植物学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (1): 76-82.DOI: 10.11983/CBB19208
收稿日期:
2019-10-24
接受日期:
2019-12-31
出版日期:
2020-01-01
发布日期:
2020-01-03
通讯作者:
任东涛
基金资助:
Dan Zhu,Hanwei Cao,Yuan Li,Dongtao Ren()
Received:
2019-10-24
Accepted:
2019-12-31
Online:
2020-01-01
Published:
2020-01-03
Contact:
Dongtao Ren
摘要: 蛋白磷酸化是一种重要的蛋白质翻译后修饰方式, 几乎参与植物所有生命过程的调节。蛋白磷酸化过程主要指在蛋白激酶的催化作用下, 将三磷酸腺苷(ATP)上的γ位磷酸基团转移到底物蛋白特定氨基酸残基上的过程。底物蛋白上被磷酸化的常见氨基酸有丝氨酸、苏氨酸及酪氨酸, 磷酸基团与氨基酸中的羟基通过酯键连接。该文详细描述了几种常用的蛋白质体外及体内磷酸化的检测方法及注意事项。
朱丹,曹汉威,李媛,任东涛. 植物蛋白磷酸化的检测方法. 植物学报, 2020, 55(1): 76-82.
Dan Zhu,Hanwei Cao,Yuan Li,Dongtao Ren. Protocols for Analyzing Plant Phospho-proteins. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2020, 55(1): 76-82.
图1 原核表达的拟南芥激酶MPK6对3个推测底物的体外磷酸分析 激酶(MPK6)连接有6×His标签、推测的底物蛋白(A、B和C)连接有Flag标签。体外磷酸化反应完成后, 反应体系中的蛋白用SDS-PAGE gel分离。然后进行磷酸化底物的放射自显影分析(上图)。底物蛋白(中图)和激酶(下图)的免疫印迹分析显示底物、激酶各自在磷酸化反应中的蛋白使用量基本一致。
Figure 1 An in vitro phosphorylation assay of 3 putative substrate proteins by MPK6 in Arabidopsis thaliana MPK6 was fused with the 6×His tag and the 3 putative substrates were fused with the Flag tag. After phosphorylation reaction, the proteins in the mixture were separated on a SDS- PAGE gel. The gel was dried and exposed to X-ray film (top). Immunoblotting with anti-His and anti-Flag antibodies were used to show the levels of the substrate (middle) and kinase (bottom) proteins in the reactions.
图2 Phos-tag gel和SDS-PAGE gel电泳后, 免疫印迹检测磷酸化蛋白的对比分析 磷酸酶(如Calf intestine alkaline phosphatase, CIAP)可去除磷酸化蛋白上的磷酸基团。同一样品在CIAP处理前(-)、后(+), 磷酸化和非磷酸化形式的蛋白经Phos-tag gel (上图)和SDS- PAGE gel (下图)电泳后的免疫印迹分析结果。经Phos-tag gel电泳, 未加CIAP的样品中特定蛋白的磷酸化(P-form)和非磷酸化形式(None-P-form)被清晰地分开(上图); 加CIAP后磷酸化形式消失而非磷酸化形式条带增强。经SDS-PAGE gel电泳, 未加和加CIAP处理的样品中, 特定蛋白的磷酸化和非磷酸化形式分开不明显(下图)。
Figure 2 Immunoblotting detection of phospho-proteins in samples after Phos-tag gel and SDS-PAGE gel separation Phospho-proteins can be dephosphorylated by phosphatases (e.g. Calf intestine alkaline phosphatase, CIAP). Protein samples treated with (+) or without (-) CIAP were separated by Phos-tag (top) and SDS-PAGE (bottom) gels, and the specific protein was further detected by immunoblotting. The P-form and None-P-form of the protein were separated clearly by a Phos-tag gel (top), while the two forms were not separated by a SDS-PAGE gel (bottom). The missing of the upper band and the increasing of the bottom band after Phos-tag gel separation indicated that P-form protein was completely dephosphorylated by CIAP treatment.
图3 拟南芥幼苗总蛋白双向凝胶电泳后的磷酸化蛋白Pro-Q Diamond染色检测分析 2周龄拟南芥幼苗总蛋白提取液经双向凝胶电泳分离后, 用Pro-Q Diamond试剂对磷酸化蛋白进行染色(左图)。荧光扫描后的凝胶再进行考马斯亮蓝染色(blue-silver staining) (右图)。
Figure 3 Pro-Q staining assay of the phospho-proteins in total proteins extracted from Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings and separated by a 2D gel Two-week-old Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings were used for total protein extraction. The total proteins were separated by a 2D gel and the phospho-proteins were stained by Pro-Q (left). The gel was scanned with a Typhoon 9410 fluorescence scanner, and then stained with blue-silver to visualize the proteins (right).
[1] | Agrawal GK, Thelen JJ (2005). Development of a simplified, economical polyacrylamide gel staining protocol for phosphoproteins. Proteomics 5, 4684-4688. |
[2] | Agrawal GK, Thelen JJ (2006). Large scale identification and quantitative profiling of phosphoproteins expressed during seed filling in oilseed rape. Mol Cell Proteomics 5, 2044-2059. |
[3] | Blom N, Sicheritz-Pontén T, Gupta R, Gammeltoft S, Brunak S (2004). Prediction of post-translational glycosylation and phosphorylation of proteins from the amino acid sequence. Proteomics 4, 1633-1649. |
[4] | Candiano G, Bruschi M, Musante L, Santucci L, Ghiggeri GM, Carnemolla B, Orecchia P, Zardi L, Righetti PG (2004). Blue silver: a very sensitive colloidal Coomassie G-250 staining for proteome analysis. Electrophoresis 25, 1327-1333. |
[5] | Chao Q, Liu XY, Mei YC, Gao ZF, Chen YB, Qian CR, Hao YB, Wang BC (2014). Light-regulated phosphorylation of maize phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase plays a vital role in its activity. Plant Mol Biol 85, 95-105. |
[6] | Chen MJ, Dixon JE, Manning G (2017). Genomics and evolution of protein phosphatases. Sci Signal 10, eaag1796. |
[7] | de la Fuente van Bentem S, Hirt H (2007). Using phosphoproteomics to reveal signaling dynamics in plants. Trends Plant Sci 12, 404-411. |
[8] | Ficarro SB, McCleland ML, Stukenberg PT, Burke DJ, Ross MM, Shabanowitz J, Hunt DF, White FM (2002). Phosphoproteome analysis by mass spectrometry and its application to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Biotechnol 20, 301-305. |
[9] | Fischer EH, Krebs EG (1955). Conversion of phosphorylase B to phosphorylase A in muscle extracts. J Biol Chem 216, 121-132. |
[10] | Frost DC, Li LJ (2014). Recent advances in mass spectrometry-based glycoproteomics. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol 95, 71-123. |
[11] | Hubbard MJ, Cohen P (1993). On target with a new mechanism for the regulation of protein phosphorylation. Trends Biochem Sci 18, 172-177. |
[12] | Ke YQ, Han GQ, He HQ, Li JX (2009). Differential regulation of proteins and phosphoproteins in rice under drought stress. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 379, 133-138. |
[13] | Khan M, Takasaki H, Komatsu S (2005). Comprehensive phosphoproteome analysis in rice and identification of phosphoproteins responsive to different hormones/stresses. J Proteome Res 4, 1592-1599. |
[14] | Kim HS, Fernandes G, Lee CW (2016). Protein phosphatases involved in regulating mitosis: facts and hypotheses. Mol Cell 39, 654-662. |
[15] | Kinoshita E, Kinoshita-Kikuta E, Koike T (2007). Specific recognition and detection of phosphorylated proteins using characteristics of metal ion. Yakugaku Zasshi 127, 1897-1913. |
[16] | Kosako H, Nagano K (2011). Quantitative phosphoproteomics strategies for understanding protein kinase-mediated signal transduction pathways. Expert Rev Proteomics 8, 81-94. |
[17] | Krupa A, Preethi G, Srinivasan N (2004). Structural modes of stabilization of permissive phosphorylation sites in protein kinases: distinct strategies in Ser/Thr and Tyr kinases. J Mol Biol 339, 1025-1039. |
[18] | Laemmli UK (1970). Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680-685. |
[19] | Laugesen S, Bergoin A, Rossignol M (2004). Deciphering the plant phosphoproteome: tools and strategies for a challenging task. Plant Physiol Biochem 42, 929-936. |
[20] | Peck SC (2003). Early phosphorylation events in biotic stress. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6, 334-338. |
[21] | Prak S, Hem S, Boudet J, Viennois G, Sommerer N, Rossignol M, Maurel C, Santoni V (2008). Multiple phosphorylations in the C-terminal tail of plant plasma membrane aquaporins: role in subcellular trafficking of AtPIP2;1 in response to salt stress. Mol Cell Proteomics 7, 1019-1030. |
[22] | Wang PC, Zhao Y, Li ZP, Hsu CC, Liu X, Fu LW, Hou YJ, Du YY, Xie SJ, Zhang CG, Gao JH, Cao MJ, Huang XS, Zhu YF, Tang K, Wang XG, Tao WA, Xiong Y, Zhu JK (2018). Reciprocal regulation of the TOR kinase and ABA receptor balances plant growth and stress response. Mol Cell 69, 100-112. |
[23] | Whiteman SA, Nühse TS, Ashford DA, Sanders D, Maathuis FJ (2008). A proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis of Oryza sativa plasma membrane and vacuolar membrane. Plant J 56, 146-156. |
[24] | Wu CF, Wang RN, Liang QJ, Liang JJ, Li WK, Jung SY, Qin J, Lin SH, Kuang J (2010). Dissecting the M phase- specific phosphorylation of serine-proline or threonine- proline motifs. Mol Biol Cell 21, 1470-1481. |
[25] | Yang C, Wang ZG, Zhu PF (2004). Recent advances of protein phosphorylation in proteome. Prog Physiol Sci 35, 119-124. |
[26] | Yin XJ, Wang X, Komatsu S (2018). Phosphoproteomics: protein phosphorylation in regulation of seed germination and plant growth. Curr Protein Pept Sci 19, 401-412. |
[27] | Zhang X, Cui YN, Yu M, Su BD, Gong W, Baluška F, Komis G, Samaj J, Shan XY, Lin JX (2019). Phosphorylation-mediated dynamics of nitrate transceptor NRT1.1 regulate auxin flux and nitrate signaling in lateral root growth. Plant Physiol 181, 480-498. |
[28] | Zhu WG (2017). Regulation of p53 acetylation. Sci China Life Sci 60, 321-323. |
[1] | 胡宗刚. 抗战胜利后中美曾筹划合编《中国植物志》[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(6): 24220-. |
[2] | 何花, 谭敦炎, 杨晓琛. 被子植物隐型雌雄异株性系统的多样性、系统演化及进化意义[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(6): 24149-. |
[3] | 江康威 张青青 王亚菲 李宏 丁雨 杨永强 吐尔逊娜依·热依木. 放牧干扰下天山北坡中段植物功能群特征及其与土壤环境因子的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(6): 0-0. |
[4] | 蔡慧颖 李兰慧 林阳 梁亚涛 杨光 孙龙. 白桦叶片和细根非结构性碳水化合物对火后时间的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(6): 0-0. |
[5] | 巴苏艳, 赵春艳, 刘媛, 方强. 通过虫体花粉识别构建植物‒传粉者网络: 人工模型与AI模型高度一致[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(6): 24088-. |
[6] | 连佳丽, 陈婧, 杨雪琴, 赵莹, 罗叙, 韩翠, 赵雅欣, 李建平. 荒漠草原植物多样性和微生物多样性对降水变化的响应[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(6): 24044-. |
[7] | 艾妍雨, 胡海霞, 沈婷, 莫雨轩, 杞金华, 宋亮. 附生维管植物多样性及其与宿主特征的相关性: 以哀牢山中山湿性常绿阔叶林为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(5): 24072-. |
[8] | 胡蝶 蒋欣琪 戴志聪 陈戴一 张雨 祁珊珊 杜道林. 丛枝菌根真菌提高入侵杂草南美蟛蜞菊对除草剂的耐受性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(5): 651-659. |
[9] | 邓蓓 王晓锋 廖君. 环境胁迫影响三峡库区消落带草本和木本植物生理生态特征的整合分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(5): 623-637. |
[10] | 白皓然 侯盟 刘艳杰. 少花蒺藜草入侵与干旱对羊草草原生产力的影响机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(5): 577-589. |
[11] | 王永财, 万华伟, 高吉喜, 胡卓玮, 孙晨曦, 吕娜, 张志如. 基于深度学习的我国北方常见天然草地植物识别[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(4): 23435-. |
[12] | 周玉滢, 陈辉, 刘斯穆. 植物非典型Aux/IAA蛋白应答生长素研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2024, 59(4): 0-0. |
[13] | 曲泽坤, 朱丽琴, 姜琦, 王小红, 姚晓东, 蔡世锋, 罗素珍, 陈光水. 亚热带常绿阔叶林丛枝菌根树种养分觅食策略及其与细根形态间的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 416-427. |
[14] | 杨佳丽, 饶羽菲, 张润花, 周国林, 林处发, 何燕红, 宁国贵. 捕虫堇叶片高效再生体系的建立[J]. 植物学报, 2024, 59(4): 0-0. |
[15] | 董劭琼, 侯东杰, 曲孝云, 郭柯. 柴达木盆地植物群落样方数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 534-540. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||