植物学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (5): 846-858.DOI: 10.11983/CBB25141 cstr: 32102.14.CBB25141
曾霓1,2, 孙维悦1,3, 舒江平1,4, 周定港2, 严岳鸿1,3,*, 何祖霞1,3,*
收稿日期:2025-07-31
接受日期:2025-12-06
发布日期:2025-12-19
通讯作者:
*E-mail: yhyan@sibs.ac.cn; 542201197@qq.com
基金资助:Zeng Ni1,2, Sun Weiyue1,3, Shu Jiangping1,4, Zhou Dinggang2, Yan Yuehong1,3,*, He Zuxia1,3,*
Received:2025-07-31
Accepted:2025-12-06
Published:2025-12-19
Contact:
*E-mail: yhyan@sibs.ac.cn; 542201197@qq.com
摘要: 植物叶片的超疏水性结构具有防尘和防菌等重要功能, 且为人类研制仿生材料的重要基础原理。蕨类植物作为最早由水生向陆生过渡的维管植物, 其疏水结构存在显著多样性。该文在文献研究和疏水性初步观察的基础上, 选取25种蕨类植物进行叶表皮微形态研究, 并对其中20种植物进行接触角测量, 结果表明: (1) 叶片疏水性与其表面微结构密切相关, 多数疏水性蕨类植物的叶表皮呈现由多边形凸起与蜡晶体组成的多层级结构; 蕨类植物叶片接触角大于130°时, 已可观察到明显的疏水现象; (2) 生境相关性分析显示, 喜水环境中生长的蕨类植物, 其疏水性表现更加显著; (3) 基于叶绿体基因组的系统发育分析表明, 蕨类植物的疏水特性呈现多次独立起源的演化模式。作为最古老的陆生维管植物类群, 蕨类植物超疏水机制研究为理解植物适应陆地环境的演化策略提供了新视角, 也为开发新型仿生功能材料提供了新的天然模板。
曾霓, 孙维悦, 舒江平, 周定港, 严岳鸿, 何祖霞. 蕨类植物叶表皮微形态与超疏水效应研究. 植物学报, 2026, 61(5): 846-858.
Zeng Ni, Sun Weiyue, Shu Jiangping, Zhou Dinggang, Yan Yuehong, He Zuxia. Study on Leaf Epidermal Micromorphology and Superhydrophobic Effects in Ferns. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2026, 61(5): 846-858.
| [1] Baker EA (1982). Chemistry and morphology of plant epicuticular waxes. In: Cutler DF, Alvin KL, Price CE, eds. The Plant Cuticle. London: Academic Press. pp. 139-166. [2] Barthlott W, Büdel B, Mail M, Neumann KM, Bartels D, Fischer E (2022). Superhydrophobic terrestrial cyanobacteria and land plant transition.Front Plant Sci 13, 880439. [3] Barthlott W, Mail M, Bhushan B, Koch K (2017). Plant surfaces: structures and functions for biomimetic innovations.Nanomicro Lett 9, 23. [4] Barthlott W, Mail M, Neinhuis C (2016). Superhydrophobic hierarchically structured surfaces in biology: evolution, structural principles and biomimetic applications.Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 374, 20160191. [5] Barthlott W, Neinhuis C (1997). Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces.Planta 202, 1-8. [6] Barthlott W, Neinhuis C, Cutler D, Ditsch F, Meusel I, Theisen I, Wilhelmi H (1998). Classification and terminology of plant epicuticular waxes.Bot J Linn Soc 126, 237-260. [7] Barthlott W, Schimmel T, Wiersch S, Koch K, Brede M, Barczewski M, Walheim S, Weis A, Kaltenmaier A, Leder A, Bohn HF (2010). TheSalvinia paradox: superhydrophobic surfaces with hydrophilic pins for air retention under water. Adv Mater 22, 2325-2328. [8] Barthlott W, Wiersch S, Čolić Z, Koch K (2009). Classification of trichome types within species of the water fernSalvinia, and ontogeny of the egg-beater trichomes. Botany 87, 830-836. [9] Cassie ABD, Baxter S (1944). Wettability of porous surfaces.Trans Faraday Soc 40, 546-551. [10] Feng L, Zhang YN, Xi JM, Zhu Y, Wang N, Xia F, Jiang L (2008). Petal effect: a superhydrophobic state with high adhesive force.Langmuir 24, 4114-4119. [11] Fogg GE (1944). Diurnal fluctuation in a physical property of leaf cuticle.Nature 154, 515. [12] Gao LC, McCarthy TJ (2006). The “lotus effect” explained: two reasons why two length scales of topography are important.Langmuir 22, 2966-2967. [13] Gao XF, Jiang L (2004). Water-repellent legs of water striders.Nature 432, 36. [14] Guo ZG, Liu WM (2007). Biomimic from the superhydrophobic plant leaves in nature: binary structure and unitary structure.Plant Sci 172, 1103-1112. [15] Hansen WR, Autumn K (2005). Evidence for self-cleaning in gecko setae.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 385-389. [16] Jeffree CE (1986). The cuticle, epicuticular waxes and trichomes of plants, with reference to their structure, functions and evolution. In: Juniper BE, Southwood TRE, eds. Insects and the Plant Surface. London: Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd. pp. 23-64. [17] Jin DM, Zhou XL, Schneider H, Wei HJ, Wei HY, Yan YH (2021). Functional traits: adaption of ferns in forest.J Syst Evol 59, 1040-1050. [18] Law KY (2014). Definitions for hydrophilicity, hydrophobicity, and superhydrophobicity: getting the basics right.J Phys Chem Lett 5, 686-688. [19] Li MT, Yu LJ, Li W, Li Q, Li T, Miao YJ, Liu JM (2006). Ecological adaptation ofAdiantum flabellulatum leaf in Karst areas. Chin Bull Bot 23, 691-697. (in Chinese with English abstract) 栗茂腾, 余龙江, 李为, 李强, 李涛, 苗英杰, 刘建民 (2006). 扇叶铁线蕨叶片对岩溶环境的生态适应. 植物学通报 23, 691-697. [20] Neinhuis C, Barthlott W (1997). Characterization and distribution of water-repellent, self-cleaning plant surfaces.Ann Bot 79, 667-677. [21] Nguyen SH, Webb HK, Mahon PJ, Crawford RJ, Ivanova EP (2014). Natural insect and plant micro-/nanostructured surfaces: an excellent selection of valuable templates with superhydrophobic and self-cleaning properties.Molecules 19, 13614-13630. [22] Prats KA (2022). Fern Ecophysiology: Linking Photosynthesis, Water Relations, and Stomatal Dynamics in Ferns. PhD dissertation. New Haven: Yale University. pp. 1-168. [23] Smith WK, McClean TM (1989). Adaptive relationship between leaf water repellency, stomatal distribution, and gas exchange.Am J Bot 76, 465-469. [24] Wenzel RN (1936). Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water.Ind Eng Chem 28, 988-994. [25] Young T (1805). An essay on the cohesion of fluids.Philos Trans R Soc Lond 95, 65-87. [26] Zhang KX, Li Z, Maxey M, Chen S, Karniadakis GE (2019). Self-cleaning of hydrophobic rough surfaces by coalescence-induced wetting transition.Langmuir 35, 2431-2442. [27] Zhang SB, Sun M, Cao KF, Hu H, Zhang JL (2014). Leaf photosynthetic rate of tropical ferns is evolutionarily linked to water transport capacity.PLoS One 9, e84682. |
| [1] | 赵翊硕, 马雅真, 王天瑞, 周琦, 凌峰, 杨启池, 李因刚, 邱英雄. 银缕梅种群遗传结构解析与迁地保护技术体系构建[J]. 生物多样性, 2026, 34(8): 26207-. |
| [2] | 伊日贵, 祁得林, 朱世海, 杨婷婷, 刘丹, 高强, 夏明哲, 王维, 聂苗苗, 贾军梅, 张存芳. 基于Cyt b序列的高原鳅属鱼类物种鉴定: 系统发育与机器学习方法比较[J]. 生物多样性, 2026, 34(7): 26044-. |
| [3] | 郝晨阳, 高少羽, 程跃华, 扎西尼玛, 徐波, 杨扬. 横断山区高山冰缘植物毡毛雪莲紧实深色头状花序的生态功能[J]. 生物多样性, 2026, 34(5): 25489-. |
| [4] | 王姗姗, 刘琦, 李玉, 王天瑞, 戴锡玲, Gregor Kozlowski, 许瑾, 宋以刚. 基于叶绿体基因组构建的系统发育关系应慎用于物种鉴定和生物地理学研究: 以枫杨属为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2026, 34(5): 25475-. |
| [5] | 王露红, 李波, 杨攀艳, 黄嘉琴, 谢予婷, 杜鑫, 文毅, 王彬. 四川省繁殖鸟类群落的多维度多样性及其影响因子[J]. 生物多样性, 2026, 34(4): 25464-. |
| [6] | 冯哲, 许格希, 刘顺, 陈健, 李非凡, 巩闪闪, 贾磊, 孙镇, 余美霓, 史作民, 周庆宏, 蒋冬梅. 生境因子和系统发育协同驱动云南金沙江干热河谷植物叶片化学计量特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(2): 352-361. |
| [7] | 刘子晨, 陈文娜, 黄久香, 李玉玲, 姚纲. 中新世中晚期干旱气候的建立对龙树科物种分化的潜在影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(1): 123-133. |
| [8] | 王蔼英, 廖万金. 协同演化研究: 协同系统发育分析方法与进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(8): 25112-. |
| [9] | 于琦胧, 郝珉辉, 何怀江, 张春雨, 赵秀海. 长白山森林不同演替阶段生物多样性与生产力的关系: 基于物种、性状和系统发育的视角[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(8): 25060-. |
| [10] | 曹世宁, 余博航, 李景文, 冯益明, 卢琦, 王健铭. 中国黑戈壁地区植物群落物种、功能与系统发育β多样性分布格局及其影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(8): 25134-. |
| [11] | 余德菊, 何云雲, 曹敏, 王刚, 杨洁. 基于代谢组学与转录组学技术的热带森林树种共存机制研究——以榕属植物为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(7): 24475-. |
| [12] | 宋垚彬, 董鸣, 于飞海, 叶学华, 刘建. 克隆植物生态学: 响应与效应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(7): 999-1037. |
| [13] | 陈凯, 杨艳, 徐玲, 蒋忠华. 滇西南山地球花报春种子形态与萌发沿海拔梯度的变异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(7): 1119-1127. |
| [14] | 罗号东, 刘勇波. 植物卷须发生及调控机制研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2025, 60(6): 993-1004. |
| [15] | 傅强, 王雨婷, 饶羽菲, 黄丽改, 王晶晶, 苗妙, 孟红杰. 湖北省石松类和蕨类植物名录与地理分布[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(6): 24449-. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||