喷施不同植物生长调节剂对盐碱地小麦生长发育的影响

doi:10.11983/CBB24182

植物学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (3): 354-362.DOI: 10.11983/CBB24182 cstr: 32102.14.CBB24182

喷施不同植物生长调节剂对盐碱地小麦生长发育的影响

许庭旸¹^,²^,^†, 刘雨辰²^,^†, 王万鹏², 苏航², 苏昆龙², 吴振映², 吕明², 李福利², 王小山¹^,^*(), 付春祥²^,^*()

¹扬州大学动物科学与技术学院, 扬州 225100
²中国科学院青岛生物能源与过程研究所, 山东能源研究院, 青岛新能源山东省实验室, 青岛 266101

收稿日期:2024-11-28 接受日期:2025-02-09 出版日期:2025-05-10 发布日期:2025-02-08
通讯作者: *E-mail: wanggrass@163.com; fucx@qibebt.ac.cn
作者简介:
†共同第一作者
基金资助:
中央引导地方科技发展资金(2022ZY006);青岛新能源山东实验室“抓攻关”项目(QNESLKPP202302)

Effects of Different Plant Growth Regulators on Wheat Growth and Development in the Saline-alkali Land

Xu Tingyang¹^,²^,^†, Liu Yuchen²^,^†, Wang Wanpeng², Su Hang², Su Kunlong², Wu Zhenying², Lϋ Ming², Li Fuli², Wang Xiaoshan¹^,^*(), Fu Chunxiang²^,^*()

¹College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225100, China
²Qingdao New Energy Shandong Laboratory, Shandong Energy Research Institute, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266101, China

Received:2024-11-28 Accepted:2025-02-09 Online:2025-05-10 Published:2025-02-08
Contact: *E-mail: wanggrass@163.com; fucx@qibebt.ac.cn
About author:
†These authors contributed equally to this paper

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 植物生长调节剂是天然或人工合成的化学物质, 它们不仅对作物的生长发育具有重要调节作用, 还能提高植物的抗逆性。为研究不同植物生长调节剂对盐碱胁迫下小麦(Triticum aestivum)生长发育的影响, 探索提高盐碱地作物产量的方法, 在2023-2024年间, 于黄河三角洲农业高新技术产业示范区的盐碱地开展小麦喷施试验。试验分为4组, 包括蒸馏水对照组、0.5%褐藻寡糖组、植物黄金组以及0.5%褐藻寡糖与植物黄金的混合喷施组, 分别于2024年3月28日、4月12日、4月28日和5月12日对小麦进行喷施。结果表明, 喷施褐藻寡糖与植物黄金的混合物后, 小麦的穗粒数和百粒重显著增加。特别是混合喷施组, 其盐碱地小麦的产量达每公顷1 174.5 kg, 较单独喷施褐藻寡糖组和植物黄金组分别提高了14.4%和46.9%。综上表明, 褐藻寡糖与植物黄金联合应用能显著提高小麦在盐碱地的适应性, 显示出其在盐碱地小麦生产中的重要应用潜力。

关键词: 褐藻寡糖, 氨基酸叶面肥, 盐碱地, 小麦, 产量

Abstract: INTRODUCTION:Plant growth regulators are natural or artificially synthesized chemical substances that play an important regulatory role in the growth and development of crops, and can enhance the resistance of plants to stress. RATIONALE To study the effects of different plant growth regulators on the growth and development of wheat under salt-alkali stress, and to explore methods to increase crop yield in saline-alkali land, we conducted spraying experiments on wheat in saline-alkali soil in the Yellow River Delta Agricultural High-tech Industry Demonstration Zone from 2023 to 2024. The experiment was divided into four groups: a distilled water control group, a 0.5% alginate aligosaccharide group, a Plant Gold group, and a mixed group of 0.5% alginate aligosaccharide and Plant Gold. The wheat was sprayed on March 28, April 12, April 28, and May 12, 2024. RESULTS: The results showed that after spraying alginate oligosaccharide and its mixture with Plant Gold, the number of grains per ear and the 100-grain weight of wheat significantly increased. In particular, the group that received the mixture of alginate oligosaccharide and Plant Gold achieved a theoretical yield of 1 174.5 kg·hm^-2 for wheat in saline-alkali soil, which was an increase of 14.4% and 46.9% compared to the groups treated with only alginate oligosaccharide and Plant Gold, respectively. CONCLUSION: Therefore, the combined application of alginate oligosaccharide and Plant Gold can significantly enhance the adaptability of wheat in saline-alkali land, demonstrating its important application potential in wheat production in such environments. After selecting 1 m × 1 m sample plots within the experimental block and conducting spray tests with different plant growth regulators, the theoretical yields of different groups showed different changes. Among them, the yield of the mixed spray group was significantly higher than that of the control group.

Key words: alginate oligosaccharides, amino acid foliar fertilizer, saline-alkali land, wheat, yield

许庭旸, 刘雨辰, 王万鹏, 苏航, 苏昆龙, 吴振映, 吕明, 李福利, 王小山, 付春祥. 喷施不同植物生长调节剂对盐碱地小麦生长发育的影响. 植物学报, 2025, 60(3): 354-362.

Xu Tingyang, Liu Yuchen, Wang Wanpeng, Su Hang, Su Kunlong, Wu Zhenying, Lϋ Ming, Li Fuli, Wang Xiaoshan, Fu Chunxiang. Effects of Different Plant Growth Regulators on Wheat Growth and Development in the Saline-alkali Land. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2025, 60(3): 354-362.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.chinbullbotany.com/CN/10.11983/CBB24182

https://www.chinbullbotany.com/CN/Y2025/V60/I3/354

图/表 5

图1 植物生长调节剂处理对盐碱地小麦表型的影响 Control: 蒸馏水(对照); AO: 0.5%褐藻寡糖处理; PG: 1:1000稀释植物黄金处理; Mixture: 0.5%褐藻寡糖与1:1000稀释植物黄金混合处理。Bars=10 cm

Figure 1 Morphological characterization of wheat in the saline-alkali land after treatment with plant growth regulators Control: Distilled water; AO: 0.5% alginate oligosaccharide treatment; PG: 1:1000 diluted Plant Gold treatment; Mixture: 0.5% alginate oligosaccharide mixed with 1:1000 diluted Plant Gold. Bars=10 cm

图2 植物生长调节剂处理对盐碱地小麦生理与性状相关指标的影响 (A) 株高; (B) 穗数; (C) 穗粒数; (D) 百粒重。数据为3个小区(每区1 m × 1 m)试验结果的平均值±标准误(n=3)。不同小写字母表示各处理间差异显著(单因素方差分析, LSD检验, P<0.05)。Control、AO、PG和Mixture同图1。

Figure 2 Effects of plant growth regulators on physiologically and traits related indicators of wheat grown in the saline-alkali land (A) Plant height; (B) Number of ears; (C) Number of grains per ear; (D) 100-grain weight. Values are means±SE (n=3) of 3 sample plots (1 m × 1 m per plot). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments (one-way ANOVA, LSD test, P<0.05). Control, AO, PG, and Mixture are the same as shown in Figure 1.

图3 不同植物生长调节剂喷施处理的盐碱地小麦籽粒表型 Control、AO、PG和Mixture同图1。Bars=1 cm

Figure 3 Morphological characterization of wheat grains grown in the saline-alkali land after treatment with plant grow- th regulators Control, AO, PG, and Mixture are the same as shown in Figure 1. Bars=1 cm

图4 植物生长调节剂喷施处理对盐碱地小麦单位面积内理论产量的影响数据为3个小区(每区1 m × 1 m)试验结果的平均值±标准误(n=3)。不同小写字母表示各处理间差异显著(单因素方差分析, LSD检验, P<0.05)。Control、AO、PG和Mixture同图1。

Figure 4 Effects of theoretical yield per unit area of wheat grown in the saline-alkali land after treatment with plant grow- th regulators Values are means±SE (n=3) of 3 sample plots (1 m × 1 m per plot). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments (one-way ANOVA, LSD test, P< 0.05). Control, AO, PG, and Mixture are the same as shown in Figure 1.

图5 植物生长调节剂喷施处理对盐碱地小麦籽粒营养成分的影响 (A) 淀粉含量; (B) 脂肪含量; (C) 蛋白质含量。数据为3个小区(每区1 m × 1 m)试验结果的平均值±标准误(n=3)。不同小写字母表示各处理间差异显著(单因素方差分析, LSD检验, P<0.05)。Control、AO、PG和Mixture同图1。

Figure 5 Effects of plant growth regulators on nutrition facts of wheat grains grown in the saline-alkali land (A) Starch content; (B) Fat content; (C) Protein content. Values are means±SE (n=3) of 3 sample plots (1 m × 1 m per plot). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments (one-way ANOVA, LSD test, P<0.05). Control, AO, PG, and Mixture are the same as shown in Figure 1.

参考文献 24

[1]	Dang Y, Chen HB (2014). Guidelines for the Health of Grain. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers. pp. 27-28. (in Chinese)
	党毅, 陈虎彪 (2014). 五谷养生指南. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社. pp. 27-28.
[2]	Han RF, Ma WH, Dong XY, Fang TT, Zhang SH (2024). Effects of different plant growth regulators on the root growth of winter wheat seedlings stage. Humic Acid (3), 42-47. (in Chinese)
	韩锐锋, 马文豪, 董向阳, 方甜甜, 张书红 (2024). 不同植物生长调节剂对冬小麦苗期根系生长的影响. 腐植酸 (3), 42-47.
[3]	Hu J, Peng SH, Zhang YQ, Wei JQ, Mao JL, Qiu J, Hu YL, Hou LJ, Ye Q (2024). Effects of algal oligosaccharides on soil-nutrients, wheat-growth and rhizosphere microbial diversity. Mol Plant Breed https://link.cnki.net/urlid/46.1068.S.20240220.1347.009. (in Chinese)
	胡静, 彭守华, 张玉琴, 尉继强, 毛积磊, 邱杰, 胡怡林, 侯丽娟, 叶全 (2024). 褐藻寡糖对土壤养分、小麦生长以及根际微生物多样性的影响. 分子植物育种 https://link.cnki.net/urlid/46.1068.S.20240220.1347.009.
[4]	Ji MH (1997). Seaweed Chemistry. Beijing: Science Press. pp. 318-329. (in Chinese)
	纪明候 (1997). 海藻化学. 北京: 科学出版社. pp. 318-329.
[5]	Li HT, Sui XQ, Yang J, Wang XY (2024). Regulatory effects of foliar sprays of plant growth regulators on endogenous hormones and carbon metabolism in alfalfa. Pratac Sci 41, 437-447. (in Chinese)
	李浩天, 隋晓青, 杨静, 王鑫尧 (2024). 叶面喷施植物生长调节剂对紫花苜蓿内源激素及碳代谢的调控效应. 草业科学 41, 437-447.
[6]	Li JZ (2019). Study on application effect of water-soluble fertilizer containing amino acids on wheat. Mod Agric Sci Technol (5), 14, 17. (in Chinese)
	李佳钊 (2019). 含氨基酸水溶性肥料在小麦上的应用效果研究. 现代农业科技 (5), 14, 17.
[7]	Li XY, Gu Y, Xu FF, Bao JS (2025). Research progress on post-translational modifications of starch biosynthesis- related proteins in rice endosperm. Chin Bull Bot 60, 256-270. (in Chinese)
	李新宇, 谷月, 徐非非, 包劲松 (2025). 水稻胚乳淀粉合成相关蛋白的翻译后修饰研究进展. 植物学报 60, 256-270. DOI
[8]	Liu XM (2019). Effects of water-soluble fertilizer containing amino acids on yield and economic benefits of wheat in saline-alkali land. Rural Econ Sci Technol 30(22), 133, 148. (in Chinese)
	刘雪梅 (2019). 含氨基酸水溶肥对盐碱地小麦产量和经济效益的影响. 农村经济与科技 30(22), 133, 148.
[9]	Liu YP, Ruan ZY (2024). Effects of different plant growth regulators and foliar fertilizer combinations on winter wheat. Anhui Agric Sci Bull 30(11), 19-23. (in Chinese)
	刘银萍, 阮赞誉 (2024). 不同植物生长调节剂与叶面肥组合对冬小麦的影响研究. 安徽农学通报 30(11), 19-23.
[10]	Ma LN (2020). Study on Soil Microbial Response Characteristics of Soda Saline-Sodic Soil Improved by Rice Cultivation in Northeast China. PhD dissertation. Changchun: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Aca- demy of Sciences). pp.1-3. (in Chinese)
	马丽娜 (2020). 东北苏打盐碱地种稻改良条件下土壤微生物响应特征研究. 博士论文. 长春: 中国科学院大学(中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所). pp. 1-3.
[11]	National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China, National Medical Products Administration (2016). National food safety standards Determination of fat in food: GB5009.6-2016. (in Chinese)
	中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会, 国家食品药品监督管理总局 (2016). 食品安全国家标准食品中脂肪的测定:GB 5009. 6-2016.
[12]	People's Education Press (2020). Senior High School Biology Optional Compulsory Edition 1. Beijing: People's Education Press. pp. 100. (in Chinese)
	人民教育出版社 (2020). 人教版高中生物选择性必修1 稳态与调节. 北京: 人民教育出版社. pp. 100.
[13]	Qu XC, Liu Z, Li J, Li JF (2024). Effect of foliar spraying of Shangluo Tiantai amino acid water-soluble fertilizer on the growth, development and yield of small green cabbage. Bull Agric Sci Technol (5), 134-137. (in Chinese)
	瞿晓苍, 刘峥, 李静, 李剑锋 (2024). 叶面喷施商洛天泰氨基酸水溶肥对小青菜生长发育及产量的影响研究. 农业科技通讯 (5), 134-137.
[14]	Shao YF, Zhu DW, Yu J, Fang CY, Mou RX, Hu XQ, Zhu ZW, Chen MX (2022). Development of certified reference materials for the determination of apparent amylose content in rice. Molecules 27, 4647.
[15]	Sun CC (2024). Biological Preparation of Alginate Oligosaccharides and its Application in the Resistance of Sesuvium portulacastrum to Salt Stress. Master's thesis. Dalian: Dalian Ocean University. pp. 7-9. (in Chinese)
	孙晨晨 (2024). 褐藻寡糖的生物法制备及其在海马齿(Sesuvium portulacastrum)抗盐胁迫中的应用. 硕士论文. 大连: 大连海洋大学. pp. 7-9.
[16]	Tang KT, Zhang FF, Wang XZ, Yue YF, Lu WH, Ma CH (2018). Study on the hay yield and nutrition of ten alfalfa varieties in different fall dormancy classes in northern Xin- jiang. Chin J Grassl Sci 40(3), 43-48. (in Chinese)
	唐开婷, 张凡凡, 王旭哲, 岳亚飞, 鲁为华, 马春晖 (2018). 北疆10个不同秋眠级紫花苜蓿引进品种产量与营养品质研究. 中国草地学报 40(3), 43-48.
[17]	Wang H, Cao JY, Hou J, Zhao L, Han XY (2023). Effect of spraying algal oligosaccharide on drought resistance of tea plant. Shandong Agric Sci 55(12), 63-70. (in Chinese)
	王恒, 曹佳茵, 侯剑, 赵丽, 韩晓阳 (2023). 喷施褐藻寡糖对茶树抗旱性的影响. 山东农业科学 55(12), 63-70.
[18]	Wang HS, Zhang LF, Liu HY, Wang J, Gu XJ, Zheng CP, Liu MX, Li YK (2025). Rapid determination of oil content in tobacco seeds by serial Soxhlet extraction. J Yunnan Minzu Univ (Nat Sci Ed) 34, 46-50. (in Chinese)
	王华顺, 张玲芳, 刘华银, 王晋, 顾学娇, 郑朝胚, 刘铭心, 李银科 (2025). 串联索氏提取法快速测定烟草种子中油脂质量分数. 云南民族大学学报(自然科学版) 34, 46-50.
[19]	Wang ZQ (1993). Saline Soils in China. Beijing: Science Press. pp. 538-542. (in Chinese)
	王遵亲 (1993). 中国盐渍土. 北京: 科学出版社. pp. 538-542.
[20]	Wang ZY, Lu YC (2024). Effects of amino acid spraying and seed coating on growth and cold-tolerance of maize seedlings. Chin Sugar 46(3), 10-17. (in Chinese)
	王子钰, 路运才 (2024). 氨基酸喷施和种子包衣对玉米幼苗生长及抗冷性的影响. 中国糖料 46(3), 10-17.
[21]	Xie L (2024). Salt and alkali desert is also a mountain of gold and silver. Consumption Daily. 2024-09-24. (in Chinese)
	解磊 (2024). 盐碱荒滩也是金山银山. 消费日报. 2024-09- 24.
[22]	Xu M (2018). Effects of a Compound Amino Acid Preparation on Stress Resistance of Chinese Cabbage and Cotton. Master's thesis. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. pp. 4-7. (in Chinese)
	许猛 (2018). 复合氨基酸制剂对小白菜和棉花抗逆性的影响. 硕士论文. 北京: 中国农业科学院. pp. 4-7.
[23]	Zhang XY, Zhou JK, Li ZM, Qin YM, Yu RT, Zhang HW, Zheng YH, Zhu JW, Zhang DM, Fu L (2019). The qualitative electrochemical determination of multiple components in seaweed fertilizer. Int J Electrochem Sci 14, 6283-6291.
[24]	Zhang ZH (2018). Regulatory Effects of Different Amino- Acid Foliar Fertilizers on High Temperature Stress at Flowering Stage in Maize. Master's thesis. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University. pp. 12-14. (in Chinese)
	张志辉 (2018). 氨基酸叶面肥处理对玉米开花期高温胁迫的调控效应研究. 硕士论文. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学. pp. 12-14.

喷施不同植物生长调节剂对盐碱地小麦生长发育的影响

Effects of Different Plant Growth Regulators on Wheat Growth and Development in the Saline-alkali Land

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 24

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	邱四春, 康禧, 张舒琪, 孙羽晨, 刘世岩, 张跃强, 史雪, 许盛宝. 新疆春小麦品种加代模式和遗传转化效率探究[J]. 植物学报, 2026, 61(2): 291-299.
[2]	李月琪, 麻仲花, 刘威帆, 苏明, 万猛虎, 李清云, 张丹, 刘吉利, 吴娜. 垂直深旋耕配施有机肥对盐碱地玉米叶片衰老特性及产量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(1): 222-236.
[3]	徐恩相, 周蕾, 章晓炜, 张国萍, 仲杜伟, 黄智, 刘派, 迟永刚. 基于不同生育阶段冠层光谱和碳通量的水稻产量估算[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(1): 82-93.
[4]	王志波, 刘文胜, 吴瑞俊, 王国梁. 2018-2023年黄土高原丘陵沟壑区川台地农田长期监测样地作物收获期性状和产量数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(8): 1301-1311.
[5]	李少伟, 何永涛, 孙维, 戴尔阜. 2016-2020年拉萨河谷典型农田生态系统长期监测样地作物收获期性状和产量数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(8): 1321-1328.
[6]	樊月玲, 蒋正德, 叶佳舒, 郑立臣, 陈欣. 2005-2015年下辽河平原农田长期观测样地主要农作物收获期性状和产量数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(8): 1271-1282.
[7]	王书伟, 林静慧, 周伟, 单军, 赵旭, 颜晓元. 2004-2020年太湖平原典型农田生态系统长期监测样地作物收获期性状和产量数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(8): 1283-1292.
[8]	王鹏, 李向义, 高艳菊, 热甫开提·沙比提, 曾凡江. 2005-2010年塔克拉玛干沙漠南缘绿洲农田长期监测样地棉花收获期性状和产量数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(8): 1329-1338.
[9]	朱喜, 何志斌, 杜明武, 赵丽雯, 吴丹丹. 2004-2010年河西走廊中段绿洲农田生态系统长期监测样地作物性状和产量数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(8): 1312-1320.
[10]	严文秀, 赵诗晗, 郑春燕, 张萍, 沈海花, 常锦峰, 徐亢. 基于多物候指标的人工饲草长势监测及产量估测[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(7): 1096-1109.
[11]	张斌, 张浩成, 乔天, 吕治兵, 许亚男, 李雪芹, 原向阳, 冯美臣, 张美俊. 接种丛枝菌根真菌对干旱胁迫燕麦非结构性碳水化合物及碳氮磷化学计量特征的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(7): 1082-1095.
[12]	郭宇荣, 刘红, 王振华, 田岗, 刘鑫, 郭杰, 李春勇, 李会霞. 长杂谷系列谷子杂交种产量优势及其生理机制[J]. 植物学报, 2025, 60(6): 931-943.
[13]	唐远翔, 熊仕臣, 朱洪锋, 张新生, 游成铭, 刘思凝, 谭波, 徐振锋. 长期氮添加对四川盆地西缘常绿阔叶林优势树种凋落叶产量及碳氮磷归还的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(5): 720-731.
[14]	贾盖亚, 张娜, 李宏伟, 李滨, 李振声, 孔照胜, 郑琪. 抗叶锈病小偃麦代换系WTS135的遗传学分析与分子标记开发[J]. 植物学报, 2025, 60(5): 804-815.
[15]	刘笑, 杜琬莹, 张云秀, 唐成名, 李华伟, 夏海勇, 樊守金, 孔令安. NO₃^-缓解小麦根部NH₄⁺毒性机理(长英文摘要）[J]. 植物学报, 2024, 59(3): 397-413.