Effect of Cottonseed Meal on Cotton Physiology and Growth Compensation Under Salinity-alkalinity Stress

doi:10.11983/CBB18089

Abstract

Abstract: We investigated the salt-tolerant mechanism of cottonseed meal in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) under sali- nity-alkalinity stress. Salinity-alkalinity stress of 8 g·kg ^-1was tested in the field to explore the effect of cottonseed meal dose on the physiology and growth of cotton. Cottonseed meal could increase the absorption of K ⁺ and decrease that of Na ⁺. K ⁺ and Na ⁺ were kept in ion balance in cells under salinity-alkalinity stress. Cottonseed meal could effectively alleviate damage to cotton, significantly promote growth of cotton, and improve chlorophyll content and photosynthesis of leaves. An amount of 6 000 kg·hm ^-2 cottonseed meal was the most significant treatment, and the improvement effect of cottonseed meal under salt stress was better. According to principal component analysis, the K ⁺/Na ⁺ratio in leaves, root length, fresh weight, dry weight and intercellular CO₂ concentration were the main factors involved in salinity-alkalinity stress.

Key words: cottonseed meal, salinity-alkalinity stress, physiology, growth, compensation effect

Hongxiu Ma,Kaiyong Wang,Kaixiang Zhang,Chunmei Meng,Mengjie An. Effect of Cottonseed Meal on Cotton Physiology and Growth Compensation Under Salinity-alkalinity Stress[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2019, 54(2): 208-216.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://www.chinbullbotany.com/EN/10.11983/CBB18089

https://www.chinbullbotany.com/EN/Y2019/V54/I2/208

Figures/Tables 7

References 38

[1]	阿曼古丽·买买提阿力, 拉扎提·努尔布拉提, 高丽丽, 张巨松, 田立文 ( 2017). 盐胁迫对海岛棉和陆地棉幼苗生长及生理特性的影响. 植物学报 52, 465-473.
[2]	鲍士旦 ( 2000). 土壤农化分析(第3版). 北京: 中国农业出版社. pp.270-271.
[3]	陈俊 ( 2006). 碱地肤幼苗抗氧化酶系统对盐碱混合胁迫的生理响应特点. 硕士论文. 长春: 东北师范大学. pp.4-10.
[4]	陈琪, 石剑华 ( 2013). 棉籽饼使用脱毒剂和生物发酵脱毒的营养分析. 当代畜禽养殖业( 10), 6-7,8.
[5]	郭凯, 巨兆强, 封晓辉, 李晓光, 刘小京 ( 2016). 咸水结冰灌溉改良盐碱地的研究进展及展望. 中国生态农业学报 24, 1016-1024.
[6]	黄清荣, 祁琳, 柏新富 ( 2018). 根环境供氧状况对盐胁迫下棉花幼苗光合及离子吸收的影响. 生态学报 38, 528-536.
[7]	贾玉珍, 朱禧月, 唐予迪, 蔡养廉, 林同保, 罗先宝, 杨兆庚, 韩海江 ( 1987). 棉花出苗及苗期耐盐性指标的研究. 河南农业大学学报 21, 30-41.
[8]	焦伟红 ( 2011). 燕麦耐盐碱渗透调节机制研究. 硕士论文. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学. pp.15-20.
[9]	李合生, 陈华癸 ( 2000). 21世纪农林本科生物系列课程改革的研究与实践(上). 中国农业教育 ( 4), 19-22.
[10]	蔺吉祥, 李晓宇, 唐佳红, 张兆军, 李卓琳, 高战武, 穆春生 ( 2011). 盐碱胁迫对小麦种子萌发、早期幼苗生长及Na ⁺、K ⁺代谢的影响 . 麦类作物学报 31, 1148-1152.
[11]	刘玉国, 谭兰兰, 卞龙, 王开勇 ( 2013). 盐渍化土壤改良剂的筛选. 农业科技与信息(20), 48-49, 50 .
[12]	牛花朋, 李胜荣, 申俊峰, 李祯, 佟景贵 ( 2006). 粉煤灰与若干有机固体废弃物配施改良土壤的研究进展. 地球与环境 34(2), 27-34.
[13]	石德成, 殷丽娟 ( 1993). 盐(NaCl)与碱(Na₂CO₃)对星星草胁迫作用的差异. 植物学报 35, 144-149.
[14]	田长彦, 周宏飞, 刘国庆 ( 2000). 21世纪新疆土壤盐渍化调控与农业持续发展研究建议. 干旱区地理 23, 177-181.
[15]	王安平, 吕云峰, 张军民, 赵青余, 王加启, 田科雄 ( 2010). 我国棉粕和棉籽蛋白营养成分和棉酚含量调研. 华北农学报 25(S1), 301-304. DOI
[16]	王文杰, 贺海升, 祖元刚, 赵修华, 杨磊, 关宇, 许慧男, 于兴洋 ( 2009). 施加改良剂对重度盐碱地盐碱动态及杨树生长的影响. 生态学报 29, 2272-2278.
[17]	韦本辉, 申章佑, 周佳, 甘秀芹, 劳承英, 周灵芝, 刘斌, 胡泊, 李艳英 ( 2017). 粉垄改造利用盐碱地效果初探. 中国农业科技导报 19(10), 107-112.
[18]	翁永玲, 宫鹏 ( 2006). 土壤盐渍化遥感应用研究进展. 地理科学 26, 369-375.
[19]	杨国会, 石德成 ( 2011). 盐碱胁迫对小冰麦相对生长率及茎叶离子积累的影响. 河南农业科学 40, 45-47, 57.
[20]	杨淑萍, 危常州, 梁永超 ( 2010). 盐胁迫对不同基因型海岛棉光合作用及荧光特性的影响. 中国农业科学 43, 1585-1593.
[21]	员学锋, 汪有科, 吴普特, 冯浩 ( 2005). PAM对土壤物理性状影响的试验研究及机理分析. 水土保持学报 19(2), 37-40.
[22]	张华宁, 李孟军, 郭秀林, 张艳敏, 刘子会 ( 2017). 盐胁迫下不同K⁺吸收抑制剂对小麦根系K⁺/Na⁺比和质膜相关蛋白活性的影响 . 华北农学报 32(5), 154-162.
[23]	张景云, 缪南生, 白雅梅, 万新建, 吕文河 ( 2014). 盐胁迫下二倍体马铃薯叶绿素含量和抗氧化酶活性的变化. 作物杂志 ( 5), 59-63.
[24]	张娜, 潘思轶, 侯旭杰 ( 2009). 棉籽蛋白提取工艺及其主要理化性质研究. 食品研究与开发 30(7), 36-38.
[25]	张树文, 杨久春, 李颖, 张养贞, 常丽萍 ( 2010). 1950s中期以来东北地区盐碱地时空变化及成因分析. 自然资源学报 25, 435-442.
[26]	赵可夫, 王韶唐 ( 1990). 作物抗性生理. 北京: 农业出版社. pp. 300-304.
[27]	周志林, 唐君, 曹清河, 赵冬兰, 张安 ( 2017). NaCl胁迫对甘薯植株体内K⁺、Na⁺和Cl^-含量及生长的影响 . 中国农业科技导报 19(4), 17-23.
[28]	罗宾BA ( 陈恺元等译) ( 1983). 棉花生理学. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社. pp. 116-118.
[29]	Boscaiu M, Estrelles E, Soriano P, Vicente O ( 2005). Effects of salt stress on the reproductive biology of the halophyte Plantago crassifolia . Biol Plant 49, 141-143.
[30]	Jalees MM, Khan MZ, Saleemi MK, Khan A ( 2011). Effects of cottonseed meal on hematological, biochemical and behavioral alterations in male Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). Pak Vet J 31, 211-214.
[31]	Li RL, Shi FC, Fukuda K, Yang YL ( 2010). Effects of salt and alkali stresses on germination, growth, photosynthesis and ion accumulation in alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.). Soil Sci Plant Nutr 56, 725-733.
[32]	Munns R ( 2002). Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ 25, 239-250. DOI URL
[33]	Nedjimi B, Daoud Y ( 2009). Ameliorative effect of CaCl₂ on growth, membrane permeability and nutrient uptake in Atriplex halimus subsp. schweinfurthii grown at high (NaCl) salinity. Desalination 249, 163-166.
[34]	Schroeder JI, Ward JM, Gassmann W ( 1994). Perspectives on the physiology and structure of inward-rectifying K⁺ channels in higher plants: biophysical implications for K⁺ uptake . Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 23, 441-471. DOI URL
[35]	Štefanić PP, Koffler T, Adler G, Bar-Zvi D ( 2013). Chloroplasts of salt-grown Arabidopsis seedlings are impaired in structure, genome copy number and transcript levels. PLoS One 8, e82548. DOI URL
[36]	Wang LW, Showalter AM, Ungar IA ( 2005). Effects of intraspecific competition on growth and photosynthesis of Atriplex prostrata . Aquat Bot 83, 187-192.
[37]	Zhang JT, Mu CS ( 2009). Effects of saline and alkaline stresses on the germination, growth, photosynthesis, ionic balance and anti-oxidant system in an alkali-tolerant leguminous forage Lathyrus quinquenervius . Soil Sci Plant Nutr 55, 685-697.
[38]	Zhang TB, Zhan XY, Kang YH, Wan SQ, Feng H ( 2017). Improvements of soil salt characteristics and nutrient status in an impermeable saline-sodic soil reclaimed with an improved drip irrigation while ridge planting Lycium barbarum L. J Soils Sediments 17, 1126-1139.

Treatment	Total chlorophyll content (mg·g^-1)	Chlorophyll a content (mg·g^-1)	Chlorophyll b content (mg·g^-1)	Carotenoid content (mg·g^-1)
CK	2.51±0.10 a	1.45±0.08 a	0.66±0.06 a	0.64±0.09 a
Y₀	1.51±0.08 c	1.17±0.10 bc	0.33±0.13 b	0.34±0.09 b
Y₁	1.80±0.08 bc	1.37±0.08 bc	0.43±0.09 ab	0.46±0.10 ab
Y₂	2.07±0.13 ab	1.44±0.09 ab	0.45±0.10 ab	0.57±0.13 ab
J₀	2.18±0.19 ab	1.17±0.13 c	0.42±0.13 ab	0.28±0.08 b
J₁	1.78±0.28 bc	1.37±0.13 ab	0.33±0.10 b	0.32±0.09 b
J₂	1.89±0.12 bc	1.43±0.08 ab	0.40±0.11 ab	0.51±0.16 ab

Treatment	Total chlorophyll content (mg·g^-1)	Chlorophyll a content (mg·g^-1)	Chlorophyll b content (mg·g^-1)	Carotenoid content (mg·g^-1)
CK	2.51±0.10 a	1.45±0.08 a	0.66±0.06 a	0.64±0.09 a
Y₀	1.51±0.08 c	1.17±0.10 bc	0.33±0.13 b	0.34±0.09 b
Y₁	1.80±0.08 bc	1.37±0.08 bc	0.43±0.09 ab	0.46±0.10 ab
Y₂	2.07±0.13 ab	1.44±0.09 ab	0.45±0.10 ab	0.57±0.13 ab
J₀	2.18±0.19 ab	1.17±0.13 c	0.42±0.13 ab	0.28±0.08 b
J₁	1.78±0.28 bc	1.37±0.13 ab	0.33±0.10 b	0.32±0.09 b
J₂	1.89±0.12 bc	1.43±0.08 ab	0.40±0.11 ab	0.51±0.16 ab

Treatment	P_n (μmol·m^-2·s^-1)	G_s(mol·m^-2·s^-1)	E (mmol·m^-2·s^-1)	C_i (μmol·mol^-1)	L_s
CK	6.73±0.15 a	111.13±1.28 a	1.81±0.25 a	281.20±0.10 b	0.25±0.10 a
Y₀	6.32±0.38 b	79.17±0.70 d	1.60±1.95 ab	262.79±0.07 e	0.28±0.04 a
Y₁	6.57±0.15 a	85.7±0.49 c	1.67±1.10 ab	270.00±0.06 d	0.25±0.06 a
Y₂	6.63±0.27 a	94.38±1.81 b	1.76±1.86 ab	282.81±0.04 b	0.21±0.10 a
J₀	5.16±0.07 c	75.16±1.63 e	1.58±1.60 b	274.77±0.08 c	0.26±0.05 a
J₁	5.76±0.18 bc	85.78±1.06 c	1.63±1.54 ab	282.47±0.06 b	0.21±0.10 a
J₂	5.82±0.25 b	86.02±1.51 c	1.66±1.88 ab	294.13±0.10 a	0.21±0.09 a

Treatment	P_n (μmol·m^-2·s^-1)	G_s(mol·m^-2·s^-1)	E (mmol·m^-2·s^-1)	C_i (μmol·mol^-1)	L_s
CK	6.73±0.15 a	111.13±1.28 a	1.81±0.25 a	281.20±0.10 b	0.25±0.10 a
Y₀	6.32±0.38 b	79.17±0.70 d	1.60±1.95 ab	262.79±0.07 e	0.28±0.04 a
Y₁	6.57±0.15 a	85.7±0.49 c	1.67±1.10 ab	270.00±0.06 d	0.25±0.06 a
Y₂	6.63±0.27 a	94.38±1.81 b	1.76±1.86 ab	282.81±0.04 b	0.21±0.10 a
J₀	5.16±0.07 c	75.16±1.63 e	1.58±1.60 b	274.77±0.08 c	0.26±0.05 a
J₁	5.76±0.18 bc	85.78±1.06 c	1.63±1.54 ab	282.47±0.06 b	0.21±0.10 a
J₂	5.82±0.25 b	86.02±1.51 c	1.66±1.88 ab	294.13±0.10 a	0.21±0.09 a

Treatment	Plant height (cm)	Root length (cm)	Fresh weight (g·plant^-1)	Dry weight (g·plant^-1)
CK	89.4±0.36 b	31.83±0.78 a	184.59±0.23 a	54.49±0.26 a
Y₀	84.1±0.17 c	26.1±0.61 c	135.81±0.52 g	37.89±0.46 e
Y₁	91±0.58 b	29.83±0.35 b	173.12±0.88 c	44.21±0.18 c
Y₂	98.67±0.58 a	30.97±0.40 ab	181.43±0.88 b	55.15±0.34 a
J₀	74.33±0.58 d	22.78±0.40 d	148.47±0.43 f	34.42±0.34 f
J₁	76.33±1.15 d	25.4±0.26 c	162.33±0.96 e	39.75±0.27 d
J₂	82.33±0.58 c	26.4±0.17 c	165.12±0.42 d	46.63±0.71 b