桃ERF转录因子家族生物信息学分析及 芽萌发相关基因筛选

doi:10.11983/CBB17117

植物学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (5): 612-624.DOI: 10.11983/CBB17117

桃ERF转录因子家族生物信息学分析及芽萌发相关基因筛选

赵雪惠^1,², 王庆杰^1,², 李晨^1,², 陈修德^1,², 肖伟^1,², 高东升^1,², 付喜玲^1,^2,^*()

¹山东农业大学园艺科学与工程学院, 泰安 271018
²山东农业大学作物生物学国家重点实验室, 泰安 271018

收稿日期:2017-06-15 接受日期:2017-10-16 出版日期:2018-09-01 发布日期:2018-11-29
通讯作者: 付喜玲
作者简介:

作者简介：路安民(图中左), 植物系统分类学家。20世纪60-70年代编著《中国植物志》等, 后从事植物系统发育和进化研究。“七五”以来主持了4项中科院、国家自然科学基金委重大和重点项目。1991年获国务院颁发的有突出贡献科学家荣誉证书。1987年8月-1990年12月担任中科院植物所所长。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(No.31372050)、山东农业大学科技创新团队-设施园艺优势团队(No.SYL2017YSTD07)和山东省自然科学基金(No.ZR2017BC036)

Genome-wide Identification of Ethylene Responsive Factor (ERF) Family Genes in Peach and Screening of Genes Related to Germination

Zhao Xuehui^1,², Wang Qingjie^1,², Li Chen^1,², Chen Xiude^1,², Xiao Wei^1,², Gao Dongsheng^1,², Fu Xiling^1,^2,^*()

¹College of Horticulture Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China;
²State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China;

Received:2017-06-15 Accepted:2017-10-16 Online:2018-09-01 Published:2018-11-29
Contact: Fu Xiling
About author:
† These authors contributed equally to this paper

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以中油四号油桃(Prunus persica var. nectarina)为研究对象, 利用MEGA 6.0、MEME、GSDS和DNAMAN 6.0等软件对桃ERF家族数据进行生物信息学分析, 鉴定得到102个ERF转录因子家族基因, 并通过构建系统进化树将这102个基因分为10个子家族(I-X)。基因结构分析表明, 有81个基因不含内含子, 20个基因含有1个内含子, 有1个基因与其它成员差异较大, 含有5个内含子。保守元件分析表明, ERF家族包含20个保守元件, 其中Motif 1、Motif 2和Motif 4都属于AP2/ERF结构域, 同一个保守元件主要出现在同一个子家族中, 并且大部分保守元件的功能未知。VIII子家族基因的荧光定量PCR分析表明, 在桃叶芽处于不同的发育状态时, PpeERF068的表达量存在较大差异, 光照培养箱中培养的桃芽在萌发过程中各时期表达量变化趋势进一步表明该基因可能与叶芽萌发有关, 将其命名为PpeEBB1。该研究为进一步揭示PpeEBB1的分子机制奠定了基础, 并为桃树的栽培管理和熟期调控了提供理论指导。

关键词: 桃, ERF家族, 芽萌发, PpeEBB1

Abstract: In this study, genome-wide identification of ERF family genes in ‘zhongyousihao’ peach was studied by using MEGA 6.0, MEME, GSDS, DNAMAN 6.0. We identified 102 genes, and phylogenetic analyses of the genes indicated that the transcription factors can be classified into 10 different groups (I-X). Gene structure analysis showed that 81 genes had no introns, 20 genes contained an intron, and 1 gene contained 5 introns, which had a large difference from other members. Conservative motif analysis showed that the ERF family contained 20 conserved elements: Motifs 1, 2 and 4 belonged to the APETALA2 (AP2)/ERF domain, and the same conserved motif appeared mainly in the same family; the function of most conserved motifs is unknown. qRT-PCR revealed that the expression of PpeERF068 during dormancy and germination was consistent with the developmental status of leaf buds, which suggested that it might be related to leaf bud germination. The gene expression of peach buds during each period in light culture incubation further showed the relation between PpeERF068 and the germination of leaf buds. So PpeERF068 was named PpeEBB1. We will further study the molecular mechanism of PpeEBB1 to provide theoretical guidance for the cultivation and management of peach.

Key words: peach, ERF family, bud germination, PpeEBB1

赵雪惠, 王庆杰, 李晨, 陈修德, 肖伟, 高东升, 付喜玲. 桃ERF转录因子家族生物信息学分析及芽萌发相关基因筛选. 植物学报, 2018, 53(5): 612-624.

Zhao Xuehui, Wang Qingjie, Li Chen, Chen Xiude, Xiao Wei, Gao Dongsheng, Fu Xiling. Genome-wide Identification of Ethylene Responsive Factor (ERF) Family Genes in Peach and Screening of Genes Related to Germination. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2018, 53(5): 612-624.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.chinbullbotany.com/CN/10.11983/CBB17117

https://www.chinbullbotany.com/CN/Y2018/V53/I5/612

图/表 7

参考文献 33

1	段成国, 李宪利, 高东升, 刘焕芳, 李萌 (2004). 剥鳞和激素处理对大樱桃花芽休眠解除及内源激素变化的影响. 西北植物学报 24, 615-620.
2	胡健兵 (2016). 全基因组发掘甜橙胁迫应答ERF类基因及其表达分析. 硕士论文. 武汉: 华中农业大学. pp. 27-33.
3	孙明岳, 周君, 谭秋平, 付喜玲, 陈修德, 李玲, 高东升 (2016). 苹果bZIP转录因子家族生物信息学分析及其在休眠芽中的表达. 中国农业科学 49, 1325-1345.
4	谭志一, 董毅敏, 高秀英, 房耀仁 (1985). 毛白杨冬芽休眠解除过程中脱落酸及赤霉素含量的变化. 植物学报 27, 381-386.
5	翟莹, 杨晓杰, 孙天国, 赵艳, 余春粉, 王秀文 (2013). 大豆转录因子GmERF5的克隆、表达及功能分析. 植物学报 48, 498-506.
6	Aharoni A, Dixit S, Jetter R, Thoenes E, van Arkel G, Pereira A (2004). The SHINE clade of AP2 domain transcription factors activates wax biosynthesis, alters cuticle properties, and confers drought tolerance when overexpressed in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell 16, 2463-2480.
7	Broun P, Poindexter P, Osborne E, Jiang CZ, Riechmann JL (2004). WIN1, a transcriptional activator of epidermal wax accumulation in Arabidopsis.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101, 4706-4711.
8	Carles CC, Fletcher JC (2003). Shoot apical meristem maintenance: the art of a dynamic balance.Trends Plant Sci 8, 394-401.
9	Chandler JW, Cole M, Jacobs B, Comelli P, Werr W (2011). Genetic integration of DORNRÖSCHEN and DORNRÖSCHEN-LIKE reveals hierarchical interactions in auxin signaling and patterning of the Arabidopsis apical embryo. Plant Mol Biol 75, 223-236.
10	Chandler JW, Werr W (2014). Arabidopsis floral phytomer development: auxin response relative to biphasic modes of organ initiation.J Exp Bot 65, 3097-3110.
11	Chen M, Tan QP, Sun MY, Li DM, Fu XL, Chen XD, Xiao W, Li L, Gao DS (2016). Genome-wide identification of WRKY family genes in peach and analysis of WRKY expression during bud dormancy. Mol Genet Genomics 291, 1319-1332.
12	Dubouzet JG, Sakuma Y, Ito Y, Kasuga M, Dubouzet EG, Miura S, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2003). OsDREB genes in rice, Oryza sativa L., encode transcription activators that function in drought-, high-salt and cold-responsive gene expression. Plant J 33, 751-763.
13	Elliott RC, Betzner AS, Huttner E, Oakes MP, Tucker WQ, Gerentes D, Perez P, Smyth DR (1996). AINTEGUMENTA, an APETALA2-like gene of Arabidopsis with pleiotropic roles in ovule development and floral organ growth. Plant Cell 8, 155-168.
14	Ferguson BJ, Beveridge CA (2009). Roles for auxin, cytokinin, and strigolactone in regulating shoot branching.Plant Physiol 149, 1929-1944.
15	Fujimoto SY, Ohta M, Usui A, Shinshi H, Ohme-Takagi M (2000). Arabidopsis ethylene-responsive element binding factors act as transcriptional activators or repressors of GCC box-mediated gene expression.Plant Cell 12, 393-404.
16	Gu YQ, Wildermuth MC, Chakravarthy S, Loh YT, Yang CM, He XH, Han Y, Martin GB (2002). Tomato transcription factors Pti4, Pti5, and Pti6 activate defense responses when expressed in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell 14, 817-831.
17	Hu YX, Wang YX, Liu XF, Li JY (2004). Arabidopsis RAV1 is down-regulated by brassinosteroid and may act as a negative regulator during plant development.Cell Res 14, 8-15.
18	Magome H, Yamaguchi S, Hanada A, Kamiya Y, Oda K (2004). dwarf and delayed-flowering 1, a novel Arabidopsis mutant deficient in gibberellin biosynthesis because of overexpression of a putative AP2 transcription factor. Plant J 37, 720-729.
19	Moose SP, Sisco PH (1996). Glossy15, an APETALA2-like gene from maize that regulates leaf epidermal cell identity. Genes Dev 10, 3018-3027.
20	Nakano T, Suzuki K, Fujimura T, Shinshi H (2006). Genome-wide analysis of the ERF gene family in Arabidopsis and rice.Plant Physiol 140, 411-432.
21	Pandey GK, Grant JJ, Cheong YH, Kim BG, Li LG, Luan S (2005). ABR1, an APETALA2-domain transcription factor that functions as a repressor of ABA response in Arabidopsis.Plant Physiol 139, 1185-1193.
22	Park JM, Park CJ, Lee SB, Ham BK, Shin R, Paek KH (2001). Overexpression of the tobacco Tsi1 gene encoding an EREBP/AP2-type transcription factor enhances resistance against pathogen attack and osmotic stress in tobacco. Plant Cell 13, 1035-1046.
23	Savaldi-Goldstein S, Chory J (2008). Growth coordination and the shoot epidermis.Curr Opin Plant Biol 11, 42-48.
24	Sherif S, El-Sharkawy I, Paliyath G, Jayasankar S (2013). PpERF3b, a transcriptional repressor from peach, contribu- tes to disease susceptibility and side branching in EAR- dependent and -independent fashions.Plant Cell Rep 32, 1111-1124.
25	Song CP, Agarwal M, Ohta M, Guo Y, Halfter U, Wang PC, Zhu JK (2005). Role of an Arabidopsis AP2/EREBP-type transcriptional repressor in abscisic acid and drought stress responses.Plant Cell 17, 2384-2396.
26	Tsukagoshi H, Saijo T, Shibata D, Morikami A, Nakamura K (2005). Analysis of a sugar response mutant of Arabidopsis identified a novel B3 domain protein that functions as an active transcriptional repressor.Plant Physiol 138, 675-685.
27	Xu W, Li F, Ling LZ, Liu AZ (2013). Genome-wide survey and expression profiles of the AP2/ERF family in castor bean(Ricinus communis L.). BMC Genomics 14, 785.
28	Xu ZS, Chen M, Li LC, Ma YZ (2011). Functions and application of the AP2/ERF transcription factor family in crop improvement.J Integr Plant Biol 53, 570-585.
29	Yi SY, Kim JH, Joung YH, Lee S, Kim WT, Yu SH, Choi D (2004). The pepper transcription factor CaPF1 confers pathogen and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis.Plant Phy- siol 136, 2862-2874.
30	Yordanov YS, Ma C, Strauss SH, Busov VB (2014). EARLY BUD-BREAK 1 (EBB1) is a regulator of release from seasonal dormancy in poplar trees.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111, 10001-10006.
31	Zhang GY, Chen M, Chen XP, Xu ZS, Guan S, Li LC, Li AL, Guo JM, Mao L, Ma YZ (2008). Phylogeny, gene structures, and expression patterns of the ERF gene family in soybean (Glycine max L.). J Exp Bot 59, 4095-4107.
32	Zheng CL, Halaly T, Acheampong AK, Takebayashi Y, Jikumaru Y, Kamiya Y, Or E (2015). Abscisic acid (ABA) regulates grape bud dormancy, and dormancy release stimuli may act through modification of ABA metabolism.J Exp Bot 66, 1527-1542.
33	Zhuang J, Cai B, Peng RH, Zhu B, Jin XF, Xue Y, Gao F, Fu XY, Tian YS, Zhao W, Qiao YS, Zhang Z, Xiong AS, Yao QH (2008). Genome-wide analysis of the AP2/ERF gene family in Populus trichocarpa. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 371, 468-474.

Locus name	Forward primer (5′-3′)	Reverse primer (5′-3′)
Prupe.3g094700	GCGGAGATAAGAGACCGAAT	AGAAGATGATGAGCAAGGTGAG
Prupe.1g245500	AGTATCACAGACGACGCAGG	ATCGCCCATCACTCAAGA
Prupe.1g212700	TATGCGGCGGAGATAAGA	GGGTGAGATAATGGAGGTGA
Prupe.1g139600	TGGATTCTGGGACAACCA	GGAACTGATGGAGAGCAAGAG
Prupe.4g176200	GCCCAAACTCCAAAGAGA	GTTGTTGTGGCTGTTGATGT
Prupe.4g051400	TCTCGCTCAGGGTGTTAGTA	CAGCCGTTGATGAAACTG
Prupe.8g230600	TTGCCTCACACGCTTGTTA	GAACGGTTTCTTCTCTTTCCTC
Prupe.4g051200	TCTCTCTCTGGACCTCAACAT	CGCCAACATTTCCTACAAC
Prupe.4g222300	AAGCCAAGACCAACTTCCC	TGTCCTGAAACCCGTAACC
Prupe.3g209100	TCCTCATCCTCCGTCGTAGA	ATCACCACAAACCTCACCG
Actin	GTTATTCTTCATCGGCGTCTTCG	CTTCACCATTCCAGTTCCATTGTC

Locus name	Forward primer (5′-3′)	Reverse primer (5′-3′)
Prupe.3g094700	GCGGAGATAAGAGACCGAAT	AGAAGATGATGAGCAAGGTGAG
Prupe.1g245500	AGTATCACAGACGACGCAGG	ATCGCCCATCACTCAAGA
Prupe.1g212700	TATGCGGCGGAGATAAGA	GGGTGAGATAATGGAGGTGA
Prupe.1g139600	TGGATTCTGGGACAACCA	GGAACTGATGGAGAGCAAGAG
Prupe.4g176200	GCCCAAACTCCAAAGAGA	GTTGTTGTGGCTGTTGATGT
Prupe.4g051400	TCTCGCTCAGGGTGTTAGTA	CAGCCGTTGATGAAACTG
Prupe.8g230600	TTGCCTCACACGCTTGTTA	GAACGGTTTCTTCTCTTTCCTC
Prupe.4g051200	TCTCTCTCTGGACCTCAACAT	CGCCAACATTTCCTACAAC
Prupe.4g222300	AAGCCAAGACCAACTTCCC	TGTCCTGAAACCCGTAACC
Prupe.3g209100	TCCTCATCCTCCGTCGTAGA	ATCACCACAAACCTCACCG
Actin	GTTATTCTTCATCGGCGTCTTCG	CTTCACCATTCCAGTTCCATTGTC

Group name	Gene name	Locus name	ORF length (bp)	Size (aa)	Molecular weight (Da)	PI	EST hitting
I	PpeERF#001	Prupe.6g182200	1122	373	41331.3	6.56	13
I	PpeERF#002	Prupe.3g009400	642	213	23101.2	9.79	7
I	PpeERF#003	Prupe.1g513600	1137	378	41236.8	6.37	9
I	PpeERF#004	Prupe.5g117800	933	310	34377.6	8.34	9
I	PpeERF#005	Prupe.3g157100	1386	461	51713.0	5.97	0
I	PpeERF#006	Prupe.1g008400	1230	409	45352.9	7.81	2
I	PpeERF#007	Prupe.8g198700	696	231	26301.6	9.19	0
II	PpeERF#008	Prupe.6g176400	540	179	20308.7	9.51	0
II	PpeERF#009	Prupe.1g432000	528	175	19844.9	9.39	1
II	PpeERF#010	Prupe.1g464400	453	150	17240.2	9.42	2
II	PpeERF#011	Prupe.6g231500	501	166	17849.1	8.72	0
II	PpeERF#012	Prupe.1g546100	501	166	17890.7	5.62	0
II	PpeERF#013	Prupe.1g500900	726	241	26308.4	5.61	0
II	PpeERF#014	Prupe.7g194400	648	215	23980.2	5.16	0
II	PpeERF#015	Prupe.1g001700	552	183	20044.5	7.74	0
III	PpeERF#016	Prupe.5g090700	558	185	19627.0	4.89	0
III	PpeERF#017	Prupe.5g090600	537	178	19407.7	5.67	0
III	PpeERF#018	Prupe.5g090400	543	180	19547.0	5.50	0
III	PpeERF#019	Prupe.5g090300	543	180	19510.8	5.50	0
III	PpeERF#020	Prupe.5g090800	555	184	19705.9	4.64	0
III	PpeERF#021	Prupe.2g289600	696	231	24485.1	4.83	0
III	PpeERF#022	Prupe.7g116300	609	202	21536.7	4.91	0
III	PpeERF#023	Prupe.2g190200	609	202	22713.9	5.87	1
III	PpeERF#024	Prupe.2g123200	831	276	30098.8	4.94	0
III	PpeERF#025	Prupe.5g065300	762	253	28183.5	4.91	0
III	PpeERF#026	Prupe.1g448600	771	256	27960.9	5.11	0
III	PpeERF#027	Prupe.7g222700	789	262	28536.4	4.94	0
III	PpeERF#028	Prupe.3g062800	732	243	26436.2	6.67	1
III	PpeERF#029	Prupe.7g115900	606	201	22481.2	4.95	0
III	PpeERF#030	Prupe.2g289500	690	229	24976.9	5.14	7
III	PpeERF#031	Prupe.5g090500	723	240	27217.8	7.69	0
III	PpeERF#032	Prupe.5g090100	711	236	26352.7	5.17	0
III	PpeERF#033	Prupe.5g090000	693	230	25658.8	5.13	7
III	PpeERF#034	Prupe.5g090200	699	232	26157.5	5.03	1
III	PpeERF#035	Prupe.5g089900	693	230	25521.9	7.78	0
III	PpeERF#036	Prupe.1g545700	522	173	19078.3	5.44	0
III	PpeERF#037	Prupe.1g545400	600	199	22101.0	5.54	0
IV	PpeERF#038	Prupe.2g253000	1041	346	37474.1	6.52	0
IV	PpeERF#039	Prupe.6g284400	1554	517	58370.7	4.74	0
IV	PpeERF#040	Prupe.2g256900	1167	388	42473.1	4.64	3
IV	PpeERF#041	Prupe.3g223300	591	196	21305.5	8.32	0
IV	PpeERF#042	Prupe.7g066700	858	285	32054.9	5.73	0
Group name	Gene name	Locus name	ORF length (bp)	Size (aa)	Molecular weight (Da)	PI	EST hitting
IV	PpeERF#043	Prupe.6g354000	672	223	23337.9	8.50	0
IV	PpeERF#044	Prupe.1g372100	768	255	28137.6	6.55	0
V	PpeERF#045	Prupe.3g096000	639	212	24310.2	5.94	0
V	PpeERF#046	Prupe.1g390800	588	195	22413.4	6.66	6
V	PpeERF#047	Prupe.1g480400	672	223	24759.7	9.10	0
V	PpeERF#048	Prupe.7g243600	732	243	26570.6	7.02	0
V	PpeERF#049	Prupe.3g084600	567	188	20855.3	5.97	0
V	PpeERF#050	Prupe.7g004900	945	314	34636.3	5.44	0
V	PpeERF#051	Prupe.6g004400	867	288	31688.5	6.01	0
V	PpeERF#052	Prupe.3g263000	1275	424	46904.3	4.58	0
V	PpeERF#053	Prupe.5g136200	939	312	33152.5	6.13	0
V	PpeERF#054	Prupe.1g084800	936	311	33626.0	8.92	0
V	PpeERF#055	Prupe.5g213800	675	224	25367.4	8.71	0
VI	PpeERF#056	Prupe.5g114100	1002	333	37019.0	4.98	0
VI	PpeERF#057	Prupe.2g306400	1098	365	41098.9	4.75	2
VI	PpeERF#058	Prupe.2g183200	864	287	32269.0	4.95	0
VI	PpeERF#059	Prupe.3g019900	570	189	20614.4	9.37	0
VI	PpeERF#060	Prupe.7g060700	588	195	21933.2	10.37	2
VI	PpeERF#061	Prupe.6g039700	927	308	34031.9	5.49	2
VI	PpeERF#062	Prupe.5g220700	1311	436	49386.8	6.25	1
VI	PpeERF#063	Prupe.1g310100	1020	339	38021.2	4.92	1
VII	PpeERF#064	Prupe.8g264900	966	321	35682.6	5.68	4
VII	PpeERF#065	Prupe.3g032300	1149	382	42495.9	4.81	84
VII	PpeERF#066	Prupe.1g130300	870	289	31564.0	7.66	31
VIII	PpeERF#067	Prupe.3g094700	870	289	31781.0	9.56	0
VIII	PpeERF#068	Prupe.1g245500	1275	424	46297.0	7.73	0
VIII	PpeERF#069	Prupe.1g212700	831	276	29938.4	4.94	0
VIII	PpeERF#070	Prupe.1g139600	1092	363	39938.7	5.60	0
VIII	PpeERF#071	Prupe.4g176200	687	228	24245.0	9.62	2
VIII	PpeERF#072	Prupe.4g051400	795	264	28447.6	9.47	1
VIII	PpeERF#073	Prupe.8g230600	546	181	19951.0	9.99	0
VIII	PpeERF#074	Prupe.4g051200	519	172	18303.7	9.20	3
VIII	PpeERF#075	Prupe.4g222300	696	231	25022.8	7.62	20
VIII	PpeERF#076	Prupe.3g209100	708	235	25471.3	6.58	3
IX	PpeERF#077	Prupe.2g129700	672	223	24950.8	5.41	0
IX	PpeERF#078	Prupe.2g129500	651	216	23968.9	5.99	0
IX	PpeERF#079	Prupe.2g129600	714	237	25948.7	5.47	0
IX	PpeERF#080	Prupe.2g129300	816	271	29817.0	5.17	0
IX	PpeERF#081	Prupe.2g129400	621	206	22559.1	5.97	0
IX	PpeERF#082	Prupe.5g061800	846	281	30157.0	9.09	10
IX	PpeERF#083	Prupe.6g064700	2115	704	77761.3	9.77	15
IX	PpeERF#084	Prupe.2g272300	783	260	29210.8	6.53	3
IX	PpeERF#085	Prupe.5g062000	1059	352	39322.2	5.90	5
Group name	Gene name	Locus name	ORF length (bp)	Size (aa)	Molecular weight (Da)	PI	EST hitting
IX	PpeERF#086	Prupe.2g272400	945	314	35018.8	6.17	21
IX	PpeERF#087	Prupe.2g272500	726	241	27069.2	5.92	0
IX	PpeERF#088	Prupe.8g224700	540	179	20470.7	6.08	0
IX	PpeERF#089	Prupe.1g037800	492	163	18008.7	6.85	0
IX	PpeERF#090	Prupe.8g224800	465	154	17059.7	7.79	0
IX	PpeERF#091	Prupe.1g037700	417	138	15204.7	6.84	0
IX	PpeERF#092	Prupe.4g055600	795	264	29431.3	5.61	0
IX	PpeERF#093	Prupe.4g055500	564	187	20369.6	9.51	2
IX	PpeERF#094	Prupe.6g348700	744	247	28089.7	4.92	0
IX	PpeERF#095	Prupe.8g224600	759	252	28672.0	4.99	1
IX	PpeERF#096	Prupe.1g037900	699	232	25950.8	5.54	1
X	PpeERF#097	Prupe.8g125100	816	271	30318.2	8.16	0
X	PpeERF#098	Prupe.7g134100	801	266	29255.4	7.67	0
X	PpeERF#099	Prupe.5g141200	696	231	25763.5	9.21	0
X	PpeERF#100	Prupe.6g165700	1215	404	43314.9	7.07	2
X	PpeERF#101	Prupe.5g141300	816	271	30005.0	6.16	0
X	PpeERF#102	Prupe.1g214900	741	246	27203.7	6.23	1

Group name	Gene name	Locus name	ORF length (bp)	Size (aa)	Molecular weight (Da)	PI	EST hitting
I	PpeERF#001	Prupe.6g182200	1122	373	41331.3	6.56	13
I	PpeERF#002	Prupe.3g009400	642	213	23101.2	9.79	7
I	PpeERF#003	Prupe.1g513600	1137	378	41236.8	6.37	9
I	PpeERF#004	Prupe.5g117800	933	310	34377.6	8.34	9
I	PpeERF#005	Prupe.3g157100	1386	461	51713.0	5.97	0
I	PpeERF#006	Prupe.1g008400	1230	409	45352.9	7.81	2
I	PpeERF#007	Prupe.8g198700	696	231	26301.6	9.19	0
II	PpeERF#008	Prupe.6g176400	540	179	20308.7	9.51	0
II	PpeERF#009	Prupe.1g432000	528	175	19844.9	9.39	1
II	PpeERF#010	Prupe.1g464400	453	150	17240.2	9.42	2
II	PpeERF#011	Prupe.6g231500	501	166	17849.1	8.72	0
II	PpeERF#012	Prupe.1g546100	501	166	17890.7	5.62	0
II	PpeERF#013	Prupe.1g500900	726	241	26308.4	5.61	0
II	PpeERF#014	Prupe.7g194400	648	215	23980.2	5.16	0
II	PpeERF#015	Prupe.1g001700	552	183	20044.5	7.74	0
III	PpeERF#016	Prupe.5g090700	558	185	19627.0	4.89	0
III	PpeERF#017	Prupe.5g090600	537	178	19407.7	5.67	0
III	PpeERF#018	Prupe.5g090400	543	180	19547.0	5.50	0
III	PpeERF#019	Prupe.5g090300	543	180	19510.8	5.50	0
III	PpeERF#020	Prupe.5g090800	555	184	19705.9	4.64	0
III	PpeERF#021	Prupe.2g289600	696	231	24485.1	4.83	0
III	PpeERF#022	Prupe.7g116300	609	202	21536.7	4.91	0
III	PpeERF#023	Prupe.2g190200	609	202	22713.9	5.87	1
III	PpeERF#024	Prupe.2g123200	831	276	30098.8	4.94	0
III	PpeERF#025	Prupe.5g065300	762	253	28183.5	4.91	0
III	PpeERF#026	Prupe.1g448600	771	256	27960.9	5.11	0
III	PpeERF#027	Prupe.7g222700	789	262	28536.4	4.94	0
III	PpeERF#028	Prupe.3g062800	732	243	26436.2	6.67	1
III	PpeERF#029	Prupe.7g115900	606	201	22481.2	4.95	0
III	PpeERF#030	Prupe.2g289500	690	229	24976.9	5.14	7
III	PpeERF#031	Prupe.5g090500	723	240	27217.8	7.69	0
III	PpeERF#032	Prupe.5g090100	711	236	26352.7	5.17	0
III	PpeERF#033	Prupe.5g090000	693	230	25658.8	5.13	7
III	PpeERF#034	Prupe.5g090200	699	232	26157.5	5.03	1
III	PpeERF#035	Prupe.5g089900	693	230	25521.9	7.78	0
III	PpeERF#036	Prupe.1g545700	522	173	19078.3	5.44	0
III	PpeERF#037	Prupe.1g545400	600	199	22101.0	5.54	0
IV	PpeERF#038	Prupe.2g253000	1041	346	37474.1	6.52	0
IV	PpeERF#039	Prupe.6g284400	1554	517	58370.7	4.74	0
IV	PpeERF#040	Prupe.2g256900	1167	388	42473.1	4.64	3
IV	PpeERF#041	Prupe.3g223300	591	196	21305.5	8.32	0
IV	PpeERF#042	Prupe.7g066700	858	285	32054.9	5.73	0
Group name	Gene name	Locus name	ORF length (bp)	Size (aa)	Molecular weight (Da)	PI	EST hitting
IV	PpeERF#043	Prupe.6g354000	672	223	23337.9	8.50	0
IV	PpeERF#044	Prupe.1g372100	768	255	28137.6	6.55	0
V	PpeERF#045	Prupe.3g096000	639	212	24310.2	5.94	0
V	PpeERF#046	Prupe.1g390800	588	195	22413.4	6.66	6
V	PpeERF#047	Prupe.1g480400	672	223	24759.7	9.10	0
V	PpeERF#048	Prupe.7g243600	732	243	26570.6	7.02	0
V	PpeERF#049	Prupe.3g084600	567	188	20855.3	5.97	0
V	PpeERF#050	Prupe.7g004900	945	314	34636.3	5.44	0
V	PpeERF#051	Prupe.6g004400	867	288	31688.5	6.01	0
V	PpeERF#052	Prupe.3g263000	1275	424	46904.3	4.58	0
V	PpeERF#053	Prupe.5g136200	939	312	33152.5	6.13	0
V	PpeERF#054	Prupe.1g084800	936	311	33626.0	8.92	0
V	PpeERF#055	Prupe.5g213800	675	224	25367.4	8.71	0
VI	PpeERF#056	Prupe.5g114100	1002	333	37019.0	4.98	0
VI	PpeERF#057	Prupe.2g306400	1098	365	41098.9	4.75	2
VI	PpeERF#058	Prupe.2g183200	864	287	32269.0	4.95	0
VI	PpeERF#059	Prupe.3g019900	570	189	20614.4	9.37	0
VI	PpeERF#060	Prupe.7g060700	588	195	21933.2	10.37	2
VI	PpeERF#061	Prupe.6g039700	927	308	34031.9	5.49	2
VI	PpeERF#062	Prupe.5g220700	1311	436	49386.8	6.25	1
VI	PpeERF#063	Prupe.1g310100	1020	339	38021.2	4.92	1
VII	PpeERF#064	Prupe.8g264900	966	321	35682.6	5.68	4
VII	PpeERF#065	Prupe.3g032300	1149	382	42495.9	4.81	84
VII	PpeERF#066	Prupe.1g130300	870	289	31564.0	7.66	31
VIII	PpeERF#067	Prupe.3g094700	870	289	31781.0	9.56	0
VIII	PpeERF#068	Prupe.1g245500	1275	424	46297.0	7.73	0
VIII	PpeERF#069	Prupe.1g212700	831	276	29938.4	4.94	0
VIII	PpeERF#070	Prupe.1g139600	1092	363	39938.7	5.60	0
VIII	PpeERF#071	Prupe.4g176200	687	228	24245.0	9.62	2
VIII	PpeERF#072	Prupe.4g051400	795	264	28447.6	9.47	1
VIII	PpeERF#073	Prupe.8g230600	546	181	19951.0	9.99	0
VIII	PpeERF#074	Prupe.4g051200	519	172	18303.7	9.20	3
VIII	PpeERF#075	Prupe.4g222300	696	231	25022.8	7.62	20
VIII	PpeERF#076	Prupe.3g209100	708	235	25471.3	6.58	3
IX	PpeERF#077	Prupe.2g129700	672	223	24950.8	5.41	0
IX	PpeERF#078	Prupe.2g129500	651	216	23968.9	5.99	0
IX	PpeERF#079	Prupe.2g129600	714	237	25948.7	5.47	0
IX	PpeERF#080	Prupe.2g129300	816	271	29817.0	5.17	0
IX	PpeERF#081	Prupe.2g129400	621	206	22559.1	5.97	0
IX	PpeERF#082	Prupe.5g061800	846	281	30157.0	9.09	10
IX	PpeERF#083	Prupe.6g064700	2115	704	77761.3	9.77	15
IX	PpeERF#084	Prupe.2g272300	783	260	29210.8	6.53	3
IX	PpeERF#085	Prupe.5g062000	1059	352	39322.2	5.90	5
Group name	Gene name	Locus name	ORF length (bp)	Size (aa)	Molecular weight (Da)	PI	EST hitting
IX	PpeERF#086	Prupe.2g272400	945	314	35018.8	6.17	21
IX	PpeERF#087	Prupe.2g272500	726	241	27069.2	5.92	0
IX	PpeERF#088	Prupe.8g224700	540	179	20470.7	6.08	0
IX	PpeERF#089	Prupe.1g037800	492	163	18008.7	6.85	0
IX	PpeERF#090	Prupe.8g224800	465	154	17059.7	7.79	0
IX	PpeERF#091	Prupe.1g037700	417	138	15204.7	6.84	0
IX	PpeERF#092	Prupe.4g055600	795	264	29431.3	5.61	0
IX	PpeERF#093	Prupe.4g055500	564	187	20369.6	9.51	2
IX	PpeERF#094	Prupe.6g348700	744	247	28089.7	4.92	0
IX	PpeERF#095	Prupe.8g224600	759	252	28672.0	4.99	1
IX	PpeERF#096	Prupe.1g037900	699	232	25950.8	5.54	1
X	PpeERF#097	Prupe.8g125100	816	271	30318.2	8.16	0
X	PpeERF#098	Prupe.7g134100	801	266	29255.4	7.67	0
X	PpeERF#099	Prupe.5g141200	696	231	25763.5	9.21	0
X	PpeERF#100	Prupe.6g165700	1215	404	43314.9	7.07	2
X	PpeERF#101	Prupe.5g141300	816	271	30005.0	6.16	0
X	PpeERF#102	Prupe.1g214900	741	246	27203.7	6.23	1

[1]	王燕玲, 招礼军, 朱栗琼, 莫若果, 林婷, 赵小雨. 广西天然红鳞蒲桃种群幼苗数量特征及动态分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(9): 1278-1286.
[2]	齐海玲, 樊鹏振, 王跃华, 刘杰. 中国北方六省区胡桃的遗传多样性和群体结构[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 23120-.
[3]	管岳, 王妍欣, 褚佳瑶, 冯琳骄, 宋晓萌, 周龙. 新疆野扁桃种群年龄结构及动态分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(7): 967-977.
[4]	闫涵, 马松梅, 魏博, 张宏祥, 张丹. 孑遗灌木长柄扁桃的历史分布格局及其环境驱动力[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(7): 766-774.
[5]	李晨, 刘建廷, 樊永信, 赵雪惠, 肖伟, 陈修德, 付喜玲, 李玲, 李冬梅. UV-B对设施桃叶片光合功能及叶绿体超微结构的影响[J]. 植物学报, 2022, 57(4): 434-443.
[6]	周亮, 杨君珑, 杨虎, 窦建德, 黄维, 李小伟. 宁夏蒙古扁桃群落特征与分类[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(2): 243-248.
[7]	王春成, 张云玲, 马松梅, 黄刚, 张丹, 闫涵. 中国扁桃亚属四种野生扁桃的系统发育与物种分化[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(9): 987-995.
[8]	贾晓东,许梦洋,莫正海,宣继萍,翟敏,郭忠仁. 薄壳山核桃酚类代谢物研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2020, 55(1): 106-119.
[9]	唐丽丽, 张梅, 赵香林, 康慕谊, 刘鸿雁, 高贤明, 杨彤, 郑璞帆, 石福臣. 华北地区胡桃楸林分布规律及群落构建机制分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(9): 753-761.
[10]	张淑辉,王红,王文茹,吴雪莲,肖元松,彭福田. 蔗糖对桃幼苗生长发育及其SnRK1酶活性的影响[J]. 植物学报, 2019, 54(6): 744-752.
[11]	郜怀峰,张亚飞,王国栋,孙希武,贺月,彭福田,肖元松. 钼在桃树干旱胁迫响应中的作用解析[J]. 植物学报, 2019, 54(2): 227-236.
[12]	张媚, 林马水, 曹秀秀, 赵树民, 蒋达青, 王冰璇, 汪石莹, 樊炎迪, 郭明, 林海萍. 不同经营模式山核桃林地土壤pH值、养分与细菌多样性的差异[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(6): 611-619.
[13]	周乃富, 张俊佩, 刘昊, 查巍巍, 裴东. 木本植物非均质化组织石蜡切片制作方法[J]. 植物学报, 2018, 53(5): 653-660.
[14]	王玉国, 杨洁, 陈家宽. 长江流域野生猕猴桃遗传资源的潜在价值、现状分析与保护策略[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(4): 373-383.
[15]	赵雪惠, 肖伟, 郭建敏, 高东升, 付喜玲, 李冬梅. 补充蓝光对设施栽培油桃光合性能及糖酸积累的影响[J]. 植物学报, 2018, 53(2): 227-237.

桃ERF转录因子家族生物信息学分析及芽萌发相关基因筛选

Genome-wide Identification of Ethylene Responsive Factor (ERF) Family Genes in Peach and Screening of Genes Related to Germination

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 33

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

桃ERF转录因子家族生物信息学分析及 芽萌发相关基因筛选

Genome-wide Identification of Ethylene Responsive Factor (ERF) Family Genes in Peach and Screening of Genes Related to Germination

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 33

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

桃ERF转录因子家族生物信息学分析及芽萌发相关基因筛选