Chinese Bulletin of Botany ›› 2017, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (5): 543-549.DOI: 10.11983/CBB16123 cstr: 32102.14.CBB16123
• EXPERIMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS • Previous Articles Next Articles
Lulong Sun, Wei Song, Yuanpeng Du, Heng Zhai*
Received:2016-06-02
Accepted:2016-09-04
Online:2017-09-01
Published:2017-07-10
Contact:
Heng Zhai
Lulong Sun, Wei Song, Yuanpeng Du, Heng Zhai. Application of Photochemical Reflectance Index in Comparing Frost Resistance of Grapevine Cultivars[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2017, 52(5): 543-549.
Figure 1 Temperature-PRI relationships in leaves of different grapevine cultivars (A)-(L) Indicate grapevine cultivars Kyoho, Summer black, Muscat, Moldova, Tangwei Butao, Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot, Frontenac, Vidal Blanc, Shan Butao, White Riesling and Pinot Chardonnay, respectively, the same as Figure 2. All regressions were conducted for the range of -8°C to 0°C and significant difference at 0.05 levels.
Figure 2 Temperature-Rt relationships in different grapevine cultivars (A)-(L) See Figure 1. Rt (%)=PRIt/PRI4°C×100, t=0, -2, -4, -6, -8°C. All regressions were conducted for the range of -8°C to 0°C and significant difference at 0.05 levels.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R0 | ||||||||||||
| 1. Kyoho | ||||||||||||
| 2. Summer black | * | |||||||||||
| 3. Muscat | * | * | ||||||||||
| 4. Moldova | * | * | * | |||||||||
| 5. Tangwei Butao | * | * | * | * | ||||||||
| 6. Cabernet Sauvignon | * | * | * | * | * | |||||||
| 7. Merlot | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||||||
| 8. Frontenac | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||||
| 9. Vidal Blanc | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||||
| 10. Shan Butao | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||
| 11. White Riesling | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||
| 12. Pinot Chardonnay | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |
| R-8 | ||||||||||||
| 1. Kyoho | ||||||||||||
| 2. Summer black | * | |||||||||||
| 3. Muscat | * | * | ||||||||||
| 4. Moldova | * | * | * | |||||||||
| 5. Tangwei Butao | * | * | * | * | ||||||||
| 6. Cabernet Sauvignon | * | * | * | * | * | |||||||
| 7. Merlot | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||||||
| 8. Frontenac | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||||
| 9. Vidal Blanc | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||||
| 10. Shan Butao | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||
| 11. White Riesling | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||
| 12. Pinot Chardonnay | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |
| 1/SLP | ||||||||||||
| 1. Kyoho | ||||||||||||
| 2. Summer black | * | |||||||||||
| 3. Muscat | * | n | ||||||||||
| 4. Moldova | * | * | * | |||||||||
| 5. Tangwei Butao | * | * | * | * | ||||||||
| 6. Cabernet Sauvignon | * | * | * | * | * | |||||||
| 7. Merlot | * | * | n | * | * | * | ||||||
| 8. Frontenac | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||||
| 9. Vidal Blanc | * | * | * | n | * | * | * | * | ||||
| 10. Shan Butao | * | * | n | * | * | * | n | * | * | |||
| 11. White Riesling | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||
| 12. Pinot Chardonnay | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |
Table 1 Comparison of R0, R-8, 1/SLP among 12 grapevine cultivar leaves
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R0 | ||||||||||||
| 1. Kyoho | ||||||||||||
| 2. Summer black | * | |||||||||||
| 3. Muscat | * | * | ||||||||||
| 4. Moldova | * | * | * | |||||||||
| 5. Tangwei Butao | * | * | * | * | ||||||||
| 6. Cabernet Sauvignon | * | * | * | * | * | |||||||
| 7. Merlot | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||||||
| 8. Frontenac | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||||
| 9. Vidal Blanc | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||||
| 10. Shan Butao | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||
| 11. White Riesling | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||
| 12. Pinot Chardonnay | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |
| R-8 | ||||||||||||
| 1. Kyoho | ||||||||||||
| 2. Summer black | * | |||||||||||
| 3. Muscat | * | * | ||||||||||
| 4. Moldova | * | * | * | |||||||||
| 5. Tangwei Butao | * | * | * | * | ||||||||
| 6. Cabernet Sauvignon | * | * | * | * | * | |||||||
| 7. Merlot | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||||||
| 8. Frontenac | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||||
| 9. Vidal Blanc | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||||
| 10. Shan Butao | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||
| 11. White Riesling | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||
| 12. Pinot Chardonnay | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |
| 1/SLP | ||||||||||||
| 1. Kyoho | ||||||||||||
| 2. Summer black | * | |||||||||||
| 3. Muscat | * | n | ||||||||||
| 4. Moldova | * | * | * | |||||||||
| 5. Tangwei Butao | * | * | * | * | ||||||||
| 6. Cabernet Sauvignon | * | * | * | * | * | |||||||
| 7. Merlot | * | * | n | * | * | * | ||||||
| 8. Frontenac | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||||
| 9. Vidal Blanc | * | * | * | n | * | * | * | * | ||||
| 10. Shan Butao | * | * | n | * | * | * | n | * | * | |||
| 11. White Riesling | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||
| 12. Pinot Chardonnay | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |
| Cultivar | R0 | R-8 | 1/SLP | Means |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyoho | 0.667 | 0.644 | 0.083 | 0.464 |
| Summer black | 0.668 | 0.298 | 0 | 0.322 |
| Muscat | 0.513 | 0.151 | 0.006 | 0.223 |
| Moldova | 1 | 0.930 | 0.023 | 0.651 |
| Tangwei Butao | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.333 |
| Cabernet Sauvignon | 0.977 | 1 | 0.057 | 0.678 |
| Merlot | 0.839 | 0.661 | 0.012 | 0.504 |
| Frontenac | 0.772 | 0.591 | 0.041 | 0.468 |
| Vidal Blanc | 0.874 | 0.713 | 0.024 | 0.537 |
| Shan Butao | 0.828 | 0.623 | 0.011 | 0.487 |
| White Riesling | 0.946 | 0.973 | 0.066 | 0.662 |
| Pinot Chardonnay | 0.525 | 0.486 | 0.123 | 0.378 |
Table 2 Affiliation function analysis of cold hardiness in lea- ves of 12 grapevine cultivars
| Cultivar | R0 | R-8 | 1/SLP | Means |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyoho | 0.667 | 0.644 | 0.083 | 0.464 |
| Summer black | 0.668 | 0.298 | 0 | 0.322 |
| Muscat | 0.513 | 0.151 | 0.006 | 0.223 |
| Moldova | 1 | 0.930 | 0.023 | 0.651 |
| Tangwei Butao | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.333 |
| Cabernet Sauvignon | 0.977 | 1 | 0.057 | 0.678 |
| Merlot | 0.839 | 0.661 | 0.012 | 0.504 |
| Frontenac | 0.772 | 0.591 | 0.041 | 0.468 |
| Vidal Blanc | 0.874 | 0.713 | 0.024 | 0.537 |
| Shan Butao | 0.828 | 0.623 | 0.011 | 0.487 |
| White Riesling | 0.946 | 0.973 | 0.066 | 0.662 |
| Pinot Chardonnay | 0.525 | 0.486 | 0.123 | 0.378 |
| [1] | 白金风, 公芙萍, 李春华, 武峰梅, 赵贵报 (2015). 侯马市近30年霜及霜冻的气候特征分析. 中国农学通报 31(2), 257-261. |
| [2] | 高振 (2014). 基于温度-伤害度关系分析葡萄抗寒性及其影响因素. 硕士论文. 泰安: 山东农业大学. pp. 19-20. |
| [3] | 潘淑坤, 张明军, 汪宝龙, 马雪宁 (2013). 1960-2011年新疆初终霜日及无霜期的变化特征. 干旱区研究 30, 735-742. |
| [4] | 张磊, 王静, 张晓煜, 卫建国, 段晓凤, 李红英, 肖艳红 (2014). 近50a宁夏初、终霜日基本特征及变化趋势. 干旱区研究 31, 1039-1045. |
| [5] | Allen DJ, Ort DR (2001). Impacts of chilling temperatures on photosynthesis in warm-climate plants.Trends Plant Sci 6, 36-42. |
| [6] | Ferguson JC, Tarara JM, Mills LJ, Grove GG, Keller M (2011). Dynamic thermal time model of cold hardiness for dormant grapevine buds.Ann Bot 107, 389-396. |
| [7] | Fuller MP, Telli G (1999). An investigation of the frost hardiness of grapevine (Vitis vinifera) during bud break.Ann Appl Biol 135, 589-595. |
| [8] | Gu SL (1999). Lethal temperature coefficient—a new parameter for interpretation of cold hardiness.J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 74, 53-59. |
| [9] | Kovács LG, Byers PL, Kaps ML, Saenz J (2003). Dormancy, cold hardiness, and spring frost hazard in Vitis amurensis hybrids under continental climatic conditions.Am J Enol Viticult 54, 8-14. |
| [10] | Maughan TL, Black BL, Drost D (2015). Critical temperature for sub-lethal cold injury of strawberry leaves.Sci Hortic 183, 8-12. |
| [11] | Nakaji T, Oguma H, Fujinuma Y (2006). Seasonal changes in the relationship between photochemical reflectance in- dex and photosynthetic light use efficiency of Japanese larch needles.Int J Remote Sens 27, 493-509. |
| [12] | Neuner G, Erler A, Ladinig U, Hacker J, Wagner J (2013). Frost resistance of reproductive tissues during various sta- ges of development in high mountain plants.Physiol Plant- arum 147, 88-100. |
| [13] | Sun LL, Song W, Geng QW, Du YP, Zhai H, Qin WS (2016). Comparison of cold hardiness in the leaves of various grape cultivars based on photochemical reflectance index.Vitis J Grapevine Res 55, 107-112. |
| [14] | Wample RL, Bary A (1992). Harvest date as a factor in carbohydrate storage and cold hardiness of Cabernet Sauvignon grapevines.J Am Soc Hortic Sci 117, 32-36. |
| [15] | Wample RL, Spayd SE, Evans RG, Stevens RG (1993). Nitrogen fertilization of White Riesling grapes in Was- hington: nitrogen seasonal effects on bud cold hardiness and carbohydrate reserves.Am J Enol Viticult 44, 159-167. |
| [16] | Wolf TK, Cook MK (1994). Cold hardiness of dormant buds of grape cultivars: comparison of thermal analysis and field survival.HortScience 29, 1453-1455. |
| [17] | Wu CY, Niu Z, Tang Q, Huang WJ (2010). Revised photochemical reflectance index (PRI) for predicting light use efficiency of wheat in a growth cycle: validation and com- parison.Int J Remote Sens 31, 2911-2924. |
| [1] | Cao Yi-fei, Su Tao, Cao Min, Wang Hai-yan, Yang Jie. Drivers of Cenozoic Angiosperm Leaf Vein Density Evolution: Climate Adaptation and Herbivory Pressure [J]. , 2027, 51(动植物互作): 0-. |
| [2] | Rao Chaokang, Tang Liang. Characteristics and Drivers of Mangrove Phyllosphere Microbial Communities across Different Tidal Elevations [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(预发表): 1-. |
| [3] | Xiangzheng Yin, Haiyan Jiang, Jun Zhang, Chunsheng Luo, Yuanming Zhang. Diversity characteristics of phyllosphere bacterial communities in desert shrubs in hyper-arid regions [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2026, 34(4): 25485-. |
| [4] | Shengyun Wang, Erbiao Guo, Mengjun Li, Zhonghua Wang. Leaf Color Mutants in Medicinal Plants: Induction and Mutation Mechanisms [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2026, 61(3): 529-540. |
| [5] | Penglai Fan, Wei Yao, Chengming Huang, Qihai Zhou. Research history and conservation progress of leaf monkeys in China [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2026, 34(3): 25446-. |
| [6] | Yuyan Jin, Shuangshuang Chen, Jing Feng, Xintong Liu, Xiangyu Qi, Huijie Chen, Yan Dong, Yanming Deng. Establishment of a Regeneration System In Vitro for Hydrangea macrophylla ‘Chikushi-no-kaze’ [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2026, 61(3): 485-495. |
| [7] | MeiqiongTang, Chunyin Liang, Ying Hu, Yang Lin, Fan Wei, Ying Liang, Linxuan Li, Gang Li. The Comparative Analysis of Psoralen and Bergapten Contents and Transcriptome Characterization in Ficus hirta with Different Leaf shapes [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2026, 61(2): 223-237. |
| [8] | LI Qin, HE Peng-Cheng, YE Qing. Variation in flower and leaf functional traits of 24 species in South China National Botanical Garden [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(2): 474-488. |
| [9] | WANG Meng-Xue, HU Ming-Yan, CHU Cheng-Jin, CHEN Yang, LUO Wen-Qi, MA Zi-Long. C, N, P stoichiometric characteristics of leaves and fine roots in different mycorrhizal tree species in subtropical forests [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(2): 334-343. |
| [10] | FENG Zhe, XU Ge-Xi, LIU Shun, CHEN Jian, LI Fei-Fan, GONG Shan-Shan, JIA Lei, SUN Zhen, YU Mei-Ni, SHI Zuo-Min, ZHOU Qing-Hong, JIANG Dong-Mei. Habitat factors and phylogeny jointly drive leaf stoichiometry in dry-hot valley region of Jinsha River, Yunnan, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(2): 352-361. |
| [11] | ZHANG Jing, CHEN Jie, LI Yan-Peng, PAN Li-Jun, XU Han, LI Yi-De, HE Hai-Sheng. Comparison of plant biomass in conifer and broadleaf mixed artificial forests in south subtropical area and analyses of influential factors [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(2): 400-416. |
| [12] | HOU Xiao-Fan, MA Chen-Han, SUN Yu-Qian, GAO Yu-Han, LI Pin. Differential ecological stoichiometry of leaf and fine root litter decomposition under ozone stress [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(2): 268-278. |
| [13] | YE Xue-Min, GAO Wei, TANG Xing-Lin, CHEN Fu-Sheng, SUN Rong-Xi, LUO Kun-Shui. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus additions on leaf herbivory damage and its underlying mechanisms in saplings in an evergreen broad-leaved forest [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(2): 256-267. |
| [14] | YU Jiang-Shan, XU Hao, GUO Yong-Zhong, HOU Ji-Hua. Important role of organ age in variation and coordination of stoichiometry in Pinus tabuliformis leaves, twigs and roots [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(2): 306-317. |
| [15] | TIAN Di, CHI Xiao-Long, SHI Liang, LIU Xiao-Han, ZHAO Chang-Ti, WU Mei, ZHANG Yu-Zhong, GAO Yong-Liang. Stoichiometric characteristics of dominant afforestation tree species and their environmental drivers in Saihanba region [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(2): 362-373. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||