植物学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (3): 441-451.DOI: 10.11983/CBB23105
康敏1,4, 张美莹1,4, 齐秀双6, 佟宁宁4,5, 李旸4,5, 舒庆艳4,5, 刘政安4,5, 吕长平2,3,*(), 彭丽平4,5,*()
收稿日期:
2023-08-03
接受日期:
2023-12-19
出版日期:
2024-05-01
发布日期:
2023-12-29
通讯作者:
吕长平, 湖南农业大学副教授, 硕士生导师, 主要研究方向为园林与观赏园艺植物栽培生理。曾获湖南省科技进步三等奖4次, 国家教学成果二等奖、湖南农业大学教学成果二等奖各1次; 以通讯作者和第一作者身份在Horticultural Science and Technology及湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版)等学术期刊上发表研究论文30多篇。E-mail: 基金资助:
Min Kang1,4, Meiying Zhang1,4, Xiushuang Qi6, Ningning Tong4,5, Yang Li4,5, Qingyan Shu4,5, Zheng’an Liu4,5, Changping Lü2,3,*(), Liping Peng4,5,*()
Received:
2023-08-03
Accepted:
2023-12-19
Online:
2024-05-01
Published:
2023-12-29
Contact:
E-mail: 摘要: 以伊藤杂种‘和谐’(Itoh hybrids ‘He Xie’)的鳞芽为材料建立离体快繁技术体系, 可克服传统方法繁育较慢的缺点, 加速伊藤杂种优良品种的繁育推广。采用单因子试验设计, 分别探究不同灭菌时间、不同植物生长调节剂浓度、不同根诱导时间以及不同生根苗等级对‘和谐’组培苗启动、增殖、生根和驯化效果的影响。结果表明, 用2%次氯酸钠溶液的最佳灭菌时间为12分钟, 鳞芽污染率为9.09%; 最佳初始培养基配方为MS+1.5 mg∙L-1 6-BA+0.2 mg∙L-1 GA3+0.5 mg∙L-1 AgNO3; 最佳增殖培养基配方为MS+450 mg∙L-1 CaCl2+0.5 mg∙L-1 6-BA+0.2 mg∙L-1 IBA+0.2 mg∙L-1 GA3+0.5 mg∙L-1 AgNO3, 增殖系数为3.3; 无根苗在根诱导培养基1/2MS+1.0 mg∙L-1腐胺+2.0 mg∙L-1 IBA上, 经4°C低温暗培养8天后常温光照培养30天, 再转入根形成培养基1/2MS+1.0 g∙L-1 AC, 培养20天生根率达66.7%; 苗移栽的基质为珍珠岩:蛭石:草炭土=1:1:1 (v/v/v), 移栽60天后, 一级苗成活率最高为52.0%, 二级苗和三级苗则大部分死亡, 表明生根质量对移栽成活至关重要。
康敏, 张美莹, 齐秀双, 佟宁宁, 李旸, 舒庆艳, 刘政安, 吕长平, 彭丽平. 伊藤杂种‘和谐’组培快繁体系的建立. 植物学报, 2024, 59(3): 441-451.
Min Kang, Meiying Zhang, Xiushuang Qi, Ningning Tong, Yang Li, Qingyan Shu, Zheng’an Liu, Changping Lü, Liping Peng. Establishment of a Fast Breeding System for Itoh Hybrid ‘He Xie’ in Tissue Culture. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2024, 59(3): 441-451.
图1 ‘和谐’鳞芽启动与单芽增殖 (A) 花; (B) 外植体; (C)-(E) 鳞芽在不同浓度(0.5、1.0和1.5 mg∙L-1) 6-BA启动培养30天后试管苗生长状态; (F) 增殖培养30天后单芽生长状态。Bars=2 cm
Figure 1 Bud initiation and single bud proliferation of 'He Xie' (A) Flowers; (B) Explants; (C)-(E) The performance of test-tube plantlets after bud initiation at different 6-BA concentrations (0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mg∙L-1) for 30 days; (F) Growth situation of single shoot after proliferation culture for 30 days. Bars=2 cm
图2 ‘和谐’试管苗生根和驯化移栽的生长表现 (A) 用于生根诱导的单芽(bar=2 cm); (B) 春化30天(冷处理8天, 根诱导30天, 根伸长20天后于4°C冷藏30天)的生根苗(bar= 2 cm); (C)-(F) 不同生根质量的试管苗(C: 三级苗; D: 二级苗; E, F: 一级苗) (bars=2 cm); (G)-(I) 驯化60天不同生根质量的移栽苗(G: 三级苗; H: 二级苗; I: 一级苗) (bars=3 cm)
Figure 2 The growth performance for rooting and domesticated transplanting of ‘He Xie’ tube plantlet (A) Single shoots used for root induction (bar=2 cm); (B) Rooted seedlings after 30 d of vernalization (cold treatment for 8 days, root induction for 30 days, and root elongation for 20 days, cold storage at 4°C for 30 days) (bar=2 cm); (C)-(F) The test tube plantlets with different rooting qualities (C: Tertiary; D: Secondary; E, F: Primary) (bars=2 cm); (G)-(I) The transplanted seedlings of different rooting quality for domesticating 60 d (G: Tertiary; H: Secondary; I: Primary) (bars=3 cm)
Treatments | Time (min) | Sodium hypochlorite | Contamination rate (%) | Survival rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 8 | 2% | 62.5 | 100 |
X2 | 10 | 2% | 40.0 | 100 |
X3 | 12 | 2% | 9.09 | 100 |
表1 不同消毒时间下‘和谐’鳞芽的污染率和存活率
Table 1 Contamination rate and surviveal rate of ‘He Xie’ buds treated with different disinfection times
Treatments | Time (min) | Sodium hypochlorite | Contamination rate (%) | Survival rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 8 | 2% | 62.5 | 100 |
X2 | 10 | 2% | 40.0 | 100 |
X3 | 12 | 2% | 9.09 | 100 |
Treatments | GA3 (mg∙L-1) | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | Induction rate (%) | Browning rate (%) | Multiplication factor (n) | Stem length (cm) | Leaves per plant (n) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 100 | 20 | 2.40±0.26 b | 2.58±0.60 a | 6.47±1.01 a |
2 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 100 | 10 | 2.80±0.10 a | 2.95±0.23 a | 7.80±0.70 a |
3 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 100 | 10 | 2.93±0.12 a | 3.05±0.41 a | 6.93±0.21 a |
表2 不同浓度6-BA对‘和谐’鳞芽初代培养的影响
Table 2 Effect of different 6-BA concentrations on the primary culture of ‘He Xie’ buds
Treatments | GA3 (mg∙L-1) | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | Induction rate (%) | Browning rate (%) | Multiplication factor (n) | Stem length (cm) | Leaves per plant (n) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 100 | 20 | 2.40±0.26 b | 2.58±0.60 a | 6.47±1.01 a |
2 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 100 | 10 | 2.80±0.10 a | 2.95±0.23 a | 7.80±0.70 a |
3 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 100 | 10 | 2.93±0.12 a | 3.05±0.41 a | 6.93±0.21 a |
Treatments | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | IBA (mg∙L-1) | GA3 (mg∙L-1) | Multiplication factor (n) | Browning rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 3.25±0.33 a | 0.04±0.07 a |
2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 2.67±0.29 ab | 0.08±0.07 a |
3 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 2.13±0.33 b | 0.17±0.07 a |
表3 GA3浓度对‘和谐’试管苗增殖的影响
Table 3 Effect of GA3 concentration on proliferation of ‘He Xie’ test-tube plantlets
Treatments | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | IBA (mg∙L-1) | GA3 (mg∙L-1) | Multiplication factor (n) | Browning rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 3.25±0.33 a | 0.04±0.07 a |
2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 2.67±0.29 ab | 0.08±0.07 a |
3 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 2.13±0.33 b | 0.17±0.07 a |
Treatments | IBA (mg∙L-1) | Induction time (d) | Rooting rate (%) | Rooting number (n) | Root length (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.5 | 30 | 1.59±2.75 h | 0.67±1.15 cd | 1.53±2.66 bc |
2 | 0.5 | 40 | 19.05±2.75 fg | 2.00±1.15 abc | 5.20±2.66 a |
3 | 0.5 | 50 | 14.29±0.00 g | 1.33±0.58 cde | 3.87±0.23 ab |
4 | 1.0 | 30 | 19.05±8.24 fg | 1.33±0.58 cde | 5.33±1.94 a |
5 | 1.0 | 40 | 3.17±5.50 h | 0.67±1.15 cd | 1.53±2.66 bc |
6 | 1.0 | 50 | 0.00±0.00 h | 0.00±0.00 d | 0.00±0.00 c |
7 | 1.5 | 30 | 14.29±0.00 g | 1.67±1.15 abc | 4.17±2.75 ab |
8 | 1.5 | 40 | 33.33±8.25 de | 2.00±0.50 abc | 4.73±0.13 a |
9 | 1.5 | 50 | 28.57±0.00 ef | 2.67±1.15 ab | 5.33±0.50 a |
10 | 2.0 | 30 | 66.67±8.25 a | 3.33±0.58 a | 4.77±0.65 a |
11 | 2.0 | 40 | 42.86±0.00 bcd | 2.78±0.39 ab | 5.33±0.62 a |
12 | 2.0 | 50 | 47.62±8.24 bc | 2.33±0.67 abc | 4.95±1.58 a |
13 | 2.5 | 30 | 38.10±8.25 cde | 1.72±0.25 abc | 4.85±1.73 a |
14 | 2.5 | 40 | 71.43±0.00 a | 2.06±0.42 abc | 5.26±0.52 a |
15 | 2.5 | 50 | 52.38±8.24 b | 2.11±0.84 abc | 5.38±0.98 a |
表4 IBA浓度与诱导时间对诱导生根的影响
Table 4 Effect of IBA concentration and induction time on induced rooting
Treatments | IBA (mg∙L-1) | Induction time (d) | Rooting rate (%) | Rooting number (n) | Root length (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.5 | 30 | 1.59±2.75 h | 0.67±1.15 cd | 1.53±2.66 bc |
2 | 0.5 | 40 | 19.05±2.75 fg | 2.00±1.15 abc | 5.20±2.66 a |
3 | 0.5 | 50 | 14.29±0.00 g | 1.33±0.58 cde | 3.87±0.23 ab |
4 | 1.0 | 30 | 19.05±8.24 fg | 1.33±0.58 cde | 5.33±1.94 a |
5 | 1.0 | 40 | 3.17±5.50 h | 0.67±1.15 cd | 1.53±2.66 bc |
6 | 1.0 | 50 | 0.00±0.00 h | 0.00±0.00 d | 0.00±0.00 c |
7 | 1.5 | 30 | 14.29±0.00 g | 1.67±1.15 abc | 4.17±2.75 ab |
8 | 1.5 | 40 | 33.33±8.25 de | 2.00±0.50 abc | 4.73±0.13 a |
9 | 1.5 | 50 | 28.57±0.00 ef | 2.67±1.15 ab | 5.33±0.50 a |
10 | 2.0 | 30 | 66.67±8.25 a | 3.33±0.58 a | 4.77±0.65 a |
11 | 2.0 | 40 | 42.86±0.00 bcd | 2.78±0.39 ab | 5.33±0.62 a |
12 | 2.0 | 50 | 47.62±8.24 bc | 2.33±0.67 abc | 4.95±1.58 a |
13 | 2.5 | 30 | 38.10±8.25 cde | 1.72±0.25 abc | 4.85±1.73 a |
14 | 2.5 | 40 | 71.43±0.00 a | 2.06±0.42 abc | 5.26±0.52 a |
15 | 2.5 | 50 | 52.38±8.24 b | 2.11±0.84 abc | 5.38±0.98 a |
Rooting quality | Survival rate (%) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 d | 20 d | 30 d | 40 d | 50 d | 60 d | |
Level 1 | 96.00 | 92.00 | 72.00 | 72.00 | 64.00 | 52.00 |
Level 2 | 87.80 | 85.37 | 73.17 | 62.85 | 60.98 | 48.78 |
Level 3 | 52.38 | 47.62 | 28.57 | 19.05 | 14.29 | 14.29 |
表5 不同生根数与生根质量对不同时间移栽苗成活率的影响
Table 5 Effect of different rooting number and rooting quality on the survival rate of transplanted seedlings at different time
Rooting quality | Survival rate (%) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 d | 20 d | 30 d | 40 d | 50 d | 60 d | |
Level 1 | 96.00 | 92.00 | 72.00 | 72.00 | 64.00 | 52.00 |
Level 2 | 87.80 | 85.37 | 73.17 | 62.85 | 60.98 | 48.78 |
Level 3 | 52.38 | 47.62 | 28.57 | 19.05 | 14.29 | 14.29 |
[1] | An BY (2005). Studies on the Establishment of In Viro Regeneration System of Peony suffruticosa. Master’s thesis. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University. pp. 38-39, 41. (in Chinese) |
安佰义 (2005). 牡丹组培离体再生系统的建立. 硕士论文. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学. pp. 38-39, 41. | |
[2] | Beruto M, Lanteri L, Portogallo C (2004). Micropropagation of tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 79, 249-255. |
[3] | Bouza L, Jacques M, Miginiac E (1994a). In vitro propagation of Paeonia suffruticosa Andr. cv. ‘Mme de Vatry’: developmental effects of exogenous hormones during the multiplication phase. Sci Hortic 57, 241-251. |
[4] | Bouza L, Jacques M, Sotta B, Miginiac E (1994b). The reactivation of tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa Andr.) vitroplants by chilling is correlated with modifications of abscisic acid, auxin and cytokinin levels. Plant Sci 97, 153-160. |
[5] | Bouza L, Sotta B, Bonnet M, Jacques M, Arnaud Y (1992). Hormone content and meristematic activity of Paeonia suffruticosa Andr. cv. ‘Madame de Vatry’ vitroplants during in vitro rooting. Acta Hortic 320, 213-216. |
[6] | Gu ZY, Men SQ, Zhu J, Hao Q, Tong NN, Liu ZA, Zhang HC, Shu QY, Wang LS (2019). Chalcone synthase is ubiquitinated and degraded via interactions with a RING- H2 protein in petals of Paeonia ‘He Xie’. J Exp Bot 70, 4749-4762. |
[7] | Han K, Liang CA, Liu HF, Wang XH (2021). Garden application of Ito peony (hybrid). Spec Econ Anim Plants 24(5), 50-52. (in Chinese) |
韩鲲, 梁长安, 刘红凡, 王晓晖 (2021). 伊藤牡丹(杂种)的园林应用. 特种经济动植物 24(5), 50-52. | |
[8] | Hao Q, Liu ZA, Shu QY, Wang LS, Chen FF (2008). Identification of intersectional hybrid between section moutan and section Paeonia found in China for the first time. Acta Hortic Sin 35, 853-858. (in Chinese) |
郝青, 刘政安, 舒庆艳, 王亮生, 陈富飞 (2008). 中国首例芍药牡丹远缘杂交种的发现及鉴定. 园艺学报 35, 853-858. | |
[9] | Hu K, Zhang LJ, Bai XM, Cui YN, Ruan YY (2007). Analysis of the cause of contamination and explant sterilization in plant tissue culture. J Anhui Agric Sci 35, 680-681. (in Chinese) |
胡凯, 张立军, 白雪梅, 崔玉娜, 阮燕晔 (2007). 植物组织培养污染原因分析及外植体的消毒. 安徽农业科学 35, 680-681. | |
[10] | Jia WQ, You Y, Liu HC (2012). Preliminary study on the adventitious bud induction and rooting of peony. North Hortic (12), 138-140. (in Chinese) |
贾文庆, 尤扬, 刘会超 (2012). 牡丹顶芽不定芽诱导及生根的初步研究. 北方园艺 (12), 138-140. | |
[11] | Jing DD, Liu ZA, Li XX, Xiao XJ (2011). Preliminary study on fertility of a distant hybrid ‘Hexie’ of tree peony. Sci Silvae Sin 47(10), 59-62. (in Chinese) |
荆丹丹, 刘政安, 李新旭, 肖雪霁 (2011). 牡丹远缘杂种‘和谐’育性的初步研究. 林业科学 47(10), 59-62. | |
[12] | Kong XS, Zhang MX (1998). Study on the in vitro micropropagation of tree peony. North Hortic (3-4), 87-89. (in Chinese) |
孔祥生, 张妙霞 (1998). 牡丹离体快繁技术研究. 北方园艺 (3-4), 87-89. | |
[13] | Li LZM (2016). Micropropagation of Paeonia ‘Bartzella’ —A Hybrid Between Herbaceous and Tree Peony. Master’s thesis. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University. pp. 26-39. (in Chinese) |
李刘泽木 (2016). 芍药与牡丹组间杂种‘Bartzella’的离体快繁技术研究. 硕士论文. 北京: 北京林业大学. pp. 26-39. | |
[14] | Li MY, Liu L, Liu Y, Zhang XM (2021). Establishment of tissue culture system for axillary bud regeneration of Primula × pubescens. Chin Bull Bot 56, 732-739. (in Chinese) |
李孟悦, 刘柳, 刘艳, 张晓曼 (2021). 毛报春(Primula × pubescens)腋芽再生组织培养体系的建立. 植物学报 56, 732-739.
DOI |
|
[15] | Li P, Cheng FY (2007). Progress of peony tissue culture technology. North Hortic (11), 102-106. (in Chinese) |
李萍, 成仿云 (2007). 牡丹组织培养技术的研究进展. 北方园艺 (11), 102-106. | |
[16] | Li Y, Kong F, Liu ZA, Peng LP, Shu QY (2022). PhUGT78A22, a novel glycosyltransferase in Paeonia ‘He Xie’, can catalyze the transfer of glucose to glucosylated anthocyanins during petal blotch formation. BMC Plant Biol 22, 405. |
[17] | Li ZJ, Liu ZG, Li HM (2006). Research on peony fast breeding technology. Shandong For Sci Technol 36(3), 39-40. (in Chinese) |
李志军, 刘志国, 李红梅 (2006). 牡丹组培快繁技术研究. 山东林业科技 36(3), 39-40. | |
[18] | Liu DQ (2013). An insight into the rationing of growth factors and cytokinins during plant tissue culture. Middle Sch Biol 29(5), 5-6. (in Chinese) |
刘东奇 (2013). 植物组织培养过程中生长素和细胞分裂素的配比问题浅析. 中学生物学 29(5), 5-6. | |
[19] | Liu JX, Yu XN (2015). Grey correlation analysis between blooming stage and related phenophases and prediction model establishment of blooming stage of herbaceous peony introduced in Beijing. J Plant Resour Environ 24(4), 108-110. (in Chinese) |
刘建鑫, 于晓南 (2015). 北京地区引进观赏芍药花期与相关物候期的灰色关联分析及其花期预测模型建立. 植物资源与环境学报 24(4), 108-110. | |
[20] | Liu SQ, Wang FZ, An LJ (1995). Theory and Practice of Cell Engineering. Shenyang: Liaoning University Publishing House. pp. 48-49. (in Chinese) |
刘世强, 王法政, 安利佳 (1995). 细胞工程的理论与实践. 沈阳: 辽宁大学出版社. pp. 48-49. | |
[21] | Liu ZG, Zhao SZ, Shu QY (2021). A culture medium and method for the propagation of oil peony. China Patent, ZL201910627011.5. 2021-10-15. (in Chinese) |
刘政安, 赵素珍, 舒庆艳 (2021). 一种用于油用牡丹繁殖的培养基及方法. 中国专利, ZL201910627011.5. 2021-10- 15. | |
[22] | Ma XL, Wu JX, Liu SH (2018). Current status and outlook of Ito peony development. China Flowers Hortic (16), 28-31. (in Chinese) |
马翔龙, 吴敬需, 刘少华 (2018). 伊藤牡丹发展现状与展望. 中国花卉园艺 (16), 28-31. | |
[23] | Murashige T (1974). Plant propagation through tissue cultures. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 25, 135-166. |
[24] | Qiu JM (2010). Study on the In Vitro Micropropagation of Tree Peony. Master’s thesis. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University. pp. 3. (in Chinese) |
邱金梅 (2010). 牡丹离体快繁技术的研究. 硕士论文. 北京: 北京林业大学. pp. 3. | |
[25] | Sun JF, Cheng FY (2007). Preliminary report on the introduction of intersectional hybrids between tree and herbaceous peonies. Chin Landsc Archit 23(5), 51-54. (in Chinese) |
孙菊芳, 成仿云 (2007). 芍药与牡丹组间杂种引种栽培初报. 中国园林 23(5), 51-54. | |
[26] | Sun MT, Li JH, Ren J, Qin YJ, Lu J, Meng FZ (2022). Establishment of aseptic system and callus induction of Paeonia Itoh ‘Bartzella’. J Shandong For Sci Technol 52(3), 7-11. (in Chinese) |
孙茂桐, 李际红, 任静, 秦永健, 卢洁, 孟凡志 (2022). 伊藤杂种‘巴茨拉’不同外植体无菌体系建立及愈伤组织诱导. 山东林业科技 52(3), 7-11. | |
[27] | Tang FL, Zhao J, Zhao ZG, Xia K, Qiu S (2019). Tissue culture and rapid propagation of Ardisia gigantifolia. Chin Bull Bot 54, 378-384. (in Chinese) |
唐凤鸾, 赵健, 赵志国, 夏科, 仇硕 (2019). 走马胎的组织培养与快速繁殖. 植物学报 54, 378-384.
DOI |
|
[28] | Tong NN, Zhou XY, Peng LP, Liu ZA, Shu QY (2021). A comprehensive study of three species of Paeonia stem and leaf phytochemicals, and their antioxidant activities. J Ethnopharmacol 273, 113985. |
[29] | Wang JX, Yan XL, Pan RC (2005). Relationship between adventitious root formation and plant hormones. Plant Physiol Commun 41, 133-142. (in Chinese) |
王金祥, 严小龙, 潘瑞炽 (2005). 不定根形成与植物激素的关系. 植物生理学通讯 41, 133-142. | |
[30] | Wang X (2016). In Vitro Rapid Propagation of Paeonia ostii ‘Feng Dan’. Master’s thesis. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University. pp. 5-38. (in Chinese) |
王新 (2016). ‘凤丹’牡丹离体快繁技术研究. 硕士论文. 北京: 北京林业大学. pp. 5-38. | |
[31] | Wang X, Cheng FY, Zhong Y, Wen SS, Li LZM, Huang NZ (2016). Establishment of in vitro rapid propagation system for tree peony (Paeonia ostii). Sci Silvae Sin 52(5), 101-110. (in Chinese) |
王新, 成仿云, 钟原, 文书生, 李刘泽木, 黄弄璋 (2016). 凤丹牡丹鳞芽离体培养与快繁技术. 林业科学 52(5), 101-110. | |
[32] | Wang YQ, Wei LD, Wang WJ, Liu BJ, Zhang CL, Zhang JW, He YH (2020). The establishment and optimization of a regeneration system for marigold (Tagetes erecta). Chin Bull Bot 55, 749-759. (in Chinese) |
王亚琴, 韦陆丹, 王文静, 刘宝骏, 张春玲, 张俊卫, 何燕红 (2020). 万寿菊再生体系的建立及优化. 植物学报 55, 749-759. | |
[33] | Wen SS, Cheng FY, Zhong Y, Wang X, Li LZM, Huang NZ (2016). Protocol for the micropropagation of tree peony (Paeonia × lemoinei ‘High Noon’). Plant Sci J 34, 143-150. (in Chinese) |
文书生, 成仿云, 钟原, 王新, 李刘泽木, 黄弄璋 (2016). ‘正午’牡丹微繁殖体系的建立. 植物科学学报 34, 143-150. | |
[34] | Wu GX, Cui LH, Liu SH, Yao F, Si SX, Ren SH, Wu JX, Wang SQ (2011). Preliminary studying report of cultiva- ting and demonstrating Itoh hybrids introduced from abroad. North Hortic (24), 67-71. (in Chinese) |
吴国新, 崔玲华, 刘少华, 姚方, 司守霞, 任叔辉, 吴敬需, 王拴芹 (2011). 国外伊藤杂种牡丹引进栽培示范研究. 北方园艺 (24), 67-71. | |
[35] | Wu JX, Liu SH, Sui CQ (2022). Intergroup hybridization of peony and peony introduced from abroad. China Flowers Hortic (5), 54-60. (in Chinese) |
吴敬需, 刘少华, 隋承权 (2022). 国外引进的牡丹芍药组间杂种品种. 中国花卉园艺 (5), 54-60. | |
[36] | Yan XF, Qu WF (2020). A tissue culture propagation method of peony. Chinese Patent, ZL202010129492.X. 2021-01- 05. (in Chinese) |
闫晓芳, 屈武斐 (2020). 一种牡丹的组织培养繁殖方法. 中国专利, ZL202010129492.X. 2021-01-05. | |
[37] | Yang LH, Zhang JJ, Wang Q, Zhu W, Zhang T, Yu XN (2017). Ploidy identification and karyotype analysis of five Itoh hybrid peonies. Bull Bot Res 37, 535-541. (in Chinese) |
杨柳慧, 张建军, 王琪, 朱炜, 张滕, 于晓南 (2017). 5个芍药属伊藤杂种的倍性鉴定及核型分析. 植物研究 37, 535-541.
DOI |
|
[38] | Yin LQ, Wang XQ, Hu YH, Liu Z, Li XF, Zhang JJ (2012). Several factors influencing tissue culture of Paeonia suffruticosa. Agric Acta Shanghai 28, 17-21. (in Chinese) |
殷丽青, 王新其, 胡永红, 刘炤, 李秀芬, 张建军 (2012). 牡丹组织培养若干影响因子研究. 上海农业学报 28, 17-21. | |
[39] | Zhang Q, Wang HF (2012). In vitro shoot rooting and plantlet transplanting of tree peonies. Acta Hortic Sin 39, 1819-1828. (in Chinese) |
张倩, 王华芳 (2012). 牡丹试管苗生根与移栽技术研究进展. 园艺学报 39, 1819-1828. | |
[40] | Zhang WB (2022). Effects of disinfectant type and disinfection time on peony explants. Agric Technol Serv 39(7), 46-48. (in Chinese) |
张伟彬 (2022). 消毒剂种类及消毒时间对牡丹外植体的影响. 农技服务 39(7), 46-48. | |
[41] | Zhuang Q, Zhu SY, Du XQ, Zhao LQ (2011). Introduction of interspecific hybrids of Paeonia to northeast China. J North For Univ 39(4), 21-23. (in Chinese) |
庄倩, 朱松岩, 杜晓琪, 赵立群 (2011). 芍药属组间杂种引进东北地区栽培试验. 东北林业大学学报 39(4), 21-23. |
[1] | 田旭平, 岳康杰, 王佳丽, 刘慧欣, 史子尹, 亢红伟. 毛建草愈伤组织诱导及植株再生[J]. 植物学报, 2024, 59(4): 0-0. |
[2] | 刘小妹,孙丽莉,傅向东,廖红. 茶树嫩枝扦插的高效方法[J]. 植物学报, 2019, 54(4): 531-538. |
[3] | 王大鹏, 唐嘉泽, 邵明成, 张文彪, 王华芳. 胡杨组织培养叶片及插穗毛状根发生[J]. 植物学报, 2017, 52(2): 210-217. |
[4] | 张群, 吕秀立, 何小丽, 朱义, 崔心红. 海三棱藨草的组织培养与快繁体系[J]. 植物学报, 2016, 51(5): 684-690. |
[5] | 胡峰, 施琼, 黄烈健. 黑木相思愈伤组织诱导及植株再生[J]. 植物学报, 2014, 49(5): 603-610. |
[6] | 许德成, 王小菁. 红厚壳茎段丛生芽诱导与植株再生[J]. 植物学报, 2014, 49(2): 167-172. |
[7] | 付言钊;杨仁秀;王桂萍;王春春;牛立元;沈振国*. 大豆初生根凯氏带对铜离子的通透性[J]. 植物学报, 2010, 45(02): 198-204. |
[8] | 裴东 谷瑞升. 树木复幼的研究概述[J]. 植物学报, 2005, 22(06): 753-760. |
[9] | 马艳 肖娅萍 王彩玲 王哲之. 苦皮藤试管苗生根培养研究[J]. 植物学报, 2004, 21(03): 332-336. |
[10] | 李绪行 邵莉楣 殷蔚薏 郑平 李淑捷. 黄腐酸和汪平酸对小麦种子萌发与幼苗生长及绿豆下胚轴生根的影响[J]. 植物学报, 1991, 8(03): 51-55. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||