利用荧光标记SSR鉴别21个茶花新品种

doi:10.11983/CBB18019

植物学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (1): 37-45.DOI: 10.11983/CBB18019

利用荧光标记SSR鉴别21个茶花新品种

陶乃奇¹,张斌^2,³,刘信凯⁴,周和达²,钟乃盛⁴,严丹峰⁴,张敏¹,高继银⁴,张文驹^1,^*()

1 复旦大学生命科学学院生物多样性科学研究所, 生物多样性与生态工程教育部重点实验室, 上海 200433
2 上海星源农业实验场, 上海 201417
3 上海市农业发展促进中心, 上海 200335
4 棕榈生态城镇发展股份有限公司, 广州 510627

收稿日期:2018-01-18 接受日期:2018-04-28 出版日期:2019-01-01 发布日期:2019-07-31
通讯作者: 张文驹
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(31670223);上海市农委农业种质资源创新与良种良法配套技术集成应用沪农科种字(2015第10号No.2016F2FC0012)

Identification of 21 New Camellia Hybrid Varieties by Fluorescence-labelled Simple Sequence Repeat Markers

Naiqi Tao¹,Bin Zhang^2,³,Xinkai Liu⁴,Heda Zhou²,Naisheng Zhong⁴,Danfeng Yan⁴,Min Zhang¹,Jiyin Gao⁴,Wenju Zhang^1,^*()

1 Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Institute of Biodiversity Science, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
2 Shanghai Xingyuan Agricultural Experiment Center, Shanghai 201417, China
3 Shanghai Agricultural Development and Promotion Center, Shanghai 200335, China
4 Palm Eco-Town Development Co, Ltd, Guangzhou 510627, China

Received:2018-01-18 Accepted:2018-04-28 Online:2019-01-01 Published:2019-07-31
Contact: Wenju Zhang

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用杜鹃红山茶(Camellia azalea)转录组数据和前人研究中获得的12个高多态性的SSR位点, 采用荧光毛细管电泳分析了21个茶花杂交新品种的基因型。结果显示, 12对SSR引物都能获得稳定清晰的扩增产物, 且上述12个SSR位点的基因型能够完全区分上述21个茶花新品种。其中, 来自同一杂交组合后代的多个品种, 基因型间有差异的位点数为2-10个, 来自不同杂交组合后代的品种间, 其基因型有差异的位点数为5-12个。研究结果表明, 上述21个茶花新品种均获得了独特的基因型标记, 能准确地进行品种身份鉴定, 这对以扦插或嫁接扩大生产的茶花品种的鉴定和品种权保护具有重要意义。

关键词: 山茶属, 荧光标记SSR, 新品种保护, 品种鉴定

Abstract: In this study, 12 highly polymorphic simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci were selected from Camellia azalea transcriptome data and previous studies, and the genotypes of 21 new Camellia hybrid varieties were analyzed by fluorescence capillary electrophoresis. Repeatable and distinct amplification products could be obtained at 12 SSR loci from all samples, and 21 new varieties could be identified by the specific genotype of 12 SSR loci. Significantly, for the 21 new varieties, the number of discrepant loci was 2 to 10 among varieties from the same parental combination but 5 to 12 among varieties from different combinations. Hence, each of the 21 varieties was marked by a unique group of molecular markers, which can be used to identify these varieties accurately. These markers are very useful for identifying and protecting Camellia varieties, especially for those propagated that are produced by grafting or cutting.

Key words: Camellia, fluorescence labelled SSR, new variety protection, variety identification

陶乃奇,张斌,刘信凯,周和达,钟乃盛,严丹峰,张敏,高继银,张文驹. 利用荧光标记SSR鉴别21个茶花新品种. 植物学报, 2019, 54(1): 37-45.

Naiqi Tao,Bin Zhang,Xinkai Liu,Heda Zhou,Naisheng Zhong,Danfeng Yan,Min Zhang,Jiyin Gao,Wenju Zhang. Identification of 21 New Camellia Hybrid Varieties by Fluorescence-labelled Simple Sequence Repeat Markers. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2019, 54(1): 37-45.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.chinbullbotany.com/CN/10.11983/CBB18019

https://www.chinbullbotany.com/CN/Y2019/V54/I1/37

图/表 7

参考文献 38

1	陈赢男, 张新叶, 戴晓港 ( 2014). 利用微卫星标记鉴别油茶品种. 经济林研究 32(4), 140-143.
2	陈雨, 潘大建, 曲延英, 范芝兰, 陈建酉, 李晨 ( 2008). 广东高州7个普通野生稻居群遗传结构的SSR分析. 植物学报 25, 430-436. DOI URL
3	段云裳, 姜燕华, 王丽鸳, 成浩, 房婉萍, 黎星辉 ( 2011). 我国茶树主要骨干亲本及其衍生品种(系)的SSR分析. 植物遗传资源学报 12, 533-538.
4	高继银, 刘信凯, 赵强民 (2016). 四季茶花杂交新品种彩色图集.杭州: 浙江科学技术出版社. pp. 26-36.
5	郭琪, 郭大龙, 郭丽丽, 张琳, 侯小改 ( 2015). SSR分子标记在牡丹亲缘关系研究中的应用与研究进展. 植物学报 50, 652-664. DOI URL
6	胡兴华, 王燕, 邹玲俐, 黄仕训 ( 2013). 茶花品种SSR指纹图谱分型技术反应体系优化. 中国农学通报 29, 127-131. DOI URL
7	李琳琳, 黄万坚, 刘信凯, 高继银, 李凯凯, 叶创兴, 石祥刚 ( 2014). 应用SSR分子标记技术鉴定张氏红山茶杂交F₁代真实性的研究. 广东园林 36(2), 44-47. DOI URL
8	李汝玉, 李群, 张文兰, 张晗, 宋国安, 王东建 ( 2007). 利用SSR标记进行小麦品种鉴定和新品种保护研究. 山东农业科学 ( 6), 14-17. DOI URL
9	李艳梅 ( 2016). 花开大理四会同办——2016大理国际茶花大会召开. 中国花卉园艺 ( 5), 36-38.
10	刘振, 王新超, 赵丽萍, 姚明哲, 王平盛, 许玫, 唐一春, 陈亮 ( 2008). 基于EST-SSR的西南茶区茶树资源遗传多样性和亲缘关系分析. 分子植物育种 6, 100-110. DOI URL
11	闵天禄 (2000). 世界山茶属的研究. 昆明: 云南科技出版社. pp. 1-35.
12	邱杨, 李锡香, 李清霞, 陈亦辰, 沈镝, 王海平, 宋江萍 ( 2014). 利用SSR标记构建萝卜种质资源分子身份证. 植物遗传资源学报 15, 648-654. DOI URL
13	邵阳, 范文, 黄连冬, 高继银, 李昕骥, 张文驹 ( 2015). 基于RNA-seq的崇左金花茶EST-SSR标记开发. 复旦学报(自然科学版) 54, 761-767.
14	申屠文月, 陈析丰, 马伯军 ( 2006). 3个山茶花变异品种的形态鉴定和RAPD分析. 浙江师范大学学报(自然科学版) 29, 317-321. DOI URL
15	徐雷锋, 葛亮, 袁素霞, 任君芳, 袁迎迎, 李雅男, 刘春, 明军 ( 2014). 利用荧光标记SSR构建百合种质资源分子身份证. 园艺学报 41, 2055-2064.
16	张冰清, 陆徐忠, 吴新杰, 李莉, 陈凤祥, 马琳, 张小娟, 倪金龙, 汪秀峰, 秦瑞英, 杨剑波 ( 2014). 利用SSR标记进行杂交油菜品种鉴定. 中国油料作物学报 36, 728-734. DOI URL
17	张嘉, 刘爱青, 张淑玲, 解莹然, 刘燕 ( 2016). 利用荧光标记SSR绘制中国芍药品种分子身份证. 北京林业大学学报 38(6), 101-109. DOI URL
18	张景荣, 刘军 ( 2006). 名贵茶花种质资源的RAPD分析. 西北植物学报 26, 683-687. DOI URL
19	张晓庆 ( 2008). 中国茶花品种分类、测试指南及已知品种数据库构建. 硕士论文. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院. pp. 33-89.
20	张亚利, 宋垚, 奉树成 ( 2016). SSR分子标记在山茶属观赏资源遗传多样性研究中的应用. 植物科学学报 34, 755-764. DOI URL
21	中国国家林业局 ( 2000). 中华人民共和国林业植物新品种保护名录(第一批). 科技与法律 ( 1), 150.
22	周文才, 温强, 杨军, 王建文, 徐立安, 徐林初 ( 2017). 油茶栽培品种SSR指纹图谱构建及聚类分析. 分子植物育种 15, 238-249.
23	Bartholomew B ( 1980). Corrigenda to the origin and classification of the garden varieties of Camellia reticulata.American Camellia Yearbook 35, 1-29.
24	Chen ZY, Jiang YS, Wang ZF, Wei JQ, Wei X, Tang H, Li ZC ( 2010). Development and characterization of microsatellite markers for Camellia nitidissima.Conserv Genet 11, 1163-1165.
25	Cipriani G, Marrazzo MT, Marconi R, Cimato A, Testolin R ( 2002). Microsatellite markers isolated in olive ( Olea europaea L.) are suitable for individual fingerprinting and reveal polymorphism within ancient cultivars.Theor Appl Genet 104, 223-228. DOI URL PMID
26	Doyle JJ, Doyle JL ( 1987). A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19, 11-15.
27	Freeman S, West J, James C, Lea V, Mayes S ( 2004). Isolation and characterization of highly polymorphic microsatellites in tea ( Camellia sinensis).Mol Ecol Notes 4, 324-326. DOI URL
28	Gianfranceschi L, Seglias N, Tarchini R, Komjanc M, Gessler C ( 1998). Simple sequence repeats for the ge- netic analysis of apple. Theor Appl Genet 96, 1069-1076. DOI URL
29	Kalia RK, Rai MK, Kalia S, Singh R, Dhawan AK ( 2011). Microsatellite markers: an overview of the recent progress in plants. Euphytica 177, 309-334. DOI URL
30	Kaundun SS, Matusmoto S ( 2002). Heterologous nuclear and chloroplast microsatellite amplification and variation in tea, Camellia sinensis.Genome 45, 1041-1048. DOI URL PMID
31	Liufu YQ, Peng GQ, Lu YB, Ye QQ, Tang SQ ( 2014). De- velopment and characterization of 38 microsatellite markers for Camellia flavida based on transcriptome sequen-cing.Conserv Genet Resour 6, 1007-1010. DOI URL
32	Nei M ( 1973). Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70, 3321-3323. DOI URL PMID
33	Powell W, Machray GC, Provan J ( 1996 a). Polymorphism revealed by simple sequence repeats. Trends Plant Sci 1, 215-222. DOI URL
34	Powell W, Morgante M, Andre C, Hanafey M, Vogel J, Tingey S, Rafalski A ( 1996 b). The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Mol Breed 2, 225-238.
35	Rongwen J, Akkaya MS, Bhagwat AA, Lavi U, Cregan PB ( 1995). The use of microsatellite DNA markers for soybean genotype identification. Theor Appl Genet 90, 43-48. DOI URL PMID
36	Wendel JF, Parks CR ( 1983). Cultivar identification in Camellia japonica L.using allozyme polymorphisms. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 108, 290-295.
37	Xu J, Huang LD, Xu Y, Zhang WJ ( 2009). Identifying hybrids of golden Camellia using SSR molecular markers.J Fudan Univ (Nat Sci) 48, 668-673.
38	Yeh FC, Yang RC, Boyle T, Ye ZH, Mao JX ( 1999). POPGENE, Version 1.32: the user friendly software for population genetic analysis.

Cross combination No.	New variety No.	Parental types of cross combinations
ZH-01	SJ-01	Var. B (♀)×Var. A (♂)
	SJ-02	Var. B (♀)×Var. A (♂)
	SJ-03	Var. B (♀)×Var. A (♂)
	SJ-04	Var. B (♀)×Var. A (♂)
ZH-02	SJ-05	Var. C (♀)×Var. A (♂)
	SJ-06	Var. C (♀)×Var. A (♂)
	SJ-07	Var. C (♀)×Var. A (♂)
	SJ-08	Var. C (♀)×Var. A (♂)
ZH-03	SJ-09	Var. D (♀)×Var. A (♂)
	SJ-10	Var. D (♀)×Var. A (♂)
	SJ-11	Var. D (♀)×Var. A (♂)
ZH-04	SJ-12	Var. E (♀)×Var. A (♂)
ZH-05	SJ-13	Var. F (♀)×Var. A (♂)
ZH-06	SJ-14	Var. A (♀)×Var. G (♂)
	SJ-15	Var. A (♀)×Var. G (♂)
	SJ-16	Var. A (♀)×Var. G (♂)
ZH-07	SJ-17	Var. A (♀)×Var. H (♂)
ZH-07	SJ-18	Var. A (♀)×Var. H (♂)
ZH-08	SJ-19	Var. A (♀)×Var. I (♂)
ZH-09	SJ-20	Var. A (♀)×Var. J (♂)
ZH-10	SJ-21	Var. A (♀)×Var. K (♂)

Cross combination No.	New variety No.	Parental types of cross combinations
ZH-01	SJ-01	Var. B (♀)×Var. A (♂)
	SJ-02	Var. B (♀)×Var. A (♂)
	SJ-03	Var. B (♀)×Var. A (♂)
	SJ-04	Var. B (♀)×Var. A (♂)
ZH-02	SJ-05	Var. C (♀)×Var. A (♂)
	SJ-06	Var. C (♀)×Var. A (♂)
	SJ-07	Var. C (♀)×Var. A (♂)
	SJ-08	Var. C (♀)×Var. A (♂)
ZH-03	SJ-09	Var. D (♀)×Var. A (♂)
	SJ-10	Var. D (♀)×Var. A (♂)
	SJ-11	Var. D (♀)×Var. A (♂)
ZH-04	SJ-12	Var. E (♀)×Var. A (♂)
ZH-05	SJ-13	Var. F (♀)×Var. A (♂)
ZH-06	SJ-14	Var. A (♀)×Var. G (♂)
	SJ-15	Var. A (♀)×Var. G (♂)
	SJ-16	Var. A (♀)×Var. G (♂)
ZH-07	SJ-17	Var. A (♀)×Var. H (♂)
ZH-07	SJ-18	Var. A (♀)×Var. H (♂)
ZH-08	SJ-19	Var. A (♀)×Var. I (♂)
ZH-09	SJ-20	Var. A (♀)×Var. J (♂)
ZH-10	SJ-21	Var. A (♀)×Var. K (♂)

No.	Primer sequences (5′-3′)	Repeat motifs	Ta (°C)	References
478	F: CAACACCACCAACAAGA	(AAAGG)4	53	Liu et al., 2008
478	R: GATATGAGATCCGTCCC	(AAAGG)4	53	Liu et al., 2008
SSR2	F: TATTGCCTACGACCATTTCCA	(GA)14	56	Kaundun and Matsumoto, 2002
SSR2	R: TTTGAGTTCGTTGCCTTCTCT	(GA)14	56	Kaundun and Matsumoto, 2002
CamsinM11	F: GCATCATTCCACCACTCACC	(CA)12	60	Freeman et al., 2004
CamsinM11	R: GTCATCAAACCAGTGGCTCA	(CA)12	60	Freeman et al., 2004
CamSSR01	F: CCAACAAGAATCAGGAAGAG	(AAT)6	54	In this study
CamSSR01	R: ATCCAACGGTGGTAGACGAG	(AAT)6	54	In this study
CamSSR02	F: AGTTCCGCCTCCAGTTTGAC	(ACG)7	54	In this study
CamSSR02	R: GGACCGAGAGGTAACAGTGG	(ACG)7	54	In this study
CamSSR03	F: GCCACTACCCTCTTTACACC	(CAC)7	55	In this study
CamSSR03	R: TTCTCTTCCTCTTTCTTCCC	(CAC)7	55	In this study
CamSSR04	F: ATGTGTTGAGTAGCGAGCGT	(AT)10	56	In this study
CamSSR04	R: TTGTCCATCTTTATGTAGGG	(AT)10	56	In this study
CamSSR05	F: GCAAACACCAACTGATTACC	(TA)10	56	In this study
CamSSR05	R: TTCCATACAACTCAACCAAA	(TA)10	56	In this study
CamSSR06	F: GGTTTGGAAAAAGGACACGC	(GCC)7	58	In this study
CamSSR06	R: AATCTGCCTCTGGTAGTCCG	(GCC)7	58	In this study
CamSSR07	F: TCTCATCCCCATCTTTATCC	(TCC)7	58	In this study
CamSSR07	R: GTTCCCTGCTGCTGTTGTTA	(TCC)7	58	In this study
CamSSR08	F: TCACCAGTCACTTTCCCTCC	(AC)10	58	In this study
CamSSR08	R: CCACCAAAAGGCACAATACC	(AC)10	58	In this study
CamSSR09	F: CATCATCCATCAAACCGTCC	(AT)10	58	In this study
CamSSR09	R: GAAGGCACATTGGTTCTGGG	(AT)10	58	In this study

No.	Primer sequences (5′-3′)	Repeat motifs	Ta (°C)	References
478	F: CAACACCACCAACAAGA	(AAAGG)4	53	Liu et al., 2008
478	R: GATATGAGATCCGTCCC	(AAAGG)4	53	Liu et al., 2008
SSR2	F: TATTGCCTACGACCATTTCCA	(GA)14	56	Kaundun and Matsumoto, 2002
SSR2	R: TTTGAGTTCGTTGCCTTCTCT	(GA)14	56	Kaundun and Matsumoto, 2002
CamsinM11	F: GCATCATTCCACCACTCACC	(CA)12	60	Freeman et al., 2004
CamsinM11	R: GTCATCAAACCAGTGGCTCA	(CA)12	60	Freeman et al., 2004
CamSSR01	F: CCAACAAGAATCAGGAAGAG	(AAT)6	54	In this study
CamSSR01	R: ATCCAACGGTGGTAGACGAG	(AAT)6	54	In this study
CamSSR02	F: AGTTCCGCCTCCAGTTTGAC	(ACG)7	54	In this study
CamSSR02	R: GGACCGAGAGGTAACAGTGG	(ACG)7	54	In this study
CamSSR03	F: GCCACTACCCTCTTTACACC	(CAC)7	55	In this study
CamSSR03	R: TTCTCTTCCTCTTTCTTCCC	(CAC)7	55	In this study
CamSSR04	F: ATGTGTTGAGTAGCGAGCGT	(AT)10	56	In this study
CamSSR04	R: TTGTCCATCTTTATGTAGGG	(AT)10	56	In this study
CamSSR05	F: GCAAACACCAACTGATTACC	(TA)10	56	In this study
CamSSR05	R: TTCCATACAACTCAACCAAA	(TA)10	56	In this study
CamSSR06	F: GGTTTGGAAAAAGGACACGC	(GCC)7	58	In this study
CamSSR06	R: AATCTGCCTCTGGTAGTCCG	(GCC)7	58	In this study
CamSSR07	F: TCTCATCCCCATCTTTATCC	(TCC)7	58	In this study
CamSSR07	R: GTTCCCTGCTGCTGTTGTTA	(TCC)7	58	In this study
CamSSR08	F: TCACCAGTCACTTTCCCTCC	(AC)10	58	In this study
CamSSR08	R: CCACCAAAAGGCACAATACC	(AC)10	58	In this study
CamSSR09	F: CATCATCCATCAAACCGTCC	(AT)10	58	In this study
CamSSR09	R: GAAGGCACATTGGTTCTGGG	(AT)10	58	In this study

Primers	Na	Ne	PIC
478	7.00	4.12	0.72
SSR2	6.00	2.63	0.58
CamsinM11	4.00	1.85	0.43
CamSSR01	3.00	1.48	0.29
CamSSR02	4.00	2.97	0.62
CamSSR03	6.00	4.96	0.77
CamSSR04	6.00	2.99	0.62
CamSSR05	4.00	2.82	0.58
CamSSR06	4.00	1.76	0.41
CamSSR07	4.00	1.58	0.35
CamSSR08	6.00	4.96	0.77
CamSSR09	5.00	2.32	0.49
(mean)	4.92	2.87	0.55

利用荧光标记SSR鉴别21个茶花新品种

Identification of 21 New Camellia Hybrid Varieties by Fluorescence-labelled Simple Sequence Repeat Markers

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 38

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

Code of pattern	Cam- SSR08	Cam- SSR04	478	SSR2	Cam- SSR03	Cam- SSR09	Cam- SSR06	Cam- sinM11	Cam- SSR01	Cam- SSR07	Cam- SSR05	Cam- SSR02
1	125/131	165/167	113/115	217	278/313	209/215	176/185	171	188/200	206	234/240	271/274
2	125/135	165/171	113/129	217/219	278/321	211/217	179/182	173	195	206/212	234/242	271/277
3	127	167	115	217/225	278/322	213/215	179/185	177	195/200	206/215	236/240	271/283
4	127/131	167/171	115/129	217/227	278/323	215	182/185	181	200	206/221
5	129	167/173	117/129	217/231	307/321	215/217	185
6	129/131	169/171	121/129	217/235	307/322	217
7	129/133	171	123/129	219/235	307/323
8	129/135	171/173	123/133
9	131/133	171/175
A	133
B	133/135

No.	Molecular identity code	No.	Molecular identity code
SJ-01	192315514322	SJ-12	393121414432
SJ-02	291315514322	SJ-13	485225334121
SJ-03	122516514322	SJ-14	546224111121
SJ-04	897336114322	SJ-15	545254111121
SJ-05	975265414113	SJ-16	646254114121
SJ-06	913235513113	SJ-17	353661513121
SJ-07	A73135522123	SJ-18	445664323113
SJ-08	A35165424121	SJ-19	934175513111
SJ-09	973663214212	SJ-20	563424544123
SJ-10	972646514212	SJ-21	748772514411
SJ-11	B61664544212

[1]	薛建华, 姜莉, 马晓林, 邴艳红, 赵思晨, 马克平. 莲品种DNA指纹图谱的构建[J]. 生物多样性, 2016, 24(1): 3-11.
[2]	徐颖, 徐晶, 高继银, 张文驹. 山茶属植物ITS的多态性——一个广泛逃离一致性进化的实例[J]. 植物学报, 2011, 46(2): 162-169.
[3]	梁明山曾宇周翔侯留记李霞. 遗传标记及其在作物品种鉴定中的应用[J]. 植物学报, 2001, 18(03): 257-265.