技术方法

黄梁木实时荧光定量PCR分析中内参基因的选择

展开
  • 华南农业大学林学与风景园林学院, 广东省森林植物种质创新与利用重点实验室, 广州 510642
作者简介:白克智, 1959年开始在中国科学院植物研究所工作, 先后任助理研究员、研究员, 长期从事植物生长发育及其调控的研究。1986年,其主持的“满江红生物学特性研究”荣获中国科学院科技进步二等奖。曾任《植物生理学报》编委、《植物学报》常务编委、中国植物生长调节剂协会主任等职。

收稿日期: 2018-01-03

  网络出版日期: 2018-04-26

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(No.31600525)和广东省科技计划(No.2017B020201008)

Selection and Validation of Reference Genes for Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis in Neolamarckia cadamba

Expand
  • Guangdong Key Laboratory for Innovative Development and Utilization of Forest Plant Germplasm, College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China

Received date: 2018-01-03

  Online published: 2018-04-26

摘要

为筛选黄梁木(Neolamarckia cadamba)实时定量PCR最佳内参基因, 该研究以黄梁木的根、芽、叶、花、果、皮及形成层为材料, 利用RT-qPCR技术对ACTCACCYPEF1α等21个管家基因家族43个候选内参基因进行表达量分析, 并利用geNorm、NormFinder和BestKeeper软件进行内参基因稳定性分析。geNorm的分析结果显示, UPL基因的稳定性最高(M=0.443), UBQ基因的稳定性最低(M=2.859); NormFinder的分析结果显示, UPL基因的稳定性最高(E=0.223), UBQ基因的稳定性最低(M=4.759); BestKeeper分析显示, UPL基因的标准偏差(SD=0.513)最低。研究结果表明, UPL基因作为内参基因稳定性最高, UBQ基因的稳定性最低。因此可以选择UPL基因作为黄梁木不同组织中RT-qPCR定量分析的内参基因。

本文引用格式

张登, 李景剑, 张梦洁, 包钰韬, 杨霄, 徐武云, 欧阳昆唏, 陈晓阳 . 黄梁木实时荧光定量PCR分析中内参基因的选择[J]. 植物学报, 2018 , 53(6) : 829 -839 . DOI: 10.11983/CBB18003

Abstract

In this study, root, shoot, leaf, flower, fruit, peel and cambium tissue of Neolamarckia cadamba was sampled to analyze the expression of 43 candidate reference genes in 21 housekeeping gene families, such as ACT, CAC, CYP, and EF1α, by RT-qPCR. The software geNorm, NormFinder and BestKeeper were used to analyze expression stability of these candidate reference genes in the seven different tissues. geNorm analysis revealed that the stability of the UPL gene was the highest (M=0.443) and the stability of UBQ was the lowest (M=2.859). NormFinder analysis revealed that the stability of UPL was the highest (E=0.223), UBQ was the lowest (M=4.759). BestKeeper analysis revealed that the standard deviation of UPL (SD=0.513) was the lowest. These findings suggest that UPL has the highest stability, and UBQ has the lowest stability. UPL gene could be selected as an internal reference gene for analysis of gene expression among different tissues of N. cadamba.

参考文献

[1] 邓小梅, 欧阳昆唏, 张倩, 黄浩, 陈晓阳 (2011). 团花研究现状及发展思考. 中南林业科技大学学报 31, 90-95.
[2] 姜琼, 王幼宁, 王利祥, 孙政玺, 李霞 (2015). 盐胁迫下大豆根组织定量PCR分析中内参基因的选择. 植物学报 50, 754-764.
[3] 欧阳昆唏, 李俊成, 黄浩, 刘明骞,陈晓阳 (2013). 团花树α-扩展蛋白基因的克隆及表达分析. 林业科学 49, 62-71.
[4] 孙美莲, 王云生, 杨冬青, 韦朝领, 高丽萍, 夏涛, 单育, 骆洋 (2010). 茶树实时荧光定量PCR分析中内参基因的选择. 植物学报 45, 579-587.
[5] 吴文凯, 刘成前, 周志刚, 卢山 (2009). 用于莱茵衣藻荧光定量PCR分析的内参基因选择. 植物生理学通讯 45, 667-672.
[6] Andersen CL, Jensen JL, ørntoft TF (2004). Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets.Cancer Res 64, 5245-5250.
[7] Bustin SA (2000). Absolute quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays.J Mol Endocrinol 25, 169-193.
[8] Bustin SA (2010). Why the need for qPCR publication guidelines?—The case for MIQE.Methods 50, 217-226.
[9] Chandel M, Kumar M, Sharma U, Kumar N, Singh B, Kaur S (2016). Isolation and characterization of flavanols fromAnthocephalus cadamba and evaluation of their antioxidant, antigenotoxic, cytotoxic and COX-2 inhibitory activities. Rev Bras Farmacogn 26, 474-483.
[10] Chen L, Zhong HY, Kuang JF, Li JG, Lu WJ, Chen JY (2011). Validation of reference genes for RT-qPCR studies of gene expression in banana fruit under different experimental conditions.Planta 234, 377-390.
[11] Die JV, Roman B, Flores F, Rowland LJ (2016). Design and sampling plan optimization for RT-qPCR experiments in plants: a case study in blueberry.Front Plant Sci 7, 271.
[12] Galeano E, Vasconcelos TS, Ramiro DA, de Fátima De Martin V, Carrer H (2014). Identification and validation of quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR reference genes for gene expression analysis in teak (Tectona grandis L.f.). BMC Res Notes 7, 464.
[13] Gibson UE, Heid CA, Williams PM (1996). A novel method for real time quantitative RT-PCR.Genome Res 6, 995-1001.
[14] Ginzinger DG (2002). Gene quantification using real-time quantitative PCR: an emerging technology hits the mainstream.Exp Hematol 30, 503-512.
[15] Ho WS, Pang SL, Abdullah J (2014). Identification and analysis of expressed sequence tags present in xylem tissues of kelampayan (Neolamarckia cadamba(Roxb.) Bosser). Physiol Mol Biol Plants 20, 393-397.
[16] Jian B, Liu B, Bi YR, Hou WS, Wu CX, Han TF (2008). Validation of internal control for gene expression study in soybean by quantitative real-time PCR.BMC Mol Biol 9, 59.
[17] Li JC, Hu XS, Huang XL, Huo HQ, Li JJ, Zhang D, Li P, Ouyang KX, Chen XY (2017). Functional identification of an EXPA gene(NcEXPA8) isolated from the tree Neolamarckia cadamba. Biotechnol Biotec Eq 31, 1116-1125.
[18] Liu ZL, Slininger PJ (2007). Universal external RNA controls for microbial gene expression analysis using microarray and qRT-PCR.J Microbiol Meth 68, 486-496.
[19] Martins MQ, Fortunato AS, Rodrigues WP, Partelli FL, Campostrini E, Lidon FC, DaMatta FM, Ramalho JC, Ribeiro-Barros AI (2017). Selection and validation of reference genes for accurate RT-qPCR data normalization in Coffea spp. under a climate changes context of interacting elevated [CO2] and temperature. Front Plant Sci 8, 307.
[20] Ouyang KX, Li JC, Huang H, Que QM, Li P, Chen XY (2014). A simple method for RNA isolation from various tissues of the tree Neolamarckia cadamba. Biotechnol Biotec Eq 28, 1008-1013.
[21] Ouyang KX, Li JC, Zhao XH, Que QM, Li P, Huang H, Deng XM, Singh SK, Wu AM, Chen XY (2016). Transcriptomic analysis of multipurpose timber yielding tree Neolamarckia cadamba during xylogenesis using RNA- Seq. PLoS One 11, e0159407.
[22] Pandey A, Negi PS (2016). Traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacological properties of Neolamarckia cad- amba: a review. J Ethnopharmacol 181, 118-135.
[23] Pandey A, Negi PS (2018). Phytochemical composition,in vitro antioxidant activity and antibacterial mechanisms of Neolamarckia cadamba fruits extracts. Nat Prod Res 32, 1189-1192.
[24] Pfaffl MW, Tichopad A, Prgomet C, Neuvians TP (2004). Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper- Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations.Biotechnol Lett 26, 509-515.
[25] Thellin O, Zorzi W, Lakaye B, De Borman B, Coumans B, Hennen G, Grisar T, Igout A, Heinen E (1999). Housekeeping genes as internal standards: use and limits.J Biotechnol 75, 291-295.
[26] Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Speleman F (2002). Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 3, research0034.
[27] Zhao XH, Ouyang KX, Gan SM, Zeng W, Song LL, Zhao S, Li JC, Doblin MS, Bacic A, Chen XY, Marchant A, Deng XM, Wu AM (2014). Biochemical and molecular changes associated with heteroxylan biosynthesis in Neolamarckia cadamba(Rubiaceae) during xylogenesis. Front Plant Sci 5, 602.
[28] Zhou X, Tarver MR, Bennett GW, Oi FM, Scharf ME (2006). Two hexamerin genes from the termite Reticulitermes flavipes: sequence, expression, and proposed functions in caste regulation. Gene 376, 47-58.
文章导航

/