[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

植物学报 >

2022 , Vol. 57 >Issue 2: 250 - 258

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11983/CBB21213

专题论坛

植物光合作用的三维特性研究进展

展开
  • 1中国科学院植物研究所, 北方资源植物重点实验室, 北京 100093
    2中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
    3北京市植物园, 北京 100093
jcdao@ibcas.ac.cn
*E-mail: ldh1166@163.com;

收稿日期: 2021-11-30

  录用日期: 2022-02-25

  网络出版日期: 2022-02-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(31970350)

收起

Advances in Three-dimensional Characteristics of Photosynthesis in Plants

Expand
  • 1Key Laboratory of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China
    2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    3Beijing Botanical Garden, Beijing 100093, China

Received date: 2021-11-30

  Accepted date: 2022-02-25

  Online published: 2022-02-25

Fold

摘要

光合作用是地球上最重要的化学反应。虽然针对植物光合作用已经进行了广泛深入的研究, 但从三维层面探讨植物叶片光合功能及其调节作用的工作较少。叶片结构、光合机构组分、叶片内光能吸收和传递均具有明显的三维特性, 极大影响叶片内CO2转运、叶肉细胞的电子传递和碳同化, 进而使叶片光合功能及其调控表现出复杂的三维特征。因此, 从三维角度分析叶片光合特性有助于理解光合作用机理, 也能够为提高植物光合作用效率提供理论支持。

关键词： 叶片结构; 光合作用; 光吸收; 光传递; CO2转运; 三维结构

本文引用格式

邹青青, 吴含玉, 刘东焕, 姜闯道 . 植物光合作用的三维特性研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2022 , 57(2) : 250 -258 . DOI: 10.11983/CBB21213

Abstract

Photosynthesis is the most important chemical reaction on earth. Though photosynthesis in plant has been extensively studied, little attention has been paid to the photosynthetic function of plant leaves and its’ regulation in three-dimensional level. There are obvious three-dimensional characteristics in leaf structure, photosynthetic components, light transmission, and light absorption in leaves, which may greatly affect the CO2 transport inside leaves, electron transport and carbon assimilation in various mesophyll cells. Unavoidably, the photosynthetic function and its’ regulation in leaves may show complex three-dimensional characteristics. Consequently, the analysis of leaf photosynthetic characteristics from the three-dimensional perspective will help us understand the mechanism of photosynthesis and provide a theoretical support to improve photosynthetic efficiency in plants.

Key words： leaf structure; photosynthesis; light absorption; light transmission; CO2 transport; three-dimensional structure

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

参考文献

[1] 程建峰, 陈根云, 沈允钢 (2010). 神农架林区不同类型植物的叶片特征与光合性能研究. 生态环境学报 19, 165-171.
[2] 巩玥, 陈海苗, 姜闯道, 石雷 (2014). 植物叶片解剖结构的量化及其在C4植物高粱中的应用. 植物学报 49, 173-182.
[3] 宋丽清, 胡春梅, 侯喜林, 石雷, 刘立安, 杨景成, 姜闯道 (2015). 高粱、紫苏叶脉密度与光合特性的关系. 植物学报 50, 100-106.
[4] 王晓琳, 李志强, 姜闯道, 石雷, 邢全, 刘立安 (2012). 散射光和直射光对高粱叶片光合功能的影响. 作物学报 38, 1452-1459.
[5] Amunts A, Drory O, Nelson N (2007). The structure of a plant photosystem I supercomplex at 3.4 Å resolution. Nature 447, 58-63.
[6] Baker NR (2008). Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe of photosynthesis in vivo. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59, 89-113.
[7] Barbosa C, Pugnaire FI, Peroni N, Castellani TT (2018). Warming effects on the colonization of a coastal ecosystem by Furcraea foetida (Asparagaceae), a clonal invasive species. Plant Ecol 219, 813-821.
[8] Brodersen CR, Vogelmann TC (2010). Do changes in light direction affect absorption profiles in leaves? Funct Plant Biol 37, 403-412.
[9] Buckley TN (2015). The contributions of apoplastic, symplastic and gas phase pathways for water transport outside the bundle sheath in leaves. Plant Cell Environ 38, 7-22.
[10] Buckley TN, Farquhar GD (2004). A new analytical model for whole-leaf potential electron transport rate. Plant Cell Environ 27, 1487-1502.
[11] Cui M, Vogelmann TC, Smith WK (1991). Chlorophyll and light gradients in sun and shade leaves of Spinacia oleracea. Plant Cell Environ 14, 493-500.
[12] DeBlasio SL, Mullen JL, Luesse DR, Hangarter RP (2003). Phytochrome modulation of blue light-induced chloroplast movements in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 133, 1471-1479.
[13] Drag DW, Slattery R, Siebers M, DeLucia EH, Ort DR, Bernacchi CJ (2020). Soybean photosynthetic and biomass responses to carbon dioxide concentrations ranging from pre-industrial to the distant future. J Exp Bot 71, 3690-3700.
[14] Earles JM, Buckley TN, Brodersen CR, Busch FA, Cano FJ, Choat B, Evans JR, Farquhar GD, Harwood R, Huynh M, John GP, Miller ML, Rockwell FE, Sack L, Scoffoni C, Struik PC, Wu A, Yin XY, Barbour MM (2019). Embracing 3D complexity in leaf carbon-water exchange. Trends Plant Sci 24, 15-24.
[15] Earles JM, Théroux-Rancourt G Roddy AB, Gilbert ME, McElrone AJ, Brodersen CR (2018). Beyond porosity: 3D leaf intercellular airspace traits that impact mesophyll conductance. Plant Physiol 178, 148-162.
[16] Eckstein A, Zięba P, Gabryś H (2012). Sugar and light effects on the condition of the photosynthetic apparatus of Arabidopsis thaliana cultured in vitro. J Plant Growth Regul 31, 90-101.
[17] Evans JR, Kaldenhoff R, Genty B, Terashima I (2009). Resistances along the CO2 diffusion pathway inside leaves. J Exp Bot 60, 2235-2248.
[18] Evans JR, Loreto F (2000). Acquisition and diffusion of CO2 in higher plant leaves. In: Leegood RC, Sharkey TD, von Caemmerer S, eds. Photosynthesis:Physiology and Metabolism. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. pp. 321-351.
[19] Evans JR, Morgan PB, Von Caemmerer S (2017). Light quality affects chloroplast electron transport rates estimated from Chl fluorescence measurements. Plant Cell Physiol 58, 1652-1660.
[20] Evans JR, Vogelmann TC (2003). Profiles of 14C fixation through spinach leaves in relation to light absorption and photosynthetic capacity. Plant Cell Environ 26, 547-560.
[21] Evans JR, Von Caemmerer S (1996). Carbon dioxide diffusion inside leaves. Plant Physiol 110, 339-346.
[22] Evans JR, Von Caemmerer S, Setchell BA, Hudson GS (1994). The relationship between CO2 transfer conductance and leaf anatomy in transgenic tobacco with a reduced content of Rubisco. Australian J Plant Physiol 21, 475-495.
[23] Galmés J, Ochogavía JM, Gago J, Roldán EJ, Cifre J, Conesa MÀ (2013). Leaf responses to drought stress in Mediterranean accessions of Solanum lycopersicum: anatomical adaptations in relation to gas exchange parameters. Plant Cell Environ 36, 920-935.
[24] Harwood R, Goodman E, Gudmundsdottir M, Huynh M, Musulin Q, Song M, Barbour MM (2020). Cell and chloroplast anatomical features are poorly estimated from 2D cross-sections. New Phytol 225, 2567-2578.
[25] Hatch MD (1992). C4 photosynthesis: an unlikely process full of surprises. Plant Cell Physiol 33, 333-342.
[26] Ho QT, Berghuijs HNC, Watté R, Verboven P, Herremans E, Yin XY, Retta MA, Aernouts B, Saeys W, Helfen L, Farquhar GD, Struik PC, Nicolaï BM (2016). Three-di-a)mensional microscale modelling of CO2 transport and light propagation in tomato leaves enlightens photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ 39, 50-61.
[27] Holloway-Phillips M (2019). Illuminating photosynthesis in the mesophyll of diverse leaves. Plant Physiol 180, 1256- 1258.
[28] Iermak I, Vink J, Bader AN, Wientjes E, van Amerongen H (2016). Visualizing heterogeneity of photosynthetic properties of plant leaves with two-photon fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta-Bioenerg 1857, 1473-1478.
[29] Jahnke S, Krewitt M (2002). Atmospheric CO2 concentration may directly affect leaf respiration measurement in tobacco, but not respiration itself. Plant Cell Environ 25, 641-651.
[30] Johnson DM, Smith WK, Vogelmann TC, Brodersen CR (2005). Leaf architecture and direction of incident light influence mesophyll fluorescence profiles. Am J Bot 92, 1425-1431.
[31] Karabourniotis G, Bornman JF, Nikolopoulos D (2000). A possible optical role of the bundle sheath extensions of the heterobaric leaves of Vitis vinifera and Quercus coccifera. Plant Cell Environ 23, 423-430.
[32] Klughammer C, Schreiber U (2015). Apparent PSII absorption cross-section and estimation of mean PAR in optically thin and dense suspensions of Chlorella. Photosynth Res 123, 77-92.
[33] Laisk A, Edwards GE (1998). Oxygen and electron flow in C4 photosynthesis: mehler reaction, photorespiration and CO2 concentration in the bundle sheath. Planta 205, 632- 645.
[34] Liakoura V, Fotelli MN, Rennenberg H, Karabourniotis G (2009). Should structure-function relations be considered separately for homobaric vs. heterobaric leaves? Am J Bot 96, 612-619.
[35] Lichtenberg M, Trampe ECL, Vogelmann TC, Kühl M (2017). Light sheet microscopy imaging of light absorption and photosynthesis distribution in plant tissue. Plant Physiol 175, 721-733.
[10] Maai E, Miyake H, Taniguchi M (2011). Differential positioning of chloroplasts in C4 mesophyll and bundle sheath cells. Plant Signal Behav 6, 1111-1113.
[37] Mantuano D, Ornellas T, Aidar MPM, Mantovani A (2021). Photosynthetic activity increases with leaf size and intercellular spaces in an allomorphic lianescent aroid Rhodospatha oblongata. Funct Plant Biol 48, 557-566.
[38] Morison JIL, Lawson T (2007). Does lateral gas diffusion in leaves matter? Plant Cell Environ 30, 1072-1085.
[39] Nikolopoulos D, Liakopoulos G, Drossopoulos I, Karabourniotis G (2002). The relationship between anatomy and photosynthetic performance of heterobaric leaves. Plant Physiol 129, 235-243.
[40] Nishio JN, Sun J, Vogelmann TC (1993). Carbon fixation gradients across spinach leaves do not follow internal light gradients. Plant Cell 5, 953-961.
[41] Oguchi R, Douwstra P, Fujita T, Chow WS, Terashima I (2011). Intra-leaf gradients of photoinhibition induced by different color lights: implications for the dual mechanisms of photoinhibition and for the application of conventional chlorophyll fluorometers. New Phytol 191, 146-159.
[42] Peguero-Pina JJ, Gil-Pelegrín E, Morales F (2009). Photosystem II efficiency of the palisade and spongy mesophyll in Quercus coccifera using adaxial/abaxial illumination and excitation light sources with wavelengths varying in penetration into the leaf tissue. Photosynth Res 99, 49-61.
[43] Pierantoni M, Brumfeld V, Addadi L, Weiner S (2019). A 3D study of the relationship between leaf vein structure and mechanical function. Acta Biomater 88, 111-119.
[44] Pieruschka R, Huber G, Berry JA (2010). Control of transpiration by radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 13372- 13377.
[45] Pieruschka R, Schurr U, Jahnke S (2005). Lateral gas diffusion inside leaves. J Exp Bot 56, 857-864.
[46] Pieruschka R, Schurr U, Jensen M, Wolff WF, Jahnke S (2006). Lateral diffusion of CO2 from shaded to illuminated leaf parts affects photosynthesis inside homobaric leaves. New Phytol 169, 779-788.
[47] Qin XC, Suga M, Kuang TY, Shen JR (2015). Structural basis for energy transfer pathways in the plant PSI-LHCI supercomplex. Science 348, 989-995.
[48] Rodrigues TM, Amaro ACE, Boaro CSF, Mendes KR, de Melo Silva SC, Júnior VF, Machado SR (2017). Four distinct leaf types in the brazilian cerrado, based on bundle sheath extension morphology. Botany 95, 1171-1178.
[49] Rogowski P, Wasilewska-Dębowska W, Krupnik T, Drożak A, Zienkiewicz M, Krysiak M, Romanowska E (2019). Photosynthesis and organization of maize mesophyll and bundle sheath thylakoids of plants grown in various light intensities. Environ Exp Bot 162, 72-86.
[50] Romanowska E, Drozak A (2006). Comparative analysis of biochemical properties of mesophyll and bundle sheath chloroplasts from various subtypes of C4 plants grown at moderate irradiance. Acta Biochim Pol 53, 709-719.
[51] Sáez PL, Bravo LA, Cavieres LA, Vallejos V, Sanhueza C, Font-Carrascosa M, Gil-Pelegrin E, Peguero-Pina JJ, Galmés J (2017). Photosynthetic limitations in two antarctic vascular plants: importance of leaf anatomical traits and Rubisco kinetic parameters. J Exp Bot 68, 2871- 2883.
[52] Sage TL, Sage RF (2009). The functional anatomy of rice leaves: implications for refixation of photorespiratory CO2 and efforts to engineer C4 photosynthesis into rice. Plant Cell Physiol 50, 756-772.
[53] Scoffoni C, Albuquerque C, Brodersen CR, Townes SV, John GP, Bartlett MK, Buckley TN, McElrone AJ, Sack L (2017). Outside-xylem vulnerability, not xylem embolism, controls leaf hydraulic decline during dehydration. Plant Physiol 173, 1197-1210.
[54] Slattery RA, Grennan AK, Sivaguru M, Sozzani R, Ort DR (2016). Light sheet microscopy reveals more gradual light attenuation in light-green versus dark-green soybean leaves. J Exp Bot 67, 4697-4709.
[55] Smith HL, McAusland L, Murchie EH (2017). Don’t ignore the green light: exploring diverse roles in plant processes. J Exp Bot 68, 2099-2110.
[56] Smith WK, Vogelmann TC, DeLucia EH, Bell DT, Shepherd KA (1997). Leaf form and photosynthesis. BioScience 47, 785-793.
[57] Strasser RJ, Srivastava A, Tsimilli-Michael M (2000). The fluorescence transient as a tool to characterize and screen photosynthetic samples. In: Yunus M, Pathre U, Mohanty P, eds. Probing Photosynthesis:Mechanism, London: Taylor and Francis. pp. 445- 483.
[58] Sun JD, Nishio JN (2001). Why abaxial illumination limits photosynthetic carbon fixation in spinach leaves. Plant Cell Physiol 42, 1-8.
[59] Terashima I, Fujita T, Inoue T, Chow WS, Oguchi R (2009). Green light drives leaf photosynthesis more efficiently than red light in strong white light: revisiting the enigmatic question of why leaves are green. Plant Cell Physiol 50, 684-697.
[60] Terashima I, Hanba YT, Tazoe Y, Vyas P, Yano S (2006). Irradiance and phenotype: comparative eco-development of sun and shade leaves in relation to photosynthetic CO2 diffusion. J Exp Bot 57, 343-354.
[61] Terashima I, Inoue Y (1985a). Vertical gradient in photosynthetic properties of spinach chloroplast dependent on intra-leaf light environment. Plant Cell Physiol 26, 781- 785.
[62] Terashima I, Inoue Y (1985b). Palisade tissue chloroplasts and spongy tissue chloroplasts in spinach: biochemical and ultrastructural differences. Plant Cell Physiol 26, 63- 75.
[63] Terashima I, Saeki T (1983). Light environment within a leaf I. Optical properties of paradermal sections of Camellia leaves with special reference to differences in the optical properties of palisade and spongy tissues. Plant Cell Physiol 24, 1493-1501.
[64] Théroux-Rancourt G, Gilbert ME (2017). The light response of mesophyll conductance is controlled by structure across leaf profiles. Plant Cell Environ 40, 726-740.
[65] Tholen D, Boom C, Zhu XG (2012). Opinion: prospects for improving photosynthesis by altering leaf anatomy. Plant Sci 197, 92-101.
[66] Vogelmann TC, Bornman JF, Yates DJ (1996). Focusing of light by leaf epidermal cells. Physiol Plantarum 98, 43-56.
[67] Vogelmann TC, Evans JR (2002). Profiles of light absorption and chlorophyll within spinach leaves from chlorophyll fluorescence. Plant Cell Environ 25, 1313-1323.
[68] Wientjes E, Philippi J, Borst JW, Van Amerongen H (2017). Imaging the photosystem I/photosystem II chlorophyll ratio inside the leaf. Biochim Biophys Acta-Bioenerg 1858, 259-265.
[69] Williams WT (1948). The continuity of intercellular spaces in the leaf of Pelargonium zonale, and its bearing on recent stomatal investigations. Ann Bot 12, 411-420.
[70] Wu HY, Dong FQ, Liu LA, Shi L, Zhang WF, Jiang CD (2020). Dorsoventral variation in photosynthesis during leaf senescence probed by chlorophyll a fluorescence induction kinetics in cucumber and maize plants. Photosynthetica 58, 479-487.
[71] Xiao Y, Tholen D, Zhu XG (2016). The influence of leaf anatomy on the internal light environment and photosynthetic electron transport rate: exploration with a new leaf ray tracing model. J Exp Bot 67, 6021-6035.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

[an error occurred while processing this directive]