锁阳ITS序列遗传多样性分析

doi:10.11983/CBB17193

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为阐明锁阳(Cynomorium songaricum)的遗传结构与遗传多样性, 以甘肃省河西走廊地区及青海省共18个居群的188个锁阳个体为研究对象, 利用现代分子生物学技术, 采用序列分析方法从核-质基因方面对遗传结构进行了分析。结果显示, 锁阳ITS序列总长度为687 bp, 含有7个变异位点, 定义9个单倍型, 整体单倍型多态性H_d=0.294 20, 核苷酸多样性π=0.000 49。在整个单倍型网络中介图中, 单倍型H1位于中心位置, 并在所有的居群中均有分布, 为核心的古老单倍型。分子方差分析结果显示, 锁阳种群变异主要来源于种群内。根据ITS序列得到的群体间遗传分化系数以及Mantel检验结果, 锁阳种群间的遗传距离与地理距离之间不存在相关性, 表明现存的锁阳居群是相对近期发生生境片段化的产物。中性检验结果表明, 锁阳拒绝中性进化, 群体历经扩张或者基因座位受到负选择作用, 其中性零假说不能被排除。该研究为锁阳的系统分类、资源鉴定以及保护措施的制定提供了分子证据。

关键词: 锁阳, ITS, 遗传多样性, 中性假说

Abstract: To elucidate the genetic structure and genetic diversity of Cynomorium songaricum, modern molecular biology techniques at the DNA level were used to study the genetic structure of 188 C. songaricum individuals from 18 wild populations in the Hexi Corridor Region of Gansu and Qinghai. After alignment, all amplified sequence lengths were 687 bp. The 687 bp ITS sequence detected 7 mutation sites in 188 individuals, defining 9 haplotypes. Processing these 9 haplotype sequences led to a data matrix for calculating the haplotype diversity (H_d=0.294 20) and nucleotide diversity (π=0.000 49). In the haplotype network map, H1 is located in the center and distributed in all populations, and is the ancient and core haplotype. AMOVA revealed that the variation in C. songaricum mainly occurs in populations. According to the genetic differentiation coefficient and Mantel test of ITS sequences, we found no significant relation between genetic and geographic distances, so the current distribution of C. songaricum represents the fragmentation product in recent time. Detection of historical expansion of populations showed that the Tajima’s D test rejected a neutral mutation evolution, and the population expansion history or gene locus is under negative selection pressure, so the null hypothesis cannot be ruled out. Our study provides molecular evidence for the classification system, identification and protection measures of C. songaricum.

Key words: Cynomorium songaricum, ITS, genetic diversity, neutral hypothesis

任梦云, 杜乐山, 陈彦君, 张盾, 沈奇, 关潇, 张银东. 锁阳ITS序列遗传多样性分析. 植物学报, 2018, 53(3): 313-321.

Ren Mengyun, Du Leshan, Chen Yanjun, Zhang Dun, Shen Qi, Guan Xiao, Zhang Yindong. Analysis on Genetic Diversity of Cynomorium songaricum by ITS Sequence. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2018, 53(3): 313-321.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.chinbullbotany.com/CN/10.11983/CBB17193

https://www.chinbullbotany.com/CN/Y2018/V53/I3/313

图/表 8

表1 18个锁阳居群样地分布信息

Table 1 Location of 18 populations of Cynomorium songaricum

Sample No.	Location	Longitude E (°)	Latitude N (°)	Height (m)	Number
R1	Zhangye, Gansu	102.522	36.822	1803	11
R2	Minqin, Gansu	100.772	39.223	1370	17
R3	Jinchang, Gansu	102.54	38.44	1466	7
R4	Sandan, Gansu	101.118	38.897	2020	10
R5	Gaotai, Gansu	99.086	39.787	1339	11
R6	Sunan, Gansu	99.176	39.604	1395	10
R7	Sunan, Gansu	99.474	39.445	1391	12
R8	Jiuquan, Gansu	98.55	40.3	1232	4
R9	Yumen, Gansu	97.196	40.516	1395	10
R10	Guazhou, Gansu	95.585	40.212	1343	11
R11	Dunhuang, Gansu	94.583	40.368	1033	11
R12	Subei, Gansu	96.619	39.397	2355	10
R13	Delingha, Qinghai	97.334	37.206	2780	11
R14	Geermu, Qinghai	92.839	36.701	2790	7
R15	Dulan, Qinghai	98.164	36.476	2972	12
R16	Wulan, Qinghai	98.622	36.458	2917	12
R17	Gonghe, Qinghai	100.183	36.446	2904	11
R18	Guide, Qinghai	101.639	36.219	2389	11

表2 锁阳核糖体ITS序列的单倍型多态性位点

Table 2 Variable sites of ITS sequence haplotypes of Cynomorium songaricum

Haplotype	Variable sites							Abundance
Haplotype	63	86	197	274	421	605	623	Abundance
H1	G	G	G	T	G	C	G	143
H2	A	G	G	T	G	C	T	3
H3	G	A	G	T	G	C	G	1
H4	G	A	G	T	G	G	G	2
H5	A	G	G	T	G	C	G	26
H6	G	G	A	T	G	C	G	5
H7	G	G	A	G	G	C	G	1
H8	G	G	G	T	G	G	G	4
H9	G	G	G	T	A	C	G	3

表3 锁阳18个居群的单倍型遗传多样性组成

Table 3 Haplotype diversity and composition of Cynomorium songaricum from18 populations

Population code	Samples	Haptotypes	H_d
R1	11	H1, H2, H3, H4	0.25974
R2	17	H1, H5, H6	0.11586
R3	7	H1, H5	0.43956
R4	10	H1, H2, H5	0.42632
R5	11	H1, H6	0.24675
R6	10	H1, H7, H8	0.19474
R7	12	H1, H5	0.08333
R8	4	H1, H5, H9	0.60714
R9	10	H1, H8	0.10000
R10	11	H1, H5, H8	0.17749
R11	11	H1, H4, H6	0.17749
R12	10	H1	0
R13	11	H1	0
R14	7	H1, H6	0.14286
R15	12	H1, H9	0.08333
R16	12	H1, H9	0.08333
R17	11	H1, H8	0.09091
R18	11	H1	0
Total	188		0.29420

图1 基于锁阳ITS序列的严格一致性树步长=784, CI=0.949 0, RI=0.911 7, RCI=0.865 2。分支上的数字分别代表MP/ML/BI的支持率。

Figure 1 Strict consensus tree based on the ITS sequence of Cynomorium songaricumLength=784, CI=0.949 0, RI=0.911 7, RCI=0.865 2. The num- bers on the branch represent the support rate of MP/ML/BI, respectively.

图2 锁阳18个居群基于ITS序列的单倍型网络图圆圈的大小与单倍型的相对频率成正比; 不同颜色代表锁阳属不同种群。

Figure 2 Haplotype network based on ITS sequence of Cynomorium songaricum from 18 populationsThe size of circles are proportional to the relative frequency of the haplotype; Different colors represent different populations of Cynomorium songaricum.

表4 锁阳种群遗传结构参数

Table 4 Genetic structural parameters of Cynomorium songaricum

Sequence	H_S(SE)	H_T(SE)	G_ST(SE)	N_ST(SE)
ITS	0.179 (0.0390)	0.277 (0.0820)	0.353 (0.1914)	0.408 (0.2038)

表5 锁阳核糖体基因单倍型分子方差分析

Table 5 Analysis of molecular variance for ribosome haplotypes of Cynomorium songaricum

Source of variation	df	Sum of squares	Variance components	Percentage	F_ST	P
Among populations	17	28.833	0.07689 Va	44.57	0.44566	<0.001*
Within populations	358	34.239	0.09564 Vb	55.43	0.44566	<0.001*
Total	375	63.072	0.17253

图3 基于ITS序列的锁阳种群失配分析柱形代表变异位点在群体扩张模型下的预期分布; 虚线代表变异位点的实际分布。

Figure 3 Mismatch distribution analysis for the populations of Cynomorium songaricum based on ITS sequenceCylindricality represents the expected distribution of variation sites under the population expansion model; dotted line represents the actual distribution of variation sites.

参考文献 35

[1]	陈贵林, 岳鑫, 刘广达 (2011). 锁阳愈伤组织体系的建立及遗传多样性研究. 见: 第十届全国药用植物及植物药学术研讨会论文集. 昆明: 中国植物学会. pp. 26.
[2]	陈叶, 高海宁, 高宏, 韩多宏, 罗光宏, 张勇 (2013). 甘肃河西走廊道地药材锁阳的分布和利用. 中兽医医药杂志 32, 77-79.
[3]	郝媛媛, 岳利军, 康建军, 王锁民 (2012). “沙漠人参”肉苁蓉和锁阳研究进展. 草业学报21, 286-293.
[4]	黄建峰, 李朗, 李捷 (2016). 樟属植物ITS序列多态性分析. 植物学报 51, 609-619.
[5]	李洪芹, 马昌豪, 彭艳丽 (2015). 山东玫瑰花核糖体rDNA ITS序列分析初步探究. 天津中医药大学学报 34, 104-107.
[6]	李金博, 高丽华, 周美亮, 李诗刚, 彭昭良, 吴燕民 (2016). 15个白三叶品种的ISSR和ITS遗传多样性分析. 草业科学 33, 1147-1153.
[7]	李学营, 彭建营, 白瑞霞 (2005). 基于核rDNA的ITS序列在种子植物系统发育研究中的应用. 西北植物学报 25, 829-834.
[8]	宁淑萍, 颜海飞, 郝刚, 葛学军 (2008). 植物DNA条形码研究进展. 生物多样性 16, 417-425.
[9]	宋宇婷, 马大龙, 隋心, 穆立蔷 (2011). 黑龙江、吉林地区松茸ITS序列遗传多样性分析. 中国酿造 30, 133-136.
[10]	岳鑫, 段园园, 陈贵林 (2013). 锁阳愈伤组织诱导和增殖及不定根分化. 植物生理学报 49, 1421-1426.
[11]	中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会 (2000). 中国植物志(第五十三卷第二分册). 北京: 科学出版社. pp. 152-154.
[12]	Avise JC (2000).Phylogeography: the History and Formation of Species. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. pp. 134-135.
[13]	Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Röhl A (1999). Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies.Mol Biol Evol 16, 37-48.
[14]	Barkman TJ, McNeal JR, Lim SH, Coat G, Croom HB, Young ND, Depamphilis CW (2007). Mitochondrial DNA suggests at least 11 origins of parasitism in angiosperms and reveals genomic chimerism in parasitic plants.BMC Evol Biol 7, 248.
[15]	Cibrián-Jaramillo A, Bacon CD, Garwood NC, Bateman RM, Thomas MM, Russell S, Bailey CD, Hahn WJ, Bridgewater SG, DeSalle R (2009). Population genetics of the understory fishtail palm Chamaedorea ernestiau- gusti in Belize: high genetic connectivity with local differen- tiation. BMC Genet 10, 65.
[16]	Cooke DEL, Duncan JM (1997). Phylogenetic analysis of Phytophthora species based on ITS1 and ITS2 sequences of the ribosomal RNA gene repeat. Mycol Res 101, 667-677.
[17]	Cosacov A, Johnson LA, Paiaro V, Cocucci AA, Córdoba FE, Sérsic AN, Crisci J (2013). Precipitation rather than temperature influenced the phylogeography of the endemic shrub Anarthrophyllum desideratum in the Patagonian steppe. J Biogeogra 40, 168-182.
[18]	Excoffier L (2004). Patterns of DNA sequence diversity and genetic structure after a range expansion: lessons from the infinite-island model.Mol Ecol 13, 853-864.
[19]	Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2007). Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis.Evol Bioinform 1, 47-50.
[20]	Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992). Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data.Genetics 131, 479-491.
[21]	Hall TA (1999). BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/ 98/NT. In: Information Retrieval Ltd., Nucleic Acids Symposium Series, vol. 41. London: IRL Press. pp. 95-98.
[22]	Hou DY, Song JY, Shi LC, Ma XC, Xin TY, Han JP, Xiao W, Sun ZY, Cheng RY, Yao H (2013a). Stability and accuracy assessment of identification of traditional Chinese materia medica using DNA barcoding: a case study on Flos Lonicerae Japonicae.Biomed Res Int 2013, 549037.
[23]	Hou DY, Song JY, Yao H, Han JP, Pang XH, Shi LC, Wang XC, Chen SL (2013b). Molecular identification of corni fructus and its adulterants by ITS/ITS2 sequences.Chin J Nat Med 11, 121-127.
[24]	Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016). MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger data- sets.Mol Biol Evol 33, 1870-1874.
[25]	Lahaye R, Van der Bank M, Bogarin D, Warner J, Pupulin F, Gigot G, Maurin O, Duthoit S, Barraclough TG, Savolainen V (2008). DNA barcoding the floras of biodiversity hotspots.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105, 2923-2928.
[26]	Librado P, Rozas J (2009). DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data.Bioinformatics 25, 1451-1452.
[27]	Liu GD, Chen GL, Li W, Li CX (2013). Genetic and phytochemical diversities of Cynomorium songaricum Rupr. in Northwest China indicated by ISSR markers and HPLC- fingerprinting. Biochem Syst Ecol 48, 34-41.
[28]	Newmaster SG, Fazekas AJ, Steeves RAD, Janovec J (2008). Testing candidate plant barcode regions in the My- risticaceae.Mol Ecol Res 8, 480-490.
[29]	Nickrent DL, Der JP, Anderson FE (2005). Discovery of the photosynthetic relatives of the “Maltese mushroom” Cynomorium. BMC Evol Biol 5, 38.
[30]	Pons O, Petit RJ (1996). Measwring and testing genetic differentiation with ordered Versus unordered alleles. Genetics 144, 1237-1245.
[31]	Rogers AR, Harpending H (1992). Population growth makes waves in the distribution of pairwise genetic differences.Mol Biol Evol 9, 552-569.
[32]	Slatkin M, Hudson RR (1991). Pairwise comparisons of mitochondrial DNA sequences in stable and exponentially growing populations.Genetics 129, 555-562.
[33]	Song JY, Shi LC, Li DZ, Sun YZ, Niu YY, Chen ZD, Luo HM, Pang XH, Sun ZY, Liu C, Lv AP, Deng YP, Larson-Rabin Z, Wilkinson M, Chen SL (2012). Extensive pyrosequencing reveals frequent intra-genomic variations of internal transcribed spacer regions of nuclear ribosomal DNA.PLoS One 7, e43971.
[34]	Swafford DL (2002). PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony ( and Other Methods). Version 4.0 10b. Sunderland, MA:Sinauer Associates.
[35]	Zhang ZH, Li CQ, Li JH (2009). Phylogenetic placement of Cynomorium in Rosales inferred from sequences of the inverted repeat region of the chloroplast genome. J Syst Evol 47, 297-304.