植物学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (1): 76-82.DOI: 10.11983/CBB19208
收稿日期:
2019-10-24
接受日期:
2019-12-31
出版日期:
2020-01-01
发布日期:
2020-01-03
通讯作者:
任东涛
基金资助:
Dan Zhu,Hanwei Cao,Yuan Li,Dongtao Ren()
Received:
2019-10-24
Accepted:
2019-12-31
Online:
2020-01-01
Published:
2020-01-03
Contact:
Dongtao Ren
摘要: 蛋白磷酸化是一种重要的蛋白质翻译后修饰方式, 几乎参与植物所有生命过程的调节。蛋白磷酸化过程主要指在蛋白激酶的催化作用下, 将三磷酸腺苷(ATP)上的γ位磷酸基团转移到底物蛋白特定氨基酸残基上的过程。底物蛋白上被磷酸化的常见氨基酸有丝氨酸、苏氨酸及酪氨酸, 磷酸基团与氨基酸中的羟基通过酯键连接。该文详细描述了几种常用的蛋白质体外及体内磷酸化的检测方法及注意事项。
朱丹,曹汉威,李媛,任东涛. 植物蛋白磷酸化的检测方法. 植物学报, 2020, 55(1): 76-82.
Dan Zhu,Hanwei Cao,Yuan Li,Dongtao Ren. Protocols for Analyzing Plant Phospho-proteins. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2020, 55(1): 76-82.
图1 原核表达的拟南芥激酶MPK6对3个推测底物的体外磷酸分析 激酶(MPK6)连接有6×His标签、推测的底物蛋白(A、B和C)连接有Flag标签。体外磷酸化反应完成后, 反应体系中的蛋白用SDS-PAGE gel分离。然后进行磷酸化底物的放射自显影分析(上图)。底物蛋白(中图)和激酶(下图)的免疫印迹分析显示底物、激酶各自在磷酸化反应中的蛋白使用量基本一致。
Figure 1 An in vitro phosphorylation assay of 3 putative substrate proteins by MPK6 in Arabidopsis thaliana MPK6 was fused with the 6×His tag and the 3 putative substrates were fused with the Flag tag. After phosphorylation reaction, the proteins in the mixture were separated on a SDS- PAGE gel. The gel was dried and exposed to X-ray film (top). Immunoblotting with anti-His and anti-Flag antibodies were used to show the levels of the substrate (middle) and kinase (bottom) proteins in the reactions.
图2 Phos-tag gel和SDS-PAGE gel电泳后, 免疫印迹检测磷酸化蛋白的对比分析 磷酸酶(如Calf intestine alkaline phosphatase, CIAP)可去除磷酸化蛋白上的磷酸基团。同一样品在CIAP处理前(-)、后(+), 磷酸化和非磷酸化形式的蛋白经Phos-tag gel (上图)和SDS- PAGE gel (下图)电泳后的免疫印迹分析结果。经Phos-tag gel电泳, 未加CIAP的样品中特定蛋白的磷酸化(P-form)和非磷酸化形式(None-P-form)被清晰地分开(上图); 加CIAP后磷酸化形式消失而非磷酸化形式条带增强。经SDS-PAGE gel电泳, 未加和加CIAP处理的样品中, 特定蛋白的磷酸化和非磷酸化形式分开不明显(下图)。
Figure 2 Immunoblotting detection of phospho-proteins in samples after Phos-tag gel and SDS-PAGE gel separation Phospho-proteins can be dephosphorylated by phosphatases (e.g. Calf intestine alkaline phosphatase, CIAP). Protein samples treated with (+) or without (-) CIAP were separated by Phos-tag (top) and SDS-PAGE (bottom) gels, and the specific protein was further detected by immunoblotting. The P-form and None-P-form of the protein were separated clearly by a Phos-tag gel (top), while the two forms were not separated by a SDS-PAGE gel (bottom). The missing of the upper band and the increasing of the bottom band after Phos-tag gel separation indicated that P-form protein was completely dephosphorylated by CIAP treatment.
图3 拟南芥幼苗总蛋白双向凝胶电泳后的磷酸化蛋白Pro-Q Diamond染色检测分析 2周龄拟南芥幼苗总蛋白提取液经双向凝胶电泳分离后, 用Pro-Q Diamond试剂对磷酸化蛋白进行染色(左图)。荧光扫描后的凝胶再进行考马斯亮蓝染色(blue-silver staining) (右图)。
Figure 3 Pro-Q staining assay of the phospho-proteins in total proteins extracted from Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings and separated by a 2D gel Two-week-old Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings were used for total protein extraction. The total proteins were separated by a 2D gel and the phospho-proteins were stained by Pro-Q (left). The gel was scanned with a Typhoon 9410 fluorescence scanner, and then stained with blue-silver to visualize the proteins (right).
[1] | Agrawal GK, Thelen JJ (2005). Development of a simplified, economical polyacrylamide gel staining protocol for phosphoproteins. Proteomics 5, 4684-4688. |
[2] | Agrawal GK, Thelen JJ (2006). Large scale identification and quantitative profiling of phosphoproteins expressed during seed filling in oilseed rape. Mol Cell Proteomics 5, 2044-2059. |
[3] | Blom N, Sicheritz-Pontén T, Gupta R, Gammeltoft S, Brunak S (2004). Prediction of post-translational glycosylation and phosphorylation of proteins from the amino acid sequence. Proteomics 4, 1633-1649. |
[4] | Candiano G, Bruschi M, Musante L, Santucci L, Ghiggeri GM, Carnemolla B, Orecchia P, Zardi L, Righetti PG (2004). Blue silver: a very sensitive colloidal Coomassie G-250 staining for proteome analysis. Electrophoresis 25, 1327-1333. |
[5] | Chao Q, Liu XY, Mei YC, Gao ZF, Chen YB, Qian CR, Hao YB, Wang BC (2014). Light-regulated phosphorylation of maize phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase plays a vital role in its activity. Plant Mol Biol 85, 95-105. |
[6] | Chen MJ, Dixon JE, Manning G (2017). Genomics and evolution of protein phosphatases. Sci Signal 10, eaag1796. |
[7] | de la Fuente van Bentem S, Hirt H (2007). Using phosphoproteomics to reveal signaling dynamics in plants. Trends Plant Sci 12, 404-411. |
[8] | Ficarro SB, McCleland ML, Stukenberg PT, Burke DJ, Ross MM, Shabanowitz J, Hunt DF, White FM (2002). Phosphoproteome analysis by mass spectrometry and its application to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Biotechnol 20, 301-305. |
[9] | Fischer EH, Krebs EG (1955). Conversion of phosphorylase B to phosphorylase A in muscle extracts. J Biol Chem 216, 121-132. |
[10] | Frost DC, Li LJ (2014). Recent advances in mass spectrometry-based glycoproteomics. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol 95, 71-123. |
[11] | Hubbard MJ, Cohen P (1993). On target with a new mechanism for the regulation of protein phosphorylation. Trends Biochem Sci 18, 172-177. |
[12] | Ke YQ, Han GQ, He HQ, Li JX (2009). Differential regulation of proteins and phosphoproteins in rice under drought stress. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 379, 133-138. |
[13] | Khan M, Takasaki H, Komatsu S (2005). Comprehensive phosphoproteome analysis in rice and identification of phosphoproteins responsive to different hormones/stresses. J Proteome Res 4, 1592-1599. |
[14] | Kim HS, Fernandes G, Lee CW (2016). Protein phosphatases involved in regulating mitosis: facts and hypotheses. Mol Cell 39, 654-662. |
[15] | Kinoshita E, Kinoshita-Kikuta E, Koike T (2007). Specific recognition and detection of phosphorylated proteins using characteristics of metal ion. Yakugaku Zasshi 127, 1897-1913. |
[16] | Kosako H, Nagano K (2011). Quantitative phosphoproteomics strategies for understanding protein kinase-mediated signal transduction pathways. Expert Rev Proteomics 8, 81-94. |
[17] | Krupa A, Preethi G, Srinivasan N (2004). Structural modes of stabilization of permissive phosphorylation sites in protein kinases: distinct strategies in Ser/Thr and Tyr kinases. J Mol Biol 339, 1025-1039. |
[18] | Laemmli UK (1970). Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680-685. |
[19] | Laugesen S, Bergoin A, Rossignol M (2004). Deciphering the plant phosphoproteome: tools and strategies for a challenging task. Plant Physiol Biochem 42, 929-936. |
[20] | Peck SC (2003). Early phosphorylation events in biotic stress. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6, 334-338. |
[21] | Prak S, Hem S, Boudet J, Viennois G, Sommerer N, Rossignol M, Maurel C, Santoni V (2008). Multiple phosphorylations in the C-terminal tail of plant plasma membrane aquaporins: role in subcellular trafficking of AtPIP2;1 in response to salt stress. Mol Cell Proteomics 7, 1019-1030. |
[22] | Wang PC, Zhao Y, Li ZP, Hsu CC, Liu X, Fu LW, Hou YJ, Du YY, Xie SJ, Zhang CG, Gao JH, Cao MJ, Huang XS, Zhu YF, Tang K, Wang XG, Tao WA, Xiong Y, Zhu JK (2018). Reciprocal regulation of the TOR kinase and ABA receptor balances plant growth and stress response. Mol Cell 69, 100-112. |
[23] | Whiteman SA, Nühse TS, Ashford DA, Sanders D, Maathuis FJ (2008). A proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis of Oryza sativa plasma membrane and vacuolar membrane. Plant J 56, 146-156. |
[24] | Wu CF, Wang RN, Liang QJ, Liang JJ, Li WK, Jung SY, Qin J, Lin SH, Kuang J (2010). Dissecting the M phase- specific phosphorylation of serine-proline or threonine- proline motifs. Mol Biol Cell 21, 1470-1481. |
[25] | Yang C, Wang ZG, Zhu PF (2004). Recent advances of protein phosphorylation in proteome. Prog Physiol Sci 35, 119-124. |
[26] | Yin XJ, Wang X, Komatsu S (2018). Phosphoproteomics: protein phosphorylation in regulation of seed germination and plant growth. Curr Protein Pept Sci 19, 401-412. |
[27] | Zhang X, Cui YN, Yu M, Su BD, Gong W, Baluška F, Komis G, Samaj J, Shan XY, Lin JX (2019). Phosphorylation-mediated dynamics of nitrate transceptor NRT1.1 regulate auxin flux and nitrate signaling in lateral root growth. Plant Physiol 181, 480-498. |
[28] | Zhu WG (2017). Regulation of p53 acetylation. Sci China Life Sci 60, 321-323. |
[1] | 肖兰 张琳婷 董标 邓传远 李霞 姜德刚 林勇明. 渤海区无居民海岛主要植被类型群落特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(预发表): 0-0. |
[2] | 董劭琼 侯东杰 曲孝云 郭柯. 柴达木盆地植物群落样方数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(预发表): 0-0. |
[3] | 王雨婷 刘旭婧 唐驰飞 陈玮钰 王美娟 向松竹 刘梅 杨林森 傅强 晏召贵 孟红杰. 神农架极小种群植物庙台槭群落特征及种群动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(预发表): 0-0. |
[4] | 刘聪聪 何念鹏 李颖 张佳慧 闫镤 王若梦 王瑞丽. 宏观生态学中的植物功能性状:研究历史与发展趋势[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(预发表): 0-0. |
[5] | 韩大勇 李海燕 张维 杨允菲. 松嫩草地全叶马兰种群分株养分的季节运转及衰老过程[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(预发表): 0-0. |
[6] | 吴相獐, 雷富民, 单壹壹, 于晶. 上海城市公园苔藓植物多样性分布格局及其环境影响因子[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23364-0. |
[7] | 张飞飞, 杨天凤, 陈莉荣, 刘冬梅, 杨柳园, 杨杜宇, 鞠鹏, 陆露. 被子植物花粉颜色多样性及应用研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23346-. |
[8] | 张楚然, 李生发, 李逢昌, 唐志忠, 刘辉燕, 王丽红, 顾荣, 邓云, 张志明, 林露湘. 云南鸡足山亚热带半湿润常绿阔叶林20 ha动态监测样地木本植物生境关联与群落数量分类 [J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23393-. |
[9] | 杜志烨, 李明玉, 陈稷, 黄进. 植物胁迫相关蛋白功能研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2024, 59(1): 0-0. |
[10] | 张悦婧, 桑鹤天, 王涵琦, 石珍珍, 李丽, 王馨, 孙坤, 张继, 冯汉青. 植物对非生物性胁迫系统性反应中信号传递的研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2024, 59(1): 0-0. |
[11] | 任海, 何拓, 文世峰, 董晖. 中国特色、世界一流国家植物园的主要特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23192-. |
[12] | 廖景平, 倪杜娟, 何拓, 黄宏文. 全球植物园发展历史、现状与展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23256-. |
[13] | 李勇, 李三青, 王欢. 天津野生维管植物编目及分布数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23128-. |
[14] | 段晓敏, 李佳佳, 李靖宇, 李艳楠, 袁存霞, 王英娜, 刘建利. 腾格里沙漠东南缘藓结皮植物-土壤连续体不同粒径土壤微生物群落多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23131-. |
[15] | 陈进. 《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》与国家植物园体系建设[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23257-. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||