照和温度对红花槭限制生长保存的影响[J]. 植物学报, 2019, 54(1): 64-71.
[9]	燕丽萍, 李丽, 刘翠兰, 吴德军, 王因花, 任飞, 赵梁军. 绒毛白蜡体胚诱导和植株再生[J]. 植物学报, 2016, 51(6): 807-816.
[10]	任桂萍, 王小菁, 朱根发. 不同光质的LED对蝴蝶兰组织培养增殖及生根的影响[J]. 植物学报, 2016, 51(1): 81-88.
[11]	徐贤柱, 涂艺声, 吉枝单, 陈曼, 蔡险峰, 杨萍. 蛇足石杉离体培养物形态变化与石杉碱甲积累的研究[J]. 植物学报, 2015, 50(6): 733-738.
[12]	冯欢, 易姝利, 谢佳恒, 雷梦琦, 黄萱. 微型月季愈伤组织诱导及植株再生[J]. 植物学报, 2014, 49(5): 595-602.
[13]	张庆红, 汤丽云, 司徒少金, 王莎, 何国振. 药用植物栀子的组织培养[J]. 植物学报, 2014, 49(3): 331-336.
[14]	刘琳, 俞斌, 黄鹏燕, 贾军, 赵华, 彭俊华, 陈鹏, 彭良才. 芒不同基因型愈伤组织诱导及分化的差异[J]. 植物学报, 2013, 48(2): 192-198.
[15]	许东婷, 王俊丽, 刘名飞, 毕凯丽, 宋韵霏. 华北蓝盆花的组织培养与植株再生[J]. 植物学报, 2011, 46(4): 476-478.