研究报告

SlHVA22l基因调节番茄耐旱性

  • 赵来鹏 ,
  • 王柏柯 ,
  • 杨涛 ,
  • 李宁 ,
  • 杨海涛 ,
  • 王娟 ,
  • 闫会转
展开
  • 1新疆农业大学园艺学院, 乌鲁木齐 830052
    2新疆农业科学院园艺作物研究所, 新疆特色果蔬基因组研究与遗传改良重点研究室, 乌鲁木齐 830091
*王娟, 新疆农业科学院园艺作物研究所副研究员, 硕士生导师。长期从事番茄品质改良及抗逆性分子育种研究。以通讯作者和第一作者身份在Plant Physiology and BiochemistryEnvironmental and Experimental Botany等国际期刊上发表研究论文20余篇。目前其研究团队以番茄为模式植物, 利用遗传学、基因组学及翻译组学等手段在方法学上不断创新, 解析番茄响应非生物胁迫及品质改良的分子机制, 利用基因组编辑技术开发番茄育种体系。E-mail: drjuanwang@126.com;
hzhyan1118@163.com

收稿日期: 2023-09-15

  录用日期: 2023-12-19

  网络出版日期: 2024-01-12

基金资助

农业科技创新稳定支持项目(xjnkywdzc-2023001);自治区重点研发计划(2022B02032-2);新疆特色果蔬基因组研究与遗传改良重点实验室开放课题(2023);新疆维吾尔自治区蔬菜产业技术体系(XJARS-07)

Investigation of the Regulation of Drought Tolerance by the SlHVA22l Gene in Tomato

  • Laipeng Zhao ,
  • Baike Wang ,
  • Tao Yang ,
  • Ning Li ,
  • Haitao Yang ,
  • Juan Wang ,
  • Huizhuan Yan
Expand
  • 1College of Horticulture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
    2Key Laboratory of Horticulture Crop Genomics Research and Genetic Improvement in Xinjiang, Institute of Horticultural Crops, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China

Received date: 2023-09-15

  Accepted date: 2023-12-19

  Online published: 2024-01-12

摘要

植物在生长发育过程中面临各种非生物胁迫。其中干旱胁迫严重影响作物生长, 降低其产量。植物中以TB2/DP1结构域为特征的HVA22蛋白参与调控生长发育和非生物胁迫响应。然而, HVA22在番茄(Solanum lycopersicum)干旱胁迫响应中的功能尚不清楚。该研究探索了番茄SlHVA22l基因的功能。结果表明, 番茄SlHVA22l与其它双子叶植物中的HVA22l同源蛋白具有较高的序列相似性。表达模式分析显示, SlHVA22l基因表达受干旱胁迫和植物激素(ABA和MeJA)诱导。此外, 通过酵母(Saccharomyces cerevisiae)异源表达和病毒诱导基因沉默技术沉默番茄SlHVA22l基因, 验证了SlHVA22l基因的抗旱功能。干旱处理后沉默植株表现出较高的过氧化氢(H2O2)和丙二醛(MDA)含量, 以及较低的O2-.清除率, 且其超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化物酶(POD)、过氧化氢酶(CAT)和抗坏血酸过氧化物酶(APX)的活性较对照显著降低。综上表明, SlHVA22l基因在番茄抵御干旱胁迫中发挥重要作用。

本文引用格式

赵来鹏 , 王柏柯 , 杨涛 , 李宁 , 杨海涛 , 王娟 , 闫会转 . SlHVA22l基因调节番茄耐旱性[J]. 植物学报, 2024 , 59(4) : 558 -573 . DOI: 10.11983/CBB23129

Abstract

Plants inevitably face a multitude of abiotic stresses during their growth and development stages. Drought stress significantly hampers crop growth and reduces yield. The plant HVA22 protein is characterized by the TB2/DP1 structural domain and is implicated in the modulation of plant growth, development, and responses to abiotic stress. However, its precise function in the context of drought stress response in tomato remains to be elucidated. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the functional role of the tomato SlHVA22l gene in drought tolerance. The results showed that the amino acid sequence of SlHVA22l exhibits a higher degree of sequence similarity to that of homologous HVA22l proteins found in other dicotyledonous plants. Furthermore, the expression pattern analysis revealed a significant upregulation of the SlHVA22l gene in response to drought stress and phytohormones (ABA and MeJA). Moreover, the function of the SlHVA22l gene in drought tolerance was subsequently verified by yeast heterologous expression and silencing of the endogenous SlHVA22l gene in tomato via virus-induced gene silencing. The silenced plants exhibited higher H2O2 and malondialdehyde contents, as well as lower O2-. scavenging after drought treatment. Moreover, the activities of superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalase, and ascorbate peroxidase were significantly decreased in the silenced plants compared to those in the control plants. Collectively, these results indicate that the SlHVA22l gene plays an important role in tomato resistance to drought stress.

参考文献

[1] Argasinska J, Rana AA, Gilchrist MJ, Lachani K, Young A, Smith JC (2009). Loss of REEP4 causes paralysis of the Xenopus embryo. Int J Dev Biol 53, 37-43.
[2] Casaretto JA, Ho THD (2005). Transcriptional regulation by abscisic acid in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) seeds involves autoregulation of the transcription factor HvABI5. Plant Mol Biol 57, 21-34.
[3] Chaudhary J, Khatri P, Singla P, Kumawat S, Kumari A, Vikram A, Jindal SK, Kardile H, Kumar R, Sonah H (2019). Advances in omics approaches for abiotic stress tolerance in tomato. Biology 8, 90.
[4] Chen CN, Chu CC, Zentella R, Pan SM, Ho THD (2002). AtHVA22 gene family in Arabidopsis: phylogenetic relationship, ABA and stress regulation, and tissue-specific expression. Plant Mol Biol 49, 631-642.
[5] Choudhury FK, Rivero RM, Blumwald E, Mittler R (2017). Reactive oxygen species, abiotic stress and stress combination. Plant J 90, 856-867.
[6] Danquah A, de Zélicourt A, Boudsocq M, Neubauer J, Frei dit Frey N, Leonhardt N, Pateyron S, Gwinner F, Tamby JP, Ortiz-Masia D, Marcote MJ, Hirt H, Colcombet J (2015). Identification and characterization of an ABA-activated MAP kinase cascade in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 82, 232-244.
[7] Eggert E, Obata T, Gerstenberger A, Gier K, Brandt T, Fernie AR, Schulze W, Kühn C (2016). A sucrose transporter-interacting protein disulphide isomerase affects redox homeostasis and links sucrose partitioning with abiotic stress tolerance. Plant Cell Environ 39, 1366- 1380.
[8] Fukuda T, Saigusa T, Furukawa K, Inoue K, Yamashita SI, Kanki T (2023). Hva22, a REEP family protein in fission yeast, promotes reticulophagy in collaboration with a receptor protein. Autophagy 19, 2657-2667.
[9] Gomes Ferreira MD, Araújo Castro J, Santana Silva RJ, Micheli F (2019). HVA22 from citrus: a small gene family whose some members are involved in plant response to abiotic stress. Plant Physiol Biochem 142, 395-404.
[10] Grzesiak MT, Hordyńska N, Maksymowicz A, Grzesiak S, Szechyńska-Hebda M (2019). Variation among spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes in response to the drought stress. II-root system structure. Plants 8, 584.
[11] Guo WJ, Ho THD (2008). An abscisic acid-induced protein, HVA22, inhibits gibberellin-mediated programmed cell death in cereal aleurone cells. Plant Physiol 147, 1710- 1722.
[12] Hata T, Nan HT, Koh K, Ishiura H, Tsuji S, Takiyama Y (2022). A clinical and genetic study of SPG31 in Japan. J Hum Genet 67, 421-425.
[13] Iovieno P, Punzo P, Guida G, Mistretta C, Van Oosten MJ, Nurcato R, Bostan H, Colantuono C, Costa A, Bagnaresi P, Chiusano ML, Albrizio R, Giorio P, Batelli G, Grillo S (2016). Transcriptomic changes drive physiological responses to progressive drought stress and rehydration in tomato. Front Plant Sci 7, 371.
[14] Jiang LL, Wang YB, Zhang SH, He R, Li W, Han J, Cheng XG (2017). Tomato SlDREB1 gene conferred the transcriptional activation of drought-induced gene and an enhanced tolerance of the transgenic Arabidopsis to drought stress. Plant Growth Regul 81, 131-145.
[15] Jiao P, Liu TY, Zhao CL, Fei JB, Guan SY, Ma YY (2023). ZmTCP14, a TCP transcription factor, modulates drought stress response in Zea mays L. Environ Exp Bot 208, 105232.
[16] Kumar MN, Jane WN, Verslues PE (2013). Role of the putative osmosensor Arabidopsis Histidine kinase1 in dehydration avoidance and low-water-potential response. Plant Physiol 161, 942-953.
[17] Letunic I, Bork P (2021). Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 49, W293-W296.
[18] Li Q, Shen H, Yuan SJ, Dai XG, Yang CX (2023). miRNAs and lncRNAs in tomato: roles in biotic and abiotic stress responses. Front Plant Sci 13, 1094459.
[19] Liang MW, Li HJ, Zhou F, Li HY, Liu J, Hao Y, Wang YD, Zhao HP, Han SC (2015). Subcellular distribution of NTL transcription factors in Arabidopsis thaliana. Traffic 16, 1062- 1074.
[20] Liu MM, Yu HY, Zhao GJ, Huang QF, Lu YE, Ouyang B (2017). Profiling of drought-responsive microRNA and mRNA in tomato using high-throughput sequencing. BMC Genomics 18, 481.
[21] Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-??CT method. Methods 25, 402-408.
[22] Lu P (2013). Physiological functional analysis of a stress- induced protein, HVA22, in Escherichia coli. Acce Inter J 1, 14-23.
[23] Massimi M (2021). Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) anatomical, physiological, biochemical and production responses to drought stress-a mini-review essay. Int J Hortic Sci 27, 40-45.
[24] Meng FW, Zhao QQ, Zhao X, Yang C, Liu R, Pang JH, Zhao WS, Wang Q, Liu MX, Zhang ZG, Kong ZS, Liu J (2022). A rice protein modulates endoplasmic reticulum homeostasis and coordinates with a transcription factor to initiate blast disease resistance. Cell Rep 39, 110941.
[25] Nemeskéri E, Helyes L (2019). Physiological responses of selected vegetable crop species to water stress. Agronomy 9, 447.
[26] Nemeskéri E, Neményi A, B?cs A, Pék Z, Helyes L (2019). Physiological factors and their relationship with the productivity of processing tomato under different water supplies. Water 11, 586.
[27] Nicolas P, Shinozaki Y, Powell A, Philippe G, Snyder SI, Bao K, Zheng Y, Xu YM, Courtney L, Vrebalov J, Casteel CL, Mueller LA, Fei ZJ, Giovannoni JJ, Rose JKC, Catalá C (2022). Spatiotemporal dynamics of the tomato fruit transcriptome under prolonged water stress. Plant Physiol 190, 2557-2578.
[28] Orellana S, Ya?ez M, Espinoza A, Verdugo I, González E, Ruiz-Lara S, Casaretto JA (2010). The transcription factor SlAREB1 confers drought, salt stress tolerance and regulates biotic and abiotic stress-related genes in tomato. Plant Cell Environ 33, 2191-2208.
[29] Park S, Li JS, Pittman JK, Berkowitz GA, Yang HB, Undurraga S, Morris J, Hirschi KD, Gaxiola RA (2005). Up-regulation of a H+-pyrophosphatase (H+-PPase) as a strategy to engineer drought-resistant crop plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 18830-18835.
[30] Reichardt S, Piepho HP, Stintzi A, Schaller A (2020). Peptide signaling for drought-induced tomato flower drop. Science 367, 1482-1485.
[31] Ripoll J, Urban L, Brunel B, Bertin N (2016). Water deficit effects on tomato quality depend on fruit developmental stage and genotype. J Plant Physiol 190, 26-35.
[32] Rombauts S, Déhais P, Van Montagu M, Rouzé P (1999). PlantCARE, a plant cis-acting regulatory element database. Nucleic Acids Res 27, 295-296.
[33] Sharon K, Suvarna S (2017). Cloning of HVA22 homolog from aloe vera and preliminary study of transgenic plant development. Int J Pure App Biosci 5, 1113-1121.
[34] Shen QX, Chen CN, Brands A, Pan SM, Tuan-Hua DH (2001). The stress- and abscisic acid-induced barley gene HVA22: developmental regulation and homologues in diverse organisms. Plant Mol Biol 45, 327-340.
[35] Shen QX, Uknes S, Ho THD (1993). Hormone respon-se complex in a novel abscisic acid and cycloheximide-inducible barley gene. J Biol Chem 268, 23652-23660.
[36] Sun HM, Li JT, Li X, Lv Q, Chen LP, Wang BX, Li LQ (2022a). RING E3 ubiquitin ligase TaSADR1 negatively regulates drought resistance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol Biochem 170, 255-265.
[37] Sun ZH, Feng ZK, Ding YL, Qi YP, Jiang S, Li Z, Wang Y, Qi JS, Song CP, Yang SH, Gong ZZ (2022b). RAF22, ABI1 and OST1 form a dynamic interactive network that optimizes plant growth and responses to drought stress in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant 15, 1192-1210.
[38] Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S (2021). MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol 38, 3022-3027.
[39] Wagih O (2017). ggseqlogo: a versatile R package for drawing sequence logos. Bioinformatics 33, 3645-3647.
[40] Wai AH, Waseem M, Cho LH, Kim ST, Lee DJ, Kim CK, Chung MY (2022). Comprehensive genome-wide analysis and expression pattern profiling of the SlHVA22 gene family unravels their likely involvement in the abiotic stress adaptation of tomato. Int J Mol Sci 23, 12222.
[41] Wang L, Zheng B, Yuan Y, Xu QL, Chen P (2020a). Transcriptome profiling of Fagopyrum tataricum leaves in response to lead stress. BMC Plant Biol 20, 54.
[42] Wang M, Yuan JR, Qin LM, Shi WM, Xia GM, Liu SW (2020b). TaCYP81D5, one member in a wheat cytochrome P450 gene cluster, confers salinity tolerance via reactive oxygen species scavenging. Plant Biotechnol J 18, 791-804.
[43] Wang YJ, Zhang XY, Huang GR, Liu XY, Guo R, Gu FX, Zhong XL, Mei XR (2019). Characteristics of phosphatidic acid and the underlying mechanisms of ABA-induced stomatal movement in plants. Chin Bull Bot 54, 245-254. (in Chinese)
  王雅静, 张欣莹, 黄桂荣, 刘晓英, 郭瑞, 顾峰雪, 钟秀丽, 梅旭荣 (2019). 植物磷脂酸的特性及其在ABA诱导气孔运动中的作用. 植物学报 54, 245-254.
[44] Wang YQ, Cao XY, Zhang DK, Li YQ, Wang QQ, Ma F, Xu X, Zhan XQ, Hu TX (2023). SlGATA17, a tomato GATA protein, interacts with SlHY5 to modulate salinity tolerance and germination. Environ Exp Bot 206, 105191.
[45] Wei XT, Fan XH, Zhang HL, Jiao P, Jiang ZZ, Lu X, Liu SY, Guan SY, Ma YY (2022). Overexpression of ZmSRG7 improves drought and salt tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.). Int J Mol Sci 23, 13349.
[46] Xiong HY, Yu JP, Miao JL, Li JJ, Zhang HL, Wang X, Liu PL, Zhao Y, Jiang CH, Yin ZG, Li Y, Guo Y, Fu BY, Wang WS, Li ZK, Ali J, Li ZC (2018). Natural variation in OsLG3 increases drought tolerance in rice by inducing ROS scavenging. Plant Physiol 178, 451-467.
[47] Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (2006). Transcriptional regulatory networks in cellular responses and tolerance to dehydration and cold stresses. Annu Rev Plant Biol 57, 781-803.
[48] Yang YG, Lv WT, Li MJ, Wang B, Sun DM, Deng X (2013). Maize membrane-bound transcription factor Zmbzip17 is a key regulator in the cross-talk of ER quality control and ABA signaling. Plant Cell Physiol 54, 2020-2033.
[49] Zhang HJ, Yuan YC, Xing HX, Xin M, Saeed M, Wu Q, Wu J, Zhuang T, Zhang XP, Mao LL, Sun XZ, Song XL, Wang ZW (2023). Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the HVA22 gene family in cotton and functional analysis of GhHVA22E1D in drought and salt tolerance. Front Plant Sci 14, 1139526.
[50] Zhang YG, Zhang Y, Ayibaiheremu Mutailifu, Zhang DY (2021). Heterologous overexpression of desiccation-tole- rance moss ScABI3gene changes stomatal phenotype and improves drought resistance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Chin Bull Bot 56, 414-421. (in Chinese)
  张一弓, 张怡, 阿依白合热木·木台力甫, 张道远 (2021). 异源过表达齿肋赤藓ScABI3基因改变拟南芥气孔表型并提高抗旱性. 植物学报 56, 414-421.
[51] Zhao LP, Wang BK, Yang T, Yan HZ, Yu QH, Wang J (2023). Genome-wide identification and analysis of the evolution and expression pattern of the HVA22 gene family in three wild species of tomatoes. PeerJ 11, e14844.
[52] Zhou P, An Y, Wang ZL, Du HM, Huang BR (2014). Characterization of gene expression associated with drought avoidance and tolerance traits in a perennial grass species. PLoS One 9, e103611.
文章导航

/

674-3466/bottom_cn.htm"-->