Spatial Distribution Pattern of Epilithic Moss Homomallium simlaense Patches in Rocky Desertification Habitats in Zhongliang Mountain, Chongqing, Southwest China

doi:10.11983/CBB16191

Abstract

Abstract:

The present study used O-ring Point Pattern Analysis to analyze the spatial distribution patterns of three sizes of moss patches in the Karst area of Zhongliang Mountain, Chongqing, to understand the ecological characteristics and process of the common epilithic moss species Homomallium simlaense. Data were from 0.75 hm² sample plots in three rocky desertification habitats (potential, slight, and medium rocky desertification). The total number of H. simlaense patches was higher in slight rocky desertification plots, then potential rock desertification plots; medium rock desertification plots had lower patch number. In the three habitats, the changes in patch number were from small patches>medium patches>large patches. Small and medium patches were significantly clustered at small scales but randomly distributed at other scales; however, the large patches randomly distributed at all scales. We found a positive correlation between medium and small patches at small scales in the three habitats and no significant correlation between large and medium patches at most scales, except small scales in potential rocky desertification plots. Relative humidity was the most important environmental factor affecting the moss patch distribution, and the slope and number of rock fracture also played a significant role. Small and medium patches tended to aggregate with increasing moisture and shade stress. Moss patch size and its distribution pattern are good predictors of the ecological restoration in Karst rocky desertification areas.

Key words: rocky desertification habitat, patch size, spatial distribution pattern, stress gradient hypothesis

Chengqiang Dang, Huimin Huang, Rong Dong, Miao Chen, Ting Gao, Jianping Tao. Spatial Distribution Pattern of Epilithic Moss Homomallium simlaense Patches in Rocky Desertification Habitats in Zhongliang Mountain, Chongqing, Southwest China[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2017, 52(5): 598-607.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://www.chinbullbotany.com/EN/10.11983/CBB16191

https://www.chinbullbotany.com/EN/Y2017/V52/I5/598

Figures/Tables 7

Table 1 Survey of three types of rocky desertification habitat

Item	Plots
Item	Potential rocky desertification (A)	Slight rocky desertification (B)	Medium rocky desertification (C)
Elevation (m)	552	564	585
Slope (°)	26.3	22.1	31.5
Shade degree	0.55	0.35	0.10
Aspect	South	Southeast	Northeast
Geographical coordinates	29°41′40″N 106°24′47″E	29°41′53″N 106°24′30″E	29°41′57″N 106°24′20″E
Vegetation type	Broadleaved deciduous forest Shrub	Thick growth of grass Shrub	Thick growth of grass Shrub

Figure 1 The quantitative relation of Homomallium simlaense patches in 3 types of rocky desertification habitat A: Potential rocky desertification; B: Slight rocky desertification; C: Medium rocky desertification

Figure 2 Scatterplot of spatial distributions of Homomallium simlaense patches in 3 types of rocky desertification habitat(A) Potential rocky desertification; (B) Slight rocky desertification; (C) Medium rocky desertification

Figure 3 Spatial distribution pattern of Homomallium simlaense patches in 3 types of rocky desertification habitat(A1)-(A3) Potential rocky desertification; (B1)-(B3) Slight rocky desertification; (C1), (C2) Medium rocky desertification

Figure 4 Spatial associations of different patches of Homomallium simlaense in 3 types of rocky desertification habitat(A1)-(A3) Potential rocky desertification; (B1)-(B3) Slight rocky desertification; (C1) Medium rocky desertification

Table 2 Statistical characteristics of the first 4 axes of the principal component analysis in 3 types of rocky desertification habitat

Plots
Plots		1	2	3	4
Potential rocky desertification (A)	Eigenvalues	0.515	0.329	0.123	0.028
Potential rocky desertification (A)	Cumulative percentage variance of species data	51.5	84.4	96.6	99.4
Slight rocky desertification (B)	Eigenvalues	0.527	0.398	0.057	0.016
Slight rocky desertification (B)	Cumulative percentage variance of species data	52.7	92.5	98.2	99.8
Medium rocky desertification (C)	Eigenvalues	0.461	0.385	0.141	0.011
Medium rocky desertification (C)	Cumulative percentage variance of species data	46.1	84.7	98.7	99.8

Figure 5 Different patches of Homomallium simlaense rela- tionship with environmental factors in 3 types of rocky desertification habitat(A) Potential rocky desertification; (B) Slight rocky desertification; (C) Medium rocky desertification. 1, 2, 3……No. of patches. SFS: Rock fracture; SJ: Microhabitat (stone facing, cliff, stony gully, stone pit, and grotto); PD: Gradient; YBD: Crown density; XDSD: Relative humidity

References 40

[1]	高福元, 石福习 (2015). 基于不同零模型的三江平原沼泽湿地主要物种小尺度点格局分析. 生态学报 35, 2029-2037.
[2]	《广西西南喀斯特生物多样性》编委会 (2011). 广西西南喀斯特生物多样性. 北京: 中国大百科全书出版社. pp.106-108.
[3]	郭柯, 刘长成, 董鸣 (2011). 我国西南喀斯特植物生态适应性与石漠化治理. 植物生态学报 35, 991-999.
[4]	郭水良, 曹同 (2000). 长白山地区森林生态系统树附生苔藓植物群落分布格局研究. 植物生态学报 24, 442-450.
[5]	郭垚鑫, 胡有宁, 李刚, 王得祥, 杨吉健, 杨改河 (2014). 太白山红桦种群不同发育阶段的空间格局与关联性. 林业科学 50, 9-14.
[6]	郭屹立, 王斌, 向悟生, 丁涛, 陆树华, 黄俞淞, 黄甫昭, 李冬兴, 李先琨 (2015). 广西弄岗北热带喀斯特季节性雨林监测样地种群空间点格局分析. 生物多样性 23, 183-191.
[7]	韩文衡, 向悟生, 叶铎, 吕仕洪, 丁涛, 李先琨 (2010). 广西木论保护区喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶混交林优势种空间格局及其相关性. 应用生态学报 21, 2769-2776.
[8]	吉雪花, 张元明, 陶冶, 周小兵, 张静 (2013). 藓类结皮斑块面积与环境因子的关系. 中国沙漠 33, 1803-1809.
[9]	吉雪花, 张元明, 周小兵, 吴林, 张静 (2014). 不同尺度苔藓结皮土壤性状的空间分布特征. 生态学报 34, 4006-4016.
[10]	籍烨, 张朝晖 (2014). 喀斯特石漠生态系统不同自然演替阶段中苔藓植物多样性特征分析. 植物科学学报 32, 577-585.
[11]	姜俊, 赵秀海 (2011). 吉林蛟河针阔混交林群落优势种群种间联结性. 林业科学 47, 149-153.
[12]	李军峰, 贾少华, 王智慧, 张朝晖 (2015). 喀斯特石漠化过程中苔藓植物多样性及分布与环境关系. 生态科学 34, 68-73.
[13]	刘艳, 曹同, 王剑, 曹阳 (2008). 杭州市区土生苔藓植物分布与生态因子的关系. 应用生态学报 19, 775-781.
[14]	皮春燕, 刘艳 (2014). 重庆主城区住宅小区苔藓组成与多样性. 生物多样性 22, 583-588.
[15]	宋同清, 彭晚霞, 曾馥平, 王克林, 覃文更, 谭卫宁, 刘璐, 杜虎, 鹿士杨 (2010). 木论喀斯特峰丛洼地森林群落空间格局及环境解释. 植物生态学报 34, 298-308.
[16]	王琳, 张金屯 (2004). 历山山地草甸优势种的种间关联和相关分析. 西北植物学报 24, 1435-1440.
[17]	王晓雨, 于大炮, 周莉, 周旺明, 吴志军, 郭焱, 包也, 孟莹莹, 代力民 (2015). 长白山北坡林线岳桦种群空间分布格局. 生态学报 35, 116-124.
[18]	王鑫厅, 侯亚丽, 刘芳, 常英, 王炜, 梁存柱, 苗百岭 (2011). 羊草+大针茅草原退化群落优势种群空间点格局分析. 植物生态学报 35, 1281-1289.
[19]	熊康宁 (2002). 喀斯特石漠化的遥感——GIS典型研究: 以贵州省为例. 北京: 地质出版社. pp. 23-25.
[20]	徐晟翀, 曹同, 于晶, 陈怡, 宋国元 (2006). 上海市树附生苔藓植物分布格局研究. 西北植物学报 26, 1053-1058.
[21]	许强, 吕金枝, 苗艳明, 毕润成 (2016). 翅果油树群落主要物种空间分布格局及其关联性. 植物学报 51, 49-57.
[22]	杨洪晓, 张金屯, 吴波, 李晓松, 张友炎 (2006). 毛乌素沙地油蒿种群点格局分析. 植物生态学报 30, 563-570.
[23]	张金屯 (1998). 植物种群空间分布的点格局分析. 植物生态学报 22, 344-349.
[24]	张军以, 戴明宏, 王腊春, 苏维词, 曹立国 (2015). 西南喀斯特石漠化治理植物选择与生态适应性. 地球与环境 43, 269-278.
[25]	张明娟, 刘茂松, 徐驰, 池婷, 洪超 (2012). 不同密度条件下芨芨草空间格局对环境胁迫的响应. 生态学报 32, 595-604.
[26]	张天汉, 代玉, 王智慧, 张朝晖 (2014). 贵州关岭县喀斯特峰丛石漠区苔藓群落生态特征. 中国岩溶 33, 192-200.
[27]	张炜平, 潘莎, 贾昕, 储诚进, 肖洒, 林玥, 白燕远, 王根轩 (2013). 植物间正相互作用对种群动态和群落结构的影响: 基于个体模型的研究进展. 植物生态学报 37, 571-582.
[28]	张元明, 曹同, 潘伯荣 (2003). 新疆博格达山地面生苔藓植物物种多样性研究. 应用生态学报 14, 887-891.
[29]	张忠华, 胡刚, 倪健 (2015). 茂兰喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶混交林树种的空间分布格局及其分形特征. 生态学报 35, 8221-8230.
[30]	Bai C, Yan M, BI R, He YH (2014). Spatial pattern analysis of dominant species in Exochorda giraldii community in Xingtang Temple of Taiyue Mountains, Shanxi, China.Chin J Plant Ecol 38, 1283-1295.
[31]	Brooker RW, Maestre FT, Callaway RM, Lortie CL, Cavieres LA, Kunstler G, Liancourt P, Tielböerger K, Travis JMJ, Anthelme F, Armas C, Coll L, Corcket E, Delzon S, Forey E, Kikvidze Z, Olofsson J, Pugnaire FI, Quiroz CL, Saccone P, Schiffers K, Seifan M, Touzard B, Michalet R (2008). Facilitation in plant comm- unities: the past, the present, and the future.J Ecol 96, 18-34.
[32]	Callaway RM (2007). Positive Interactions and Interdependence in Plant Communities. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 443-444.
[33]	Callaway RM, Walker LR (1997). Competition and facilitation: a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities.Ecology 78, 1958-1965.
[34]	Condit R, Ashton PS, Baker P, Bunyavejchewin S, Gunatilleke S, Gunatilleke N, Hubbell SP, Foster RB, Itoh A, LaFrankie JV, Lee HS, Losos E, Manokaran N, Sukumar R, Yamakura T (2000). Spatial patterns in the distribution of tropical tree species.Science 288, 1414-1418.
[35]	Glime JM (2006). Bryophyte Ecology. .
[36]	Mägdefrau K (1982). Life-forms of Bryophytes. In: Smith AJE, ed. Bryophyte Ecology. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 45-58.
[37]	Nathan R (2006). Long-distance dispersal of plants.Science 313, 786-788.
[38]	Rayburn AP, Schiffers K, Schupp EW (2011). Use of precise spatial data for describing spatial patterns and plant interactions in a diverse Great Basin shrub community.Plant Ecol 212, 585-594.
[39]	Shen GC, He FL, Waagepetersen R, Sun IF, Hao ZQ, Chen ZS, Yu MJ (2013). Quantifying effects of habitat heterogeneity and other clustering processes on spatial distributions of tree species.Ecology 94, 2436-2443.
[40]	Wiegand T, Moloney KA (2004). Rings, circles, and null- models for point pattern analysis in ecology.Oikos 104, 209-229.