[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
研究报告

基于形态和分子证据对斑果藤族和节蒴木科的系统学研究

展开
  • 1山西师范大学生命科学学院, 临汾 041004
    2中国科学院植物研究所系统与进化植物学国家重点实验室, 北京 100093

? 共同第一作者

收稿日期: 2014-08-21

  录用日期: 2015-01-27

  网络出版日期: 2015-05-07

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(No.31300180, No.31270268)、国家重点基础研究发展计划(No.2014CB954100)、中国科学院海外科教基地建设计划(No.SAJC201315)、中国科学院国际合作局对外合作重点项目(No.GJIIZ201321)和山西师范大学校自然科学基金(No.ZR1312)

Phylogeny of Stixeae and Borthwickiaceae Based on Morphological and Molecular Data

Expand
  • 1School of Life Sciences, Shanxi Normal University, Linfen 041004, China
    2State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China

? These authors contributed equally to this paper

Received date: 2014-08-21

  Accepted date: 2015-01-27

  Online published: 2015-05-07

摘要

斑果藤族(Stixeae)和节蒴木属(Borthwickia)传统上被置于山柑科(Capparaceae), 最近的分子和形态学证据均支持它们从山柑科中分离出来, 节蒴木属已被提升为科, 但斑果藤族的系统位置和分类地位尚不清楚。为解决斑果藤族的系统位置和分类地位, 并进一步为节蒴木科的成立提供证据, 对核心十字花目GRFT (Gyrostemonaceae-Resedaceae- Forchhammeria-Tirania)分支, 使用叶表皮等20个形态性状和5个DNA片段(matKrbcLndhFtrnL-F和ITS), 用最大简约法(MP)和贝叶斯分析(BI)对形态及分子矩阵进行系统发育分析。结果高度支持斑果藤族的Neothorelia为GRFT分支成员; NeothoreliaTirania和斑果藤属(Stixis)聚为一支, 但Forchhammeria的位置尚不明确; 形态及分子系统发育分析结果均支持节蒴木科成立。

本文引用格式

赵慧玲, 鲁丽敏, 苏俊霞, 陈之端 . 基于形态和分子证据对斑果藤族和节蒴木科的系统学研究[J]. 植物学报, 2015 , 50(4) : 473 -481 . DOI: 10.11983/CBB14152

Abstract

Stixeae (including Stixis, Tirania, Neothorelia and Forchhammeria) and Borthwickia have traditionally been placed in Capparaceae. Recent molecular and morphological studies suggest Borthwickia as a new monotypic family. However, the positions and taxonomic ranks of Stixeae remain unresolved. To estimate the relationships of Stixeae, we reconstructed the phylogeny of the Gyrostemonaceae-Resedaceae-Forchhammeria-Tirania (GRFT) clade of the core Brassicales using maximum parsimony and Bayesian analysis with 20 morphological characters and five DNA regions (matK, rbcL, ndhF, trnL-F, and ITS). Our results strongly support Neothorelia as a new member of the GRFT clade; Neothorelia, Tirania and Stixis form a clade with strong support. The systematic position of Forchhammeria is still uncertain; molecular and morphological evidence support Borthwickiaceae as a new monotypic family.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

参考文献

1 洪亚平, 潘开玉, 陈之端, 路安民 (2001). 防己科植物的叶表皮特征及其系统学意义. 植物学报 43, 615-623.
2 桑涛, 徐炳声 (1996). 分支系统学当前的理论和方法概述及华东地区山胡椒属十二个种的分支系统学研究. 植物分类学报 34, 12-28.
3 苏俊霞 (2012). 蔷薇分支的分子系统学研究. 博士学位论文. 北京: 中国科学院植物研究所.
4 孙必兴 (1999). 山柑科. 见: 吴征镒编. 中国植物志(第32卷). 北京: 科学出版社. pp. 484-540.
5 孙稚颖, 张宪春 (2009). 中国瓦韦属药用植物的叶表皮观察. 植物学报 44, 331-337.
6 吴征镒, 路安民, 汤彦承, 陈之端, 李德铢 (2004). 中国被子植物科属综论. 北京: 科学出版社.
7 APG III (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group III). (2009). An update of the angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III.Bot J Linn Soc 161, 105-121.
8 Carlquist S, Hansen BF, Iltis HH, Olson ME, Geiger DL (2014). Forchhammeria and Stixis (Brassicales): stem and wood anatomical diversity, ecological and phylogenetic significance.Aliso 31, 59-75.
9 Dogan Y, Mert H, Akcan K (2008). Anatomical studies of Reseda lutea (Resedaceae).Phytologia Balcan 14, 91-95.
10 Dowled A, Reveal JL (2008). New suprageneric names for vascular plants.Phytologia 90, 416-417.
11 Erdtman G (1952). Pollen Morphology and Plant Taxonomy. Angiosperms. Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell.
12 Hansen BF (1977). A Monograph of Forchhammeria (Capparidaceae). Master Thesis Dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
13 Hall JC, Iltis HH, Sytsma KJ (2004). Molecular phylogenetics of core Brassicales, placement of orphan genera Emblingia, Forchhammeria, Tirania, and character evolution.Syst Bot 29, 654-669.
14 Hall JC, Sytsma KJ, Iltis HH (2002). Phylogeny of Capparaceae and Brassicaceae based on chloroplast sequence data.Am J Bot 89, 1826-1842.
15 Hillis DM, Bull JJ (1993). An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis.Syst Biol 42, 182-192.
16 Hutchinson J (1967). The genera of flowering plants (Angiospermae), Vol. 2. Dicotyledons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
17 Jacobs M (1968). Borthwickia (Capparaceae) from Yunnan and in fruit.Blumea 16, 360.
18 Kers LE (2003). Capparaceae. In: Kubitzki K, Bayer C, eds. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. 5. Flowering Plants: Dicotyledons; Malvales, Capparales, and non-betalain Caryophyllales. Berlin: Springer. pp. 36-56.
19 Kubitzki K (2003). Resedaceae. In: Kubitzki K, Bayer C, eds. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. 5. Flowering Plants: Dicotyledons; Malvales, Capparales, and non-betalain Caryophyllales. Berlin: Springer. pp. 334-338.
20 Mabberley DJ (2008). Mabberley’s plant-book, third edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21 Martín-Bravo S, Meimberg H, Luceño M, Märkl W, Valcárcel V, Bräuchler C, Vargas P, Heubl G (2007). Molecular systematics and biogeography of Resedaceae based on ITS and trnL-F sequences.Mol Phylogenet Evol 44, 1105-1120.
22 Mitra K (1975). Contribution to the pollen morphology of the family Capparaceae.Bull Bot Surv India 17, 7-31.
23 Morton CM, Karol KG, Chase MW (1997). Taxonomic affinities of Physena (Physenaceae) and Asteropeia (Theaceae).Bot Rev 63, 231-239.
24 Pax F, Hoffmann K (1936). Capparidaceae. In: Engler A, Prantl K, eds. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, Vol. 17b. Leipzig: Engelmann. pp. 146-233.
25 Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003). MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models.Bioinformatics 19, 1572-1574.
26 Ronse De Craene LP, Haston E (2006). The systematic relationships of glucosinolate-producing plants and related families: a cladistic investigation based on morphological and molecular characters.Bot J Linn Soc 151, 453-494.
27 Silvio F (2010). Micromorphological observations on leaf and pollen of Capparis L. sect. Capparis (Capparaceae).Plant Biosyst 138, 125-134.
28 Smith WW (1911). Borthwickia, a new genera of Cappari- daceae.Trans Proc Bot Soc Edinburgh 24, 175-176.
29 Stanford AM, Harden M, Parks CR (2000). Phylogeny and biogeography of Juglans (Juglanaceae) based on matK and ITS sequence data. Am J Bot 87, 872-882.
30 Swofford DL (2003). PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0b10. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
31 Su JX, Wang W, Zhang LB, Chen ZD (2012). Phylogenetic placement of two enigmatic genera, Borthwickia and Stixis, based on molecular and pollen data, and the description of a new family of Brassicales, Borthwicki- aceae.Taxon 61, 601-611.
32 Takhtajan A (1997). Diversity and Classification of Flowering Plants. New York: Columbia University Press.
33 White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990). Amplifications and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis M, Gelfand D, Sninsky J, White T, eds. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. San Diego, California: Academic Press. pp. 315-322.
34 Zhang ML, Tucker GC (2008). Capparaceae. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, Hong DY, eds. Flora of China, Vol. 7. Beijing: Science Press; St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden. pp. 433-450.
文章导航

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]