雷公藤悬浮细胞原生质体的制备及瞬时转化体系的建立

doi:10.11983/CBB16171

植物学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (6): 774-782.DOI: 10.11983/CBB16171

雷公藤悬浮细胞原生质体的制备及瞬时转化体系的建立

胡添源¹, 王睿¹, 陈上¹, 马宝伟¹, 高伟^1,^2,^*(), 黄璐琦³

¹首都医科大学中医药学院, 北京 100069
²中医络病研究北京市重点实验室, 北京 100069
³中国中医科学院中药资源中心, 道地药材国家重点实验室培育基地, 北京 100700

收稿日期:2016-08-21 接受日期:2017-01-10 出版日期:2017-11-01 发布日期:2018-02-22
通讯作者: 高伟
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金优秀青年科学基金(No.81422053)、国家杰出青年科学基金(No.81325023)和“十三五”时期北京市属高校高水平教师队伍建设支持计划(No.CIT&TCD20170324)

Protoplast Isolation and Establishment of Transient Expression System of Tripterygium wilfordii Suspension Culture Cells

Hu Tianyuan¹, Wang Rui¹, Chen Shang¹, Ma Baowei¹, Gao Wei^1,^2,^*(), Huang Luqi³

¹School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
²Key Laboratory of Collateral Diseases, Beijing 100069, China
³Key Laboratory of Dao-di Herbs, National Resources Center for Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medicinal Sciences, Beijing 100700, China

Received:2016-08-21 Accepted:2017-01-10 Online:2017-11-01 Published:2018-02-22
Contact: Gao Wei

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探索药用植物雷公藤(Tripterygium wilfordii)悬浮细胞原生质体提取的最优条件, 并建立雷公藤原生质体瞬时转化体系, 以雷公藤悬浮细胞为材料, 对酶解液配比、酶解时间、甘露醇浓度及处理转速进行考察。用PEG介导的瞬时转化法将外源基因转化到雷公藤原生质体中。结果表明, 以雷公藤悬浮细胞为材料提取原生质体的最佳条件是酶液配比为2.0%纤维素酶+0.5%果胶酶+0.5%离析酶, 甘露醇浓度为0.6 mol?L^-1, 酶解10小时, 处理转速为67×g; 用PEG介导法将含有编码GFP的植物表达载体转化雷公藤悬浮细胞原生质体, 激光共聚焦扫描显微镜下细胞显示绿色荧光。通过实验筛选得到雷公藤悬浮细胞原生质体的最佳提取条件, 建立了雷公藤悬浮细胞原生质体的瞬时转化体系, 为进一步开展雷公藤功能基因及合成生物学研究奠定了基础。

关键词: 原生质体, 悬浮细胞, 瞬时转化, 雷公藤

Abstract: We aimed to find the best protoplast extraction conditions with Tripterygium wilfordii suspension culture cells and establish an efficient transient expression system. Key factors in protoplast isolation, such as concentration of enzymes, time of enzymolysis, osmotic pressure and centrifugation speed, were studied. PEG mediation was used to transfer the GFP gene into protoplasts. The optimal extraction system was with cellulose R-10 2.0%, pectinase Y-23 0.5%, macerozyme R-10 0.5%, 0.6 mol?L^-1mannitol. The suitable enzymolysis time was 10 h, and the optimal centrifugation speed was 67 ×g. Under LSCM, the protoplast emitted green fluorescence after transforming the plasmid encoding green fluorescent protein into it. We revealed the optional conditions to isolate protoplast of T. wilfordii suspension cells and established the transient transformation system; it laid a foundation for further study on the functional genes and syn- thetic biology of T. wilfordii.

Key words: protoplast, suspension culture cells, transient transformation, Tripterygium wilfordii

胡添源, 王睿, 陈上, 马宝伟, 高伟, 黄璐琦. 雷公藤悬浮细胞原生质体的制备及瞬时转化体系的建立. 植物学报, 2017, 52(6): 774-782.

Hu Tianyuan, Wang Rui, Chen Shang, Ma Baowei, Gao Wei, Huang Luqi. Protoplast Isolation and Establishment of Transient Expression System of Tripterygium wilfordii Suspension Culture Cells. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2017, 52(6): 774-782.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.chinbullbotany.com/CN/10.11983/CBB16171

https://www.chinbullbotany.com/CN/Y2017/V52/I6/774

图/表 7

表1 雷公藤悬浮细胞细胞壁酶解液配比

Table 1 Proportion of enzymic digestion to remove Triptery- gium wilfordii suspension cells cytoderm

Group	Cellulase (%)	Pectinase (%)	Macerozyme (%)
1	1.5	0.3	0.5
2	2.0	0.3	0.5
3	2.0	0.5	0.5
4	2.0	0.7	0.5
5	2.5	0.3	0.5

图1 酶解液浓度对雷公藤悬浮细胞原生质体产量(A)和活力(B)的影响不同小写字母表示在P<0.05水平上差异显著。

Figure 1 The influence of enzyme concentration on Tripterygium wilfordii suspension cells protoplast yield (A) and activity (B) Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P<0.05.

图2 不同酶解时间对雷公藤悬浮细胞原生质体产量(A)及活力(B)的影响不同小写字母表示在P<0.05水平上差异显著。

Figure 2 The influence of enzymatic hydrolysis time on Trip- terygium wilfordii suspension cells protoplast yield (A) and activity (B)Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P<0.05.

图3 不同甘露醇浓度对雷公藤悬浮细胞原生质体产量(A)和活力(B)的影响不同小写字母表示在P<0.05水平上差异显著。

Figure 3 The influence of mannitol concentration on Tripterygium wilfordii suspension cells protoplast yield (A) and activity (B)Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P<0.05.

图4 不同转速对雷公藤悬浮细胞原生质体的产量(A)及活力(B)的影响不同小写字母表示在P<0.05水平上差异显著。

Figure 4 The influence of centrifugal speed on Tripterygium wilfordii suspension cells protoplast yield (A) and activity (B)Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P<0.05.

图5 光学显微镜下雷公藤悬浮细胞原生质体形态(A) 台盼蓝染色前的原生质体; (B) 台盼蓝染色后的原生质体(红框标出的为死细胞)。Bars=100 μm

Figure 5 Morphology of Tripterygium wilfordii suspension cells protoplast under optical microscope(A) Morphology of protoplast before trypan blue staining; (B) Morphology of protoplast after trypan blue staining, and the blue cell in red box was dead. Bars=100 μm

图6 激光共聚焦扫描显微镜下观察雷公藤悬浮细胞原生质体(A) 明场下的原生质体; (B) 488 nm激发光下GFP荧光; (C) 原生质体无自发荧光; (D) 叠加效果图。Bars=1 μm

Figure 6 Protoplast of Tripterygium wilfordii suspension cells under laser scanning confocal microscop(A) Protoplasts under the laser confocal microscope in bright field; (B) GFP fluorescence of protoplast under the laser confocal microscope in excitation 488 nm; (C) There is no red chloroplast spontaneous fluorescence of protoplast under the laser confocal microscope in excitation 488 nm; (D) Red chlorophyll fluorescence signals and GFP signals from protoplast. Bars=1 μm

参考文献 25

[1]	段炼, 钱君, 郭小雨, 朱英 (2014). 一种快速高效的水稻原生质体制备和转化方法的建立. 植物生理学报 50, 351-357.
[2]	李妮娜, 丁林云, 张志远, 郭旺珍 (2014). 棉花叶肉原生质体分离及目标基因瞬时表达体系的建立. 作物学报 40, 231-239. DOI URL
[3]	刘凡, 赵泓, 秦帆 (2006). 结球白菜下胚轴原生质体培养及其体细胞胚植株再生. 植物学通报 23, 275-280. DOI URL
[4]	刘继红, 邓秀新 (1999). 植物原生质体非对称融合及其在育种上的应用. 生命科学 11, 88-91.
[5]	张良波, 李培旺, 黄振, 李昌珠 (2011). 木本植物原生质体制备体系的研究进展. 中南林业科技大学学报 31(8), 102-107. DOI URL
[6]	朱楠, 刘俊, 张馨宇, 董娟娥 (2014). 丹参悬浮培养细胞原生质体的制备和活力检测. 生物工程学报 30, 1612-1621. DOI URL
[7]	Chugh R, Sangwan V, Patil SP, Dudeja V, Dawra RK, Banerjee S, Schumacher RJ, Blazar BR, Georg GI, Vickers SM, Saluja AK (2012). A preclinical evaluation of minnelide as a therapeutic agent against pancreatic cancer. Sci Transl Med 4, 156ra139.
[8]	Cocking EC (1960). A method for the isolation of plant protoplasts and vacuoles.Nature 187, 927-929. DOI URL PMID
[9]	Duarte P, Ribeiro D, Carqueijeiro I, Bettencourt S, Sottomayor M (2016). Protoplast transformation as a plant- transferable transient expression system.Methods Mol Biol 1405, 137. DOI URL
[10]	Gilroy S, Jones RL (1992). Gibberellic acid and abscisic acid coordinately regulate cytoplasmic calcium and secre- tory activity in barley aleurone protoplasts.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89, 3591-3595. DOI URL
[11]	Guo ZJ, Kallus S, Akiyoshi K, Sunamoto J (2006). Artificial cell wall for plant protoplast. Coating of plasma membrane with hydrophobized polysaccharides.Chem Lett 31, 415-416.
[12]	Knight MR, Campbell AK, Smith SM, Trewavas AJ (1991). Transgenic plant aequorin reports the effects of touch and cold-shock and elicitors on cytoplasmic calcium.Nature 352, 524-526. DOI URL
[13]	Liu JL, Lee J, Salazar Hernandez MA, Mazitschek R, Ozcan U (2015). Treatment of obesity with celastrol.Cell 161, 999-1011. DOI URL
[14]	Lu L, Li FQ, Wang XM (2010). Novel anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective agents for Parkinson’s disease.CNS Neu- rol Disord Drug Targets 9, 232-240. DOI URL
[15]	Maas C, Werr W (1989). Mechanism and optimized conditions for PEG mediated DNA transfection into plant protoplasts.Plant Cell Rep 8, 148-151. DOI URL PMID
[16]	Nagata T, Takebe I (1970). Cell wall regeneration and cell division in isolated tobacco mesophyll protoplasts.Planta 92, 301-308. DOI URL
[17]	Sheen J (2001). Signal transduction in maize and Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts.Plant Physiol 127, 1466-1475. DOI URL PMID
[18]	Su P, Tong YR, Cheng QQ, Hu YT, Zhang M, Yang J, Teng QZ, Gao W, Huang LQ (2016). Functional characterization of ent-copalyl diphosphate synthase, kaurene synthase and kaurene oxidase in the Salvia miltiorrhiza gibberellin biosynthetic pathway. Sci Rep 6, 23057.
[19]	Titov DV, Gilman B, He QL, Bhat S, Low WK, Dang YJ, Smeaton M, Demain AL, Miller PS, Kugel JF, Goodrich JA, Liu JO (2011). XPB, a subunit of TFIIH, is a target of the natural product triptolide.Nat Chem Biol 7, 182-188. DOI URL PMID
[20]	Tudses N, Premjet S, Premjet D (2015). Establishment of method for protoplast fusion with peg-mediated between jatropha curcas l. and ricinus communis l.Int J Life Sci Biotech Pharm Res 4, 50-56.
[21]	Wang X, Liang XB, Li FQ, Zhou HF, Liu XY, Wang JJ, Wang XM (2008). Therapeutic strategies for Parkinson’s disease: the ancient meets the future-traditional Chinese herbal medicine, electroacupuncture, gene therapy and stem cells.Neurochem Res 33, 1956-1963. DOI URL
[22]	Woo JW, Kim J, Kwon SI, Corvalán C, Cho SW, Kim H, Kim SG, Kim ST, Choe S, Kim JS (2015). DNA-free genome editing in plants with preassembled CRISPR- Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Nat Biotechnol 33, 1162-1164. DOI URL PMID
[23]	Zhang M, Su P, Zhou YJ, Wang XJ, Zhao YJ, Liu YJ, Tong YR, Hu TY, Huang LQ, Gao W (2015). Identification of geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase genes from Tripterygium wilfordii. Plant Cell Rep 34, 2179-2188.
[24]	Zhao YJ, Chen X, Zhang M, Su P, Liu YJ, Tong YR, Wang XJ, Huang LQ, Gao W (2015). Molecular cloning and characterisation of farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase from Tripterygium wilfordii. PLoS One 10, r0125415.
[25]	Zhou ZL, Yang YX, Ding J, Li YC, Miao ZH (2012). Triptolide: structural modifications, structure-activity relations- hips, bioactivities, clinical development and mechanisms.Nat Prod Rep 29, 457-475. DOI URL PMID

雷公藤悬浮细胞原生质体的制备及瞬时转化体系的建立

Protoplast Isolation and Establishment of Transient Expression System of Tripterygium wilfordii Suspension Culture Cells

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张玉琴, 吴嘉诚, 何萌, 刘仁义, 朱晓玥. 铁观音原生质体高效瞬时转化方法的建立[J]. 植物学报, 2022, 57(3): 340-349.
[2]	宋爱华, 张文斌, 孙姝兰, 李凌飞, 王小菁. 非洲菊原生质体制备及瞬时转化系统的建立[J]. 植物学报, 2017, 52(4): 511-519.
[3]	乔妹, 孙嘉炜, 陈琰, 韩胜芳, 侯春燕, 刘刚, 王冬梅. 小麦悬浮细胞应答激发子刺激的过敏性反应中Ca²⁺和 NO的动态变化及其相互作用[J]. 植物学报, 2015, 50(1): 1-11.
[4]	杜玮炜, 姚小洪, 黄宏文. 环境胁迫对雷公藤中雷公藤红素含量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(1): 180-185.
[5]	张改娜;贾敬芬*. 草木樨状黄芪和木本霸王的科间体细胞杂交[J]. 植物学报, 2009, 44(04): 442-450.
[6]	聂志刚;王艳;李韶山. 重金属诱导拟南芥原生质体DNA 损伤的单细胞凝胶电泳检测[J]. 植物学报, 2009, 44(01): 117-123.
[7]	杜玮炜;黄宏文;. 雷公藤次生代谢产物雷公藤红素含量与环境因子相关性分析[J]. 植物学报, 2008, 25(06): 707-713.
[8]	王文霞;李曙光;赵小明;林炳承;杜昱光. 壳寡糖对烟草悬浮细胞茉莉酸合成基因转录的影响[J]. 植物学报, 2008, 25(05): 526-532.
[9]	熊丹;陈发菊;梁宏伟;王玉兵. 珍稀濒危植物香果树胚性细胞悬浮系的建立和植株再生[J]. 植物学报, 2008, 25(03): 337-343.
[10]	詹宝徐文忠麻密. 砷超富集植物蜈蚣草原生质体的分离及其抗砷性分析[J]. 植物学报, 2006, 23(4): 363-367.
[11]	刘凡赵泓　　秦帆. 结球白菜下胚轴原生质体培养及其体细胞胚植株再生[J]. 植物学报, 2006, 23(3): 275-280.
[12]	付春华余龙江. 细胞融合与植物细胞质雄性不育性状改良[J]. 植物学报, 2005, 22(增刊): 99-107.
[13]	张贵友　李萍　戴尧仁. 低温胁迫下褪黑激素对烟草悬浮细胞精氨酸脱羧酶活性的影响[J]. 植物学报, 2005, 22(05): 555-559.
[14]	张国增安国勇宋纯鹏. 不同培养条件对拟南芥根细胞膜片钳记录的影响[J]. 植物学报, 2005, 22(01): 27-31.
[15]	王晶珊孙世孟王维华毕英娜徐丽娟孟祥霞. 甘薯同一不亲和群内品种间体细胞杂种[J]. 植物学报, 2004, 21(03): 306-311.