Chin Bull Bot ›› 2019, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (4): 509-514.doi: 10.11983/CBB19101


• TECHNIQUES AND METHODS • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Identification of Chilling Tolerance of Rice Seedlings by Cold Water Bath

Liu Dongfeng,Tang Yongyan,Luo Shengtao,Luo Wei,Li Zhitao,Chong Kang,Xu Yunyuan()   

  1. Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Physiology, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China
  • Received:2019-05-29 Accepted:2019-06-11 Online:2020-01-08 Published:2019-07-01
  • Contact: Xu Yunyuan


The premise of studies on rice chilling tolerance is to find an efficient and accurate way to evaluate chilling tolerance of rice seedling. In this study, we developed an efficient technology to evaluate the cold tolerance at seedling stage by using a constant temperature water bath, based on the characteristics of excellent temperature uniformity for circulation of water. In this method, the setting temperature of environment temperature and water bath was 20°C and 4°C, respectively. From the results of two subspecies (indica/xian and japonica/geng), we summarized the reference treatment time for different survival rate of cultivars. Some attention to the cold treatment procedure was also discussed.

Key words: rice, seedling, cold tolerance, low temperature water bath

Figure 1

Germination and sowing of rice seeds, and the way of seedling culture (A) Germination of rice seeds; (B) Placement of germination seeds in 96-well plates without bottom; (C) Trefoil stage seedlings (Bar=2 cm)"

Figure 2

The diagram of low temperature water bath treatment of rice seedlings (A) The temperature of water bath within 24 h; (B) Seedlings under chilling treatment in 4°C water bath; (C) Partially enlarged detail of the seedlings in the cold water bath tank; (D) A diagram of the fixation pattern of seedlings in cold water bath"

Figure 3

Effect of submerged depth of cold water on low temperature tolerance of rice Red arrow indicated the site of shoot apical meristem under different water depth in chilling treatment I, II and III. Dotted lines represent the water surface. The survival rates were indicated on the top of the seedlings recoveried for 7 days. Treatment with 28oC water was used as control (left). Bars=6 cm"

Figure 4

The evaluation of cold tolerance for different rice varieties at seedling stage (A) Phenotypic response to chilling in DJ, NIP and MH86, the survival rate was determined after cold-water treatment at 4°C for 96 h and subsequent recovery at 28°C for 7 days (means±SD, n≥30, three replicates); (B) The phenotype for seedlings of ZH10 and OX8 after the chilling treatment at 4°C for 120 h, subsequently at 28°C for 50 days. Bars=2 cm"

Table 2

The recommended treatment time for different survival rates of cultivars of indica/xian and japonica/geng"

Cultivars Survival rate (>50%) Survival rate (<10%)
KY131, Kitaake 60-80 h 96-120 h
DJ, HY 72-84 h 120-144 h
ZH10, NIP 72-96 h 120-144 h
YD 96-144 h 168-192 h
ZF802, GLA4, IR64 12-28 h 40-60 h
93-11, MH86 24-40 h 48-60 h
[1] Andaya VC, Tai TH ( 2006). Fine mapping of the qCTS12 locus, a major QTL for seedling cold tolerance in rice. Theor Appl Genet 113, 467-475.
[2] Baba S, Takahashi Y ( 1956). Water and sand culture. In:Togari Y, Matsuo T, Hatamari M, Yamada N, Horada T, Suzuki N, eds. Sakumotsi-Shiken-ho (Laboratory Manual in Crop Science). Kyokai, Tokyo: Nogyo-Gijitsu. pp. 157-185.
[3] Bonnecarrère V, Borsani O, Díaz P, Capdevielle F, Blanco P, Monza J ( 2011). Response to photoxidative stress induced by cold in japonica rice is genotype dependent. Plant Sci 180, 726-732.
[4] Ma Y, Dai XY, Xu YY, Luo W, Zheng XM, Zeng DL, Pan YJ, Lin XL, Liu HH, Zhang DJ, Xiao J, Guo XY, Xu SJ, Niu YD, Jin JB, Zhang H, Xu X, Li LG, Wang W, Qian Q, Ge S, Chong K ( 2015). COLD1 confers chilling tolerance in rice. Cell 160, 1209-1221.
[5] Yoshida S, Forno DA, Cock JH, Gomez KA ( 1976). Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice. Las Banos, Laguna: IRRI. pp. 62.
[6] Zhang X, Guo XP, Lei CL, Cheng ZJ, Lin QB, Wang JL, Wu FQ, Wang J, Wan JM ( 2011). Overexpression of SlCZFP1, a novel TFIIIA-type zinc finger protein from tomato, confers enhanced cold tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Mol Biol Rep 29, 185-196.
[1] yuchun Rao. Research Progress on Rice Root Genetics and Breeding [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2020, 55(3): 0-0.
[2] Xinghui Lu,Runguo Zang,Yi Ding,Jihong Huang,Yue Xu. Habitat characteristics and its effects on seedling abundance of Hopea hainanensis, a Wild Plant with Extremely Small Populations [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2020, 28(3): 289-295.
[3] Han Mei-ling, Tan Ru-jiao, Chao Dai-yin. A New Progress of Green Revolution: Epigenetic Modification Dual-regulated by Gibberellin and Nitrogen Supply Contributes to Breeding of High Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency Rice [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2020, 55(1): 5-8.
[4] Zhang Tong,Guo Yalu,Chen Yue,Ma Jinjiao,Lan Jinping,Yan Gaowei,Liu Yuqing,Xu Shan,Li Liyun,Liu Guozhen,Dou Shijuan. Expression Characterization of Rice OsPR10A and Its Function in Response to Drought Stress [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2019, 54(6): 711-722.
[5] Zhang Shuo, Wu Changyin. Long Noncoding RNA Ef-cd Promotes Maturity Without Yield Penalty in Rice [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2019, 54(5): 550-553.
[6] Li Weitao, He Min, Chen Xuewei. Discovery of ZmFBL41 Chang7-2 as A Key Weapon against Banded Leaf and Sheath Blight Resistance in Maize [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2019, 54(5): 547-549.
[7] Tian Huaidong, Li Jing, Tian Baohua, Niu Pengfei, Li Zhen, Yue Zhongxiao, Qu Yajuan, Jiang Jianfang, Wang Guangyuan, Cen Huihui, Li Nan, Yan Feng. Method for N-methyl-N-nitrosourea Mutagenesis on Hermaphroditic Germ Cells of Rice [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2019, 54(5): 625-633.
[8] Zhou Chun, Jiao Ran, Hu Ping, Lin Han, Hu Juan, Xu Na, Wu Xianmei, Rao Yuchun, Wang Yuexing. Gene Mapping and Candidate Gene Analysis of Rice Early Senescence Mutant LS-es1 [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2019, 54(5): 606-619.
[9] Liu Jin, Yao Xiaoyun, Yu Liqin, Li Hui, Zhou Huiying, Wang Jiayu, Li Maomao. Detection and Analysis of Dynamic Quantitative Trait Loci at Three Years for Seed Storability in Rice (Oryza sativa) [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2019, 54(4): 464-473.
[10] Cheng Xinjie, Yu Hengxiu, Cheng Zhukuan. Protocols for Analyzing Rice Meiotic Chromosomes [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2019, 54(4): 503-508.
[11] Wang Xiaolin,Wang Ertao. NRT1.1B Connects Root Microbiota and Nitrogen Use in Rice [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2019, 54(3): 285-287.
[12] Yang Dewei,Wang Mo,Han Libo,Tang Dingzhong,Li Shengping. Progress of Cloning and Breeding Application of Blast Resistance Genes in Rice and Avirulence Genes in Blast Fungi [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2019, 54(2): 265-276.
[13] Li Lulu, Yin Wenchao, Niu Mei, Meng Wenjing, Zhang Xiaoxing, Tong Hongning. Functional Analysis of Brassinosteroids in Salt Stress Responses in Rice [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2019, 54(2): 185-193.
[14] Ye Wenlan,Ma Guolan,Yuan liyanan,Zheng Shiyi,Cheng Linqiao,Fang Yuan,Rao Yuchun. Research Progress on Pathogenic Characteristics and Resistance of Bacterial Panicle Blight of Rice [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2019, 54(2): 277-283.
[15] Gao Huaifeng,Zhang Yafei,Wang Guodong,Sun Xiwu,He Yue,Peng Futian,Xiao Yuansong. The Effect of Molybdenum on Drought Stress Response in Peach [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2019, 54(2): 227-236.
Full text



[1] LIU Jun;ZHAO Lan-Yong;FENG Zhen;ZHANG Mei-Rong;WU Yin-Feng. Optimization Selection of Genetic Transformation Regeneration System from Leaves of Dendranthema morifolium[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2004, 21(05): 556 -558 .
[2] Luo Jian-ping and Ja Jing-fen. Structure and Function of Plant Oligosaceaharins[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1996, 13(04): 28 -33 .
[3] YANG Qi-He SONG Song-Quan YE Wan-HuiYIN Shou-HuaT. Mechanism of Seed Photosensitivity and FactorsInfluencing Seed Photosensitivity[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2003, 20(02): 238 -247 .
[4] CUI Yue-Hua;WANG Mao and SUN Ke-Lian. Morphological Study of Gutta-containing Cells in Eucommia ulmoides Oliv.[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1999, 16(04): 439 -443 .
[5] CHEN Shao-Liang LI Jin-Ke BI Wang-Fu WANG Sha-Sheng. Genotypic Variation in Accumulation of Salt Ions, Betaine and Sugars in Poplar Under Conditions of Salt Stress[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2001, 18(05): 587 -596 .
[6] . Advances in Research into Low-Phytic-Acid Mutants in Crops[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2005, 22(04): 463 -470 .
[7] Cong Ma, Weiwen Kong. Research Progress in Plant Metacaspase[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2012, 47(5): 543 -549 .
[8] Chang’en Tian, Yuping Zhou. Research Progress in Plant IQ Motif-containing Calmodulin-binding Proteins[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2013, 48(4): 447 -460 .
[9] Huawei Xu, Dianyun Hou. Research Advances in Protein Transport into Chloroplasts in Plant Cell#br#[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2018, 53(2): 264 -275 .
[10] Li Jiandong, Zheng Huiying. ?ber die Anwendung der Braun-Blanquet's Methode in der Steppen-Untersuchung[J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 1983, 7(3): 186 -203 .