拟南芥SPL1基因参与调节低磷条件下的根际酸化反应
收稿日期: 2015-05-18
修回日期: 2015-11-29
网络出版日期: 2016-03-31
基金资助
国家自然科学基金(No.31371426, No.31570263)
SPL1 is Involved in the Regulation of Rhizosphere Acidification Reaction Under Low Phosphate Condition in Arabidopsis
Received date: 2015-05-18
Revised date: 2015-11-29
Online published: 2016-03-31
根际酸化是植物适应低磷胁迫的重要策略, 但植物是如何感知和转导低磷信号, 进而促进根际酸化的分子机制至今还不十分清楚。利用pH指示剂(溴甲酚紫)显色法从拟南芥(Arabidopsis thaliana) T-DNA插入突变体库中分离得到了1株低磷诱导根际酸化缺失突变体spl1。在含溴甲酚紫的低磷培养基上培养8小时, 野生型拟南芥根际培养基的颜色变为黄色, 而突变体spl1根际培养基的颜色没有明显变化, 表明spl1的低磷根际酸化反应能力降低。当低磷胁迫处理延长20天, spl1叶片的花青素积累明显高于野生型。同时也出现, 即使在磷营养正常条件下, spl1突变体也表现出根毛数量与长度增加的特征。进一步的研究表明, 在低磷条件下, spl1突变体根部的磷含量略高于野生型, 与磷转运相关基因的表达量明显高于野生型。分子遗传学分析结果表明, SPL1基因受低磷胁迫诱导, 主要在拟南芥的叶片和花等组织中表达, 其编码的蛋白广泛分布在细胞的各个部位。以上结果表明, SPL1参与介导低磷诱导的拟南芥根际酸化反应, 调节多种低磷胁迫反应及低磷条件下磷饥饿诱导基因的表达。
雷凯健, 任晶, 朱园园, 安国勇 . 拟南芥SPL1基因参与调节低磷条件下的根际酸化反应[J]. 植物学报, 2016 , 51(2) : 184 -193 . DOI: 10.11983/CBB15080
Under low phosphate (Pi), the rhizosphere acidification of plants is a vital strategy to cope with low Pi stress. However, how plants perceive and transduce the low Pi signal and acidify the rhizosphere is not clear. A mutant, spl1, with decreased rhizosphere acidification induced by low Pi, was isolated from a T-DNA library by using the pH indicator (bromocresol purple). After 8 h incubation in low Pi medium containing bromocresol purple, the color of the rhizosphere of wild-type (WT) seedlings on the low Pi medium turned yellow, whereas that of the rhizosphere of spl1 seedlings did not change, which suggested decreased rhizosphere acidification capacity of spl1. The anthocyanin content was higher for spl1 than the WT with 20 days of low Pi treatment. The number and the length of root hairs of spl1 increased under normal conditions. Further research suggested that the Pi content of the spl1 mutant was slightly decreased in shoot but increased in root under Pi deficiency. Moreover, the expression of Pi transport-related genes in the spl1 mutant increased under Pi deficiency. Molecular genetics analysis revealed that the expression of SPL1 was induced by low Pi stress. SPL1 was mainly expressed in Arabidopsis leaves and flower tissues and the SPL1 protein was widely distributed in each part of the cell. These results indicate that SPL1 is involved in low Pi-induced rhizosphere acidification, regulation of multiple low Pi responses and Pi starvation-induced gene expression.
[1]张健, 徐金相, 孔英珍, 纪振动, 王兴春, 安丰英, 李超, 孙加强, 张素芝, 杨晓辉, 牟金叶, 刘新仿, 李家洋, 薛勇彪, 左建儒 .化学诱导激活型拟南芥突变体库的构建及分析. [J].植物学通报, 2005, 32 :1082-1088 [2]Ames BN .Assay of inorganic phosphate, total phosphate and phosphatase. [J].Methods Enzymol, 1966, 8 :115-118 [3]Bates TR, Lynch JP .Stimulation of root hair elongation in Arabidopsis thaliana by low phosphorus availability. [J].Plant Cell Environ, 1996, 19 (): 529-538 [4]Cordell D, Dranger JO, White S .The story of phosphorus: Global food security and food for thought. [J].Global Environ Change, 2009, 19 ():292-305. [5]Cruz-Ramirez A, Oropeza-Aburto A, Razo-Hernandez F, Ramirez-Chavez E, Herrera-Estrella L .t role in extraplastidic galactolipid biosynthesis and phosphate recycling in Arabidopsis roots[J]., 2006, :- [6]Herrera-Estrella L (2006).Phospholipase DZ2 plays an important role in extraplastidic galactolipid biosynthesis and phosphate recycling in Arabidopsis roots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 6765-6770. [7].Franco-Zorrilla JM, Valli A, Todesco M, Mateos I, Puga MI, Rubio-Somoza I, Leyva A, [8]Weigel D, Garcia JA, Paz-Ares J (2007).Target mimicry provides a new mechanism for regulation of microRNA activity. Nat Genet 39: 1033-1037. [9]Gomes-Junior RA, Moldes CA, Delite F S, Pompeu GB, Grat?o PL, Mazzafera P, Lea PJ, Azevedo RA (2006).Antioxidant metabolism of coffee cell suspension cultures in response to cadmium. Chemosphere 65, 1330－1337. [10]Gou JY, Felippes F, Liu CJ, Weigel D, Wang JW (2011).Negative regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis by a miR156-targeted SPL transcription factor. Plant Cell 23, 1512－1522. [11]Hinsinger P, Gobran GR, Gregory PJ, Wenzel WW (2005).Rhizosphere geometry and heterogeneity arising from root-mediated physical and chemical processes. New Phytol 168, 293－303. [12]Hsieh LC, Lin SI, Shih AC, Chen JW, Lin WY, Tseng CY, Li WH, Chiou TJ (2009) .Uncovering small RNA-mediated responses to phosphate deficiency in Arabidopsis by deep sequencing. Plant Physiol 151, 2120－2132. [13]Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW (1987).GUS fusions: Beta-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. Embo J 6, 3901－3907. [14]Khorassani R, Hettwer U, Ratzinger A, Steingrobe B, Karlovsky P, Claassen N (2011).Citramalic acid and salicylic acid in sugar beet root exudates solubilize soil phosphorus. BMC Plant Biol 11, 121－128. [15]Kim J, Yi H, Choi G, Shin B, Song PS, Choi G (2003).Functional characterization of phytochrome interacting factor 3 in phytochrome-mediated light signal transduction. Plant Cell 15, 2399－2407. [16]Kim JJ, Lee JH, Kim W, Jung HS, Huijser P, Ahn JH (2012).The microRNA156-SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE3 module regulates ambient temperature-responsive flowering via FLOWERING LOCUS T in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 159, 461－478. [17]Lapis-Gaza HR, Jost R, Finnegan PM (2014).Arabidopsis PHOSPHATE TRANSPORTER1 genes PHT1; 8 and PHT1; 9 are involved in root-to-shoot translocation of orthophosphate. BMC Plant Biol 14, 334. [18]Li M, Shinano T, Tadano T (1997).Distribution of exudates of lupin roots in the rhizosphere under phosphorus deficient conditions. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 43, 237－245. [19]Lin SI, Chiang SF, Lin WY, Chen JW, Tseng CY, Wu PC, Chiou TJ (2008).Regulatory [20]network of microRNA399 and PHO2 by systemic signaling.Plant Physiol 147, 732–746. [21]López-Bucio J, Cruz-Ramírez A, Herrera-Estrella L (2003).The role nutrient availability in regulating root architecture. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6, 280－287. [22]Neumann G, Massonneau A, Mertinoia E, Ro¨mheld V (1999).Physiological adaptations to phosphorus deficiency during proteoid root development in white lupin. Planta 208, 373－382. [23]Raghothama KG (1999) Phosphate acquisition.Annu Rev Plant Physiol. Plant Mol Biol 50, 665－693. [24]Rausch C, Bucher M (2002).Molecular mechanisms of phosphate transport in plants. Planta 216, 23－37. [25]Rouached H, Arpat AB, Poirier Y (2010).Regulation of phosphate starvation responses in plants: signaling players and cross-talks. Mol Plant 3, 288－299. [26]Santi S, Schmidt W (2009).Dissecting iron deficiency-induced proton extrusion in Arabidopsis roots. New Phytol 183, 1072－1084. [27].Shin H, Shin HS, Chen R, Harrison MJ (2006) Loss of At4 function impacts phosphate [28]distribution between the roots and the shoots during phosphate starvation.Plant J 45, 712－726. [29]Sternberg D, Mandels GR (1979).Induction of cellulolytic enzymes in Trichoderma reesei by sophorose. J Bacteriol 139, 761－769. [30]Stone J, Liang X, Nekl E, Stiers J (2005).Arabidopsis AtSPL14, a plant-specific SBP-domain transcription factor, participates in plant development and sensitivity to fumonisin B1. Plant J 41, 744－754. [31]Ticconi CA, Abel S (2004).Short on phosphate: plant surveillance and countermeasures. Trends Plant Sci 9, 548－555. [32]Unte US, Sorensen AM, Pesaresi P, Gandikota M, Leister D, Saedler H, Huijser P (2003).SPL8, an SBP-box gene that affects pollen sac development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 15, 1009－1019. [33]Vance CP, Uhde‐Stone C, Allan DL (2003) Phosphorus acquisition and use: critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource.New Phytol 157, 423－447 [34]Wang JW, Schwab R, Czech B, Mica E, Weigel D (2008).Dual effects of miR156-targeted SPL genes and CYP78A5/ KLUH on plastochron length and organ size in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 20, 1231－243. [35]Watt M, Evans JR (1999).Proteoid roots. Physiology and development. Plant Physiol 121, 317－323. [36]Wu G, Park MY, Conway SR, Wang JW, Weigel D, Poethig RS (2009).The sequential action of miR156 and miR172 regulates developmental timing in Arabidopsis. Cell 138, 750－759. [37]Xing SP, Salinas M, H?hmann S, Berndtgen R, Huijser P (2010).MiR156-targeted and non targeted SBP-box transcription factors act in concert to secure male fertility in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 22, 3935－3950. [38]Yamasaki H, Hayashi M, Fukazawa M, Kobayashi Y, Shikanai T (2009).SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE7 is a central regulator for copper homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21, 347－361. [39]Yu S, Galv?o VC, Zhang YC, Horrer D, Zhang TQ, Hao YH, Feng YQ, Wang S, Schmid M, Wang JW (2012).Gibberellin Regulates the Arabidopsis floral transition through miR156-targeted SQUAMOSA PROMOTERBINDING–LIKE transcription factors. Plant Cell 24, 3320－3332. [40]Zhang Y, Schwarz S, Saedler H, Huijser P (2007).SPL8, a local regulator in a subset of gibberellins mediated developmental processes in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol 63, 429－439. [41]Zhang Y, Xu S, Ding P, Wang D, Cheng YT, He J, Gao M, Xu F, Li Y, Zhu Z, Li X, Zhang Y (2010).Control of salicylic acid synthesis and systemic acquired resistance by two members of a plant-specific family of transcription factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 18220－18225.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
首页