Chinese Bulletin of Botany ›› 2024, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (4): 613-625.DOI: 10.11983/CBB23178 cstr: 32102.14.CBB23178
• TECHNIQUES AND METHODS • Previous Articles Next Articles
Xuping Tian*(), Kangjie Yue, Jiali Wang, Huixin Liu, Ziyin Shi, Hongwei Kang
Received:
2023-12-29
Accepted:
2024-05-13
Online:
2024-07-10
Published:
2024-07-10
Contact:
*E-mail: txp8638@sina.com
Xuping Tian, Kangjie Yue, Jiali Wang, Huixin Liu, Ziyin Shi, Hongwei Kang. Callus Induction and Plant Regeneration of Dracocephalum rupestre[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2024, 59(4): 613-625.
Type | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | TDZ (mg∙L-1) | KT (mg∙L-1) | Occurrence time (d) | Induction rate (%) | Callus growth state |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leaves of field planted individual | 0.5 | - | - | 10.25±4.65 a | 40.36±3.17 b | Yellow with a firm and dense texture |
1.0 | - | - | 7.58±1.29 b | 65.21±9.94 a | Pale yellow-green, loose, and a softer texture | |
2.0 | - | - | 6.92±1.17 b | 67.07±9.05 a | Pale yellow, loose and watery in appearance, with a soft texture | |
- | 0.5 | - | 16.25±3.39 a | 37.98±5.73 b | Green, loose, and soft in texture, with a loose consistency | |
- | 1.0 | - | 15.83±3.58 a | 40.17±7.53 b | Green, loose, with white spots, a soft texture | |
- | 2.0 | - | 11.50±2.88 b | 62.53±6.66 a | Green, loose, with white spots, a soft texture | |
- | - | 0.5 | 9.50±2.60 a | 35.19±6.73 b | Yellow, compact, with a somewhat hard texture | |
- | - | 1.0 | 8.17±2.44 ab | 57.06±9.06 a | Brownish-yellow, compact, with a soft texture | |
- | - | 2.0 | 6.67±1.45 b | 42.53±5.84 b | Brown, loose, resembling water stains, with a soft texture | |
Leaves of tissue-cultured seedling | 0.5 | - | - | 11.08±2.69 a | 47.33±8.53 b | Yellow with a firm and dense texture |
1.0 | - | - | 10.33±1.48 a | 55.76±7.85 ab | Yellow-green, loose, with a relatively soft texture | |
2.0 | - | - | 8.17±1.27 b | 68.01±6.46 a | Yellow-green, loose, with a relatively soft texture | |
- | 0.5 | - | 14.17±2.99 a | 33.63±5.79 b | Green, loose, with a soft texture | |
- | 1.0 | - | 12.33±1.03 ab | 45.36±9.64 ab | Green, compact, with a hard texture | |
- | 2.0 | - | 10.33±2.63 b | 55.61±9.07 a | Green, loose, with a relatively soft texture | |
- | - | 0.5 | 12.92±3.62 a | 40.75±8.32 b | Pale yellow, loose, with a hard texture | |
- | - | 1.0 | 11.25±2.65 a | 63.59±7.07 a | Pale yellow, loose, with a softer texture | |
- | - | 2.0 | 8.83±1.58 b | 52.29±9.41 ab | Pale yellow, loose, and loosely resembling water stains in texture |
Table 1 Effects of cytokinins on callus induction from leaves
Type | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | TDZ (mg∙L-1) | KT (mg∙L-1) | Occurrence time (d) | Induction rate (%) | Callus growth state |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leaves of field planted individual | 0.5 | - | - | 10.25±4.65 a | 40.36±3.17 b | Yellow with a firm and dense texture |
1.0 | - | - | 7.58±1.29 b | 65.21±9.94 a | Pale yellow-green, loose, and a softer texture | |
2.0 | - | - | 6.92±1.17 b | 67.07±9.05 a | Pale yellow, loose and watery in appearance, with a soft texture | |
- | 0.5 | - | 16.25±3.39 a | 37.98±5.73 b | Green, loose, and soft in texture, with a loose consistency | |
- | 1.0 | - | 15.83±3.58 a | 40.17±7.53 b | Green, loose, with white spots, a soft texture | |
- | 2.0 | - | 11.50±2.88 b | 62.53±6.66 a | Green, loose, with white spots, a soft texture | |
- | - | 0.5 | 9.50±2.60 a | 35.19±6.73 b | Yellow, compact, with a somewhat hard texture | |
- | - | 1.0 | 8.17±2.44 ab | 57.06±9.06 a | Brownish-yellow, compact, with a soft texture | |
- | - | 2.0 | 6.67±1.45 b | 42.53±5.84 b | Brown, loose, resembling water stains, with a soft texture | |
Leaves of tissue-cultured seedling | 0.5 | - | - | 11.08±2.69 a | 47.33±8.53 b | Yellow with a firm and dense texture |
1.0 | - | - | 10.33±1.48 a | 55.76±7.85 ab | Yellow-green, loose, with a relatively soft texture | |
2.0 | - | - | 8.17±1.27 b | 68.01±6.46 a | Yellow-green, loose, with a relatively soft texture | |
- | 0.5 | - | 14.17±2.99 a | 33.63±5.79 b | Green, loose, with a soft texture | |
- | 1.0 | - | 12.33±1.03 ab | 45.36±9.64 ab | Green, compact, with a hard texture | |
- | 2.0 | - | 10.33±2.63 b | 55.61±9.07 a | Green, loose, with a relatively soft texture | |
- | - | 0.5 | 12.92±3.62 a | 40.75±8.32 b | Pale yellow, loose, with a hard texture | |
- | - | 1.0 | 11.25±2.65 a | 63.59±7.07 a | Pale yellow, loose, with a softer texture | |
- | - | 2.0 | 8.83±1.58 b | 52.29±9.41 ab | Pale yellow, loose, and loosely resembling water stains in texture |
Figure 1 Callus induction and plant regeneration from leaves (A) Field planted leaves; (B) Tissue culture seedling; (C) Leaf blade expansion; (D) Induction of callus; (E) Adventitious bud differentiation of leaves of field planted individual; (F) Adventitious bud differentiation of leaves of tissue-cultured seedling; (G) Adventitious bud proliferation; (H) Root system status; (I) Transplanting. Bars=2 cm
Figure 2 Induction and differentiation of callus tissue (A) Callus from leaves of field planted individual incorporating 6-BA; (B) Callus from leaves of field planted individual incorporating TDZ; (C) Callus from leaves of field planted individual incorporating KT; (D) Callus from leaves of tissue-cultured seedling incorporating 6-BA; (E) Callus from leaves of tissue-cultured seedling incorporating TDZ; (F) Callus from leaves of tissue-cultured seedling incorporating KT; (G) Adventitious bud malformation; (H) Concurrent differentiation of adventitious buds and roots; (I) Adventitious root differentiation. Bars=2 cm
Type | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | IAA (mg∙L-1) | Occurrence time (d) | Induction rate (%) | Callus growth state |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leaves of field planted individual | 0.5 | 0 | 10.25±4.60 b | 40.37±6.89 b | Yellow, compact, and with a hard texture |
0.5 | 0.1 | 15.25±3.72 c | 39.09±8.97 bc | Green, loose, with a softer texture | |
0.5 | 0.5 | 9.58±1.40 ab | 33.28±7.29 bc | Pale yellow, loose, with a harder texture | |
0.5 | 1.0 | 8.08±1.96 a | 26.72±5.74 c | Yellow, resembling water stains, soft texture | |
1.0 | 0 | 7.58±2.29 a | 65.33±6.56 a | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.1 | 14.67±3.08 c | 55.46±5.64 ab | Green, compact, harder texture | |
1.0 | 0.5 | 10.83±3.33 b | 47.51±6.74 b | Pale yellow, loose, soft texture | |
1.0 | 1.0 | 9.58±2.39 ab | 33.72±9.32 bc | Green loose, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0 | 6.92±2.17 a | 67.55±6.54 a | Pale yellow, loose, watery appearance, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0.1 | 11.67±1.20 b | 63.29±7.96 a | Pale green, loose, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0.5 | 12.16±2.46 bc | 54.29±8.57 ab | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 1.0 | 14.00±3.43 c | 41.31±9.03 b | Green, loose, softer texture | |
Leaves of tissue- cultured seedling | 0.5 | 0 | 11.08±2.69 b | 47.81±5.75 b | Yellow, compact, hard texture |
0.5 | 0.1 | 12.00±3.38 bc | 34.52±6.34 bc | Yellow-green, loose, soft texture | |
0.5 | 0.5 | 13.00±3.43 bc | 31.96±4.75 bc | Yellow-green, compact, softer texture | |
0.5 | 1.0 | 18.08±4.17 c | 24.07±7.22 c | Yellow-green, loose, soft texture | |
1.0 | 0 | 10.33±2.48 b | 55.67±4.21 ab | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.1 | 10.33±2.58 b | 51.34±1.99 ab | Yellow-green, loose, soft texture | |
1.0 | 0.5 | 11.33±3.42 b | 46.21±11.23 b | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 1.0 | 15.42±3.22 c | 39.14±9.41 bc | Yellow-green, loose, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0 | 8.17±1.27 a | 68.73±13.47 a | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 0.1 | 9.67±2.30 ab | 55.24±6.91 ab | Yellow-green, loose, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0.5 | 9.88±2.65 ab | 51.33±13.54 ab | Green, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 1.0 | 10.33±2.79 b | 46.61±14.26 b | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture |
Table 2 Effects of combination 6-BA with IAA on the callus induction of leaves
Type | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | IAA (mg∙L-1) | Occurrence time (d) | Induction rate (%) | Callus growth state |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leaves of field planted individual | 0.5 | 0 | 10.25±4.60 b | 40.37±6.89 b | Yellow, compact, and with a hard texture |
0.5 | 0.1 | 15.25±3.72 c | 39.09±8.97 bc | Green, loose, with a softer texture | |
0.5 | 0.5 | 9.58±1.40 ab | 33.28±7.29 bc | Pale yellow, loose, with a harder texture | |
0.5 | 1.0 | 8.08±1.96 a | 26.72±5.74 c | Yellow, resembling water stains, soft texture | |
1.0 | 0 | 7.58±2.29 a | 65.33±6.56 a | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.1 | 14.67±3.08 c | 55.46±5.64 ab | Green, compact, harder texture | |
1.0 | 0.5 | 10.83±3.33 b | 47.51±6.74 b | Pale yellow, loose, soft texture | |
1.0 | 1.0 | 9.58±2.39 ab | 33.72±9.32 bc | Green loose, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0 | 6.92±2.17 a | 67.55±6.54 a | Pale yellow, loose, watery appearance, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0.1 | 11.67±1.20 b | 63.29±7.96 a | Pale green, loose, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0.5 | 12.16±2.46 bc | 54.29±8.57 ab | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 1.0 | 14.00±3.43 c | 41.31±9.03 b | Green, loose, softer texture | |
Leaves of tissue- cultured seedling | 0.5 | 0 | 11.08±2.69 b | 47.81±5.75 b | Yellow, compact, hard texture |
0.5 | 0.1 | 12.00±3.38 bc | 34.52±6.34 bc | Yellow-green, loose, soft texture | |
0.5 | 0.5 | 13.00±3.43 bc | 31.96±4.75 bc | Yellow-green, compact, softer texture | |
0.5 | 1.0 | 18.08±4.17 c | 24.07±7.22 c | Yellow-green, loose, soft texture | |
1.0 | 0 | 10.33±2.48 b | 55.67±4.21 ab | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.1 | 10.33±2.58 b | 51.34±1.99 ab | Yellow-green, loose, soft texture | |
1.0 | 0.5 | 11.33±3.42 b | 46.21±11.23 b | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 1.0 | 15.42±3.22 c | 39.14±9.41 bc | Yellow-green, loose, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0 | 8.17±1.27 a | 68.73±13.47 a | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 0.1 | 9.67±2.30 ab | 55.24±6.91 ab | Yellow-green, loose, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0.5 | 9.88±2.65 ab | 51.33±13.54 ab | Green, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 1.0 | 10.33±2.79 b | 46.61±14.26 b | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture |
Type | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | 2,4-D (mg∙L-1) | Occurrence time (d) | Induction rate (%) | Callus growth state |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leaves of field planted individual | 0.5 | 0 | 10.25±2.46 b | 40.38±8.73 b | Yellow, compact, hard texture |
0.5 | 0.1 | 11.42±1.79 bc | 25.77±6.33 c | Pale yellow, loose, soft texture | |
0.5 | 0.5 | 10.67±2.65 b | 41.83±6.86 bc | Brownish-yellow, compact, somewhat hard texture | |
0.5 | 1.0 | 15.00±4.66 c | 44.08±9.91 bc | Brownish-yellow, resembling water stains, soft texture | |
1.0 | 0 | 7.58±2.29 a | 65.38±13.16 a | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.1 | 10.08±3.20 b | 43.33±12.02 b | Pale yellow, dense, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.5 | 12.92±3.71 bc | 51.16±15.02 ab | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 1.0 | 12.00±2.76 bc | 56.32±9.31 ab | Yellow, compact, somewhat hard texture | |
2.0 | 0 | 6.92±2.17 a | 67.52±13.25 a | Pale yellow, loose, resembling water stains, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0.1 | 7.91±2.22 a | 60.83±11.02 a | Yellow, resembling water stains, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0.5 | 10.33±1.45 b | 57.12±13.37 ab | Yellow, compact, softer texture | |
2.0 | 1.0 | 13.67±2.05 bc | 48.53±8.04 b | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
Leaves of tissue-cultured seedling | 0.5 | 0 | 11.08±3.69 b | 47.51±11.05 b | Yellow, compact, hard texture |
0.5 | 0.1 | 16.42±3.08 c | 44.17±9.31 b | Pale yellow, loose, soft texture | |
0.5 | 0.5 | 11.08±2.44 b | 39.98±8.74 bc | Pale yellow, loose, hard texture | |
0.5 | 1.0 | 16.33±5.30 c | 19.03±6.33 c | Yellow, loose, soft texture | |
1.0 | 0 | 10.33±3.48 ab | 55.62±10.15 ab | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.1 | 15.17±3.17 c | 49.71±10.63 b | Green loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.5 | 10.42±3.44 ab | 44.54±9.63 b | Yellow, compact, hard texture | |
1.0 | 1.0 | 10.92±2.51 ab | 38.05±8.94 bc | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 0 | 8.17±2.27 a | 68.23±14.06 a | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 0.1 | 11.67±2.54 b | 66.11±11.82 a | Green, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 0.5 | 9.42±3.33 a | 53.42±11.44 ab | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 1.0 | 9.83±3.44 a | 50.76±14.13 b | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture |
Table 3 Effects of combination 6-BA with 2,4-D on the callus induction of leaves
Type | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | 2,4-D (mg∙L-1) | Occurrence time (d) | Induction rate (%) | Callus growth state |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leaves of field planted individual | 0.5 | 0 | 10.25±2.46 b | 40.38±8.73 b | Yellow, compact, hard texture |
0.5 | 0.1 | 11.42±1.79 bc | 25.77±6.33 c | Pale yellow, loose, soft texture | |
0.5 | 0.5 | 10.67±2.65 b | 41.83±6.86 bc | Brownish-yellow, compact, somewhat hard texture | |
0.5 | 1.0 | 15.00±4.66 c | 44.08±9.91 bc | Brownish-yellow, resembling water stains, soft texture | |
1.0 | 0 | 7.58±2.29 a | 65.38±13.16 a | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.1 | 10.08±3.20 b | 43.33±12.02 b | Pale yellow, dense, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.5 | 12.92±3.71 bc | 51.16±15.02 ab | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 1.0 | 12.00±2.76 bc | 56.32±9.31 ab | Yellow, compact, somewhat hard texture | |
2.0 | 0 | 6.92±2.17 a | 67.52±13.25 a | Pale yellow, loose, resembling water stains, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0.1 | 7.91±2.22 a | 60.83±11.02 a | Yellow, resembling water stains, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0.5 | 10.33±1.45 b | 57.12±13.37 ab | Yellow, compact, softer texture | |
2.0 | 1.0 | 13.67±2.05 bc | 48.53±8.04 b | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
Leaves of tissue-cultured seedling | 0.5 | 0 | 11.08±3.69 b | 47.51±11.05 b | Yellow, compact, hard texture |
0.5 | 0.1 | 16.42±3.08 c | 44.17±9.31 b | Pale yellow, loose, soft texture | |
0.5 | 0.5 | 11.08±2.44 b | 39.98±8.74 bc | Pale yellow, loose, hard texture | |
0.5 | 1.0 | 16.33±5.30 c | 19.03±6.33 c | Yellow, loose, soft texture | |
1.0 | 0 | 10.33±3.48 ab | 55.62±10.15 ab | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.1 | 15.17±3.17 c | 49.71±10.63 b | Green loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.5 | 10.42±3.44 ab | 44.54±9.63 b | Yellow, compact, hard texture | |
1.0 | 1.0 | 10.92±2.51 ab | 38.05±8.94 bc | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 0 | 8.17±2.27 a | 68.23±14.06 a | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 0.1 | 11.67±2.54 b | 66.11±11.82 a | Green, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 0.5 | 9.42±3.33 a | 53.42±11.44 ab | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 1.0 | 9.83±3.44 a | 50.76±14.13 b | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture |
Type | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | 2,4-D (mg∙L-1) | IAA (mg∙L-1) | Occurrence time (d) | Induction rate (%) | Callus growth state |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leaves of field planted indivi- dual | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 9.17±3.67 ab | 60.33±13.05 b | Yellow-green, loose, soft texture |
0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 12.32±3.63 bc | 44.87±10.33 c | Brown, loose, soft texture | |
0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 12.58±2.42 bc | 41.24±11.13 c | Brown, loose, soft texture | |
1.0 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 10.16±2.21 b | 84.51±14.22 a | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 11.00±2.52 b | 61.39±12.65 b | Yellow, loose, soft texture | |
1.0 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 7.69±2.44 a | 77.59±14.25 a | Yellow, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 7.42±1.09 a | 79.08±17.24 a | Yellow, resembling water stains, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 8.38±3.87 ab | 71.22±12.13 ab | Yellow with water stain, soft texture | |
2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 11.33±2.21 b | 63.49±13.41 b | Pale yellow, loose, soft texture | |
Leaves of tissue-cultured seedling | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 13.08±2.42 bc | 47.62±9.43 c | Green, compact, hard texture |
0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 14.41±4.38 bc | 53.41±13.22 bc | Green, compact, hard texture | |
0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 16.11±6.38 c | 55.76±10.16 bc | Green, compact, somewhat hard texture | |
1.0 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 9.33±2.46 ab | 42.57±9.25 c | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 11.67±3.50 b | 50.91±13.22 c | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 13.67±2.50 bc | 44.59±11.17 c | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 8.58±2.12 a | 86.73±11.29 a | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 7.32±3.31 a | 70.23±17.05 b | Yellow, loose, soft texture | |
2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 11.33±2.22 b | 67.15±13.21 b | Green, compact, hard texture |
Table 4 Effects of combination 6-BA with 2,4-D and IAA on the callus induction of leaves
Type | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | 2,4-D (mg∙L-1) | IAA (mg∙L-1) | Occurrence time (d) | Induction rate (%) | Callus growth state |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leaves of field planted indivi- dual | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 9.17±3.67 ab | 60.33±13.05 b | Yellow-green, loose, soft texture |
0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 12.32±3.63 bc | 44.87±10.33 c | Brown, loose, soft texture | |
0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 12.58±2.42 bc | 41.24±11.13 c | Brown, loose, soft texture | |
1.0 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 10.16±2.21 b | 84.51±14.22 a | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 11.00±2.52 b | 61.39±12.65 b | Yellow, loose, soft texture | |
1.0 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 7.69±2.44 a | 77.59±14.25 a | Yellow, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 7.42±1.09 a | 79.08±17.24 a | Yellow, resembling water stains, soft texture | |
2.0 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 8.38±3.87 ab | 71.22±12.13 ab | Yellow with water stain, soft texture | |
2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 11.33±2.21 b | 63.49±13.41 b | Pale yellow, loose, soft texture | |
Leaves of tissue-cultured seedling | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 13.08±2.42 bc | 47.62±9.43 c | Green, compact, hard texture |
0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 14.41±4.38 bc | 53.41±13.22 bc | Green, compact, hard texture | |
0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 16.11±6.38 c | 55.76±10.16 bc | Green, compact, somewhat hard texture | |
1.0 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 9.33±2.46 ab | 42.57±9.25 c | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 11.67±3.50 b | 50.91±13.22 c | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
1.0 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 13.67±2.50 bc | 44.59±11.17 c | Pale yellow, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 8.58±2.12 a | 86.73±11.29 a | Yellow-green, loose, softer texture | |
2.0 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 7.32±3.31 a | 70.23±17.05 b | Yellow, loose, soft texture | |
2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 11.33±2.22 b | 67.15±13.21 b | Green, compact, hard texture |
Type | No. | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | TDZ (mg∙L-1) | Adventitious buds differentiation rate (%) | Adventitious roots differentiation rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Callus from leaves of field planted individual | F1 | 0 | 0.5 | - | 12.43±3.26 ab |
F2 | 0 | 1.0 | - | 7.41±2.12 c | |
F3 | 0 | 2.0 | - | 3.94±1.12 d | |
F4 | 1.0 | 0 | - | 15.61±4.36 a | |
F5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 3.07±1.04 b | - | |
F6 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | 3.41±1.27 d | |
F7 | 1.0 | 2.0 | - | 12.37±3.75 ab | |
F8 | 2.0 | 0 | - | 10.91±3.12 b | |
F9 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 3.95±0.92 b | - | |
F10 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 4.53±0.87 b | 8.76±2.21 bc | |
F11 | 2.0 | 2.0 | - | 7.55±1.32 c | |
F12 | 3.0 | 0 | 4.66±1.41 b | 6.38±2.63 c | |
F13 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 16.71±5.22 a | - | |
F14 | 3.0 | 1.0 | - | 4.21±1.21 c | |
F15 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 4.39±1.21 b | - | |
Callus from leaves of tissue-cultured seedling | F1 | 0 | 0.5 | - | - |
F2 | 0 | 1.0 | - | 4.52±0.95 bc | |
F3 | 0 | 2.0 | - | 4.74±1.39 c | |
F4 | 1.0 | 0 | - | 4.58±1.51 bc | |
F5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | - | 1.92±0.82 c | |
F6 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | 9.17±2.42 a | |
F7 | 1.0 | 2.0 | - | 6.11±2.21 b | |
F8 | 2.0 | 0 | - | 3.43±1.02 c | |
F9 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 3.44±1.32 b | 8.32±2.31 a | |
F10 | 2.0 | 1.0 | - | 6.41±2.13 b | |
F11 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.91±0.71 bc | 3.59±1.33 c | |
F12 | 3.0 | 0 | - | 2.33±0.93 c | |
F13 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 2.37±0.69 bc | 7.15±1.12 ab | |
F14 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 3.17±1.21 b | - | |
F15 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 7.66±2.12 a | - |
Table 5 Effects of combination 6-BA with TDZ on callus differentiation
Type | No. | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | TDZ (mg∙L-1) | Adventitious buds differentiation rate (%) | Adventitious roots differentiation rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Callus from leaves of field planted individual | F1 | 0 | 0.5 | - | 12.43±3.26 ab |
F2 | 0 | 1.0 | - | 7.41±2.12 c | |
F3 | 0 | 2.0 | - | 3.94±1.12 d | |
F4 | 1.0 | 0 | - | 15.61±4.36 a | |
F5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 3.07±1.04 b | - | |
F6 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | 3.41±1.27 d | |
F7 | 1.0 | 2.0 | - | 12.37±3.75 ab | |
F8 | 2.0 | 0 | - | 10.91±3.12 b | |
F9 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 3.95±0.92 b | - | |
F10 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 4.53±0.87 b | 8.76±2.21 bc | |
F11 | 2.0 | 2.0 | - | 7.55±1.32 c | |
F12 | 3.0 | 0 | 4.66±1.41 b | 6.38±2.63 c | |
F13 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 16.71±5.22 a | - | |
F14 | 3.0 | 1.0 | - | 4.21±1.21 c | |
F15 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 4.39±1.21 b | - | |
Callus from leaves of tissue-cultured seedling | F1 | 0 | 0.5 | - | - |
F2 | 0 | 1.0 | - | 4.52±0.95 bc | |
F3 | 0 | 2.0 | - | 4.74±1.39 c | |
F4 | 1.0 | 0 | - | 4.58±1.51 bc | |
F5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | - | 1.92±0.82 c | |
F6 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | 9.17±2.42 a | |
F7 | 1.0 | 2.0 | - | 6.11±2.21 b | |
F8 | 2.0 | 0 | - | 3.43±1.02 c | |
F9 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 3.44±1.32 b | 8.32±2.31 a | |
F10 | 2.0 | 1.0 | - | 6.41±2.13 b | |
F11 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.91±0.71 bc | 3.59±1.33 c | |
F12 | 3.0 | 0 | - | 2.33±0.93 c | |
F13 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 2.37±0.69 bc | 7.15±1.12 ab | |
F14 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 3.17±1.21 b | - | |
F15 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 7.66±2.12 a | - |
Type | No. | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | TDZ (mg∙L-1) | NAA (mg∙L-1) | Adventitious buds differentiation rate (%) | Adventitious roots differentiation rate (%) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Callus from leaves of field planted indivi- dual | F1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 2.13±0.19 d | 3.21±0.13 d | |||||
F2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | 31.69±7.11 a | ||||||
F3 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 8.92±2.83 c | 9.51±2.24 c | ||||||
F4 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 6.43±1.71 cd | 23.49±11.31 b | ||||||
F5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 11.21±3.02 c | 6.91±2.17 cd | ||||||
F6 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.05 | 19.46±6.33 ab | - | ||||||
F7 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 5.64±1.91 d | 2.02±0.17 d | ||||||
F8 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 21.29±9.12 a | - | ||||||
F9 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 15.82±3.64 b | 4.09±1.22 d | ||||||
Callus from leaves of tissue-cultured seedling | F1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.05 | - | 21.23±6.71 b | |||||
F2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | 29.88±9.45 a | ||||||
F3 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | - | 19.01±6.54 bc | ||||||
F4 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | - | 12.56±4.32 cd | ||||||
F5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | - | 14.67±3.03 c | ||||||
F6 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.05 | - | 8.03±2.31 d | ||||||
F7 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | - | 11.34±2.12 d | ||||||
F8 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.05 | - | 3.34±1.42 de | ||||||
F9 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | - | 3.49±1.92 de |
Table 6 Effects of combination of 6-BA, TDZ and NAA on callus differentiation
Type | No. | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | TDZ (mg∙L-1) | NAA (mg∙L-1) | Adventitious buds differentiation rate (%) | Adventitious roots differentiation rate (%) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Callus from leaves of field planted indivi- dual | F1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 2.13±0.19 d | 3.21±0.13 d | |||||
F2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | 31.69±7.11 a | ||||||
F3 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 8.92±2.83 c | 9.51±2.24 c | ||||||
F4 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 6.43±1.71 cd | 23.49±11.31 b | ||||||
F5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 11.21±3.02 c | 6.91±2.17 cd | ||||||
F6 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.05 | 19.46±6.33 ab | - | ||||||
F7 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 5.64±1.91 d | 2.02±0.17 d | ||||||
F8 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 21.29±9.12 a | - | ||||||
F9 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 15.82±3.64 b | 4.09±1.22 d | ||||||
Callus from leaves of tissue-cultured seedling | F1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.05 | - | 21.23±6.71 b | |||||
F2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | 29.88±9.45 a | ||||||
F3 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | - | 19.01±6.54 bc | ||||||
F4 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | - | 12.56±4.32 cd | ||||||
F5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | - | 14.67±3.03 c | ||||||
F6 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.05 | - | 8.03±2.31 d | ||||||
F7 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | - | 11.34±2.12 d | ||||||
F8 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.05 | - | 3.34±1.42 de | ||||||
F9 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | - | 3.49±1.92 de |
Type | No. | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | TDZ (mg∙L-1) | IAA (mg∙L-1) | Adventitious buds differentiation rate (%) | Adventitious roots differentiation rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Callus from leaves of field planted indivi- dual | F1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.05 | - | 8.97±2.34 c |
F2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | 17.83±5.09 ab | |
F3 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 14.39±3.23 b | - | |
F4 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | - | 23.44±9.12 a | |
F5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 19.07±2.96 b | 7.15±2.17 c | |
F6 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.05 | 17.43±5.99 b | 2.31±1.97 c | |
F7 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 66.37±13.14 a | 2.69±0.81 c | |
F8 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 23.29±8.06 b | - | |
F9 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 7.94±2.01 c | 28.91±13.04 a | |
Callus from leaves of tissue-cultured seedling | F1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.05 | - | 14.32±4.23 ab |
F2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | 23.64±9.34 a | |
F3 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 22.35±9.33 b | 4.52±1.96 c | |
F4 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | - | 17.61±3.22 ab | |
F5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.32±0.42 bc | 9.02±2.83 c | |
F6 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.05 | 53.48±9.89 a | 6.49±2.02 c | |
F7 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 9.46±2.31 bc | 19.03±7.93 a | |
F8 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 19.83±6.99 b | 12.87±4.85 ab | |
F9 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 9.10±2.41 bc | 8.99±3.31 c |
Table 7 Effects of combination 6-BA, TDZ and IAA on callus differentiation
Type | No. | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | TDZ (mg∙L-1) | IAA (mg∙L-1) | Adventitious buds differentiation rate (%) | Adventitious roots differentiation rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Callus from leaves of field planted indivi- dual | F1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.05 | - | 8.97±2.34 c |
F2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | 17.83±5.09 ab | |
F3 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 14.39±3.23 b | - | |
F4 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | - | 23.44±9.12 a | |
F5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 19.07±2.96 b | 7.15±2.17 c | |
F6 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.05 | 17.43±5.99 b | 2.31±1.97 c | |
F7 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 66.37±13.14 a | 2.69±0.81 c | |
F8 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 23.29±8.06 b | - | |
F9 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 7.94±2.01 c | 28.91±13.04 a | |
Callus from leaves of tissue-cultured seedling | F1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.05 | - | 14.32±4.23 ab |
F2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | 23.64±9.34 a | |
F3 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 22.35±9.33 b | 4.52±1.96 c | |
F4 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | - | 17.61±3.22 ab | |
F5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.32±0.42 bc | 9.02±2.83 c | |
F6 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.05 | 53.48±9.89 a | 6.49±2.02 c | |
F7 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 9.46±2.31 bc | 19.03±7.93 a | |
F8 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 19.83±6.99 b | 12.87±4.85 ab | |
F9 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 9.10±2.41 bc | 8.99±3.31 c |
No. | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | NAA (mg∙L-1) | Proliferation rate (%) | Coefficient of propagation | Plant height (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Z1 | 0.5 | 0.01 | 38.21±6.27 cd | + | 1.21±0.10 d |
Z2 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 29.33±4.36 d | + | 1.37±0.21 d |
Z3 | 0.5 | 0.10 | 17.21±2.39 d | + | 1.43±0.19 cd |
Z4 | 1.0 | 0.01 | 53.69±5.49 bc | +++ | 2.36±0.14 bc |
Z5 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 56.73±7.75 bc | ++ | 2.04±0.17 c |
Z6 | 1.0 | 0.10 | 67.21±3.27 b | ++ | 1.96±0.16 c |
Z7 | 2.0 | 0.01 | 79.06±7.40 a | +++ | 2.63±0.31 b |
Z8 | 2.0 | 0.05 | 83.57±2.13 ab | +++ | 3.17±0.22 a |
Z9 | 2.0 | 0.10 | 68.33±5.56 b | ++ | 2.66±0.15 b |
Table 8 Effects of different concentrations of 6-BA and NAA combinations on adventitious bud proliferation
No. | 6-BA (mg∙L-1) | NAA (mg∙L-1) | Proliferation rate (%) | Coefficient of propagation | Plant height (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Z1 | 0.5 | 0.01 | 38.21±6.27 cd | + | 1.21±0.10 d |
Z2 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 29.33±4.36 d | + | 1.37±0.21 d |
Z3 | 0.5 | 0.10 | 17.21±2.39 d | + | 1.43±0.19 cd |
Z4 | 1.0 | 0.01 | 53.69±5.49 bc | +++ | 2.36±0.14 bc |
Z5 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 56.73±7.75 bc | ++ | 2.04±0.17 c |
Z6 | 1.0 | 0.10 | 67.21±3.27 b | ++ | 1.96±0.16 c |
Z7 | 2.0 | 0.01 | 79.06±7.40 a | +++ | 2.63±0.31 b |
Z8 | 2.0 | 0.05 | 83.57±2.13 ab | +++ | 3.17±0.22 a |
Z9 | 2.0 | 0.10 | 68.33±5.56 b | ++ | 2.66±0.15 b |
No. | NAA (mg∙L-1) | IBA (mg∙L-1) | Rooting rate (%) | Root length (cm) | Number of roots | Plant height (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | 0 | - | 43.67±4.09 c | 1.73±0.19 c | 2.39±0.25 c | 1.46±0.67 d |
S2 | 0.1 | - | 60.71±8.33 b | 1.97±0.23 c | 2.76±0.77 c | 2.69±0.42 c |
S3 | 0.5 | - | 73.63±7.41 a | 3.68±0.53 a | 3.53±1.96 b | 3.16±0.96 b |
S4 | 1.0 | - | 57.41±5.31 bc | 2.03±0.87 c | 4.31±1.13 a | 2.06±0.23 cd |
S5 | - | 0.1 | 49.96±7.39 c | 2.94±0.73 b | 2.06±0.63 c | 2.77±0.87 c |
S6 | - | 0.5 | 53.21±4.36 bc | 3.31±0.77 ab | 3.04±1.21 bc | 3.06±0.68 bc |
S7 | - | 1.0 | 51.27±5.77 bc | 2.32±0.66 bc | 3.41±1.26 b | 3.22±0.73 b |
S8 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 86.97±6.96 a | 3.22±1.07 ab | 3.65±1.17 a | 3.79±1.17 a |
S9 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 34.21±8.41 c | 2.21±0.42 bc | 2.33±0.41 c | 2.17±0.71 c |
S10 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 21.19±2.79 d | 1.53±0.39 c | 1.61±0.19 d | 1.93±0.29 d |
Table 9 Effects of different concentrations of auxins on adventitious bud rooting
No. | NAA (mg∙L-1) | IBA (mg∙L-1) | Rooting rate (%) | Root length (cm) | Number of roots | Plant height (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | 0 | - | 43.67±4.09 c | 1.73±0.19 c | 2.39±0.25 c | 1.46±0.67 d |
S2 | 0.1 | - | 60.71±8.33 b | 1.97±0.23 c | 2.76±0.77 c | 2.69±0.42 c |
S3 | 0.5 | - | 73.63±7.41 a | 3.68±0.53 a | 3.53±1.96 b | 3.16±0.96 b |
S4 | 1.0 | - | 57.41±5.31 bc | 2.03±0.87 c | 4.31±1.13 a | 2.06±0.23 cd |
S5 | - | 0.1 | 49.96±7.39 c | 2.94±0.73 b | 2.06±0.63 c | 2.77±0.87 c |
S6 | - | 0.5 | 53.21±4.36 bc | 3.31±0.77 ab | 3.04±1.21 bc | 3.06±0.68 bc |
S7 | - | 1.0 | 51.27±5.77 bc | 2.32±0.66 bc | 3.41±1.26 b | 3.22±0.73 b |
S8 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 86.97±6.96 a | 3.22±1.07 ab | 3.65±1.17 a | 3.79±1.17 a |
S9 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 34.21±8.41 c | 2.21±0.42 bc | 2.33±0.41 c | 2.17±0.71 c |
S10 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 21.19±2.79 d | 1.53±0.39 c | 1.61±0.19 d | 1.93±0.29 d |
[1] | 贺美忠 (2016). 黄芩组织培养与快速繁殖条件的研究. 农业科技通讯 (4), 79-80. |
[2] | 胡佳卉, 王小德 (2018). 羊角槭愈伤组织诱导、增殖与分化. 浙江农林大学学报 35, 975-980. |
[3] | 黄娟, 吴鹏飞, 程浩, 马祥庆 (2018). 杉木愈伤组织的继代增殖与植株再生. 森林与环境学报 38, 20-26. |
[4] | 刘俊, 孙瑞芬, 耿牡丹, 王冬霓, 张艳芳, 孙钟 (2017). 毛建草离体培养快繁体系的建立. 北方农业学报 45(6), 102-106. |
[5] |
逯锦春, 曹丽娜, 佟冠杰, 王鑫颖, 张利英, 喻锌, 李荟芳, 李彦慧 (2022). 大花银莲花愈伤组织诱导及再生体系的建立. 植物学报 57, 217-226.
DOI |
[6] |
罗虹, 温小蕙, 周圆圆, 戴思兰 (2020). 芳香堆心菊离体再生体系的建立. 植物学报 55, 318-328.
DOI |
[7] | 庞艳菊 (2019). 丹参快速扩繁与遗传转化体系建立的研究. 硕士论文. 武汉: 华中农业大学. pp. 34-36. |
[8] | 桑晓霞 (2021). 药茶原料毛建草快繁体系建立及功能成分研究. 硕士论文. 太原: 山西大学. pp. 17-21. |
[9] |
田旭平, 郭庆浩, 孙鸣屿, 李倩, 路通 (2021). 不同种源的毛建草珠芽形成比较研究. 草地学报 29, 1357-1362.
DOI |
[10] | 王莉 (2008). “草原”美国薄荷的组织培养及挥发油成分研究. 硕士论文. 雅安: 四川农业大学. pp. 27-34. |
[11] | 吴雯雯, 陆兵, 李文清, 邵元健 (2018). 留兰香薄荷离体快繁技术研究. 江苏农业科学 46(4), 47-49. |
[12] |
谢纯刚, 刘哲, 章书声, 胡海涛 (2023). 手指柠檬茎段离体再生体系建立. 植物学报 58, 926-934.
DOI |
[13] | 杨宇昊 (2023). 毛建草药茶黄酮类物质的提取纯化及活性研究. 硕士论文. 太原: 山西大学. pp. 5-9. |
[14] | 于盱, 梁呈元, 刘艳, 王海棠, 李维林 (2012). 薄荷茎段不定芽离体诱导影响因素分析及植株再生体系的建立. 江苏农业科学 40(12), 56-59. |
[15] |
张静, 牛喆, 范卫芳, 高鹏飞, 吴建慧 (2020). 狭叶黄芩组织培养再生体系的建立. 植物研究 40, 50-57.
DOI |
[16] | 张彦广 (2006). 河北省野生花卉调查及部分种的引种栽培研究. 博士论文. 北京: 北京林业大学. pp. 19-24. |
[17] | 赵佳佳, 宇佳, 迟德富 (2016). 多花筋骨草高频再生体系的建立. 湖南师范大学自然科学学报 39(1), 30-34. |
[18] | 赵晓杰, 迟德富, 李晓灿 (2011). 匍枝筋骨草再生体系构建. 中国农学通报 27(4), 120-124. |
[19] | 宗越 (2019). 毛建草茶饮习俗及组织培养研究. 硕士论文. 晋中: 山西农业大学. pp. 32-37. |
[20] | Bakhtiar Z, Mirjalili MH, Sonboli A (2016). In vitro callus induction and micropropagation of Thymus persicus (Lamiaceae), an endangered medicinal plant. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol 16, 48-54. |
[21] | Fallah M, Farzaneh M, Yousefzadi M, Ghorbanpour M, Mirjalili MH (2019). In vitro mass propagation and conservation of a rare medicinal plant, Zhumeria majdae Rech.f & Wendelbo (Lamiaceae). Biocatal Agr Biotechnol 17, 318-325. |
[22] | Gharari Z, Bagheri K, Karimkhanlooei G, Sharafi A (2021). Study of tissue culture and in vitro organogenesis of Scutellaria bornmuelleri using benzylaminopurine, isopentenyl adenine and thidiazuron. South Afr J Bot 139, 458-469. |
[23] |
Jacobs WP (1998). Hormone transport and action in the green shoot: long-term studies of a clonal stock of Coleus blumei (Labiatae). Am J Bot 85, 1353-1363.
PMID |
[24] | Karakas FP, Turker AU (2013). An efficient in vitro regeneration system for Bellis perennis L. and comparison of phenolic contents of field-grown and in vitro-grown leaves by LC-MS/MS. Ind Crops Prod 48, 162-170. |
[1] | Xiaobo Lü, Donghai Li, Xiaobo Yang, Mengwen Zhang. The species coexisted in mangrove communities through niche differentiation of flooding time and salinity [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(3): 23302-. |
[2] | Min Kang, Meiying Zhang, Xiushuang Qi, Ningning Tong, Yang Li, Qingyan Shu, Zheng’an Liu, Changping Lü, Liping Peng. Establishment of a Fast Breeding System for Itoh Hybrid ‘He Xie’ in Tissue Culture [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2024, 59(3): 441-451. |
[3] | CHEN Yu-Ting, MA Song-Mei, ZHANG Dan, ZHANG Lin, WANG Chun-Cheng. Diversity pattern and formation mechanism of sympatric Haloxylon ammodendron and Haloxylon persicum in Xinjiang, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(1): 56-67. |
[4] | Xiaodan Tan, Peng Zhang, Sirui Zhu, Xiang Liu, Shurong Zhou, Mu Liu. Effect of shrub encroachment on insect herbivory of Polygonum macrophyllum in alpine meadow of Qinghai-Xizang Plateau [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(1): 23417-. |
[5] | YANG Xin, REN Ming-Xun. Species distribution pattern and formation mechanism of mangrove plants around the South China Sea [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(8): 1105-1115. |
[6] | Kunming Zhao, Shengbin Chen, Xifu Yang. Investigation of the diversity of mammals and birds and the activity rhythm of dominant species using camera trapping in a fragmented forest in the Dujiangyan region, Sichuan Province [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2023, 31(6): 22529-. |
[7] | Fei Xiong, Hongyan Liu, Dongdong Zhai, Xinbin Duan, Huiwu Tian, Daqing Chen. Population genetic structure of Pelteobagrus vachelli in the upper Yangtze River based on genome re-sequencing [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2023, 31(4): 22391-. |
[8] | Anlun Wang, Ping He, Xinyuan Long. Spatial differentiation of fish functional groups in the Yangtze River [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2023, 31(10): 23095-. |
[9] | ZHU Ming-Yang, LIN Lin, SHE Yu-Long, XIAO Cheng-Cai, ZHAO Tong-Xing, HU Chun-Xiang, ZHAO Chang-You, WANG Wen-Li. Radial growth and its low-temperature threshold of Abies georgei var. smithii at different altitudes in Jiaozi Mountain, Yunnan, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(9): 1038-1049. |
[10] | Tianxiang Zhou, Hualin Yang, Guiquan Zhang, Jian Yang, Xi Feng, Qiang Hu, Yuehong Cheng, Jindong Zhang, Bin Wang, Caiquan Zhou. Temporal and spatial niche differentiation among three alpine Galliformes with sympatric distribution in the Wolong National Nature Reserve, Sichuan Province [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2022, 30(6): 22026-. |
[11] | Togtokh Mongke, Dongyi Bai, Tugeqin Bao, Ruoyang Zhao, Tana An, Aertengqimike Tiemuqier, Baoyindeligeer Mongkejargal, Has Soyoltiin, Manglai Dugarjaviin, Haige Han. Assessment of SNPs-based genomic diversity in different populations of Eastern Asian landrace horses [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2022, 30(5): 21031-. |
[12] | Bihu Wu, Yefeng Xie, Yi Li, Li Cong. How to delineate and zone protected areas under the scope of ecological conservation redline strategy [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2022, 30(4): 21372-. |
[13] | WANG Chun-Cheng, ZHANG Yun-Ling, MA Song-Mei, HUANG Gang, ZHANG Dan, YAN Han. Phylogeny and species differentiation of four wild almond species of subgen. Amygdalus in China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2021, 45(9): 987-995. |
[14] | Hui Zhang, Qian Liu, Xiaolei Huang. Mechanisms regulating caste and behavior differentiation in social insects [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2021, 29(4): 507-516. |
[15] | YAN Han, ZHANG Yun-Ling, MA Song-Mei, WANG Chun-Cheng, ZHANG Dan. Suitable distribution simulation and local environmental adaptability differentiation of Lycium ruthenicum in Xinjiang, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2021, 45(11): 1221-1230. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||