植物学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (4): 613-625.DOI: 10.11983/CBB23178 cstr: 32102.14.CBB23178
田旭平*(), 岳康杰, 王佳丽, 刘慧欣, 史子尹, 亢红伟
收稿日期:
2023-12-29
接受日期:
2024-05-13
出版日期:
2024-07-10
发布日期:
2024-07-10
通讯作者:
*田旭平, 山西农业大学林学院副教授, 硕士生导师。长期从事园林植物栽培应用和植物资源学研究。以通讯作者或第一作者身份先后在生态学报、草地学报、干旱区研究等期刊上发表论文20余篇。目前其研究团队聚焦解析毛建草、绒毛白蜡和石竹等植物的表型及繁殖对环境的适应性, 为栽培及选育优良种质提供技术支持。E-mail: txp8638@sina.com
基金资助:
Xuping Tian*(), Kangjie Yue, Jiali Wang, Huixin Liu, Ziyin Shi, Hongwei Kang
Received:
2023-12-29
Accepted:
2024-05-13
Online:
2024-07-10
Published:
2024-07-10
Contact:
*E-mail: txp8638@sina.com
摘要: 毛建草(Dracocephalum rupestre)是一种重要的药用植物。然而, 其叶片外植体再生系统尚未建立。以毛建草大田叶片和组培苗叶片为外植体, 探讨植物生长调节剂对愈伤组织诱导和分化、不定芽增殖及生根的影响, 建立了叶片离体再生体系。结果表明, 大田叶片愈伤组织诱导的最适培养基为MS+1.0 mg·L−1 6-BA+0.1 mg·L−1 2,4-D+1.0 mg·L−1 IAA, 诱导率达84.51%, 不定芽分化最佳培养基为MS+3.0 mg·L−1 6-BA+0.5 mg·L−1 TDZ+0.5 mg·L−1 IAA, 分化率为66.37%; 组培苗叶片愈伤组织诱导的最适培养基为MS+2.0 mg·L−1 6-BA+0.1 mg·L−1 2,4-D+0.5 mg·L−1 IAA, 诱导率达86.73%, 不定芽分化最佳培养基为MS+2.0 mg·L−1 6-BA+2.0 mg·L−1 TDZ+0.05 mg·L−1 IAA, 分化率为53.48%。不定芽增殖适宜培养基为MS+2.0 mg·L−1 6-BA+0.05 mg·L−1 NAA, 增殖率为83.57%, 最适生根培养基为1/2MS+0.1 mg·L−1 NAA+0.1 mg·L−1 IBA, 生根率为86.97%; 在草炭:蛭石=1:1 (v/v)的混合基质中组培苗长势最好。该研究建立了毛建草叶片离体培养再生体系, 为毛建草种质资源保存和种苗快繁提供了技术支持。
田旭平, 岳康杰, 王佳丽, 刘慧欣, 史子尹, 亢红伟. 毛建草愈伤组织诱导及植株再生. 植物学报, 2024, 59(4): 613-625.
Xuping Tian, Kangjie Yue, Jiali Wang, Huixin Liu, Ziyin Shi, Hongwei Kang. Callus Induction and Plant Regeneration of Dracocephalum rupestre. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2024, 59(4): 613-625.
Type | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | TDZ (mg∙L-1) | KT (mg∙L-1) | Occurrence time (d) | Induction rate (%) | Callus growth state |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leaves of field planted individual | 0.5 | - | - | 10.25±4.65 a | 40.36±3.17 b | Yellow with a firm and dense texture |
1.0 | - | - | 7.58±1.29 b | 65.21±9.94 a | Pale yellow-green, loose, and a softer texture | |
2.0 | - | - | 6.92±1.17 b | 67.07±9.05 a | Pale yellow, loose and watery in appearance, with a soft texture | |
- | 0.5 | - | 16.25±3.39 a | 37.98±5.73 b | Green, loose, and soft in texture, with a loose consistency | |
- | 1.0 | - | 15.83±3.58 a | 40.17±7.53 b | Green, loose, with white spots, a soft texture | |
- | 2.0 | - | 11.50±2.88 b | 62.53±6.66 a | Green, loose, with white spots, a soft texture | |
- | - | 0.5 | 9.50±2.60 a | 35.19±6.73 b | Yellow, compact, with a somewhat hard texture | |
- | - | 1.0 | 8.17±2.44 ab | 57.06±9.06 a | Brownish-yellow, compact, with a soft texture | |
- | - | 2.0 | 6.67±1.45 b | 42.53±5.84 b | Brown, loose, resembling water stains, with a soft texture | |
Leaves of tissue-cultured seedling | 0.5 | - | - | 11.08±2.69 a | 47.33±8.53 b | Yellow with a firm and dense texture |
1.0 | - | - | 10.33±1.48 a | 55.76±7.85 ab | Yellow-green, loose, with a relatively soft texture | |
2.0 | - | - | 8.17±1.27 b | 68.01±6.46 a | Yellow-green, loose, with a relatively soft texture | |
- | 0.5 | - | 14.17±2.99 a | 33.63±5.79 b | Green, loose, with a soft texture | |
- | 1.0 | - | 12.33±1.03 ab | 45.36±9.64 ab | Green, compact, with a hard texture | |
- | 2.0 | - | 10.33±2.63 b | 55.61±9.07 a | Green, loose, with a relatively soft texture | |
- | - | 0.5 | 12.92±3.62 a | 40.75±8.32 b | Pale yellow, loose, with a hard texture | |
- | - | 1.0 | 11.25±2.65 a | 63.59±7.07 a | Pale yellow, loose, with a softer texture | |
- | - | 2.0 | 8.83±1.58 b | 52.29±9.41 ab | Pale yellow, loose, and loosely resembling water stains in texture |
表1 细胞分裂素对叶片愈伤组织诱导的影响
Table 1 Effects of cytokinins on callus induction from leaves
Type | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | TDZ (mg∙L-1) | KT (mg∙L-1) | Occurrence time (d) | Induction rate (%) | Callus growth state |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leaves of field planted individual | 0.5 | - | - | 10.25±4.65 a | 40.36±3.17 b | Yellow with a firm and dense texture |
1.0 | - | - | 7.58±1.29 b | 65.21±9.94 a | Pale yellow-green, loose, and a softer texture | |
2.0 | - | - | 6.92±1.17 b | 67.07±9.05 a | Pale yellow, loose and watery in appearance, with a soft texture | |
- | 0.5 | - | 16.25±3.39 a | 37.98±5.73 b | Green, loose, and soft in texture, with a loose consistency | |
- | 1.0 | - | 15.83±3.58 a | 40.17±7.53 b | Green, loose, with white spots, a soft texture | |
- | 2.0 | - | 11.50±2.88 b | 62.53±6.66 a | Green, loose, with white spots, a soft texture | |
- | - | 0.5 | 9.50±2.60 a | 35.19±6.73 b | Yellow, compact, with a somewhat hard texture | |
- | - | 1.0 | 8.17±2.44 ab | 57.06±9.06 a | Brownish-yellow, compact, with a soft texture | |
- | - | 2.0 | 6.67±1.45 b | 42.53±5.84 b | Brown, loose, resembling water stains, with a soft texture | |
Leaves of tissue-cultured seedling | 0.5 | - | - | 11.08±2.69 a | 47.33±8.53 b | Yellow with a firm and dense texture |
1.0 | - | - | 10.33±1.48 a | 55.76±7.85 ab | Yellow-green, loose, with a relatively soft texture | |
2.0 | - | - | 8.17±1.27 b | 68.01±6.46 a | Yellow-green, loose, with a relatively soft texture | |
- | 0.5 | - | 14.17±2.99 a | 33.63±5.79 b | Green, loose, with a soft texture | |
- | 1.0 | - | 12.33±1.03 ab | 45.36±9.64 ab | Green, compact, with a hard texture | |
- | 2.0 | - | 10.33±2.63 b | 55.61±9.07 a | Green, loose, with a relatively soft texture | |
- | - | 0.5 | 12.92±3.62 a | 40.75±8.32 b | Pale yellow, loose, with a hard texture | |
- | - | 1.0 | 11.25±2.65 a | 63.59±7.07 a | Pale yellow, loose, with a softer texture | |
- | - | 2.0 | 8.83±1.58 b | 52.29±9.41 ab | Pale yellow, loose, and loosely resembling water stains in texture |
图1 叶片愈伤组织诱导及植株再生 (A) 大田叶片; (B) 组培苗; (C) 叶片膨大; (D) 愈伤组织诱导; (E) 大田叶片愈伤组织分化不定芽; (F) 组培苗叶片愈伤组织分化不定芽; (G) 不定芽增殖; (H) 根系状态; (I) 移栽。Bars=2 cm
Figure 1 Callus induction and plant regeneration from leaves (A) Field planted leaves; (B) Tissue culture seedling; (C) Leaf blade expansion; (D) Induction of callus; (E) Adventitious bud differentiation of leaves of field planted individual; (F) Adventitious bud differentiation of leaves of tissue-cultured seedling; (G) Adventitious bud proliferation; (H) Root system status; (I) Transplanting. Bars=2 cm
图2 愈伤组织诱导及分化 (A) 6-BA诱导的大田叶片愈伤组织; (B) TDZ诱导的大田叶片愈伤组织; (C) KT诱导的大田叶片愈伤组织; (D) 6-BA诱导的组培苗叶片愈伤组织; (E) TDZ诱导的组培苗叶片愈伤组织; (F) KT诱导的组培苗叶片愈伤组织; (G) 不定芽畸形; (H) 同时分化不定芽和不定根; (I) 不定根分化。Bars=2 cm
Figure 2 Induction and differentiation of callus tissue (A) Callus from leaves of field planted individual incorporating 6-BA; (B) Callus from leaves of field planted individual incorporating TDZ; (C) Callus from leaves of field planted individual incorporating KT; (D) Callus from leaves of tissue-cultured seedling incorporating 6-BA; (E) Callus from leaves of tissue-cultured seedling incorporating TDZ; (F) Callus from leaves of tissue-cultured seedling incorporating KT; (G) Adventitious bud malformation; (H) Concurrent differentiation of adventitious buds and roots; (I) Adventitious root differentiation. Bars=2 cm
Type | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | IAA (mg∙L-1) | Occurrence time (d) | Induction rate (%) | Callus growth state |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leaves of field planted individual | 0.5 | 0 | 10.25±4.60 b | 40.37±6.89 b | Yellow, compact, and with a hard texture |
0.5 | 0.1 | 15.25±3.72 c | 39.09±8.97 bc | Green, loose, with a softer texture | |
0.5 | 0.5 | 9.58±1.40 ab | 33.28±7.29 bc | Pale yellow, loose, with a harder texture | |
0.5 | 1.0 | 8.08±1.96 a | 26.72±5.74 c | Yellow, resembling water stains, soft texture | |
1.0 | 0 | 7.58±2.29 a | 65.33±6.56 a | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.1 | 14.67±3.08 c | 55.46±5.64 ab | Green, compact, harder texture | |
1.0 | 0.5 | 10.83±3.33 b | 47.51±6.74 b | Pale yellow, loose, soft texture | |
1.0 | 1.0 | 9.58±2.39 ab | 33.72±9.32 bc | Green loose, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0 | 6.92±2.17 a | 67.55±6.54 a | Pale yellow, loose, watery appearance, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0.1 | 11.67±1.20 b | 63.29±7.96 a | Pale green, loose, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0.5 | 12.16±2.46 bc | 54.29±8.57 ab | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 1.0 | 14.00±3.43 c | 41.31±9.03 b | Green, loose, softer texture | |
Leaves of tissue- cultured seedling | 0.5 | 0 | 11.08±2.69 b | 47.81±5.75 b | Yellow, compact, hard texture |
0.5 | 0.1 | 12.00±3.38 bc | 34.52±6.34 bc | Yellow-green, loose, soft texture | |
0.5 | 0.5 | 13.00±3.43 bc | 31.96±4.75 bc | Yellow-green, compact, softer texture | |
0.5 | 1.0 | 18.08±4.17 c | 24.07±7.22 c | Yellow-green, loose, soft texture | |
1.0 | 0 | 10.33±2.48 b | 55.67±4.21 ab | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.1 | 10.33±2.58 b | 51.34±1.99 ab | Yellow-green, loose, soft texture | |
1.0 | 0.5 | 11.33±3.42 b | 46.21±11.23 b | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 1.0 | 15.42±3.22 c | 39.14±9.41 bc | Yellow-green, loose, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0 | 8.17±1.27 a | 68.73±13.47 a | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 0.1 | 9.67±2.30 ab | 55.24±6.91 ab | Yellow-green, loose, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0.5 | 9.88±2.65 ab | 51.33±13.54 ab | Green, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 1.0 | 10.33±2.79 b | 46.61±14.26 b | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture |
表2 6-BA与IAA组合对叶片愈伤组织诱导的影响
Table 2 Effects of combination 6-BA with IAA on the callus induction of leaves
Type | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | IAA (mg∙L-1) | Occurrence time (d) | Induction rate (%) | Callus growth state |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leaves of field planted individual | 0.5 | 0 | 10.25±4.60 b | 40.37±6.89 b | Yellow, compact, and with a hard texture |
0.5 | 0.1 | 15.25±3.72 c | 39.09±8.97 bc | Green, loose, with a softer texture | |
0.5 | 0.5 | 9.58±1.40 ab | 33.28±7.29 bc | Pale yellow, loose, with a harder texture | |
0.5 | 1.0 | 8.08±1.96 a | 26.72±5.74 c | Yellow, resembling water stains, soft texture | |
1.0 | 0 | 7.58±2.29 a | 65.33±6.56 a | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.1 | 14.67±3.08 c | 55.46±5.64 ab | Green, compact, harder texture | |
1.0 | 0.5 | 10.83±3.33 b | 47.51±6.74 b | Pale yellow, loose, soft texture | |
1.0 | 1.0 | 9.58±2.39 ab | 33.72±9.32 bc | Green loose, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0 | 6.92±2.17 a | 67.55±6.54 a | Pale yellow, loose, watery appearance, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0.1 | 11.67±1.20 b | 63.29±7.96 a | Pale green, loose, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0.5 | 12.16±2.46 bc | 54.29±8.57 ab | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 1.0 | 14.00±3.43 c | 41.31±9.03 b | Green, loose, softer texture | |
Leaves of tissue- cultured seedling | 0.5 | 0 | 11.08±2.69 b | 47.81±5.75 b | Yellow, compact, hard texture |
0.5 | 0.1 | 12.00±3.38 bc | 34.52±6.34 bc | Yellow-green, loose, soft texture | |
0.5 | 0.5 | 13.00±3.43 bc | 31.96±4.75 bc | Yellow-green, compact, softer texture | |
0.5 | 1.0 | 18.08±4.17 c | 24.07±7.22 c | Yellow-green, loose, soft texture | |
1.0 | 0 | 10.33±2.48 b | 55.67±4.21 ab | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.1 | 10.33±2.58 b | 51.34±1.99 ab | Yellow-green, loose, soft texture | |
1.0 | 0.5 | 11.33±3.42 b | 46.21±11.23 b | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 1.0 | 15.42±3.22 c | 39.14±9.41 bc | Yellow-green, loose, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0 | 8.17±1.27 a | 68.73±13.47 a | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 0.1 | 9.67±2.30 ab | 55.24±6.91 ab | Yellow-green, loose, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0.5 | 9.88±2.65 ab | 51.33±13.54 ab | Green, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 1.0 | 10.33±2.79 b | 46.61±14.26 b | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture |
Type | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | 2,4-D (mg∙L-1) | Occurrence time (d) | Induction rate (%) | Callus growth state |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leaves of field planted individual | 0.5 | 0 | 10.25±2.46 b | 40.38±8.73 b | Yellow, compact, hard texture |
0.5 | 0.1 | 11.42±1.79 bc | 25.77±6.33 c | Pale yellow, loose, soft texture | |
0.5 | 0.5 | 10.67±2.65 b | 41.83±6.86 bc | Brownish-yellow, compact, somewhat hard texture | |
0.5 | 1.0 | 15.00±4.66 c | 44.08±9.91 bc | Brownish-yellow, resembling water stains, soft texture | |
1.0 | 0 | 7.58±2.29 a | 65.38±13.16 a | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.1 | 10.08±3.20 b | 43.33±12.02 b | Pale yellow, dense, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.5 | 12.92±3.71 bc | 51.16±15.02 ab | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 1.0 | 12.00±2.76 bc | 56.32±9.31 ab | Yellow, compact, somewhat hard texture | |
2.0 | 0 | 6.92±2.17 a | 67.52±13.25 a | Pale yellow, loose, resembling water stains, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0.1 | 7.91±2.22 a | 60.83±11.02 a | Yellow, resembling water stains, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0.5 | 10.33±1.45 b | 57.12±13.37 ab | Yellow, compact, softer texture | |
2.0 | 1.0 | 13.67±2.05 bc | 48.53±8.04 b | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
Leaves of tissue-cultured seedling | 0.5 | 0 | 11.08±3.69 b | 47.51±11.05 b | Yellow, compact, hard texture |
0.5 | 0.1 | 16.42±3.08 c | 44.17±9.31 b | Pale yellow, loose, soft texture | |
0.5 | 0.5 | 11.08±2.44 b | 39.98±8.74 bc | Pale yellow, loose, hard texture | |
0.5 | 1.0 | 16.33±5.30 c | 19.03±6.33 c | Yellow, loose, soft texture | |
1.0 | 0 | 10.33±3.48 ab | 55.62±10.15 ab | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.1 | 15.17±3.17 c | 49.71±10.63 b | Green loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.5 | 10.42±3.44 ab | 44.54±9.63 b | Yellow, compact, hard texture | |
1.0 | 1.0 | 10.92±2.51 ab | 38.05±8.94 bc | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 0 | 8.17±2.27 a | 68.23±14.06 a | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 0.1 | 11.67±2.54 b | 66.11±11.82 a | Green, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 0.5 | 9.42±3.33 a | 53.42±11.44 ab | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 1.0 | 9.83±3.44 a | 50.76±14.13 b | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture |
表3 6-BA与2,4-D组合对叶片愈伤组织诱导的影响
Table 3 Effects of combination 6-BA with 2,4-D on the callus induction of leaves
Type | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | 2,4-D (mg∙L-1) | Occurrence time (d) | Induction rate (%) | Callus growth state |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leaves of field planted individual | 0.5 | 0 | 10.25±2.46 b | 40.38±8.73 b | Yellow, compact, hard texture |
0.5 | 0.1 | 11.42±1.79 bc | 25.77±6.33 c | Pale yellow, loose, soft texture | |
0.5 | 0.5 | 10.67±2.65 b | 41.83±6.86 bc | Brownish-yellow, compact, somewhat hard texture | |
0.5 | 1.0 | 15.00±4.66 c | 44.08±9.91 bc | Brownish-yellow, resembling water stains, soft texture | |
1.0 | 0 | 7.58±2.29 a | 65.38±13.16 a | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.1 | 10.08±3.20 b | 43.33±12.02 b | Pale yellow, dense, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.5 | 12.92±3.71 bc | 51.16±15.02 ab | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 1.0 | 12.00±2.76 bc | 56.32±9.31 ab | Yellow, compact, somewhat hard texture | |
2.0 | 0 | 6.92±2.17 a | 67.52±13.25 a | Pale yellow, loose, resembling water stains, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0.1 | 7.91±2.22 a | 60.83±11.02 a | Yellow, resembling water stains, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0.5 | 10.33±1.45 b | 57.12±13.37 ab | Yellow, compact, softer texture | |
2.0 | 1.0 | 13.67±2.05 bc | 48.53±8.04 b | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
Leaves of tissue-cultured seedling | 0.5 | 0 | 11.08±3.69 b | 47.51±11.05 b | Yellow, compact, hard texture |
0.5 | 0.1 | 16.42±3.08 c | 44.17±9.31 b | Pale yellow, loose, soft texture | |
0.5 | 0.5 | 11.08±2.44 b | 39.98±8.74 bc | Pale yellow, loose, hard texture | |
0.5 | 1.0 | 16.33±5.30 c | 19.03±6.33 c | Yellow, loose, soft texture | |
1.0 | 0 | 10.33±3.48 ab | 55.62±10.15 ab | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.1 | 15.17±3.17 c | 49.71±10.63 b | Green loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.5 | 10.42±3.44 ab | 44.54±9.63 b | Yellow, compact, hard texture | |
1.0 | 1.0 | 10.92±2.51 ab | 38.05±8.94 bc | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 0 | 8.17±2.27 a | 68.23±14.06 a | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 0.1 | 11.67±2.54 b | 66.11±11.82 a | Green, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 0.5 | 9.42±3.33 a | 53.42±11.44 ab | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 1.0 | 9.83±3.44 a | 50.76±14.13 b | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture |
Type | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | 2,4-D (mg∙L-1) | IAA (mg∙L-1) | Occurrence time (d) | Induction rate (%) | Callus growth state |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leaves of field planted indivi- dual | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 9.17±3.67 ab | 60.33±13.05 b | Yellow-green, loose, soft texture |
0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 12.32±3.63 bc | 44.87±10.33 c | Brown, loose, soft texture | |
0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 12.58±2.42 bc | 41.24±11.13 c | Brown, loose, soft texture | |
1.0 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 10.16±2.21 b | 84.51±14.22 a | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 11.00±2.52 b | 61.39±12.65 b | Yellow, loose, soft texture | |
1.0 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 7.69±2.44 a | 77.59±14.25 a | Yellow, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 7.42±1.09 a | 79.08±17.24 a | Yellow, resembling water stains, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 8.38±3.87 ab | 71.22±12.13 ab | Yellow with water stain, soft texture | |
2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 11.33±2.21 b | 63.49±13.41 b | Pale yellow, loose, soft texture | |
Leaves of tissue-cultured seedling | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 13.08±2.42 bc | 47.62±9.43 c | Green, compact, hard texture |
0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 14.41±4.38 bc | 53.41±13.22 bc | Green, compact, hard texture | |
0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 16.11±6.38 c | 55.76±10.16 bc | Green, compact, somewhat hard texture | |
1.0 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 9.33±2.46 ab | 42.57±9.25 c | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 11.67±3.50 b | 50.91±13.22 c | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 13.67±2.50 bc | 44.59±11.17 c | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 8.58±2.12 a | 86.73±11.29 a | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 7.32±3.31 a | 70.23±17.05 b | Yellow, loose, soft texture | |
2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 11.33±2.22 b | 67.15±13.21 b | Green, compact, hard texture |
表4 6-BA与2,4-D和IAA组合对叶片愈伤组织诱导的影响
Table 4 Effects of combination 6-BA with 2,4-D and IAA on the callus induction of leaves
Type | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | 2,4-D (mg∙L-1) | IAA (mg∙L-1) | Occurrence time (d) | Induction rate (%) | Callus growth state |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leaves of field planted indivi- dual | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 9.17±3.67 ab | 60.33±13.05 b | Yellow-green, loose, soft texture |
0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 12.32±3.63 bc | 44.87±10.33 c | Brown, loose, soft texture | |
0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 12.58±2.42 bc | 41.24±11.13 c | Brown, loose, soft texture | |
1.0 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 10.16±2.21 b | 84.51±14.22 a | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 11.00±2.52 b | 61.39±12.65 b | Yellow, loose, soft texture | |
1.0 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 7.69±2.44 a | 77.59±14.25 a | Yellow, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 7.42±1.09 a | 79.08±17.24 a | Yellow, resembling water stains, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 8.38±3.87 ab | 71.22±12.13 ab | Yellow with water stain, soft texture | |
2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 11.33±2.21 b | 63.49±13.41 b | Pale yellow, loose, soft texture | |
Leaves of tissue-cultured seedling | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 13.08±2.42 bc | 47.62±9.43 c | Green, compact, hard texture |
0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 14.41±4.38 bc | 53.41±13.22 bc | Green, compact, hard texture | |
0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 16.11±6.38 c | 55.76±10.16 bc | Green, compact, somewhat hard texture | |
1.0 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 9.33±2.46 ab | 42.57±9.25 c | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 11.67±3.50 b | 50.91±13.22 c | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 13.67±2.50 bc | 44.59±11.17 c | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 8.58±2.12 a | 86.73±11.29 a | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 7.32±3.31 a | 70.23±17.05 b | Yellow, loose, soft texture | |
2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 11.33±2.22 b | 67.15±13.21 b | Green, compact, hard texture |
Type | No. | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | TDZ (mg∙L-1) | Adventitious buds differentiation rate (%) | Adventitious roots differentiation rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Callus from leaves of field planted individual | F1 | 0 | 0.5 | - | 12.43±3.26 ab |
F2 | 0 | 1.0 | - | 7.41±2.12 c | |
F3 | 0 | 2.0 | - | 3.94±1.12 d | |
F4 | 1.0 | 0 | - | 15.61±4.36 a | |
F5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 3.07±1.04 b | - | |
F6 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | 3.41±1.27 d | |
F7 | 1.0 | 2.0 | - | 12.37±3.75 ab | |
F8 | 2.0 | 0 | - | 10.91±3.12 b | |
F9 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 3.95±0.92 b | - | |
F10 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 4.53±0.87 b | 8.76±2.21 bc | |
F11 | 2.0 | 2.0 | - | 7.55±1.32 c | |
F12 | 3.0 | 0 | 4.66±1.41 b | 6.38±2.63 c | |
F13 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 16.71±5.22 a | - | |
F14 | 3.0 | 1.0 | - | 4.21±1.21 c | |
F15 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 4.39±1.21 b | - | |
Callus from leaves of tissue-cultured seedling | F1 | 0 | 0.5 | - | - |
F2 | 0 | 1.0 | - | 4.52±0.95 bc | |
F3 | 0 | 2.0 | - | 4.74±1.39 c | |
F4 | 1.0 | 0 | - | 4.58±1.51 bc | |
F5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | - | 1.92±0.82 c | |
F6 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | 9.17±2.42 a | |
F7 | 1.0 | 2.0 | - | 6.11±2.21 b | |
F8 | 2.0 | 0 | - | 3.43±1.02 c | |
F9 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 3.44±1.32 b | 8.32±2.31 a | |
F10 | 2.0 | 1.0 | - | 6.41±2.13 b | |
F11 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.91±0.71 bc | 3.59±1.33 c | |
F12 | 3.0 | 0 | - | 2.33±0.93 c | |
F13 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 2.37±0.69 bc | 7.15±1.12 ab | |
F14 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 3.17±1.21 b | - | |
F15 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 7.66±2.12 a | - |
表5 6-BA与TDZ组合对愈伤组织分化的影响
Table 5 Effects of combination 6-BA with TDZ on callus differentiation
Type | No. | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | TDZ (mg∙L-1) | Adventitious buds differentiation rate (%) | Adventitious roots differentiation rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Callus from leaves of field planted individual | F1 | 0 | 0.5 | - | 12.43±3.26 ab |
F2 | 0 | 1.0 | - | 7.41±2.12 c | |
F3 | 0 | 2.0 | - | 3.94±1.12 d | |
F4 | 1.0 | 0 | - | 15.61±4.36 a | |
F5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 3.07±1.04 b | - | |
F6 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | 3.41±1.27 d | |
F7 | 1.0 | 2.0 | - | 12.37±3.75 ab | |
F8 | 2.0 | 0 | - | 10.91±3.12 b | |
F9 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 3.95±0.92 b | - | |
F10 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 4.53±0.87 b | 8.76±2.21 bc | |
F11 | 2.0 | 2.0 | - | 7.55±1.32 c | |
F12 | 3.0 | 0 | 4.66±1.41 b | 6.38±2.63 c | |
F13 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 16.71±5.22 a | - | |
F14 | 3.0 | 1.0 | - | 4.21±1.21 c | |
F15 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 4.39±1.21 b | - | |
Callus from leaves of tissue-cultured seedling | F1 | 0 | 0.5 | - | - |
F2 | 0 | 1.0 | - | 4.52±0.95 bc | |
F3 | 0 | 2.0 | - | 4.74±1.39 c | |
F4 | 1.0 | 0 | - | 4.58±1.51 bc | |
F5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | - | 1.92±0.82 c | |
F6 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | 9.17±2.42 a | |
F7 | 1.0 | 2.0 | - | 6.11±2.21 b | |
F8 | 2.0 | 0 | - | 3.43±1.02 c | |
F9 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 3.44±1.32 b | 8.32±2.31 a | |
F10 | 2.0 | 1.0 | - | 6.41±2.13 b | |
F11 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.91±0.71 bc | 3.59±1.33 c | |
F12 | 3.0 | 0 | - | 2.33±0.93 c | |
F13 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 2.37±0.69 bc | 7.15±1.12 ab | |
F14 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 3.17±1.21 b | - | |
F15 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 7.66±2.12 a | - |
Type | No. | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | TDZ (mg∙L-1) | NAA (mg∙L-1) | Adventitious buds differentiation rate (%) | Adventitious roots differentiation rate (%) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Callus from leaves of field planted indivi- dual | F1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 2.13±0.19 d | 3.21±0.13 d | |||||
F2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | 31.69±7.11 a | ||||||
F3 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 8.92±2.83 c | 9.51±2.24 c | ||||||
F4 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 6.43±1.71 cd | 23.49±11.31 b | ||||||
F5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 11.21±3.02 c | 6.91±2.17 cd | ||||||
F6 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.05 | 19.46±6.33 ab | - | ||||||
F7 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 5.64±1.91 d | 2.02±0.17 d | ||||||
F8 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 21.29±9.12 a | - | ||||||
F9 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 15.82±3.64 b | 4.09±1.22 d | ||||||
Callus from leaves of tissue-cultured seedling | F1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.05 | - | 21.23±6.71 b | |||||
F2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | 29.88±9.45 a | ||||||
F3 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | - | 19.01±6.54 bc | ||||||
F4 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | - | 12.56±4.32 cd | ||||||
F5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | - | 14.67±3.03 c | ||||||
F6 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.05 | - | 8.03±2.31 d | ||||||
F7 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | - | 11.34±2.12 d | ||||||
F8 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.05 | - | 3.34±1.42 de | ||||||
F9 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | - | 3.49±1.92 de |
表6 6-BA、TDZ和NAA组合对愈伤组织分化的影响
Table 6 Effects of combination of 6-BA, TDZ and NAA on callus differentiation
Type | No. | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | TDZ (mg∙L-1) | NAA (mg∙L-1) | Adventitious buds differentiation rate (%) | Adventitious roots differentiation rate (%) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Callus from leaves of field planted indivi- dual | F1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 2.13±0.19 d | 3.21±0.13 d | |||||
F2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | 31.69±7.11 a | ||||||
F3 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 8.92±2.83 c | 9.51±2.24 c | ||||||
F4 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 6.43±1.71 cd | 23.49±11.31 b | ||||||
F5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 11.21±3.02 c | 6.91±2.17 cd | ||||||
F6 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.05 | 19.46±6.33 ab | - | ||||||
F7 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 5.64±1.91 d | 2.02±0.17 d | ||||||
F8 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 21.29±9.12 a | - | ||||||
F9 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 15.82±3.64 b | 4.09±1.22 d | ||||||
Callus from leaves of tissue-cultured seedling | F1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.05 | - | 21.23±6.71 b | |||||
F2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | 29.88±9.45 a | ||||||
F3 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | - | 19.01±6.54 bc | ||||||
F4 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | - | 12.56±4.32 cd | ||||||
F5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | - | 14.67±3.03 c | ||||||
F6 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.05 | - | 8.03±2.31 d | ||||||
F7 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | - | 11.34±2.12 d | ||||||
F8 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.05 | - | 3.34±1.42 de | ||||||
F9 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | - | 3.49±1.92 de |
Type | No. | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | TDZ (mg∙L-1) | IAA (mg∙L-1) | Adventitious buds differentiation rate (%) | Adventitious roots differentiation rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Callus from leaves of field planted indivi- dual | F1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.05 | - | 8.97±2.34 c |
F2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | 17.83±5.09 ab | |
F3 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 14.39±3.23 b | - | |
F4 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | - | 23.44±9.12 a | |
F5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 19.07±2.96 b | 7.15±2.17 c | |
F6 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.05 | 17.43±5.99 b | 2.31±1.97 c | |
F7 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 66.37±13.14 a | 2.69±0.81 c | |
F8 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 23.29±8.06 b | - | |
F9 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 7.94±2.01 c | 28.91±13.04 a | |
Callus from leaves of tissue-cultured seedling | F1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.05 | - | 14.32±4.23 ab |
F2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | 23.64±9.34 a | |
F3 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 22.35±9.33 b | 4.52±1.96 c | |
F4 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | - | 17.61±3.22 ab | |
F5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.32±0.42 bc | 9.02±2.83 c | |
F6 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.05 | 53.48±9.89 a | 6.49±2.02 c | |
F7 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 9.46±2.31 bc | 19.03±7.93 a | |
F8 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 19.83±6.99 b | 12.87±4.85 ab | |
F9 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 9.10±2.41 bc | 8.99±3.31 c |
表7 6-BA、TDZ和IAA组合对愈伤组织分化的影响
Table 7 Effects of combination 6-BA, TDZ and IAA on callus differentiation
Type | No. | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | TDZ (mg∙L-1) | IAA (mg∙L-1) | Adventitious buds differentiation rate (%) | Adventitious roots differentiation rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Callus from leaves of field planted indivi- dual | F1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.05 | - | 8.97±2.34 c |
F2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | 17.83±5.09 ab | |
F3 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 14.39±3.23 b | - | |
F4 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | - | 23.44±9.12 a | |
F5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 19.07±2.96 b | 7.15±2.17 c | |
F6 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.05 | 17.43±5.99 b | 2.31±1.97 c | |
F7 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 66.37±13.14 a | 2.69±0.81 c | |
F8 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 23.29±8.06 b | - | |
F9 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 7.94±2.01 c | 28.91±13.04 a | |
Callus from leaves of tissue-cultured seedling | F1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.05 | - | 14.32±4.23 ab |
F2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | 23.64±9.34 a | |
F3 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 22.35±9.33 b | 4.52±1.96 c | |
F4 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | - | 17.61±3.22 ab | |
F5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.32±0.42 bc | 9.02±2.83 c | |
F6 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.05 | 53.48±9.89 a | 6.49±2.02 c | |
F7 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 9.46±2.31 bc | 19.03±7.93 a | |
F8 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 19.83±6.99 b | 12.87±4.85 ab | |
F9 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 9.10±2.41 bc | 8.99±3.31 c |
No. | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | NAA (mg∙L-1) | Proliferation rate (%) | Coefficient of propagation | Plant height (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Z1 | 0.5 | 0.01 | 38.21±6.27 cd | + | 1.21±0.10 d |
Z2 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 29.33±4.36 d | + | 1.37±0.21 d |
Z3 | 0.5 | 0.10 | 17.21±2.39 d | + | 1.43±0.19 cd |
Z4 | 1.0 | 0.01 | 53.69±5.49 bc | +++ | 2.36±0.14 bc |
Z5 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 56.73±7.75 bc | ++ | 2.04±0.17 c |
Z6 | 1.0 | 0.10 | 67.21±3.27 b | ++ | 1.96±0.16 c |
Z7 | 2.0 | 0.01 | 79.06±7.40 a | +++ | 2.63±0.31 b |
Z8 | 2.0 | 0.05 | 83.57±2.13 ab | +++ | 3.17±0.22 a |
Z9 | 2.0 | 0.10 | 68.33±5.56 b | ++ | 2.66±0.15 b |
表8 不同浓度6-BA与NAA组合对不定芽增殖的影响
Table 8 Effects of different concentrations of 6-BA and NAA combinations on adventitious bud proliferation
No. | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | NAA (mg∙L-1) | Proliferation rate (%) | Coefficient of propagation | Plant height (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Z1 | 0.5 | 0.01 | 38.21±6.27 cd | + | 1.21±0.10 d |
Z2 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 29.33±4.36 d | + | 1.37±0.21 d |
Z3 | 0.5 | 0.10 | 17.21±2.39 d | + | 1.43±0.19 cd |
Z4 | 1.0 | 0.01 | 53.69±5.49 bc | +++ | 2.36±0.14 bc |
Z5 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 56.73±7.75 bc | ++ | 2.04±0.17 c |
Z6 | 1.0 | 0.10 | 67.21±3.27 b | ++ | 1.96±0.16 c |
Z7 | 2.0 | 0.01 | 79.06±7.40 a | +++ | 2.63±0.31 b |
Z8 | 2.0 | 0.05 | 83.57±2.13 ab | +++ | 3.17±0.22 a |
Z9 | 2.0 | 0.10 | 68.33±5.56 b | ++ | 2.66±0.15 b |
No. | NAA (mg∙L-1) | IBA (mg∙L-1) | Rooting rate (%) | Root length (cm) | Number of roots | Plant height (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | 0 | - | 43.67±4.09 c | 1.73±0.19 c | 2.39±0.25 c | 1.46±0.67 d |
S2 | 0.1 | - | 60.71±8.33 b | 1.97±0.23 c | 2.76±0.77 c | 2.69±0.42 c |
S3 | 0.5 | - | 73.63±7.41 a | 3.68±0.53 a | 3.53±1.96 b | 3.16±0.96 b |
S4 | 1.0 | - | 57.41±5.31 bc | 2.03±0.87 c | 4.31±1.13 a | 2.06±0.23 cd |
S5 | - | 0.1 | 49.96±7.39 c | 2.94±0.73 b | 2.06±0.63 c | 2.77±0.87 c |
S6 | - | 0.5 | 53.21±4.36 bc | 3.31±0.77 ab | 3.04±1.21 bc | 3.06±0.68 bc |
S7 | - | 1.0 | 51.27±5.77 bc | 2.32±0.66 bc | 3.41±1.26 b | 3.22±0.73 b |
S8 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 86.97±6.96 a | 3.22±1.07 ab | 3.65±1.17 a | 3.79±1.17 a |
S9 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 34.21±8.41 c | 2.21±0.42 bc | 2.33±0.41 c | 2.17±0.71 c |
S10 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 21.19±2.79 d | 1.53±0.39 c | 1.61±0.19 d | 1.93±0.29 d |
表9 不同浓度生长素对不定芽生根的影响
Table 9 Effects of different concentrations of auxins on adventitious bud rooting
No. | NAA (mg∙L-1) | IBA (mg∙L-1) | Rooting rate (%) | Root length (cm) | Number of roots | Plant height (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | 0 | - | 43.67±4.09 c | 1.73±0.19 c | 2.39±0.25 c | 1.46±0.67 d |
S2 | 0.1 | - | 60.71±8.33 b | 1.97±0.23 c | 2.76±0.77 c | 2.69±0.42 c |
S3 | 0.5 | - | 73.63±7.41 a | 3.68±0.53 a | 3.53±1.96 b | 3.16±0.96 b |
S4 | 1.0 | - | 57.41±5.31 bc | 2.03±0.87 c | 4.31±1.13 a | 2.06±0.23 cd |
S5 | - | 0.1 | 49.96±7.39 c | 2.94±0.73 b | 2.06±0.63 c | 2.77±0.87 c |
S6 | - | 0.5 | 53.21±4.36 bc | 3.31±0.77 ab | 3.04±1.21 bc | 3.06±0.68 bc |
S7 | - | 1.0 | 51.27±5.77 bc | 2.32±0.66 bc | 3.41±1.26 b | 3.22±0.73 b |
S8 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 86.97±6.96 a | 3.22±1.07 ab | 3.65±1.17 a | 3.79±1.17 a |
S9 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 34.21±8.41 c | 2.21±0.42 bc | 2.33±0.41 c | 2.17±0.71 c |
S10 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 21.19±2.79 d | 1.53±0.39 c | 1.61±0.19 d | 1.93±0.29 d |
[1] | 贺美忠 (2016). 黄芩组织培养与快速繁殖条件的研究. 农业科技通讯 (4), 79-80. |
[2] | 胡佳卉, 王小德 (2018). 羊角槭愈伤组织诱导、增殖与分化. 浙江农林大学学报 35, 975-980. |
[3] | 黄娟, 吴鹏飞, 程浩, 马祥庆 (2018). 杉木愈伤组织的继代增殖与植株再生. 森林与环境学报 38, 20-26. |
[4] | 刘俊, 孙瑞芬, 耿牡丹, 王冬霓, 张艳芳, 孙钟 (2017). 毛建草离体培养快繁体系的建立. 北方农业学报 45(6), 102-106. |
[5] |
逯锦春, 曹丽娜, 佟冠杰, 王鑫颖, 张利英, 喻锌, 李荟芳, 李彦慧 (2022). 大花银莲花愈伤组织诱导及再生体系的建立. 植物学报 57, 217-226.
DOI |
[6] |
罗虹, 温小蕙, 周圆圆, 戴思兰 (2020). 芳香堆心菊离体再生体系的建立. 植物学报 55, 318-328.
DOI |
[7] | 庞艳菊 (2019). 丹参快速扩繁与遗传转化体系建立的研究. 硕士论文. 武汉: 华中农业大学. pp. 34-36. |
[8] | 桑晓霞 (2021). 药茶原料毛建草快繁体系建立及功能成分研究. 硕士论文. 太原: 山西大学. pp. 17-21. |
[9] |
田旭平, 郭庆浩, 孙鸣屿, 李倩, 路通 (2021). 不同种源的毛建草珠芽形成比较研究. 草地学报 29, 1357-1362.
DOI |
[10] | 王莉 (2008). “草原”美国薄荷的组织培养及挥发油成分研究. 硕士论文. 雅安: 四川农业大学. pp. 27-34. |
[11] | 吴雯雯, 陆兵, 李文清, 邵元健 (2018). 留兰香薄荷离体快繁技术研究. 江苏农业科学 46(4), 47-49. |
[12] |
谢纯刚, 刘哲, 章书声, 胡海涛 (2023). 手指柠檬茎段离体再生体系建立. 植物学报 58, 926-934.
DOI |
[13] | 杨宇昊 (2023). 毛建草药茶黄酮类物质的提取纯化及活性研究. 硕士论文. 太原: 山西大学. pp. 5-9. |
[14] | 于盱, 梁呈元, 刘艳, 王海棠, 李维林 (2012). 薄荷茎段不定芽离体诱导影响因素分析及植株再生体系的建立. 江苏农业科学 40(12), 56-59. |
[15] |
张静, 牛喆, 范卫芳, 高鹏飞, 吴建慧 (2020). 狭叶黄芩组织培养再生体系的建立. 植物研究 40, 50-57.
DOI |
[16] | 张彦广 (2006). 河北省野生花卉调查及部分种的引种栽培研究. 博士论文. 北京: 北京林业大学. pp. 19-24. |
[17] | 赵佳佳, 宇佳, 迟德富 (2016). 多花筋骨草高频再生体系的建立. 湖南师范大学自然科学学报 39(1), 30-34. |
[18] | 赵晓杰, 迟德富, 李晓灿 (2011). 匍枝筋骨草再生体系构建. 中国农学通报 27(4), 120-124. |
[19] | 宗越 (2019). 毛建草茶饮习俗及组织培养研究. 硕士论文. 晋中: 山西农业大学. pp. 32-37. |
[20] | Bakhtiar Z, Mirjalili MH, Sonboli A (2016). In vitro callus induction and micropropagation of Thymus persicus (Lamiaceae), an endangered medicinal plant. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol 16, 48-54. |
[21] | Fallah M, Farzaneh M, Yousefzadi M, Ghorbanpour M, Mirjalili MH (2019). In vitro mass propagation and conservation of a rare medicinal plant, Zhumeria majdae Rech.f & Wendelbo (Lamiaceae). Biocatal Agr Biotechnol 17, 318-325. |
[22] | Gharari Z, Bagheri K, Karimkhanlooei G, Sharafi A (2021). Study of tissue culture and in vitro organogenesis of Scutellaria bornmuelleri using benzylaminopurine, isopentenyl adenine and thidiazuron. South Afr J Bot 139, 458-469. |
[23] |
Jacobs WP (1998). Hormone transport and action in the green shoot: long-term studies of a clonal stock of Coleus blumei (Labiatae). Am J Bot 85, 1353-1363.
PMID |
[24] | Karakas FP, Turker AU (2013). An efficient in vitro regeneration system for Bellis perennis L. and comparison of phenolic contents of field-grown and in vitro-grown leaves by LC-MS/MS. Ind Crops Prod 48, 162-170. |
[1] | 陈文娜, 李良涛, 周璐, 姚纲. 太行山近期隆升促进太行花属(蔷薇科)谱系分化[J]. 植物学报, 2024, 59(5): 763-773. |
[2] | 康敏, 张美莹, 齐秀双, 佟宁宁, 李旸, 舒庆艳, 刘政安, 吕长平, 彭丽平. 伊藤杂种‘和谐’组培快繁体系的建立[J]. 植物学报, 2024, 59(3): 441-451. |
[3] | 吕晓波, 李东海, 杨小波, 张孟文. 红树林群落通过淹水时间及海水盐度的生态位分化实现物种共存[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(3): 23302-. |
[4] | 陈雨婷, 马松梅, 张丹, 张林, 王春成. 新疆同域分布梭梭和白梭梭多样性格局及其形成机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(1): 56-67. |
[5] | 张尚文, 黄诗宇, 杨天为, 李婷, 张向军, 高曼熔. 基于正交实验的赤苍藤组培快繁体系建立[J]. 植物学报, 2024, 59(1): 99-109. |
[6] | 谭晓丹, 张鹏, 朱思睿, 刘向, 周淑荣, 刘木. 青藏高原高寒草甸灌丛化对圆穗蓼昆虫植食作用的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23417-. |
[7] | 杨鑫, 任明迅. 环南海区域红树物种多样性分布格局及其形成机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(8): 1105-1115. |
[8] | 赵坤明, 陈圣宾, 杨锡福. 基于红外相机技术调查四川都江堰破碎化森林鸟兽多样性及优势种活动节律[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(6): 22529-. |
[9] | 熊飞, 刘红艳, 翟东东, 段辛斌, 田辉伍, 陈大庆. 基于基因组重测序的长江上游瓦氏黄颡鱼群体遗传结构[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(4): 22391-. |
[10] | 朱明阳, 林琳, 佘雨龙, 肖城材, 赵通兴, 胡春相, 赵昌佑, 王文礼. 云南轿子山不同海拔急尖长苞冷杉径向生长动态及其低温阈值[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 1038-1049. |
[11] | 周天祥, 杨华林, 张贵权, 杨建, 冯茜, 胡强, 程跃红, 张晋东, 王彬, 周材权. 四川卧龙国家级自然保护区三种高山同域鸡形目鸟类的时空生态位比较[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(6): 22026-. |
[12] | 陶克涛, 白东义, 图格琴, 赵若阳, 安塔娜, 铁木齐尔·阿尔腾齐米克, 宝音德力格尔, 哈斯, 芒来, 韩海格. 基于基因组SNPs对东亚家马不同群体遗传多样性的评估[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(5): 21031-. |
[13] | 孙琼, 王嵘, 陈小勇. 物种形成过程中的分化基因组岛及其形成机制[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(3): 21383-. |
[14] | 王春成, 张云玲, 马松梅, 黄刚, 张丹, 闫涵. 中国扁桃亚属四种野生扁桃的系统发育与物种分化[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(9): 987-995. |
[15] | 杜军, 王文, 何志斌, 陈龙飞, 蔺鹏飞, 朱喜, 田全彦. 祁连山青海云杉物候表型的空间分异及其内在机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(8): 834-843. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||