利用低拷贝核基因重建菊科紫菀亚科族间系统发育关系

doi:10.11983/CBB15164

植物学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (5): 549-564.DOI: 10.11983/CBB15164

利用低拷贝核基因重建菊科紫菀亚科族间系统发育关系

刘勉^1,², 张彩飞^1,^2,,A;^*, 黄建勋^1,², 马红^1,^2,,A;^*

¹复旦大学生命科学学院, 上海 200438
²复旦大学植物科学研究所, 上海 200438

收稿日期:2015-08-15 接受日期:2015-09-05 出版日期:2015-09-01 发布日期:2015-10-09
通讯作者: 张彩飞,马红
作者简介:? 共同第一作者
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(No.91131007)

Phylogenetic Reconstruction of Tribal Relationships in Asteroi- deae (Asteraceae) with Low-copy Nuclear Genes

Mian Liu^1,2, Caifei Zhang^1,2*, Chien-Hsun Huang^1,2, Hong Ma^1,2*

¹School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China
²Institute of Plant Biology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China

Received:2015-08-15 Accepted:2015-09-05 Online:2015-09-01 Published:2015-10-09
Contact: Zhang Caifei,Ma Hong
About author:? These authors contributed equally to this paper

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 紫菀亚科(Asteroideae)是菊科最大的一个亚科, 包含的种数多于被子植物的绝大多数科。目前, 紫菀亚科族间的系统发育关系主要依赖于叶绿体基因信息, 但是叶绿体基因为单亲遗传, 并不能完整反映进化历史。鉴于杂交现象在菊科普遍存在, 故利用核基因可以反映更完整的紫菀亚科进化历史。该研究首次使用从转录组数据(20个新测+11个从NCBI数据库下载)中筛选出的47个直系同源低拷贝核基因来研究紫菀亚科的系统发育关系, 共选取了29个物种, 代表了紫菀亚科20个族中的13个族。用超矩阵分析方法和溯祖推测分析方法各获得了1个稳定的紫菀亚科系统树, 每个树上绝大多数分支都得到了高度支持, 且2个树之间没有明显的冲突。新的紫菀亚科族间系统发育关系揭示了千里光超族应并入紫菀超族, 春黄菊族可能是千里光族与紫菀族杂交起源的, 金鸡菊族很可能也是杂交起源的。该研究结果显示低拷贝核基因可以更好地解决科以下分类阶元的系统发育关系, 对菊科乃至被子植物其它科的系统发育研究具有重要的借鉴意义。

关键词: 菊科, 紫菀亚科, 低拷贝核基因, 系统发育, 转录组测序

Abstract: Asteroideae is the largest subfamily of the daisy family, Asteraceae, with more species than most other angiosperm families. Previous phylogenetic relationships of Asteroideae tribes were mostly based on chloroplast genes, which are uniparentally inherited and could not reflect the entire evolutionary histories. Especially considering the widespread phenomenon of hybridization in Asteraceae, low-copy nuclear genes with biparental inheritance can better serve as phylogenetic markers, for a more complete understanding of their evolution. To resolve the intertribal relationships in Asteroideae, transcriptomic datasets were newly generated by sequencing 20 species and additional datasets for 11 species downloaded from NCBI, representing 13 tribes and all 3 supertribes of this subfamily. Extensive sequence analyses of the 31 datasets resulted in the selection of 47 orthologous nuclear genes for phylogenetic reconstruction. Using the supermatrix analyses and coalescent estimates, we obtained robust and highly supported species trees, which are in agreement with each other. New intertribal phylogenies of Asteroideae revealed that: (1) the supertribe Senecionodae should be merged into the supertribe Asterodae; (2) Anthemideae possibly originated from a hybrid of ancestors of Senecioneae and Astereae; and (3) Coreopsideae is probably also hybrid originated. This study demonstrates that low-copy nuclear genes are good markers for infra-familial phylogenetic reconstruction and provides a foundation for future studies of phylogeny of Asteraceae and other angiosperm families.

Key words: Asteraceae, Asteroideae, low-copy nuclear genes, phylogeny, transcriptome-sequencing

刘勉, 张彩飞, 黄建勋, 马红. 利用低拷贝核基因重建菊科紫菀亚科族间系统发育关系. 植物学报, 2015, 50(5): 549-564.

Mian Liu, Caifei Zhang, Chien-Hsun Huang, Hong Ma. Phylogenetic Reconstruction of Tribal Relationships in Asteroi- deae (Asteraceae) with Low-copy Nuclear Genes. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2015, 50(5): 549-564.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.chinbullbotany.com/CN/10.11983/CBB15164

https://www.chinbullbotany.com/CN/Y2015/V50/I5/549

图/表 7

参考文献 71

1	刘勉 (2015). 用低拷贝核基因重建菊科植物的系统发育关系. 硕士论文. 上海: 复旦大学.
2	Baldwin BG (2009). Heliantheae alliance. In: Funk VA, Susanna A, Stuessy TF, Bayer RJ, eds. Systematics, Evolution, and Biogeography of Compositae. Vienna: International Association for Plant Taxonomy. pp. 689-711.
3	Baldwin BG, Wessa BL, Panero JL (2002). Nuclear rDNA evidence for major lineages of helenioid Heliantheae (Com- positae).Syst Bot 27, 161-198.
4	Bayer RJ, Starr JR (1998). Tribal phylogeny of the Asteraceae based on two non-coding chloroplast sequ- ences, the trnL intron and trnL/trnF intergenic spacer.Ann Mo Bot Gard 85, 242-256.
5	Bremer K (1987). Tribal interrelationships of the Aster- aceae.Cladistics 3, 210-253.
6	Bremer K, Anderberg AA (1994). Asteraceae: Cladistics & Classification. Portland: Timber Press.
7	Calabria LM, Emerenciano VP, Ferreira MJ, SCotti MT, Mabry TJ (2007). A phylogenetic analysis of tribes of the Asteraceae based on phytochemical data. Nat Prod Com- mun 2, 277-285.
8	Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T (2009). trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses.Bioinformatics 25, 1972-1973.
9	Corriveau JL, Coleman AW (1988). Rapid screening me- thod to detect potential biparental inheritance of plastid DNA and results for over 200 angiosperm species.Am J Bot 75, 1443-1458.
10	Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D (2012). jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing.Nat Methods 9, 772-772.
11	Ebersberger I, Strauss S, von Haeseler A (2009). Ha- MStR: profile hidden markov model based search for orthologs in ESTs.BMC Evol Biol 9, 157.
12	Edgar RC (2004). MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput.Nucleic Acids Res 32, 1792-1797.
13	Feliner GN, Rosselló JA (2007). Better the devil you know? Guidelines for insightful utilization of nrDNA ITS in species-level evolutionary studies in plants.Mol Phylogenet Evol 44, 911-919.
14	Funk VA, Susanna A, Stuessy TF, Robinson H (2009). Classification of compositae. In: Funk VA, Susanna A, Stuessy TF, Bayer RJ, eds. Systematics, Evolution, and Biogeography of Compositae. Vienna: International Association for Plant Taxonomy. pp. 171-192.
15	Goertzen LR, Cannone JJ, Gutell RR, Jansen RK (2003). ITS secondary structure derived from comparative ana- lysis: implications for sequence alignment and phylogeny of the Asteraceae.Mol Phylogenet Evol 29, 216-234.
16	Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, Regev A (2011). Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome.Nat Biotechnol 29, 644-652.
17	Jansen RK, Cai Z, Raubeson LA, Daniell H, Leebens- Mack J, Müller KF, Boore JL (2007). Analysis of 81 genes from 64 plastid genomes resolves relationships in angiosperms and identifies genome-scale evolutionary patterns.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104, 19369-19374.
18	Jansen RK, Holsinger KE, Michaels HJ, Palmer JD (1990). Phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast DNA restric- tion site data at higher taxonomic levels: an example from the Asteraceae.Evolution 44, 2089-2105.
19	Jansen RK, Michaels HJ, Palmer JD (1991). Phylogeny and character evolution in the Asteraceae based on chloroplast DNA restriction site mapping.Syst Bot 16, 98-115.
20	Karis PO (1993). Morphological phylogenetics of the As- teraceae-Asteroideae, with notes on character evolution.Plant Syst Evol 186, 69-93.
21	Karis PO (1994). Phylogeny of Asteraceae: Asteroideae revisited. In: Hind DJN, Beentje HJ, eds. Compositae: Systematics. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens Publishers. pp. 41-47.
22	Karis PO, Ryding O (1994). Tribe heliantheae. In: Bremer KE, ed. Asteraceae, Cladistics & Classification. Portland: Timber Press. pp. 559-624.
23	Kim KJ, Jansen RK (1995). ndhF sequence evolution and the major clades in the sunflower family.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92, 10379-10383.
24	Kim KJ, Jasen RK, Wallace RS, Michaels HJ, Palmer JD (1992). Phylogenetic implications of rbcL sequence varia- tion in the Asteraceae.Ann Mo Bot Gard 79, 428-445.
25	Lin ZG, Kong HZ, Nei M, Ma H (2006). Origins and evolu- tion of the recA/RAD51 gene family: evidence for ancient gene duplication and endosymbiotic gene transfer.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 10328-10333.
26	Liu JQ, Gao TG, Chen ZD, Lu AM (2002). Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau endemic Nannoglottis (Asteraceae).Mol Phylogenet Evol 23, 307-325.
27	Liu L, Wu SY, Yu LL (2015). Coalescent methods for estimating species trees from phylogenomic data.J Syst Evol 53, 380-390.
28	Lockhart PJ, Penny D (2005). The place of Amborella within the radiation of angiosperms.Trends Plant Sci 10, 201-202.
29	Mandel JR, Dikow RB, Funk VA (2015). Using phylogenomics to resolve mega-families: an example from Compositae.J Syst Evol 53, 391-402.
30	Mandel JR, Dikow RB, Funk VA, Masalia RR, Staton SE, Kozik A, Burke JM (2014). A target enrichment method for gathering phylogenetic information from hundreds of loci: an example from the Compositae.Appl Plant Sci 2, 130085.
31	Mirarab S, Reaz R, Bayzid MS, Zimmermann T, Swenson MS, Warnow T (2014). ASTRAL: genome-scale coales- cent-based species tree estimation.Bioinformatics 30, 541-548.
32	Moore MJ, Bell CD, Soltis PS, Soltis DE (2007). Using plastid genome-scale data to resolve enigmatic relation- ships among basal angiosperms.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104, 19363-19368.
33	Moore MJ, Soltis PS, Bell CD, Burleigh JG, Soltis DE (2010). Phylogenetic analysis of 83 plastid genes further resolves the early diversification of eudicots.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 4623-4628.
34	Nesom GL, Robinson H (2007). Astereae. In: Kadereit JW, Jeffrey C, eds. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. 8, Flowering Plants. Eudicots. Asterales. Berlin: Springer. pp. 284-342.
35	Ness RW, Graham SW, Barrett SC (2011). Reconciling gene and genome duplication events: using multiple nuclear gene families to infer the phylogeny of the aquatic plant family Pontederiaceae.Mol Biol Evol 28, 3009-3018.
36	Ng M, Yanofsky MF (2001). Function and evolution of the plant MADS-box gene family.Nat Rev Genet 2, 186-195.
37	Nordenstam B, Källersjö M (2009). Calenduleae. In: Funk VA, Susanna A, Stuessy TF, Bayer RJ, eds. Systematics, Evolution, and Biogeography of Compositae. Vienna: International Association for Plant Taxonomy. pp. 527-538.
38	Nordenstam B, Pelser PB, Kadereit JW, Watson LE (2009). Senecioneae. In: Funk VA, Susanna A, Stuessy TF, Bayer RJ, eds. Systematics, Evolution, and Biogeography of Compositae. Vienna: International Association for Plant Taxonomy. pp. 503-526.
39	Oberprieler C, Himmelreich S, Källersjö M, Vallès J, Watson LE, Vogt R (2009). Anthemideae. In: Funk VA, Susanna A, Stuessy TF, Bayer RJ, eds. Systematics, Evolution, and Biogeography of Compositae. Vienna: International Association for Plant Taxonomy. pp. 631-666.
40	Oberprieler C, Vogt R, Watson LE (2007). Anthemideae. In: Kadereit JW, Jeffrey C, eds. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. 8, Flowering Plants. Eudicots. Asterales. Berlin: Springer. pp. 243-374.
41	Panero JL (2005). New combinations and infrafamilial taxa in the Asteraceae. Phytologia 87, 1-14.
42	Panero JL (2007a). Key to the tribes of the Heliantheae alliance. In: Kadereit JW, Jeffrey C, eds. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. 8, Flowering Plants. Eudicots. Asterales. Berlin: Springer. pp. 391-395.
43	Panero JL (2007b). Tribe Coreopsideae. In: Kadereit JW, Jeffrey C, eds. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. 8, Flowering Plants. Eudicots. Asterales. Berlin: Springer. pp. 406-417.
44	Panero JL (2007c). Tribe Millerieae. In: Kadereit JW, Jeffrey C, eds. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. 8, Flowering Plants. Eudicots. Asterales. Berlin: Springer. pp. 477-492.
45	Panero JL, Freire SE, Espinar LA, Crozier BS, Barboza GE, Cantero JJ (2014). Resolution of deep nodes yields an improved backbone phylogeny and a new basal lineage to study early evolution of Asteraceae.Mol Phylogenet Evol 80, 43-53.
46	Panero JL, Funk VA (2002). Toward a phylogenetic subfamilial classification for the Compositae (Asteraceae).P Biol Soc Wash 115, 909-922.
47	Panero JL, Funk VA (2008). The value of sampling ano- malous taxa in phylogenetic studies: major clades of the Asteraceae revealed.Mol Phylogenet Evol 47, 757-782.
48	Pelser PB, Kennedy AH, Tepe EJ, Shidler JB, Nordenstam B, Kadereit JW, Watson LE (2010). Patterns and causes of incongruence between plastid and nuclear Senecioneae (Asteraceae) phylogenies.Am J Bot 97, 856-873.
49	Pelser PB, Watson L (2009). Introduction to Asteroideae. In: Funk VA, Susanna A, Stuessy TF, Bayer RJ, eds. Systematics, Evolution, and Biogeography of Compositae. Vienna: International Association for Plant Taxanomy. pp. 495-502.
50	Pertea G, Huang X, Liang F, Antonescu V, Sultana R, Karamycheva S, Quackenbush J (2003). TIGR gene indices clustering tools (TGICL): a software system for fast clustering of large EST datasets.Bioinformatics 19, 651-652.
51	Phillips MJ, Delsuc F, Penny D (2004). Genome-scale phylogeny and the detection of systematic biases.Mol Biol Evol 21, 1455-1458.
52	Rieseberg LH, Soltis DE (1991). Phylogenetic consequences of cytoplasmic gene flow in plants.Evol Trends Plants 5, 65-84.
53	Robinson H (1981). A revision of the tribal and subtribal limits of the Heliantheae (Asteraceae).Smithsonian Contrib Bot 51, 1-102.
54	Robinson H (2004). New supertribes, Helianthodae and Senecionodae, for the subfamily Asteroideae (Asterac- eae).Phytologia 86, 116-120.
55	Robinson H (2005). Validation of the supertribe Asterodae.Phytologia 87, 73-74.
56	Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003). MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models.Bioinformatics 19, 1572-1574.
57	Sang T, Zhong Y (2000). Testing hybridization hypotheses based on incongruent gene trees.Syst Biol 49, 422-434.
58	Soltis DE, Albert VA, Leebens-Mack J, Bell CD, Paterson AH, Zheng C, Soltis PS (2009). Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification.Am J Bot 96, 336-348.
59	Soltis DE, Albert VA, Savolainen V, Hilu K, Qiu YL, Chase MW, Soltis PS (2004). Genome-scale data, angiosperm relationships, and ‘ending incongruence’: a cautionary tale in phylogenetics.Trends Plant Sci 9, 477-483.
60	Soltis DE, Kuzoff RK (1995). Discordance between nuclear and chloroplast phylogenies in the Heuchera group (Saxi- fragaceae).Evolution 49, 727-742.
61	Stamatakis A (2006). RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models.Bioinformatics 22, 2688-2690.
62	Stefanović S, Rice DW, Palmer JD (2004). Long branch attraction, taxon sampling, and the earliest angiosperms: amborella or monocots?BMC Evol Biol 4, 35.
63	Stuessy TF (1977). Heliantheae-systematic review. In: Hey- wood VH, Harborne JB, Turner BL, eds. The Biology and Hemistry of the Compositae. London: Academic Press. pp. 621-671.
64	Suyama M, Torrents D, Bork P (2006). PAL2NAL: robust conversion of protein sequence alignments into the corresponding codon alignments.Nucleic Acids Res 34, W609-W612.
65	Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013). MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0.Mol Biol Evol 30, 2725-2729.
66	Wickett NJ, Mirarab S, Nguyen N, Warnow T, Carpenter E, Matasci N, Leebens-Mack J (2014). Phylotranscrip- tomic analysis of the origin and early diversification of land plants.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111, E4859-E4868.
67	Xu GX, Ma H, Nei M, Kong HZ (2009). Evolution of F-box genes in plants: different modes of sequence divergence and their relationships with functional diversification.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106, 835-840.
68	Yang Y, Moore MJ, Brockington SF, Soltis DE, Wong GKS, Carpenter EJ, Smith SA (2015). Dissecting molecular evolution in the highly diverse plant clade Caryophyllales using transcriptome sequencing.Mol Biol Evol (in press)
69	Zeng LP, Zhang Q, Sun RR, Kong HZ, Zhang N, Ma H (2014). Resolution of deep angiosperm phylogeny using conserved nuclear genes and estimates of early divergence times.Nat Commun 5, 4956.
70	Zimmer EA, Wen J (2012). Using nuclear gene data for plant phylogenetics: progress and prospects.Mol Phylogenet Evol 65, 774-785.
71	Zimmer EA, Wen J (2015). Using nuclear gene data for plant phylogenetics: progress and prospects II. Next-gen approaches.J Syst Evol 53, 371-379.

Tribe	Species	Locality	Accession No.	Voucher
Anthemideae	Achillea millefolium	Campus of Penn State University, USA	-	Zhang Ning, B20AM
Anthemideae	Artemisia chamaemelifolia	NCBI	SRX096997	-
Anthemideae	Tanacetum parthenium	NCBI	ERX337163	-
Astereae	Symphyotrichum subulatum	Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai	-	Liu Mian, CSLM02
Astereae	Eurybia divaricata	Campus of Penn State University, USA	-	Ma Hong, HM213
Astereae	Solidago gigantea	Penn State College, USA	-	Ma Hong, HM157
Athroismeae	Centipeda minima	Beijing Botanical Garden of CAS	-	Gao Tiangang, GTG03
Calenduleae	Osteospermum jucundum	Glasgow, UK	-	Ma Hong, HM366
Calenduleae	Calendula officinalis	Beijing Botanical Garden, Beijing	-	Zhang Caifei, 3395
Cichorieae	Sonchus asper	Campus of Penn State University, USA	-	Zhang Ning, A10SA
Cichorieae	Lactuca serriola	NCBI	SRX098217	-
Coreopsideae	Cosmos bipinnatus	Xuancheng, Anhui	-	Liu Mian, AH06
Coreopsideae	Bidens frondosa	Campus of Penn State College, USA	-	Ma Hong, HM208
Eupatorieae	Stevia rebaudiana	NCBI	-	-
Eupatorieae	Ageratum conyzoides	Mt. Tianmu, Zhejiang	SRX255224	Liu Mian, TMS08
Eupatorieae	Mikania micrantha	Indonesia	-	Gao Tiangang, GTG5498
Gnaphalieae	Helichrysum petiolare	NCBI	SRX202783	-
Gnaphalieae	Leontopodium smithianum	Mt. Dongling, Beijing	-	Yang Ji, YJ08
Helenieae	Gaillardia pulchella	Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai	-	Liu Mian, CSLM07
Heliantheae	Helianthus tuberosus	Mt. Tianmu, Zhejiang	-	Liu Mian, TMS15
Heliantheae	Iva annua	NCBI	SRX255215	-
Heliantheae	Echinacea purpurea	NCBI	SRX085117	-
Inuleae	Duhaldea cappa	Campus of Nanjing University, Nanjing	-	Yang Ji, YJLM09
Inuleae	Inula linariifolia	Mt. Zijin, Nanjing	-	Liu Mian, YJLM04
Madieae	Arnica montana	NCBI	SRX096987	-
Millerieae	Sigesbeckia pubescens	Mt. Tianmu, Zhejiang	-	Liu Mian, TMS01
Millerieae	Galinsoga quadriradiata	Mt. Tianmu, Zhejiang	-	Liu Mian, TMS02
Millerieae	Guizotia scabra	NCBI	SRX255223	-
Senecioneae	Euryops pectinatus	Campus of Fudan University, Shanghai	-	Liu Mian, FDU01
Senecioneae	Senecio aethnensis	NCBI	SRX328503	-
Senecioneae	Petasites hybridus	NCBI	SRX096999	-

Tribe	Species	Locality	Accession No.	Voucher
Anthemideae	Achillea millefolium	Campus of Penn State University, USA	-	Zhang Ning, B20AM
Anthemideae	Artemisia chamaemelifolia	NCBI	SRX096997	-
Anthemideae	Tanacetum parthenium	NCBI	ERX337163	-
Astereae	Symphyotrichum subulatum	Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai	-	Liu Mian, CSLM02
Astereae	Eurybia divaricata	Campus of Penn State University, USA	-	Ma Hong, HM213
Astereae	Solidago gigantea	Penn State College, USA	-	Ma Hong, HM157
Athroismeae	Centipeda minima	Beijing Botanical Garden of CAS	-	Gao Tiangang, GTG03
Calenduleae	Osteospermum jucundum	Glasgow, UK	-	Ma Hong, HM366
Calenduleae	Calendula officinalis	Beijing Botanical Garden, Beijing	-	Zhang Caifei, 3395
Cichorieae	Sonchus asper	Campus of Penn State University, USA	-	Zhang Ning, A10SA
Cichorieae	Lactuca serriola	NCBI	SRX098217	-
Coreopsideae	Cosmos bipinnatus	Xuancheng, Anhui	-	Liu Mian, AH06
Coreopsideae	Bidens frondosa	Campus of Penn State College, USA	-	Ma Hong, HM208
Eupatorieae	Stevia rebaudiana	NCBI	-	-
Eupatorieae	Ageratum conyzoides	Mt. Tianmu, Zhejiang	SRX255224	Liu Mian, TMS08
Eupatorieae	Mikania micrantha	Indonesia	-	Gao Tiangang, GTG5498
Gnaphalieae	Helichrysum petiolare	NCBI	SRX202783	-
Gnaphalieae	Leontopodium smithianum	Mt. Dongling, Beijing	-	Yang Ji, YJ08
Helenieae	Gaillardia pulchella	Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai	-	Liu Mian, CSLM07
Heliantheae	Helianthus tuberosus	Mt. Tianmu, Zhejiang	-	Liu Mian, TMS15
Heliantheae	Iva annua	NCBI	SRX255215	-
Heliantheae	Echinacea purpurea	NCBI	SRX085117	-
Inuleae	Duhaldea cappa	Campus of Nanjing University, Nanjing	-	Yang Ji, YJLM09
Inuleae	Inula linariifolia	Mt. Zijin, Nanjing	-	Liu Mian, YJLM04
Madieae	Arnica montana	NCBI	SRX096987	-
Millerieae	Sigesbeckia pubescens	Mt. Tianmu, Zhejiang	-	Liu Mian, TMS01
Millerieae	Galinsoga quadriradiata	Mt. Tianmu, Zhejiang	-	Liu Mian, TMS02
Millerieae	Guizotia scabra	NCBI	SRX255223	-
Senecioneae	Euryops pectinatus	Campus of Fudan University, Shanghai	-	Liu Mian, FDU01
Senecioneae	Senecio aethnensis	NCBI	SRX328503	-
Senecioneae	Petasites hybridus	NCBI	SRX096999	-

Unigene	Length (bp)	VS	VS (%)	IS	IS (%)	MS (%)
433680	1 290	809	62.71	637	49.38	1.67
433783	462	293	63.42	228	49.35	0.89
433651	1 158	656	56.65	530	45.77	4.54
435322	1 281	716	55.89	553	43.17	3.74
435258	1 236	707	57.20	518	41.91	13.26
431587	864	479	55.44	362	41.90	2.49
432845	675	368	54.52	276	40.89	1.81
431540	1 152	637	55.30	470	40.80	3.73
432103	741	394	53.17	296	39.95	8.29
435225	1 395	765	54.84	539	38.64	16.34
432720	1 104	575	52.08	408	36.96	7.53
432475	828	402	48.55	305	36.84	4.98
432118	588	317	53.91	215	36.56	4.30
435156	1 740	913	52.47	634	36.44	22.01
435256	885	436	49.27	322	36.38	3.75
435114	1 140	547	47.98	406	35.61	3.58
434310	993	459	46.22	353	35.55	5.39
432389	1 902	928	48.79	675	35.49	5.17
435299	591	290	49.07	209	35.36	3.59
432317	1 320	624	47.27	463	35.08	3.20
435127	1 569	730	46.53	550	35.05	10.70
435193	1 491	799	53.59	522	35.01	10.09
435154	1 374	663	48.25	478	34.79	4.13
431821	1 323	621	46.94	459	34.69	5.00
433235	1 560	696	44.62	538	34.49	2.20
434795	1 164	525	45.10	394	33.85	2.46
435112	2 835	1332	46.98	949	33.47	19.43
433741	777	326	41.96	259	33.33	3.40
432132	807	362	44.86	267	33.09	3.22
433969	684	303	44.30	225	32.89	0.22
433433	1 362	557	40.90	441	32.38	0.23
435159	558	244	43.73	178	31.90	4.09
433560	951	425	44.69	303	31.86	2.42
432107	1 188	473	39.81	376	31.65	1.30
432280	1 209	506	41.85	381	31.51	2.13
433255	795	318	40.00	249	31.32	1.41
435277	1 359	552	40.62	419	30.83	2.44
435118	876	388	44.29	268	30.59	2.46
433710	969	414	42.72	294	30.34	1.81
432233	1 059	455	42.97	319	30.12	3.78
432926	1 014	442	43.59	299	29.49	5.14
433740	726	285	39.26	212	29.20	0.95
433176	789	329	41.70	226	28.64	1.08
434314	942	436	46.28	269	28.56	3.59
435311	444	165	37.16	125	28.15	0.20
434176	1 296	482	37.19	351	27.08	3.19
433486	741	292	39.41	194	26.18	0.38
Average	1 090	520	47.53	382	34.95	4.63

Unigene	Length (bp)	VS	VS (%)	IS	IS (%)	MS (%)
433680	1 290	809	62.71	637	49.38	1.67
433783	462	293	63.42	228	49.35	0.89
433651	1 158	656	56.65	530	45.77	4.54
435322	1 281	716	55.89	553	43.17	3.74
435258	1 236	707	57.20	518	41.91	13.26
431587	864	479	55.44	362	41.90	2.49
432845	675	368	54.52	276	40.89	1.81
431540	1 152	637	55.30	470	40.80	3.73
432103	741	394	53.17	296	39.95	8.29
435225	1 395	765	54.84	539	38.64	16.34
432720	1 104	575	52.08	408	36.96	7.53
432475	828	402	48.55	305	36.84	4.98
432118	588	317	53.91	215	36.56	4.30
435156	1 740	913	52.47	634	36.44	22.01
435256	885	436	49.27	322	36.38	3.75
435114	1 140	547	47.98	406	35.61	3.58
434310	993	459	46.22	353	35.55	5.39
432389	1 902	928	48.79	675	35.49	5.17
435299	591	290	49.07	209	35.36	3.59
432317	1 320	624	47.27	463	35.08	3.20
435127	1 569	730	46.53	550	35.05	10.70
435193	1 491	799	53.59	522	35.01	10.09
435154	1 374	663	48.25	478	34.79	4.13
431821	1 323	621	46.94	459	34.69	5.00
433235	1 560	696	44.62	538	34.49	2.20
434795	1 164	525	45.10	394	33.85	2.46
435112	2 835	1332	46.98	949	33.47	19.43
433741	777	326	41.96	259	33.33	3.40
432132	807	362	44.86	267	33.09	3.22
433969	684	303	44.30	225	32.89	0.22
433433	1 362	557	40.90	441	32.38	0.23
435159	558	244	43.73	178	31.90	4.09
433560	951	425	44.69	303	31.86	2.42
432107	1 188	473	39.81	376	31.65	1.30
432280	1 209	506	41.85	381	31.51	2.13
433255	795	318	40.00	249	31.32	1.41
435277	1 359	552	40.62	419	30.83	2.44
435118	876	388	44.29	268	30.59	2.46
433710	969	414	42.72	294	30.34	1.81
432233	1 059	455	42.97	319	30.12	3.78
432926	1 014	442	43.59	299	29.49	5.14
433740	726	285	39.26	212	29.20	0.95
433176	789	329	41.70	226	28.64	1.08
434314	942	436	46.28	269	28.56	3.59
435311	444	165	37.16	125	28.15	0.20
434176	1 296	482	37.19	351	27.08	3.19
433486	741	292	39.41	194	26.18	0.38
Average	1 090	520	47.53	382	34.95	4.63

[1]	艾妍雨, 胡海霞, 沈婷, 莫雨轩, 杞金华, 宋亮. 附生维管植物多样性及其与宿主特征的相关性: 以哀牢山中山湿性常绿阔叶林为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(5): 24072-.
[2]	吕燕文, 王子韵, 肖钰, 何梓晗, 吴超, 胡新生. 谱系分选理论与检测方法的研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(4): 23400-.
[3]	曹可欣, 王敬雯, 郑国, 武鹏峰, 李英滨, 崔淑艳. 降水格局改变及氮沉降对北方典型草原土壤线虫多样性的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(3): 23491-.
[4]	李庆多, 栗冬梅. 全球蝙蝠巴尔通体流行状况分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23166-.
[5]	褚振州, 古丽巴哈尔·依斯拉木, 屈泽众, 田新民. 同域分布的3种木蓼属植物叶绿体基因组比较[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(3): 417-432.
[6]	包金波, 丁志杰, 苗浩宇, 李雪丽, 任书贤, 焦若岩, 李浩, 邓茜茜, 李英姿, 田新民. 石栗叶绿体基因组研究[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(2): 248-260.
[7]	宋会银, 胡征宇, 刘国祥. 绿藻门小球藻科的分类学研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(2): 22083-.
[8]	李治中, 彭帅, 王青锋, 李伟, 梁士楚, 陈进明. 中国海菜花属植物隐种多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(2): 22394-.
[9]	朱瑞良, 马晓英, 曹畅, 曹子寅. 中国苔藓植物多样性研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(7): 22378-.
[10]	王婷, 舒江平, 顾钰峰, 李艳清, 杨拓, 徐洲锋, 向建英, 张宪春, 严岳鸿. 中国石松类和蕨类植物多样性研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(7): 22381-.
[11]	王健铭, 曲梦君, 王寅, 冯益明, 吴波, 卢琦, 何念鹏, 李景文. 青藏高原北部戈壁植物群落物种、功能与系统发育β多样性分布格局及其影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(6): 21503-.
[12]	项伟, 黄冬柳, 朱师丹. 热带亚热带26种蕨类植物的吸收根解剖特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(5): 593-601.
[13]	姜晓燕, 高圣杰, 蒋燕, 田赟, 贾昕, 查天山. 毛乌素沙地植被不同恢复阶段植物群落物种多样性、功能多样性和系统发育多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(5): 21387-.
[14]	徐海霞, 何静, 易航, 王丽. 镉胁迫下地钱转录组的性别特异性响应机制[J]. 植物学报, 2022, 57(2): 182-196.
[15]	赵琦, 蒋际宝, 张曾鲁, 金清, 李佳丽, 邱江平. 海南岛蚯蚓物种组成及其系统发育分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(12): 22224-.

利用低拷贝核基因重建菊科紫菀亚科族间系统发育关系

Phylogenetic Reconstruction of Tribal Relationships in Asteroi- deae (Asteraceae) with Low-copy Nuclear Genes

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 71

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价