技术方法·

绣球花筑紫之风离体再生技术体系的建立

  • 金玉妍 1 ,
  • 陈双双 1 ,
  • 冯景 1 ,
  • 刘欣童 1 ,
  • 齐香玉 1 ,
  • 陈慧杰 1 ,
  • 董燕 2 ,
  • 邓衍明 , 1, *
展开
  • 1 江苏省农业科学院 休闲农业研究所 , 南京 210014
  • 2 中国花卉协会 , 北京 100102
* 邓衍明, 江苏省农业科学院休闲农业研究所所长, 党总支部书记, 兼规划设计研究院副院长。担任国际盆景协会中国地区委员会副主席、中国风景园林学会花卉盆景赏石分会第九届理事会副理事长、绣球花产业国家创新联盟专家委员会主任等学术职务。其团队在 Plant CellHorticulture ResearchGeodermaBiocharJournal of Hazardous MaterialsHorticultural Plant Journal等国际著名学术期刊发表研究论文200多篇。其团队重点围绕杜鹃花、绣球花和茉莉花等特色木本花卉开展基础性与前瞻性研究, 聚焦种质资源收集与新优品种选育、高效栽培技术与应用模式创新、重要性状挖掘与分子机制解析、主题花园营建与休闲产品开发等。

收稿日期: 2025-04-17

  录用日期: 2025-07-29

  网络出版日期: 2025-07-30

基金资助

江苏省种业振兴“揭榜挂帅”项目(JBGS[2021]097)

中央财政林业科技推广示范项目(苏No.[2024]TG03)

江苏省农业科技自主创新资金(CX(22)2035)

Establishment of a Regeneration System In Vitro for Hydrangea macrophylla ‘Chikushi-no-kaze’

  • Yuyan Jin 1 ,
  • Shuangshuang Chen 1 ,
  • Jing Feng 1 ,
  • Xintong Liu 1 ,
  • Xiangyu Qi 1 ,
  • Huijie Chen 1 ,
  • Yan Dong 2 ,
  • Yanming Deng , 1, *
Expand
  • 1 Institute of Leisure Agriculture, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences , Nanjing 210014, China
  • 2 China Flower Association , Beijing 100102, China

Received date: 2025-04-17

  Accepted date: 2025-07-29

  Online published: 2025-07-30

摘要

以绣球花筑紫之风 ( Hydrangea macrophylla ‘Chikushi-no-kaze’) 无菌苗叶片为外植体, 探究不同叶位、暗培养时间及植物生长调节剂等对愈伤组织诱导、不定芽再生和增殖、壮苗生长及生根的影响。结果表明, 筑紫之风组培苗第3–5位叶 (中部成熟叶片) 为最佳取样叶位, 暗培养10–14天有利于愈伤组织诱导和不定芽再生, 最适培养基为MS+3.0 mg·L–1 CPPU+0.1 mg·L–1 2,4-D, 诱导率和再生率分别为97.78%和93.33%; 不定芽增殖最适培养基为MS+2.0 mg·L–1 6-BA+0.1 mg·L–1 IBA, 增殖系数达8.33; 壮苗生长最适培养基为MS+1.0 mg·L–1 6-BA+0.1 mg·L–1 IBA, 幼苗平均茎高为4.10 cm; 采用MS+0.3 mg·L–1 IBA培养基进行生根培养, 生根率可达87.20%。该研究建立了绣球花筑紫之风离体再生技术体系, 为种苗快繁、品种改良和基因功能研究提供了技术支撑。

本文引用格式

金玉妍 , 陈双双 , 冯景 , 刘欣童 , 齐香玉 , 陈慧杰 , 董燕 , 邓衍明 . 绣球花筑紫之风离体再生技术体系的建立[J]. 植物学报, 2026 , 61(3) : 485 -495 . DOI: 10.11983/CBB25068

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Hydrangea macrophylla is essential in landscaping, ecology, and medical care, with significant development prospects. Chikushi-no-kaze is an ideal low-maintenance variety for microlandscaping and potted H. macrophylla, which are widely favored by consumers. However, the extremely low setting rate of H. macrophylla and poor seed development under natural conditions render traditional reproduction methods inadequate for meeting the demands of large-scale annual production in the market. The breeding of H. macrophylla plantlets through tissue culture technology is currently the most efficient method for producing high-quality plantlets. RATIONALE: Regeneration efficiency in plant tissue culture is a key factor in achieving factory seedling production. Therefore, this study investigated the regeneration efficiency of isolated leaves from tissue culture plantlets of Chikushi-no-kaze under optimal culture conditions at each key stage, considering different leaf positions, dark culture durations, and other factors. The aim was to establish an efficient regeneration technology system that provides technical guidance for large-scale plantlet production and serves as a reference for establishing a genetic transformation system for H. macrophylla in the future. RESULTS: The 3rd to 5th leaves (middle mature leaves) of Chikushi-no-kaze tissue culture plantlets were identified as the optimal sampling leaves. A dark culture duration of 10–14 days was conducive to callus formation. The most suitable medium for the induction and regeneration of adventitious buds was MS+3.0 mg·L–1 CPPU+0.1 mg·L–1 2,4-D, with induction and regeneration rates of 97.78% and 93.33%, respectively. The optimal medium for adventitious bud proliferation was MS+2.0 mg·L–1 6-BA+0.1 mg·L–1 IBA, yielding a proliferation coefficient of 8.33. For elongation growth, the optimal medium was MS+1.0 mg·L–1 6-BA+0.1 mg·L–1 IBA, resulting in an average stem length of 4.10 cm. The optimal medium for rooting culture was MS+0.3 mg·L–1 IBA, achieving a rooting rate of 87.20%. CONCLUSION: This study initially established a technical system for in vitro leaf regeneration of the large leaf H. macrophylla ‘Chikushi-no-kaze’, which effectively solved the problem of low efficiency of adventitious bud regeneration of H. macrophylla and helped to achieve efficient reproduction and recycling. This study lays the foundation for the large-scale production and genetic improvement of H. macrophylla.

陈彩霞, 黄敏, 赵怡, 曹传取, 王吉升, 史志话, 汪葛峰, 高山 (2023). 大花海棠‘比哥’离体快繁再生体系的初步建立. 中国农学通报 39(34), 86-91.

陈爽, 李叶华, 赵冰 (2020). 两种野生绣球花组培及快繁技术研究. 种子 39(4), 60—63, 70.

韩勇, 张艳双, 郭磊, 顾文洪, 吴志鹏, 章鸥, 张宗俊, 胡波 (2021). 绣球属植物扦插生根能力的综合评价. 上海蔬菜 (1), 79-82.

宦智群, 徐小蓉, 耿兴敏, 唐明 (2022). 木兰科植物组织培养技术研究进展. 广西植物 42, 1980-1993.

康敏, 张美莹, 齐秀双, 佟宁宁, 李旸, 舒庆艳, 刘政安, 吕长平, 彭丽平 (2024). 伊藤杂种‘和谐’组培快繁体系的建立. 植物学报 59, 441-451.

刘欣童, 陈慧杰, 陈双双, 冯景, 齐香玉, 周惠民, 金玉妍, 孙明, 邓衍明 (2025). 绣球WRKY基因家族全基因组鉴定及其响应叶斑病的表达分析. 华北农学报 40, 93-103.

马生健, 刘金祥, 曾富华, 鲁泽东 (2020). 高羊茅高效组织培养再生体系的建立. 分子植物育种 18, 1611-1616.

聂绍虎, 刘江淼, 张鑫静, 王月莹, 高永慧, 赵惠恩 (2020). 栎叶绣球‘雪花’再生体系的建立. 分子植物育种 18, 1593-1599.

秦紫艺, 陈双双, 王华娣, 邓衍明 (2021). 绣球属植物组织培养研究进展. 江苏农业科学 49(19), 45-50.

苏鹏飞 (2024). 栎叶绣球再生及光响应机制和遗传转化体系研究. 博士论文. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学. pp. 20-34.

孙晓波, 苏家乐, 陈双双, 梁丽建, 邓衍明 (2020). 大花绣球‘无尽夏’组培苗叶片再生植株的研究. 中国农学通报 36(16), 67-72.

王红梅, 陈婷婷, 刘春风, 孟紫莲, 高鹏 (2022). 圆锥绣球‘粉色精灵’组培快繁技术研究. 种子 41(4), 130-137.

王晓春, 师尚礼, 梁慧敏, 夏阳 (2010). 2,4—D和6—BA组合配比对金达苜蓿愈伤组织诱导与分化的影响. 草地学报 18, 219-222.

王亚琴, 韦陆丹, 王文静, 刘宝骏, 张春玲, 张俊卫, 何燕红 (2020). 万寿菊再生体系的建立及优化. 植物学报 55, 749-759.

吴凡, 江俊浩, 卢山, 张楠, 邱帅, 魏建芬, 沈柏春 (2022). 中国绣球属种质资源及其利用研究进展. 园艺学报 49, 2037-2050.

武晓云, 廖敏凌, 李雪茹, 舒梓淳, 辛佳潼, 张伯晗, 戴思兰 (2024). 毛华菊3种瓣型株系再生体系的建立. 植物学报 59, 245-256.

谢纯刚, 刘哲, 章书声, 胡海涛 (2023). 手指柠檬茎段离体再生体系建立. 植物学报 58, 926-934.

杨宝明, 苏艳, 黄玉玲, 李永平, 张艺萍, 桂敏, 王丽花 (2018). 八仙花叶柄离体培养和植株再生技术研究. 山西农业科学 46, 159-162.

张郎郎, 张洁, 吕虹霖, 谭彬, 王伟, 程钧, 冯建灿 (2022). 欧洲李叶片再生体系的建立. 果树学报 39, 1945-1953.

张旭红, 王頔, 梁振旭, 孙美玉, 张金政, 石雷 (2018). 欧洲百合愈伤组织诱导及植株再生体系的建立. 植物学报 53, 840-847.

周亚辉 (2020). 八仙花组织培养研究现状、问题及展望. 农业科学研究 41, 68-70.

ArafaAMS, NowerAA, HelmeSS, Abd—ElatyHA (2017). Large scales of Hydrangea macrophylla using tissue culture technique. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 6, 776-778.

BernulaD, BenkőP, KaszlerN, DomonkosI, ValkaiI, SzőllősiR, FerencG, AyaydinF, FehérA, GémesK (2020). Timely removal of exogenous cytokinin and the prevention of auxin transport from the shoot to the root affect the regeneration potential of Arabidopsis roots. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 140, 327-339.

ChenHJ, LiuXT, MaoJD, QiXY, ChenSS, FengJ, JinYY, AhmadMZ, SunM, DengYM (2024). Comparative transcriptomic and physiological analyses reveal the key role of abscisic acid in Hydrangea macrophylla responding to Corynespora cassiicola. BMC Plant Biol 24, 1066.

ChenSS, QiXY, FengJ, ChenHJ, QinZY, WangHD, DengYM (2022). Biochemistry and transcriptome analyses reveal key genes and pathways involved in high—aluminum stress response and tolerance in Hydrangea sepals. Plant Physiol Biochem 185, 268-278.

DoilA, ZhangR, SchumA, SerekM, WinkelmannetT (2008). In vitro regeneration and propagation of Hydrangea macrophylla Thunb. ‘Nachtigall’. Propag Ornam Plants 8, 151-153.

FengJ, ChenSS, ChenHJ, DaiLJ, QiXY, AhmadMZ, GaoK, QiuS, JinYY, DengYM (2024). Metabolomics reveals a key role of salicylic acid in embryo abortion underlying interspecific hybridization between Hydrangea macrophylla and H. arborescens. Plant Cell Rep 43, 248.

LedbetterDI, PreeceJE (2004). Thidiazuron stimulates adventitious shoot production from Hydrangea quercifolia Bartr. leaf explants. Sci Hortic 101, 121-126.

LiuF, Huang LL, LiYL, ReinhoudP, JongsmaMA, WangCY (2011). Shoot organogenesis in leaf explants of Hydrangea macrophylla ‘Hyd1’ and assessing genetic stability of regenerants using ISSR markers. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 104, 111-117.

LongY, YangY, PanGT, ShenYO (2022). New insights into tissue culture plant—regeneration mechanisms. Front Plant Sci 13, 926752.

Pérez—Tornero O, Egea J, Vanoostende A, Burgos L (2000). Assessment of factors affecting adventitious shoot regeneration from in vitro cultured leaves of apricot. Plant Sci 158, 61-70.

RasporM, MotykaV, KaleriAR, NinkovićS, TubićL, CingelA, ĆosićT (2021). Integrating the roles for cytokinin and auxin in de novo shoot organogenesis: from hormone uptake to signaling outputs. Int J Mol Sci 22, 8554.

SaccoE, SavonaM, AntonettiM, GrassottiA, PasqualettoPL, RuffoniB (2012). In vitro propagation and regeneration of several Hydrangea genotypes. Acta Hortic 937, 565-572.

WangSR, YanJ, HaBE, BaiYE (2021). An efficient plant regeneration system of Hydrangea bretschneideri Dipp via stem segments as explants. Phyton Int J Exp Bot 90, 595-604.

文章导航

/