糜子EST-SSR分子标记的开发及种质资源遗传多样性分析

doi:10.11983/CBB19037

植物学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (6): 723-732.DOI: 10.11983/CBB19037

糜子EST-SSR分子标记的开发及种质资源遗传多样性分析

何杰丽¹,石甜甜²,陈凌³,王海岗³,高志军⁴,杨美红¹,王瑞云^2,^3,^*(),乔治军^3,^*()

1 山西农业大学文理学院, 太谷 030801
2 山西农业大学农学院, 太谷 030801
3 山西省农业科学院农作物品种资源研究所/农业部黄土高原作物基因资源与种质创制重点实验室/杂粮种质资源发掘与遗传改良山西省重点实验室, 太原 030031
4 鄂尔多斯市农牧业科学研究院, 鄂尔多斯 017200

收稿日期:2019-02-24 接受日期:2019-06-18 出版日期:2019-11-01 发布日期:2020-07-09
通讯作者: 王瑞云,乔治军
基金资助:
国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(No.CARS-06-13.5-A16);国家自然科学基金(No.31271791);山西省回国留学人员科研资助项目(No.2016-066);山西省重点研发计划(No.201803D221008-5)

The Genetic Diversity of Common Millet (Panicum miliaceum) Germplasm Resources Based on the EST-SSR Markers

Jieli He¹,Tiantian Shi²,Ling Chen³,Haigang Wang³,Zhijun Gao⁴,Meihong Yang¹,Ruiyun Wang^2,^3,^*(),Zhijun Qiao^3,^*()

1 College of Arts and Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, China
2 College of Agronomy, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, China
3 Shanxi Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Genetic Improvement of Minor Crops, Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Germplasm Enhancement on Loess Plateau, Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Crop Germplasm Resources, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Taiyuan 030031, China
4 Erdos Institute of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Erdos 017200, China

Received:2019-02-24 Accepted:2019-06-18 Online:2019-11-01 Published:2020-07-09
Contact: Ruiyun Wang,Zhijun Qiao

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于前期高通量测序结果设计EST-SSR引物, 用于评估国内外不同生态区144份糜子(Panicum miliaceum)种质资源的遗传差异。结果表明, 200对引物中80对呈多态性, 开发效率为40%; 引物分辨率(Rp)为0.67-4.67 (平均值为2.00), 扩增产物大小为50-500 bp。144份材料在80个位点共检测到206个等位变异, 每个位点为2-3个; 多样性指数(I)为0.659 3 (RYW108)-1.087 2 (RYW124), 平均为0.859 9; 多态性信息含量(PIC)为0.222 9 (RYW98)-0.717 2 (RYW124), 平均为0.457 3。基于UPGMA将144份资源划分为3个群组, 其中2个群组主要为北方春糜子区材料, 另一个群组主要为黄土高原春夏糜子区材料。基于Structure (K=4)将材料划分为4个类群, 即2个代表北方资源基因库以及代表黄土高原和国外资源基因库各1个。基于主成分分析将材料聚为7个类群, 划分结果与材料的地理来源一致。

关键词: 糜子, 遗传多样性, 主成分分析, SSR标记

Abstract: The EST-SSR molecular markers of common millet (Panicum miliaceum) were developed by high-throughput sequencing. Using these markers, we assessed the genetic diversity in a panel of 144 common millet accessions collected from different ecotopic regions in China and abroad. It was shown that 80 pairs of these markers were polymorphic, with the efficiency of approximately 40%. The resolution power (Rp) was 0.67-4.67 (mean 2.00) and the amplified product sizes ranged from 50 to 500 bp. Among the examined 144 accessions, 206 allelic variations were identified in 80 loci, with 2-3 alleles at each locus. The Shannon’s diversity index (I) ranged from 0.659 3 (RYW108) to 1.087 2 (RYW124) with an average of 0.859 9. The range of polymorphism information content (PIC) was 0.222 9 (RYW98) -0.717 2 (RYW124) with an average of 0.457 3. Based on UPGMA, these 144 accessions were classified into 3 groups, two of which belonged to the the Northern China spring-sowing ecotopes and one group was mainly from the Loess Plateau spring-summer-sowing ecotopes. Based on Structure (K=4), all the accessions were divided into four groups, of which two groups represented the gene pool originated from the Northern China, whereas the other two groups from the Loess Plateau and abroad accessions. Based on principal component analysis (PCA), the accessions were clustered into seven groups, consistent with their geographic origins.

Key words: Panicum miliaceum, genetic diversity, PCA, EST-SSR markers

何杰丽,石甜甜,陈凌,王海岗,高志军,杨美红,王瑞云,乔治军. 糜子EST-SSR分子标记的开发及种质资源遗传多样性分析. 植物学报, 2019, 54(6): 723-732.

Jieli He,Tiantian Shi,Ling Chen,Haigang Wang,Zhijun Gao,Meihong Yang,Ruiyun Wang,Zhijun Qiao. The Genetic Diversity of Common Millet (Panicum miliaceum) Germplasm Resources Based on the EST-SSR Markers. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2019, 54(6): 723-732.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.chinbullbotany.com/CN/10.11983/CBB19037

https://www.chinbullbotany.com/CN/Y2019/V54/I6/723

图/表 11

参考文献 40

[1]	董俊丽, 王海岗, 陈凌, 王君杰, 曹晓宁, 王纶, 乔治军 ( 2015). 糜子骨干种质遗传多样性和遗传结构分析. 中国农业科学 48, 3121-3131.
[2]	国家谷子糜子产业技术体系 ( 2018). 中国现代农业产业可持续发展战略研究·谷子糜子分册. 北京: 中国农业出版社. pp. 3-22.
[3]	郭琪, 郭大龙, 郭丽丽, 张琳, 侯小改 ( 2015). SSR分子标记在牡丹亲缘关系研究中的应用与研究进展. 植物学报 50, 652-664.
[4]	连帅, 陆平, 乔治军, 张琦, 张茜, 刘敏轩, 王瑞云 ( 2016). 利用SSR分子标记研究国内外黍稷地方品种和野生资源的遗传多样性. 中国农业科学 49, 3264-3275.
[5]	刘笑瑜 ( 2017). 利用高基元SSR分析中国糜子资源的遗传多样性. 硕士论文. 太谷: 山西农业大学. pp. 22-41.
[6]	刘笑瑜, 王瑞云, 刘敏轩, 邱岩岩, 季煦, 连帅, 乔治军, 王纶, 王海岗 ( 2016). 利用SSR标记分析40份糜子资源的遗传多样性. 分子植物育种 14, 1624-1630.
[7]	王璐琳, 王瑞云, 何杰丽, 薛延桃, 陈凌, 王海岗, 乔治军 ( 2018). 糜子特异性SSR标记的开发. 山西农业科学 46, 1-4, 86.
[8]	王瑞云 (2017). 糜子遗传多样性及进化研究进展. 北京: 中国农业出版社. pp. 20-92.
[9]	王瑞云, 季煦, 陆平, 刘敏轩, 许月, 王纶, 王海岗, 乔治军 ( 2017a). 利用荧光SSR分析中国糜子遗传多样性. 作物学报 43, 530-548.
[10]	王瑞云, 刘笑瑜, 王海岗, 陆平, 刘敏轩, 陈凌, 乔治军 ( 2017b). 用高基元微卫星标记分析中国糜子遗传多样性. 中国农业科学 50, 3848-3859.
[11]	王舒婷, 何杰丽, 石甜甜, 陈凌, 王海岗, 王瑞云, 乔治军 ( 2019). 利用微卫星标记分析山西糜子的遗传多样性. 植物遗传资源学报 20, 69-78.
[12]	王银月, 刘敏轩, 陆平, 乔治军, 杨天育, 李海, 崔喜艳 ( 2014). 构建黍稷分子遗传图谱SSR引物的筛选. 作物杂志 ( 4), 32-38.
[13]	薛延桃, 陆平, 乔治军, 刘敏轩, 王瑞云 ( 2018). 基于SSR标记的黍稷种质资源遗传多样性及亲缘关系研究. 中国农业科学 51, 2846-2859.
[14]	朱宇佳, 焦凯丽, 罗秀俊, 冯尚国, 王慧中 ( 2018). 基于SSR分子标记的酸浆属植物亲缘关系研究. 植物学报 53, 305-312.
[15]	Azevedo ALS, Costa PP, Machado JC, Machado MA, Pereira AV, da Silva Lédo FJ ( 2012). Cross species amplification of Pennisetum glaucum microsatellite markers in Pennisetum purpureum and genetic diversity of napier grass accessions. Crop Sci 52, 1776-1785.
[16]	Bonman JM, Babiker EM, Cuesta-Marcos A, Esvelt-Klos K, Brown-Guedira G, Chao SM, See D, Chen JL, Akhunov E, Zhang JL, Bockelman HE, Gordon TC ( 2015). Genetic diversity among wheat accessions from the USDA national small grains collection. Crop Sci 55, 1243-1253.
[17]	Changmei S, Dorothy J ( 2014). Millet—the frugal grain. Int J Sci Res Rev 3(4), 75-90.
[18]	Cho Yl, Chung JW, Lee GA, Ma KH, Dixit A, Gwag JG, Park YJ ( 2010). Development and characterization of twenty-five new polymorphic microsatellite markers in proso millet ( Panicum miliaceum L.). Genes Genomics 32, 267-273.
[19]	Courtois B, Frouin J, Greco R, Bruschi G, Droc G, Hamelin C, Ruiz M, Clément G, Evrard JC, Van Coppenole S, Katsantonis D, Oliveira M, Negrão S, Matos C, Cavigiolo S, Lupotto E, Piffanelli P, Ahmadi N ( 2012). Genetic diversity and population structure in a European collection of rice. Crop Sci 52, 1663-1675.
[20]	Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J ( 2005). Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14, 2611-2620.
[21]	Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK ( 2003). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164, 1567-1587.
[22]	Habiyaremye C, Matanguihan JB, Guedes JD, Ganjyal GM, Whiteman MR, Kidwell KK, Murphy KM ( 2017). Proso millet ( Panicum miliaceum L.) and its potential for cultivation in the pacific northwest, U.S: a review. Front Plant Sci 7, 1961.
[23]	Hu XY, Wang JF, Lu P, Zhang HS ( 2009). Assessment of genetic diversity in broomcorn millet ( Panicum miliaceum L.) using SSR markers. J Genet Genomics 36, 491-500.
[24]	Hunt HV, Campana MG, Lawes MC, Park YJ, Bower MA, Howe CJ, Jones MK ( 2011). Genetic diversity and phylogeography of broomcorn millet ( Panicum miliaceum L.) across Eurasia. Mol Ecol 20, 4756-4771.
[25]	Liu KJ, Muse SV ( 2005). PowerMarker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics 21, 2128-2129.
[26]	Liu MX, Xu Y, He JH, Zhang S, Wang YY, Lu P ( 2016). Genetic diversity and population structure of broomcorn millet ( Panicum miliaceum L.) cultivars and landraces in China based on microsatellite markers. Int J Mol Sci 17, 370.
[27]	Lu HY, Zhang JP, Liu KB, Wu NQ, Li YM, Zhou KS, Ye ML, Zhang TY, Zhang HJ, Yang XY, Shen LC, Xu DK, Li Q ( 2009). Earliest domestication of common millet ( Panicum miliaceum ) in East Asia extended to 10, 000 years ago. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106, 7367-7372.
[28]	Murray MG, Thompson WF ( 1980). Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 8, 4321-4325.
[29]	Prevost A, Wilkinson MJ ( 1999). A new system of comparing PCR primers applied to ISSR fingerprinting of potato cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 98, 107-112.
[30]	Rajput SG, Plyler-Harveson T, Santra DK ( 2014). Development and characterization of SSR markers in proso millet based on switchgrass genomics. Am J Plant Sci 5, 175-186.
[31]	Rajput SG, Santra DK ( 2016). Evaluation of genetic diversity of proso millet germplasm available in the United States using simple-sequence repeat markers. Crop Sci 56, 2401-2409.
[32]	Rohlf FJ (2002). NTSYS-pc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, Version 2.10. New York: Exter Publishing Ltd. Setauket.
[33]	Saha D, Channabyre Gowda MV, Arya L, Verma M, Bansal KC ( 2016). Genetic and genomic resources of small millets. Crit Rev Plant Sci 35, 56-79.
[34]	Satya P, Karan M, Jana S, Mitra S, Sharma A, Karmakar PG, Ray DP ( 2015). Start codon targeted (SCoT) polymorphism reveals genetic diversity in wild and domesticated populations of ramie ( Boehmeria nivea L. Gaudich.), a premium textile fiber producing species. Meta Gene 3, 62-70.
[35]	Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S ( 2011). MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 665, 2731-2739.
[36]	Tiwar G, Singh R, Singh N, Choudhury DR, Paliwal R, Kumar A, Gupta V ( 2016). Study of arbitrarily amplified (RAPD and ISSR) and gene targeted (SCoT and CBDP) markers for genetic diversity and population structure in kalmegh [Andrographis paniculata(Burm. f.) Nees]. Ind Crops Prod 86, 1-11.
[37]	Van Inghelandt D, Melchinger AE, Lebreton C, Stich B ( 2010). Population structure and genetic diversity in a commercial maize breeding program assessed with SSR and SNP markers. Theor Appl Genet 120, 1289-1299.
[38]	Wang RY, Hunt HV, Qiao ZJ, Wang L, Han YH ( 2016). Diversity and cultivation of broomcorn millet ( Panicum miliaceum L.) in China: a review. Econ Bot 70, 332-342.
[39]	Wang RY, Wang HG, Liu XY, Ji X, Chen L, Lu P, Liu MX, Teng B, Qiao ZJ ( 2018). Waxy allelic diversity in common millet(Panicum miliaceum L.) in China. Crop J 6, 377-385.
[40]	Yeh FC, Boyle TJB ( 1997). Population genetic analysis of codominant and dominant markers and quantitative traits. Belg J Bot 129, 157-163.

Ecotope/abroad	Origin	Number of accession	Total
Northwest spring and summer-sowing ecotope (NWSS)	Xinjiang	4	4
Northern spring-sowing ecotope (NSP)	Qinghai	13	48
	Gansu	11
	Inner Mongolia	14
	Shanxi	10
Loess Plateau spring and summer-sowing ecotope (LPSS)	Shanxi	18	37
	Shaanxi	8
	Ningxia	11
Northeast spring-sowing ecotope (NES)	Heilongjiang	5	9
	Jilin	3
	Liaoning	1
Northern summer-sowing ecotope (NSU)	Hebei	9	13
	Shandong	2
	Anhui	1
	Henan	1
Southern autumn and winter-sowing ecotope (SAW)	Hainan	2	2
Abroad	Former Soviet Union	2	31
	Poland	2
	India	27
Total		144

Ecotope/abroad	Origin	Number of accession	Total
Northwest spring and summer-sowing ecotope (NWSS)	Xinjiang	4	4
Northern spring-sowing ecotope (NSP)	Qinghai	13	48
	Gansu	11
	Inner Mongolia	14
	Shanxi	10
Loess Plateau spring and summer-sowing ecotope (LPSS)	Shanxi	18	37
	Shaanxi	8
	Ningxia	11
Northeast spring-sowing ecotope (NES)	Heilongjiang	5	9
	Jilin	3
	Liaoning	1
Northern summer-sowing ecotope (NSU)	Hebei	9	13
	Shandong	2
	Anhui	1
	Henan	1
Southern autumn and winter-sowing ecotope (SAW)	Hainan	2	2
Abroad	Former Soviet Union	2	31
	Poland	2
	India	27
Total		144

Number	Unicode	Accession name	Origin
1	00000177	Hongmizi	Ningan, Heilongjiang
2	00000750	Baimizi	Shawan, Xinjiang
3	00006653	Jinshu	Hainan
4	00007238	Dahongmizi	Bameng, Inner Mongolia
5	00007478	Baigedami	Huangzhong, Qinghai
6	No unicode	Hongshuzi	Anyang, Henan

Number	Unicode	Accession name	Origin
1	00000177	Hongmizi	Ningan, Heilongjiang
2	00000750	Baimizi	Shawan, Xinjiang
3	00006653	Jinshu	Hainan
4	00007238	Dahongmizi	Bameng, Inner Mongolia
5	00007478	Baigedami	Huangzhong, Qinghai
6	No unicode	Hongshuzi	Anyang, Henan

Ecotope/ abroad	Accessions	Na	Ne	I	Ho	He	PIC
NWSS	4	2.3375±0.5017	2.1517±0.4194	0.7644±0.2178	0.8042±0.2688	0.5944±0.1193	0.3551
NSP	48	2.5750±0.4975	2.3106±0.3211	0.8604±0.1576	0.8228±0.1308	0.5655±0.0604	0.4536
LPSS	37	2.5750±0.4975	2.2803±0.3110	0.8506±0.1534	0.8384±0.1166	0.5615±0.0595	0.4203
NES	9	2.5125±0.5030	2.2435±0.3929	0.8289±0.1823	0.7937±0.1732	0.5737±0.0909	0.4212
NSU	13	2.5625±0.4992	2.2815±0.3527	0.8496±0.1632	0.7946±0.1608	0.5712±0.0667	0.4304
SAW	2	2.2375±0.5092	2.0608±0.4387	0.7347±0.2316	0.7812±0.3265	0.6813±0.2006	0.2156
Domestic	113	2.5750 ±0.4975	2.3122±0.3086	0.8628±0.1554	0.8200±0.1188	0.5625±0.0584	0.4651
Abroad	31	2.5750±0.4975	2.2464±0.2909	0.8387±0.1449	0.8540±0.1193	0.5571±0.0561	0.3896

糜子EST-SSR分子标记的开发及种质资源遗传多样性分析

The Genetic Diversity of Common Millet (Panicum miliaceum) Germplasm Resources Based on the EST-SSR Markers

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

补充材料

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 40

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

Population	NWSS	NSP	LPSS	NES	NSU	SAW	Abroad
NWSS		0.9560	0.9614	0.9487	0.9380	0.8694	0.9477
NSP	0.0449		0.9884	0.9678	0.9794	0.9110	0.9864
LPSS	0.0394	0.0117		0.9716	0.9830	0.9116	0.9865
NES	0.0527	0.0327	0.0288		0.9675	0.8974	0.9587
NSU	0.0640	0.0208	0.0171	0.0331		0.9023	0.9762
SAW	0.1400	0.0932	0.0926	0.1083	0.1029		0.9102
Abroad	0.0537	0.0137	0.0136	0.0422	0.0240	0.0941

Group	Accessions	Na	Ne	I	Ho	He	PIC
A	33	2.5750±0.4975	2.3226±0.3374	0.8654±0.1620	0.8055±0.1417	0.5696±0.0636	0.4716
B	15	2.5125±0.5030	2.2471±0.3383	0.8330±0.1627	0.8153±0.1530	0.5651±0.0686	0.3993
C	96	2.5750±0.4975	2.2922±0.2894	0.8571±0.1495	0.8363±0.1111	0.5599±0.0553	0.4380
C1	70	2.5750±0.4975	2.3136±0.3098	0.8635±0.1551	0.8291±0.1199	0.5643±0.0584	0.4531
C2	26	2.5625±0.4992	2.1912±0.2797	0.8163±0.1391	0.8555 ±0.1212	0.5477±0.0558	0.3420
C11	37	2.5750±0.4975	2.3014±0.3143	0.8589±0.1561	0.8332±0.1182	0.5664±0.0603	0.4382
C12	33	2.5750±0.4975	2.3028±0.3224	0.8583±0.1571	0.8255±0.1383	0.5654±0.0610	0.4348

Cluster		Accessions	Na	Ne	I	Ho	He	PIC
K=2	Red	68	2.5750±0.4975	2.2446±0.2626	0.8407±0.1403	0.8602±0.1056	0.5528±0.0520	0.3773
K=2	Green	76	2.5750±0.4975	2.3396±0.3329	0.8711±0.1620	0.7975±0.1315	0.5679±0.0619	0.5031
K=4	Red	47	2.5750± 0.4975	2.3496±0.3944	0.8745±0.1768	0.7439±0.1668	0.5785±0.0743	0.5296
	Green	31	2.5750± 0.4975	2.2844±0.3202	0.8516± 0.1549	0.8225±0.1399	0.5635±0.0607	0.4414
	Blue	19	2.5750±0.4975	2.2973±0.3199	0.8575±0.1568	0.8190±0.1311	0.5628±0.0608	0.4450
	Yellow	47	2.5750±0.4975	2.2238±0.2723	0.8312±0.1387	0.3634±0.2702	0.4984±0.1050	0.3543

[1]	张锋, Richard Dormatey, 刘寅笃, 李成举, 王云姣, 张春利, 张莹, 范又方, 姚攀锋, 毕真真, 刘玉汇, 白江平, 孙超 . 耐亚磷酸盐马铃薯的筛选与评价[J]. 植物学报, 2024, 59(4): 0-0.
[2]	段政勇, 丁敏, 王宇卓, 丁艺冰, 陈凌, 王瑞云, 乔治军. 糜子SBP基因家族全基因组鉴定及表达分析[J]. 植物学报, 2024, 59(2): 231-244.
[3]	李庆多, 栗冬梅. 全球蝙蝠巴尔通体流行状况分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23166-.
[4]	冯晨, 张洁, 黄宏文. 统筹植物就地保护与迁地保护的解决方案: 植物并地保护(parallel situ conservation)[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23184-.
[5]	齐海玲, 樊鹏振, 王跃华, 刘杰. 中国北方六省区胡桃的遗传多样性和群体结构[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 23120-.
[6]	熊飞, 刘红艳, 翟东东, 段辛斌, 田辉伍, 陈大庆. 基于基因组重测序的长江上游瓦氏黄颡鱼群体遗传结构[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(4): 22391-.
[7]	蒲佳佳, 杨平俊, 戴洋, 陶可欣, 高磊, 杜予州, 曹俊, 俞晓平, 杨倩倩. 长江下游外来生物福寿螺的种类及其种群遗传结构[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22346-.
[8]	何艺玥, 刘玉莹, 张富斌, 秦强, 曾燏, 吕振宇, 杨坤. 梯级水利工程背景下的嘉陵江干流蛇鮈群体遗传多样性和遗传结构[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(11): 23160-.
[9]	王宇卓, 林元香, 薛亚鹏, 段政勇, 王晓丹, 陈凌, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云, 乔治军. 山西糜子核心种质分子身份证构建[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(1): 159-168.
[10]	刘佳佳, 张大众, 张渊博, 张楚楚, 周佳玥, 熊亚红, 卓振生, 饶煜健, 冯佰利. 硒和碲对缓解糜子镉毒害及减少籽粒镉积累的调控效应[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(1): 62-76.
[11]	杨清华, 王洪露, 冯佰利. 糜子品质研究进展与展望[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(1): 22-33.
[12]	孙维悦, 舒江平, 顾钰峰, 莫日根高娃, 杜夏瑾, 刘保东, 严岳鸿. 基于保护基因组学揭示荷叶铁线蕨的濒危机制[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(7): 21508-.
[13]	程思祺, 姜峰, 金光泽. 温带森林阔叶植物幼苗叶经济谱及其与防御性状的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(6): 678-686.
[14]	陶克涛, 白东义, 图格琴, 赵若阳, 安塔娜, 铁木齐尔·阿尔腾齐米克, 宝音德力格尔, 哈斯, 芒来, 韩海格. 基于基因组SNPs对东亚家马不同群体遗传多样性的评估[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(5): 21031-.
[15]	崔静, 徐明芳, 章群, 李瑶, 曾晓舒, 李莎. 基于3种线粒体标记探讨中日沿海角木叶鲽遗传多样性差异[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(5): 21485-.