植物学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (6): 764-773.DOI: 10.11983/CBB16233
孙英坤1, 胡绍庆2, 庞基良3, 高凯1, 刘华红1, 陈焕伟4, 姚涛1, 陈林敬1, 沈柏春1,*()
收稿日期:
2016-11-30
接受日期:
2017-05-04
出版日期:
2017-11-01
发布日期:
2018-02-22
通讯作者:
沈柏春
基金资助:
Sun Yingkun1, Hu Shaoqing2, Pang Jiliang3, Gao Kai1, Liu Huahong1, Chen Huanwei4, Yao Tao1, Chen Linjing1, Shen Bochun1,*()
Received:
2016-11-30
Accepted:
2017-05-04
Online:
2017-11-01
Published:
2018-02-22
Contact:
Shen Bochun
摘要: 筛选堇叶紫金牛(Ardisia violacea)野生优株, 以其当年新发带休眠腋芽茎段为外植体, 通过启动培养、丛生芽诱导增殖、壮苗培养、生根培养和炼苗移栽等过程建立其组培快繁技术体系。研究结果表明, 最佳启动培养基为MS+0.80 mg·L-1 KT+0.10 mg·L-1 NAA+0.10 mg·L-1 IBA, 腋芽萌发率达92.60%; 最佳丛生芽诱导增殖培养基为MS1+0.50 mg·L-1 TDZ+0.10 mg·L-1 NAA, 平均增殖系数达8.60; 最佳壮苗培养基为MS+1.00 mg·L-1 KT+0.50 mg·L-1 NAA; 最佳生根培养基为1/2MS+2.00 mg·L-1 IBA+1.00 mg·L-1 NAA+1.00 mg·L-1 AC, 平均生根率达98.70%; 采用松鳞和泥炭(2:1, v/v)作为炼苗基质, 炼苗成活率可达85.30%。实验成功建立了堇叶紫金牛高效组培快繁技术体系, 经验证该体系能够满足规模化生产的需求。
孙英坤, 胡绍庆, 庞基良, 高凯, 刘华红, 陈焕伟, 姚涛, 陈林敬, 沈柏春. 珍稀濒危物种堇叶紫金牛高效快繁体系的建立. 植物学报, 2017, 52(6): 764-773.
Sun Yingkun, Hu Shaoqing, Pang Jiliang, Gao Kai, Liu Huahong, Chen Huanwei, Yao Tao, Chen Linjing, Shen Bochun. Establishment of a Tissue Culture and Propagation System for Ardisia violacea, a Rare and Endangered Species. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2017, 52(6): 764-773.
图1 堇叶紫金牛组培快繁过程(A) 启动培养; (B), (C) 增殖培养; (D) 壮苗培养; (E) 生根培养; (F) 待移栽的生根苗
Figure 1 Tissue culture and propagation process of Ardisia violacea(A) The induction of axillary buds; (B), (C) The proliferation of shoots; (D) The seedling of plantlets; (E) The rooting of plantlets; (F) The plantlets for transplantation
Treatment | Basic medium | KT (mg?L-1) | NAA (mg?L-1) | IBA (mg?L-1) | Frequency of axillary buds induction |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | MS | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 89.30%±0.028 abcAB |
2 | MS | 1.00 | 0.10 | 0.50 | 85.00%±0.002 cdBCD |
3 | MS | 1.00 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 86.10%±0.023 bcdBC |
4 | MS | 0.80 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 78.20%±0.020 efEF |
5 | MS | 0.80 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 92.60%±0.016 aA |
6 | MS | 0.80 | 0.05 | 1.00 | 74.40%±0.050 fF |
7 | MS | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.10 | 79.00%±0.041 efDEF |
8 | MS | 0.50 | 0.10 | 1.00 | 82.00%±0.018 deCDE |
9 | MS | 0.50 | 0.05 | 0.50 | 90.50%±0.023 abAB |
K1 | 0.8217 | 0.8190 | 0.9080 | ||
K2 K3 R | 0.8653 0.8367 0.0436 | 0.8457 0.8590 0.0400 | 0.7947 0.8210 0.1133 |
表1 不同启动(诱芽)培养基对堇叶紫金牛外植体茎段腋芽萌发的影响
Table 1 Effect of different initial mediums on induction of axillary buds in Ardisia violacea
Treatment | Basic medium | KT (mg?L-1) | NAA (mg?L-1) | IBA (mg?L-1) | Frequency of axillary buds induction |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | MS | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 89.30%±0.028 abcAB |
2 | MS | 1.00 | 0.10 | 0.50 | 85.00%±0.002 cdBCD |
3 | MS | 1.00 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 86.10%±0.023 bcdBC |
4 | MS | 0.80 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 78.20%±0.020 efEF |
5 | MS | 0.80 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 92.60%±0.016 aA |
6 | MS | 0.80 | 0.05 | 1.00 | 74.40%±0.050 fF |
7 | MS | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.10 | 79.00%±0.041 efDEF |
8 | MS | 0.50 | 0.10 | 1.00 | 82.00%±0.018 deCDE |
9 | MS | 0.50 | 0.05 | 0.50 | 90.50%±0.023 abAB |
K1 | 0.8217 | 0.8190 | 0.9080 | ||
K2 K3 R | 0.8653 0.8367 0.0436 | 0.8457 0.8590 0.0400 | 0.7947 0.8210 0.1133 |
Element | DEVSQ | Degree of freedom | F value | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|
KT NAA IBA | 0.0089 0.0075 0.0633 | 2 2 2 | 5.6461 4.7579 40.3488 | * * ** |
表2 堇叶紫金牛腋芽平均萌发率的正交实验方差分析
Table 2 Variance analysis of germination frequency of axil- lary buds in Ardisia violacea
Element | DEVSQ | Degree of freedom | F value | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|
KT NAA IBA | 0.0089 0.0075 0.0633 | 2 2 2 | 5.6461 4.7579 40.3488 | * * ** |
Treatment | Basic medium | TDZ (mg?L-1) | NAA (mg?L-1) | The average prolix- feration coefficient | Multiple shoots growth condition |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | MS | 0.80 | 1.00 | 7.26±0.316 dE | Poor growth; small buds; leaves almost undifferentiated |
2 | MS | 0.50 | 0.50 | 8.54±0.314 bBC | Poor growth; small buds; leaves almost undifferentiated |
3 | MS | 0.10 | 0.10 | 8.47±0.155 bBC | Poor growth; small buds; leaves almost undifferentiated |
4 | MS1 | 0.80 | 0.50 | 8.42±0.053 bcBC | Vigorous growth; bud clusters; bud clusters could be sep- arated into several independent and complete shoots; leav- es almost differentiated |
5 | MS1 | 0.50 | 0.10 | 8.60±0.3126 bB | Vigorous growth; bud clusters; bud clusters could be sep- arated into several independent and complete shoots; leav- es almost differentiated |
6 | MS1 | 0.10 | 1.00 | 7.65±0.132 dDE | Vigorous growth; bud clusters; bud clusters could be sep- arated into several independent and complete shoots; leav- es almost differentiated |
7 | MS2 | 0.80 | 0.10 | 9.20±0.223 aA | Vigorous growth; bud clusters; bud clusters couldn’t be sep- arated into several independent and complete shoots; leav- es almost undifferentiated |
8 | MS2 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 9.48±0.164 aA | Vigorous growth; bud clusters; bud clusters couldn’t be sep- arated into several independent and complete shoots; leav- es almost undifferentiated |
9 | MS2 | 0.10 | 0.50 | 8.05±0.239 cCD | Vigorous growth; bud clusters; bud clusters couldn’t be sep- arated into several independent and complete shoots; leav- es almost undifferentiated |
K1 | 8.0900 | 8.2933 | 8.1300 | ||
K2 K3 R | 8.2233 8.9100 0.8200 | 8.8733 8.0567 0.8166 | 8.3367 8.7567 0.6267 |
表3 不同培养基对堇叶紫金牛丛生芽诱导增殖的影响
Table 3 Effect of different mediums on proliferation of shoots in Ardisia violacea
Treatment | Basic medium | TDZ (mg?L-1) | NAA (mg?L-1) | The average prolix- feration coefficient | Multiple shoots growth condition |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | MS | 0.80 | 1.00 | 7.26±0.316 dE | Poor growth; small buds; leaves almost undifferentiated |
2 | MS | 0.50 | 0.50 | 8.54±0.314 bBC | Poor growth; small buds; leaves almost undifferentiated |
3 | MS | 0.10 | 0.10 | 8.47±0.155 bBC | Poor growth; small buds; leaves almost undifferentiated |
4 | MS1 | 0.80 | 0.50 | 8.42±0.053 bcBC | Vigorous growth; bud clusters; bud clusters could be sep- arated into several independent and complete shoots; leav- es almost differentiated |
5 | MS1 | 0.50 | 0.10 | 8.60±0.3126 bB | Vigorous growth; bud clusters; bud clusters could be sep- arated into several independent and complete shoots; leav- es almost differentiated |
6 | MS1 | 0.10 | 1.00 | 7.65±0.132 dDE | Vigorous growth; bud clusters; bud clusters could be sep- arated into several independent and complete shoots; leav- es almost differentiated |
7 | MS2 | 0.80 | 0.10 | 9.20±0.223 aA | Vigorous growth; bud clusters; bud clusters couldn’t be sep- arated into several independent and complete shoots; leav- es almost undifferentiated |
8 | MS2 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 9.48±0.164 aA | Vigorous growth; bud clusters; bud clusters couldn’t be sep- arated into several independent and complete shoots; leav- es almost undifferentiated |
9 | MS2 | 0.10 | 0.50 | 8.05±0.239 cCD | Vigorous growth; bud clusters; bud clusters couldn’t be sep- arated into several independent and complete shoots; leav- es almost undifferentiated |
K1 | 8.0900 | 8.2933 | 8.1300 | ||
K2 K3 R | 8.2233 8.9100 0.8200 | 8.8733 8.0567 0.8166 | 8.3367 8.7567 0.6267 |
Element | DEVSQ | Degree of freedom | F value | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|
Basic medium TDZ NAA | 3.4851 3.1781 1.8355 | 2 2 2 | 33.0721 30.1588 17.4180 | ** ** ** |
表4 堇叶紫金牛平均增殖系数的正交实验方差分析
Table 4 Variance analysis of the average proliferation coefficient in Ardisia violacea
Element | DEVSQ | Degree of freedom | F value | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|
Basic medium TDZ NAA | 3.4851 3.1781 1.8355 | 2 2 2 | 33.0721 30.1588 17.4180 | ** ** ** |
Treatment | Basic medium | KT (mg?L-1) | NAA (mg?L-1) | The average height of plantlet (cm) | The thickness and strength of the plantlet stem |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | MS | 1.00 | 0.50 | 4.62±0.20 cB | + + + + + |
2 | MS | 0.80 | 0.10 | 3.50±0.74 C | + + + + |
3 | MS | 0.50 | 0.05 | 4.82±0.11 bcAB | + + + |
4 | MS1 | 1.00 | 0.10 | 5.60±0.11 aA | + |
5 | MS1 | 0.80 | 0.05 | 5.18±0.27 abcAB | + + |
6 | MS1 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 5.42±0.05 abAB | + |
7 | MS2 | 1.00 | 0.05 | 4.90±0.11 bcAB | + + |
8 | MS2 | 0.80 | 0.50 | 4.87±0.25 bcAB | + + + |
9 | MS2 | 0.50 | 0.10 | 3.64±0.82 dC | + + + + |
K1 | 4.3133 | 5.0400 | 4.9700 | ||
K2 K3 R | 5.4000 4.4700 1.0867 | 4.5167 4.6267 0.5233 | 4.2467 4.9667 0.7233 |
表5 不同培养基对堇叶紫金牛壮苗培养的影响
Table 5 Effect of different media on seedling of plantlets in Ardisia violacea
Treatment | Basic medium | KT (mg?L-1) | NAA (mg?L-1) | The average height of plantlet (cm) | The thickness and strength of the plantlet stem |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | MS | 1.00 | 0.50 | 4.62±0.20 cB | + + + + + |
2 | MS | 0.80 | 0.10 | 3.50±0.74 C | + + + + |
3 | MS | 0.50 | 0.05 | 4.82±0.11 bcAB | + + + |
4 | MS1 | 1.00 | 0.10 | 5.60±0.11 aA | + |
5 | MS1 | 0.80 | 0.05 | 5.18±0.27 abcAB | + + |
6 | MS1 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 5.42±0.05 abAB | + |
7 | MS2 | 1.00 | 0.05 | 4.90±0.11 bcAB | + + |
8 | MS2 | 0.80 | 0.50 | 4.87±0.25 bcAB | + + + |
9 | MS2 | 0.50 | 0.10 | 3.64±0.82 dC | + + + + |
K1 | 4.3133 | 5.0400 | 4.9700 | ||
K2 K3 R | 5.4000 4.4700 1.0867 | 4.5167 4.6267 0.5233 | 4.2467 4.9667 0.7233 |
Element | DEVSQ | Degree of freedom | F value | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|
Basic medium KT NAA | 6.2109 1.3705 3.1249 | 2 2 2 | 19.6740 4.3412 9.8986 | ** * ** |
表6 堇叶紫金牛无菌小苗植株平均高度的正交实验方差分析
Table 6 Variance analysis of average height of Ardisia vio- lacea
Element | DEVSQ | Degree of freedom | F value | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|
Basic medium KT NAA | 6.2109 1.3705 3.1249 | 2 2 2 | 19.6740 4.3412 9.8986 | ** * ** |
Treatment | Basic medium | IBA (mg?L-1) | NAA (mg?L-1) | Frequency of shoots rooting | The average root number of per plantlet | The average length of the roots of per plantlet (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | MS | 2.00 | 1.50 | 93.30%±0.021 dC | 3.60±0.6 abcABC | 2.96±0.10 eC |
2 | MS | 1.50 | 1.00 | 95.30%±0.031 cdBC | 2.80±0.36 cdeBCDE | 4.22±0.11 cB |
3 | MS | 1.00 | 0.50 | 93.80%±0.013 dC | 2.50±053 deCDE | 4.60±0.28 bcB |
4 | 1/2MS | 2.00 | 1.00 | 98.70%±0.006 abAB | 4.60±0.26 Aa | 3.18±0.08 dC |
5 | 1/2MS | 1.50 | 0.50 | 99.10%±0.008 abAB | 2.00±0.95 eDE | 4.74±0.07 bAB |
6 | 1/2MS | 1.00 | 1.50 | 97.20%±0.017 abcABC | 3.10±0.62 cdBCDE | 3.35±0.13 deC |
7 | 1/4MS | 2.00 | 0.50 | 96.80%±0.026 bcABC | 3.40±0.26 bcdABCD | 3.48±0.23 dC |
8 | 1/4MS | 1.50 | 1.50 | 100.00%±0.000 aA | 1.90±0.89 eE | 5.26±0.16 aA |
9 | 1/4MS | 1.00 | 1.00 | 98.20%±0.003 abAB | 4.20±0.44 abAB | 3.50±0.27 dC |
K1 | 0.9408 | 0.9627 | 0.9683 | Frequency of shoots rooting | ||
K2 K3 R | 0.9833 0.9833 0.0425 | 0.9808 0.9640 0.0181 | 0.9734 0.9657 0.0077 | |||
K1 | 2.9667 | 3.8667 | 2.8667 | |||
K2 K3 R | 3.2333 3.1667 0.2666 | 2.2333 3.2667 1.6334 | 3.8667 2.6333 1.2334 | The average root number of per plantlet | ||
K1 | 3.9267 | 3.2856 | 3.8567 | |||
K2 K3 R | 3.8356 4.0800 0.2444 | 4.7400 3.8167 1.4544 | 3.7122 4.2733 0.5611 | The average length of the roots of per plantlet |
表7 不同培养基对堇叶紫金牛生根培养的影响
Table 7 Effect of different media on rooting in Ardisia violacea
Treatment | Basic medium | IBA (mg?L-1) | NAA (mg?L-1) | Frequency of shoots rooting | The average root number of per plantlet | The average length of the roots of per plantlet (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | MS | 2.00 | 1.50 | 93.30%±0.021 dC | 3.60±0.6 abcABC | 2.96±0.10 eC |
2 | MS | 1.50 | 1.00 | 95.30%±0.031 cdBC | 2.80±0.36 cdeBCDE | 4.22±0.11 cB |
3 | MS | 1.00 | 0.50 | 93.80%±0.013 dC | 2.50±053 deCDE | 4.60±0.28 bcB |
4 | 1/2MS | 2.00 | 1.00 | 98.70%±0.006 abAB | 4.60±0.26 Aa | 3.18±0.08 dC |
5 | 1/2MS | 1.50 | 0.50 | 99.10%±0.008 abAB | 2.00±0.95 eDE | 4.74±0.07 bAB |
6 | 1/2MS | 1.00 | 1.50 | 97.20%±0.017 abcABC | 3.10±0.62 cdBCDE | 3.35±0.13 deC |
7 | 1/4MS | 2.00 | 0.50 | 96.80%±0.026 bcABC | 3.40±0.26 bcdABCD | 3.48±0.23 dC |
8 | 1/4MS | 1.50 | 1.50 | 100.00%±0.000 aA | 1.90±0.89 eE | 5.26±0.16 aA |
9 | 1/4MS | 1.00 | 1.00 | 98.20%±0.003 abAB | 4.20±0.44 abAB | 3.50±0.27 dC |
K1 | 0.9408 | 0.9627 | 0.9683 | Frequency of shoots rooting | ||
K2 K3 R | 0.9833 0.9833 0.0425 | 0.9808 0.9640 0.0181 | 0.9734 0.9657 0.0077 | |||
K1 | 2.9667 | 3.8667 | 2.8667 | |||
K2 K3 R | 3.2333 3.1667 0.2666 | 2.2333 3.2667 1.6334 | 3.8667 2.6333 1.2334 | The average root number of per plantlet | ||
K1 | 3.9267 | 3.2856 | 3.8567 | |||
K2 K3 R | 3.8356 4.0800 0.2444 | 4.7400 3.8167 1.4544 | 3.7122 4.2733 0.5611 | The average length of the roots of per plantlet |
Element | DEVSQ | Degree of freedom | F value | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|
Basic medium IBA NAA | 0.0109 0.0018 0.0003 | 2 2 2 | 19.6977 3.3244 0.5097 | ** |
表8 堇叶紫金牛平均生根率的正交实验方差分析
Table 8 Variance analysis of average frequency of rooting in Ardisia violacea
Element | DEVSQ | Degree of freedom | F value | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|
Basic medium IBA NAA | 0.0109 0.0018 0.0003 | 2 2 2 | 19.6977 3.3244 0.5097 | ** |
Element | DEVSQ | Degree of freedom | F value | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|
Basic medium IBA NAA | 0.3467 12.2867 7.7267 | 2 2 2 | 0.4890 17.3323 10.8997 | ** ** |
表9 堇叶紫金牛平均单株苗生根条数的正交实验方差分析
Table 9 Variance analysis of average root number per pla- ntlet in Ardisia violacea
Element | DEVSQ | Degree of freedom | F value | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|
Basic medium IBA NAA | 0.3467 12.2867 7.7267 | 2 2 2 | 0.4890 17.3323 10.8997 | ** ** |
Element | DEVSQ | Degree of freedom | F value | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|
Basic medium IBA NAA | 0.2747 9.7501 1.5280 | 2 2 2 | 2.7286 96.8481 15.1773 | ** ** |
表10 堇叶紫金牛单株生根苗根系平均长度的正交实验方差分析
Table 10 Variance analysis of average length of roots per plantlet in Ardisia violacea
Element | DEVSQ | Degree of freedom | F value | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|
Basic medium IBA NAA | 0.2747 9.7501 1.5280 | 2 2 2 | 2.7286 96.8481 15.1773 | ** ** |
Treatment | Matrix (v/v) | The survival rate of plantlets |
---|---|---|
1 2 3 4 | Pine bark:peat=1:1 Pine bark:peat=2:1 Perlite:peat=1:1 Perlite:peat=2:1 | 81.72%±0.012 aA 85.30%±0.036 abAB 64.30%±0.008 dC 70.24%±0.026 cdBC |
表11 不同炼苗移栽基质对堇叶紫金牛组培生根苗成活率的影响
Table 11 Effect of different matrix on survival rate of plantlets in Ardisia violacea
Treatment | Matrix (v/v) | The survival rate of plantlets |
---|---|---|
1 2 3 4 | Pine bark:peat=1:1 Pine bark:peat=2:1 Perlite:peat=1:1 Perlite:peat=2:1 | 81.72%±0.012 aA 85.30%±0.036 abAB 64.30%±0.008 dC 70.24%±0.026 cdBC |
Batch | Multiple shoots (bottle) | Regenerated plantlets (bottle) | Rooting plantlets (bottle) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 526 | 4860 | 4773 |
2 3 | 508 620 | 4816 5282 | 4623 5176 |
4 | 582 | 5122 | 5081 |
表12 堇叶紫金牛4次组培苗规模化生产相关数据
Table 12 Data contrast of four batches large-scale production of Ardisia violacea
Batch | Multiple shoots (bottle) | Regenerated plantlets (bottle) | Rooting plantlets (bottle) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 526 | 4860 | 4773 |
2 3 | 508 620 | 4816 5282 | 4623 5176 |
4 | 582 | 5122 | 5081 |
[1] | 陈肖英, 叶庆生, 刘伟 (2003). TDZ研究进展(综述). 亚热带植物科学 32(3), 59-63. |
[2] | 崔广荣, 陆峰, 曹华龙, 刘淼才, 丁为群, 张子学 (2008). 蓝莓离体叶片胚状体高效发生及其组织学观察. 激光生物学报 17, 599-607. |
[3] | 方文哲, 姚淦 (1979). 紫金牛属研究资料. 中国科学院研究生院学报 17(4), 99-100. |
[4] | 康美玲 (2003). 虎舌红组织培养技术体系研究. 硕士论文. 成都: 四川农业大学. pp. 32-33. |
[5] | 黎国运, 徐佩玲, 陈光群 (2011). 濒危植物白桂木组培育苗技术研究. 热带林业 39(3), 24-29. |
[6] | 李艳菊, 陶加洪, 王兰珍, 久岛繁 (2005). 元宝枫组织培养研究. 北京林业大学学报 27(3), 104-107. |
[7] |
刘芳, 唐映红, 袁有美, 郭清泉, 沈帆, 陈建荣 (2016). 多肉植物劳尔的组织培养. 植物学报 51, 251-257.
DOI URL |
[8] | 罗睿 (2001). 粗壮女贞的组织培养与快速繁殖. 植物生理学通讯 37, 422. |
[9] |
吕美萍, 王元忠, 黄衡宇 (2016). 地皮消愈伤组织诱导及植株高效再生体系的建立. 植物学报 51, 89-97.
DOI URL |
[10] | 孟庆敏 (2006). 复叶槭组织培养再生体系的建立. 硕士论文. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学. pp. 5. |
[11] |
苏梦云 (2005). 美国枫香茎段组织培养与植株再生. 林业科学研究 18(1), 98-101.
DOI URL |
[12] |
唐丽, 钟秋平 (2011). 景观树种红翅槭组织培养中的不定芽诱导. 湖北农业科学 50, 606-609.
DOI URL |
[13] | 王景祥, 何业祺, 章绍尧 (1993). 浙江植物志, 第5卷. 杭州: 浙江科学技术出版社. pp. 31. |
[14] | 王刘圣丹, 邱丝丝, 夏国华, 李根有 (2010). 堇叶紫金牛的组织培养与快速繁殖. 植物生理学通讯 46, 615-616. |
[15] | 王清, 王蒂, 戴朝曦, 王玉萍 (1997). 奈乙酸、2,4-D对马铃薯愈伤组织细胞染色体倍性的影响. 甘肃农业大学学报 32, 304-307. |
[16] |
邢瑞丹, 刘庆忠, 陈新, 李亚东 (2009). 两个蓝莓品种离体叶片不定芽再生体系的建立. 山东农业科学 (5), 8-11.
DOI URL |
[17] |
闫晓慧, 谈锋, 王瑞波, 胡世俊 (2013). 濒危植物皱花细辛的组织培养. 广东农业科学 40(7), 149-151.
DOI URL |
[18] |
张群 (2012). 濒危植物沼泽小叶桦组织培养技术及其在上海地区的中试. 上海交通大学学报(农业科学版) 30, 50-54, 60.
DOI URL |
[19] | 张若蕙 (1994). 浙江珍稀濒危植物. 杭州: 浙江科学技术出版社. pp. 315-318. |
[20] |
赵红艳, 江丽丽, 马淼 (2012). 濒危药用植物天山雪莲高效植株再生体系的建立. 种子 31(4), 1-3.
DOI URL |
[21] |
朱志国 (2007). 金叶日本冬青愈伤组织诱导及分化的研究. 安徽农业科学 35, 2569-2570.
DOI URL |
[22] | Chen J, Pipoly JJ III (1996). Myrsinaceae R. Brown. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, eds. Flora of China, Vol.15. Beijing: Science Press & St. Louis: Missouri Botany Garden Press. pp.10-29. |
[23] | Huang TC (1998). Flora of Taiwan, 2nd edn. Taipei: National Taiwan University Press. pp. 46. |
[1] | 郑云凤, 张晓曼, 刘晓. 红宝石球花报春腋芽再生体系的建立[J]. 植物学报, 2018, 53(5): 686-692. |
[2] | 许德成, 王小菁. 红厚壳茎段丛生芽诱导与植株再生[J]. 植物学报, 2014, 49(2): 167-172. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||