Chinese Bulletin of Botany ›› 2018, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (3): 322-333.DOI: 10.11983/CBB17030 cstr: 32102.14.CBB17030
Special Issue: 药用植物专辑 (2018年53卷3期)
• EXPERIMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS • Previous Articles Next Articles
Wang Yucai1, Zhang Hengjia1,*(
), Deng Haoliang2, Wang Shijie2, Ba Yuchun3
Received:2017-02-24
Accepted:2017-05-03
Online:2018-05-01
Published:2018-09-11
Contact:
Zhang Hengjia
Wang Yucai, Zhang Hengjia, Deng Haoliang, Wang Shijie, Ba Yuchun. Effect of Regulated Deficit Irrigation on Water Use and Yield of Isatis indigotica[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2018, 53(3): 322-333.
| Treatments | Seedling stage | Vegetative stage | Fleshy root growth stage | Fleshy root maturity stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 75-85 | 75-85 | 75-85 | 75-85 |
| WD1 | 75-85 | 65-75 | 75-85 | 75-85 |
| WD2 | 75-85 | 55-65 | 75-85 | 75-85 |
| WD3 | 75-85 | 45-55 | 75-85 | 75-85 |
| WD4 | 75-85 | 65-75 | 65-75 | 75-85 |
| WD5 | 75-85 | 65-75 | 55-65 | 75-85 |
| WD6 | 75-85 | 55-65 | 65-75 | 75-85 |
| WD7 | 75-85 | 55-65 | 55-65 | 75-85 |
| WD8 | 75-85 | 45-55 | 65-75 | 75-85 |
| WD9 | 75-85 | 45-55 | 55-65 | 75-85 |
Table 1 Soil moisture contents of different treatments (percentage of field capacity)
| Treatments | Seedling stage | Vegetative stage | Fleshy root growth stage | Fleshy root maturity stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 75-85 | 75-85 | 75-85 | 75-85 |
| WD1 | 75-85 | 65-75 | 75-85 | 75-85 |
| WD2 | 75-85 | 55-65 | 75-85 | 75-85 |
| WD3 | 75-85 | 45-55 | 75-85 | 75-85 |
| WD4 | 75-85 | 65-75 | 65-75 | 75-85 |
| WD5 | 75-85 | 65-75 | 55-65 | 75-85 |
| WD6 | 75-85 | 55-65 | 65-75 | 75-85 |
| WD7 | 75-85 | 55-65 | 55-65 | 75-85 |
| WD8 | 75-85 | 45-55 | 65-75 | 75-85 |
| WD9 | 75-85 | 45-55 | 55-65 | 75-85 |
Figure 2 Profile soil water distribution in 0-100 cm layer in different growth stages of Isatis indigotica (A) Seedling stage; (B) Vegetative stage; (C) Fleshy root growth stage; (D) Fleshy root maturity stage. CK, and WD1-WD9 are the same as in Table 1.
Figure 3 Plant height (A) and main root length (B) of Isatis indigotica subjected to limited irrigation treatmentCK, and WD1-WD9 are the same as in Table 1.
| Treatments | Plant height (cm) | Stem and leaf biomass (g∙plant-1) | Taproot length (cm) | Taproot diameter (cm) | Root biomass (g∙plant-1) | Root/shoot ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 28.14±0.15 a | 13.09±0.18 a | 22.09±0.37 b | 1.69±0.03 a | 11.36±0.43 b | 0.868 |
| WD1 | 27.94±0.51 a | 13.22±0.25 a | 22.80±0.92 ab | 1.66±0.04 a | 13.21±0.35 a | 0.999 |
| WD2 | 26.65±0.28 b | 11.95±0.83 bc | 19.83±0.38 c | 1.47±0.02 bc | 10.96±0.19 b | 0.921 |
| WD3 | 22.45±0.94 cd | 10.87±0.57 d | 19.05±0.75 cd | 1.42±0.06 c | 9.57±0.34 c | 0.883 |
| WD4 | 27.52±0.11 ab | 12.52±0.40 ab | 23.17±0.86 a | 1.72±0.05 a | 13.39±0.37 a | 1.070 |
| WD5 | 27.11±0.47 ab | 11.67±0.52 cd | 19.29±0.37 d | 1.50±0.02 b | 10.02±0.25 c | 0.871 |
| WD6 | 26.45±0.28 b | 11.45±0.49 cd | 19.72±0.79 c | 1.41±0.11 c | 10.13±0.40 c | 0.878 |
| WD7 | 22.95±0.39 c | 11.46±0.11 cd | 18.59±1.32 d | 1.45±0.02 c | 9.53±0.38 c | 0.854 |
| WD8 | 21.87±1.71 d | 9.86±0.36 e | 16.40±0.36 e | 1.23±0.03 d | 7.50±0.15 d | 0.762 |
| WD9 | 21.74±0.75 d | 9.73±0.33 e | 16.33±0.79 e | 1.18±0.06 d | 7.10±0.37 c | 0.730 |
Table 2 Effect of water deficit on biological characteristics of Isatis indigotica
| Treatments | Plant height (cm) | Stem and leaf biomass (g∙plant-1) | Taproot length (cm) | Taproot diameter (cm) | Root biomass (g∙plant-1) | Root/shoot ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 28.14±0.15 a | 13.09±0.18 a | 22.09±0.37 b | 1.69±0.03 a | 11.36±0.43 b | 0.868 |
| WD1 | 27.94±0.51 a | 13.22±0.25 a | 22.80±0.92 ab | 1.66±0.04 a | 13.21±0.35 a | 0.999 |
| WD2 | 26.65±0.28 b | 11.95±0.83 bc | 19.83±0.38 c | 1.47±0.02 bc | 10.96±0.19 b | 0.921 |
| WD3 | 22.45±0.94 cd | 10.87±0.57 d | 19.05±0.75 cd | 1.42±0.06 c | 9.57±0.34 c | 0.883 |
| WD4 | 27.52±0.11 ab | 12.52±0.40 ab | 23.17±0.86 a | 1.72±0.05 a | 13.39±0.37 a | 1.070 |
| WD5 | 27.11±0.47 ab | 11.67±0.52 cd | 19.29±0.37 d | 1.50±0.02 b | 10.02±0.25 c | 0.871 |
| WD6 | 26.45±0.28 b | 11.45±0.49 cd | 19.72±0.79 c | 1.41±0.11 c | 10.13±0.40 c | 0.878 |
| WD7 | 22.95±0.39 c | 11.46±0.11 cd | 18.59±1.32 d | 1.45±0.02 c | 9.53±0.38 c | 0.854 |
| WD8 | 21.87±1.71 d | 9.86±0.36 e | 16.40±0.36 e | 1.23±0.03 d | 7.50±0.15 d | 0.762 |
| WD9 | 21.74±0.75 d | 9.73±0.33 e | 16.33±0.79 e | 1.18±0.06 d | 7.10±0.37 c | 0.730 |
Figure 4 Changes of leaf area index (LAI) (A) and photosynthetic rate (Pn) (B) at different growth stages of Isatis indigoticaCK, and WD1-WD9 are the same as in Table 1.
Figure 5 Effect of water deficit on (R,S)-goitrin of Isatis indigoticaCK, and WD1-WD9 are the same as in Table 1. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P<0.05 among different treatments.
| Treatments | Precipitation (mm) | Total irrigation water (mm) | Total water consumption (mm) | Yield (kg∙hm-2) | IWUE (kg∙hm-2·mm-1) | WUE (kg∙hm-2·mm-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 185.8 | 163.24 | 374.04 | 8315.58 a | 50.94 b | 22.23 b |
| WD1 | 185.8 | 152.48 | 343.28 | 8239.56 a | 54.04 a | 24.01 a |
| WD2 | 185.8 | 147.25 | 353.05 | 7219.67 b | 49.03 c | 20.45 d |
| WD3 | 185.8 | 135.12 | 335.92 | 6894.60 d | 51.03 b | 20.52 d |
| WD4 | 185.8 | 150.25 | 340.85 | 8215.52 a | 54.67 a | 24.11 a |
| WD5 | 185.8 | 145.26 | 346.06 | 7164.91 bc | 49.32 c | 20.70 cd |
| WD6 | 185.8 | 142.58 | 338.38 | 7083.69 c | 49.68 c | 20.93 c |
| WD7 | 185.8 | 137.76 | 338.56 | 6965.85 d | 50.57 b | 20.57 d |
| WD8 | 185.8 | 115.23 | 316.03 | 5311.57 e | 46.10 d | 16.81 e |
| WD9 | 185.8 | 112.47 | 315.27 | 5228.54 e | 46.48 d | 16.58 e |
Table 3 Effect of different water deficit on yield and water use efficiency of Isatis indigotica
| Treatments | Precipitation (mm) | Total irrigation water (mm) | Total water consumption (mm) | Yield (kg∙hm-2) | IWUE (kg∙hm-2·mm-1) | WUE (kg∙hm-2·mm-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 185.8 | 163.24 | 374.04 | 8315.58 a | 50.94 b | 22.23 b |
| WD1 | 185.8 | 152.48 | 343.28 | 8239.56 a | 54.04 a | 24.01 a |
| WD2 | 185.8 | 147.25 | 353.05 | 7219.67 b | 49.03 c | 20.45 d |
| WD3 | 185.8 | 135.12 | 335.92 | 6894.60 d | 51.03 b | 20.52 d |
| WD4 | 185.8 | 150.25 | 340.85 | 8215.52 a | 54.67 a | 24.11 a |
| WD5 | 185.8 | 145.26 | 346.06 | 7164.91 bc | 49.32 c | 20.70 cd |
| WD6 | 185.8 | 142.58 | 338.38 | 7083.69 c | 49.68 c | 20.93 c |
| WD7 | 185.8 | 137.76 | 338.56 | 6965.85 d | 50.57 b | 20.57 d |
| WD8 | 185.8 | 115.23 | 316.03 | 5311.57 e | 46.10 d | 16.81 e |
| WD9 | 185.8 | 112.47 | 315.27 | 5228.54 e | 46.48 d | 16.58 e |
| [1] | 柏军华, 王克如, 初振东, 陈兵, 李少昆 (2005). 叶面积测定方法的比较研究. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版) 23, 216-218. |
| [2] | 白向历, 孙世贤, 杨国航, 刘明, 张振平, 齐华 (2009). 不同生育时期水分胁迫对玉米产量及生长发育的影响. 玉米科学 17(2), 60-63. |
| [3] | 白钰, 唐晓清, 施晟璐, 王雨, 杨月, 王永中, 王康才 (2016). 氮营养对菘蓝生长及活性成分积累的影响. 核农学报 31, 169-178. |
| [4] | 方栋平, 张富仓, 李静, 王海东, 向友珍, 张燕 (2015). 灌水量和滴灌施肥方式对温室黄瓜产量和品质的影响. 应用生态学报 26, 1735-1742. |
| [5] | 国欣, 胡小龙, 王月荣, 杨子峰, 王玉涛, 李征途, 胡坪 (2016). 板蓝根多糖的系统分离纯化与组成分析. 中草药 47, 1508-1514. |
| [6] | 寇丹, 苏德荣, 吴迪, 李岩 (2014). 地下调亏滴灌对紫花苜蓿耗水、产量和品质的影响. 农业工程学报 30(2), 116-123. |
| [7] | 刘梅先, 杨劲松, 李晓明, 余美, 王进 (2011). 膜下滴灌条件下滴水量和滴水频率对棉田土壤水分分布及水分利用效率的影响. 应用生态学报 22, 3203-3210. |
| [8] | 刘盛, 陈万生, 乔传卓, 郑水庆, 曾明, 张汉明, 宋赵军 (2000). 不同种质板蓝根和大青叶的抗甲型流感病毒作用. 第二军医大学学报 21, 204-206. |
| [9] | 刘素华, 彭延, 彭小峰, 罗振, 董合忠 (2016). 调亏灌溉与合理密植对旱区棉花生长发育及产量与品质的影响. 棉花学报 28, 184-188. |
| [10] | 刘洋, 栗岩峰, 李久生, 严海军 (2015). 东北半湿润区膜下滴灌对农田水热和玉米产量的影响. 农业机械学报 46(10), 93-104, 135. |
| [11] | 罗春红, 王康才, 李同根, 刘倩倩, 邹立思 (2012). 菘蓝不同栽培类型植物性状与质量评价研究. 中国中药杂志 37, 2373-2377. |
| [12] | 宁松瑞, 左强, 石建初, 王数, 刘忠山 (2013). 新疆典型膜下滴灌棉花种植模式的用水效率与效益. 农业工程学报 29(22), 90-99. |
| [13] | 谭勇, 梁宗锁, 董娟娥, 郝海员, 叶青 (2008). 水分胁迫对菘蓝生长发育和有效成分积累的影响. 中国中药杂志 33, 19-22. |
| [14] | 王磊, 张彤, 丁圣彦 (2009). 开花期土壤短期干旱和复水对大豆光合作用和产量的影响. 植物学报 44, 185-190. |
| [15] | 吴敏, 张文辉, 周建云, 马闯, 韩文娟 (2014). 干旱胁迫对栓皮栎幼苗细根的生长与生理生化指标的影响. 生态学报 34, 4223-4233. |
| [16] | 邢英英, 张富仓, 张燕, 李静, 强生才, 李志军, 高明霞 (2014). 膜下滴灌水肥耦合促进番茄养分吸收及生长. 农业工程学报 30(21), 70-80. |
| [17] | 邢英英, 张富仓, 张燕, 李静, 强生才, 吴立峰 (2015). 滴灌施肥水肥耦合对温室番茄产量、品质和水氮利用的影响. 中国农业科学 48, 713-726. |
| [18] | 张恒嘉, 李晶 (2013). 绿洲膜下滴灌调亏马铃薯光合生理特性与水分利用. 农业机械学报 44(10), 143-151. |
| [19] | 郑建华, 黄冠华, 黄权中, 王军, 贾冬冬, 张柯桢 (2011). 干旱区膜下滴灌条件下洋葱水分生产函数与优化灌溉制度. 农业工程学报 27(8), 25-30. |
| [20] | 朱成刚, 陈亚宁, 李卫红, 付爱红, 杨玉海 (2011). 干旱胁迫对胡杨PSII光化学效率和激能耗散的影响. 植物学报 46, 413-424. |
| [21] | Kang SZ, Shi WJ, Zhang JH (2000). An improved water-use efficiency for maize grown under regulated deficit irrigation.Field Crops Res 67, 207-214. |
| [22] | Savić S, Stikić R, Radović BV, Bogičević B, Jovanović Z, Šukalović VHT (2008). Comparative effects of regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) and partial root-zone drying (PRD) on growth and cell wall peroxidase activity in tomato fruits.Sci Hortic 117, 15-20. |
| [1] | LI Yue-Qi, MA Zhong-Hua, LIU Wei-Fan, SU Ming, WAN Meng-Hu, LI Qing-Yun, ZHANG Dan, LIU Ji-Li, WU Na. Effects of vertical deep rotary tillage with organic fertilizer on leaf senescence characteristics and yield of maize in saline soil [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(1): 222-236. |
| [2] | XU En-Xiang, ZHOU Lei, ZHANG Xiao-Wei, ZHANG Guo-Ping, ZHONG Du-Wei, HUANG Zhi, LIU Pai, CHI Yong-Gang. Estimation of rice yield based on canopy reflectance spectra and carbon flux in diverse growth phases [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(1): 82-93. |
| [3] | LI Shao-Wei, HE Yong-Tao, SUN Wei, DAI Er-Fu. Dataset of crop harvest traits and yield at long-term observation farmlands in Lhasa River Valley from 2016 to 2020 [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(8): 1321-1328. |
| [4] | FAN Yue-Ling, JIANG Zheng-De, YE Jia-Shu, ZHENG Li-Chen, CHEN Xin. Dataset on harvest traits and yield of major crops in long-term farmland observation plots in the Lower Liaohe Plain from 2005 to 2015 [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(8): 1271-1282. |
| [5] | WANG Shu-Wei, LIN Jing-Hui, ZHOU Wei, SHAN Jun, ZHAO Xu, YAN Xiao-Yuan. Long-term observation dataset of crop harvest traits and yield of typical farmland ecosystems in the Taihu Plain from 2004 to 2020 [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(8): 1283-1292. |
| [6] | WANG Peng, LI Xiang-Yi, GAO Yan-Ju, SHABITI Repkat, ZENG Fan-Jiang. Dataset of cotton harvest traits and yield in the oasis farmland ecosystems on the southern margin of Taklimakan Desert from 2005 to 2010 [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(8): 1329-1338. |
| [7] | ZHU Xi, HE Zhi-Bin, DU Ming-Wu, ZHAO Li-Wen, WU Dan-Dan. Dataset of crop harvest traits and yields from long-term observation plots of oasis farmland ecosystems in the middle part of Hexi Corridor from 2004 to 2010 [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(8): 1312-1320. |
| [8] | WANG Zhi-Bo, LIU Wen-Sheng, WU Rui-Jun, WANG Guo-Liang. Dataset of crop harvest traits and yields from long-term observation farmland plots on fluvial terraces in the hilly and gully region of the Loess Plateau from 2018 to 2023 [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(8): 1301-1311. |
| [9] | YAN Wen-Xiu, ZHAO Shi-Han, ZHENG Chun-Yan, ZHANG Ping, SHEN Hai-Hua, CHANG Jin-Feng, XU Kang. Growth monitoring and yield estimation of forage based on multiple phenological indicators [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(7): 1096-1109. |
| [10] | ZHANG Bin, ZHANG Hao-Cheng, QIAO Tian, LÜ Zhi-Bing, XU Ya-Nan, LI Xue-Qin, YUAN Xiang-Yang, FENG Mei-Chen, ZHANG Mei-Jun. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation on non-structural carbohydrates and C, N and P stoichiometry in oat plants under drought stress [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(7): 1082-1095. |
| [11] | Yurong Guo, Hong Liu, Zhenhua Wang, Gang Tian, Xin Liu, Jie Guo, Chunyong Li, Huixia Li. Heterosis in Yield and Its Physiological Mechanism of Changzagu Series Millet Hybrids [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2025, 60(6): 931-943. |
| [12] | TANG Yuan-Xiang, XIONG Shi-Chen, ZHU Hong-Feng, ZHANG Xin-Sheng, YOU Cheng-Ming, LIU Si-Ning, TAN Bo, XU Zhen-Feng. Effects of long-term nitrogen addition on leaf litter production and carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus return of the dominant tree species in broadleaf evergreen forests on the western margin of Sichuan Basin [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(5): 720-731. |
| [13] | Xu Tingyang, Liu Yuchen, Wang Wanpeng, Su Hang, Su Kunlong, Wu Zhenying, Lϋ Ming, Li Fuli, Wang Xiaoshan, Fu Chunxiang. Effects of Different Plant Growth Regulators on Wheat Growth and Development in the Saline-alkali Land [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2025, 60(3): 354-362. |
| [14] | ZHU Wan-Kuan, XU Yu-Xing, HUANG Run-Xia, DU A-Peng, WANG Zhi-Chao. Differences in water use efficiency between dry and rainy seasons and their controlling factors in Eucalyptus plantation in Leizhou Peninsula [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(12): 2015-2029. |
| [15] | WANG Yin, TONG Xiao-Juan, ZHANG Jin-Song, LI Jun, MENG Ping, LIU Pei-Rong, ZHANG Jing-Ru. Impact of drought on carbon and water fluxes and their coupling in a Quercus variabilis plantation [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(9): 1157-1171. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||