Chinese Bulletin of Botany ›› 2018, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (3): 341-352.DOI: 10.11983/CBB17103
Special Issue: 药用植物专辑 (2018年53卷3期)
• TECHNIQUES AND METHODS • Previous Articles Next Articles
Li Lu1, An Yejuan1, Qiao Chunlei1, Yang Xiaohua2,*(), Zhang Huafeng1,*(), Xue Mengying1
Received:
2017-05-23
Accepted:
2017-08-30
Online:
2018-05-01
Published:
2018-09-11
Contact:
Yang Xiaohua,Zhang Huafeng
Li Lu, An Yejuan, Qiao Chunlei, Yang Xiaohua, Zhang Huafeng, Xue Mengying. Ultrasound-microwave-assisted Extraction of Alkaloids from Epimedium brevicornum and Their Inhibitory Effect on HeLa Cells[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2018, 53(3): 341-352.
Figure 1 Effects of steeped time (A), ultrasound- microwave time (B), microwave power (C), liquid to solid ratio (D), and ethanol concentration (E) on extraction yield of Epimedium brevicornum alkaloidsDifferent lowercase letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05).
Test No. | Factor | Mean extraction yield (mg∙g-1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(A) Steeped time (min) | (B) Ultrasound- microwave time (min) | (C) Microwave power (J∙s-1) | Blank | (D) Liquid to solid ratio (mL∙g-1) | (E) Ethanol concentration (%) | ||
1 | A1 16 | B1 2 | C1 50 | 1 | D1 30 | E1 50 | 14.361 |
2 | A1 16 | B2 6 | C2 100 | 2 | D2 35 | E2 60 | 13.343 |
3 | A1 16 | B3 10 | C3 150 | 3 | D3 40 | E3 70 | 12.015 |
4 | A1 16 | B4 14 | C4 200 | 4 | D4 45 | E4 80 | 10.966 |
5 | A1 16 | B5 18 | C5 250 | 5 | D5 50 | E5 90 | 9.221 |
6 | A2 24 | B1 2 | C2 100 | 3 | D4 45 | E5 90 | 9.430 |
7 | A2 24 | B2 6 | C3 150 | 4 | D5 50 | E1 50 | 9.696 |
8 | A2 24 | B3 10 | C4 200 | 5 | D1 30 | E2 60 | 15.878 |
9 | A2 24 | B4 14 | C5 250 | 1 | D2 35 | E3 70 | 14.259 |
10 | A2 24 | B5 18 | C1 50 | 2 | D3 40 | E4 80 | 11.946 |
11 | A3 32 | B1 2 | C3 150 | 5 | D2 35 | E4 80 | 12.869 |
12 | A3 32 | B2 6 | C4 200 | 1 | D3 40 | E5 90 | 11.181 |
13 | A3 32 | B3 10 | C5 250 | 2 | D4 45 | E1 50 | 10.934 |
14 | A3 32 | B4 14 | C1 50 | 3 | D5 50 | E2 60 | 9.948 |
15 | A3 32 | B5 18 | C2 100 | 4 | D1 30 | E3 70 | 15.833 |
16 | A4 40 | B1 2 | C4 200 | 2 | D5 50 | E3 70 | 9.967 |
17 | A4 40 | B2 6 | C5 250 | 3 | D1 30 | E4 80 | 15.758 |
18 | A4 40 | B3 10 | C1 50 | 4 | D2 35 | E5 90 | 12.806 |
19 | A4 40 | B4 14 | C2 100 | 5 | D3 40 | E1 50 | 12.022 |
20 | A4 40 | B5 18 | C3 150 | 1 | D4 45 | E2 60 | 11.251 |
21 | A5 48 | B1 2 | C5 250 | 4 | D3 40 | E2 60 | 11.895 |
22 | A5 48 | B2 6 | C1 50 | 5 | D4 45 | E3 70 | 10.764 |
23 | A5 48 | B3 10 | C2 100 | 1 | D5 50 | E4 80 | 9.765 |
24 | A5 48 | B4 14 | C3 150 | 2 | D1 30 | E5 90 | 14.588 |
25 | A5 48 | B5 18 | C4 200 | 3 | D2 35 | E1 50 | 13.640 |
T1 | 59.906 | 58.522 | 59.824 | 60.817 | 76.417 | 60.652 | |
T2 | 61.209 | 60.741 | 60.393 | 60.779 | 66.917 | 62.315 | |
T3 | 60.766 | 61.398 | 60.418 | 60.791 | 59.059 | 62.839 | |
T4 | 61.803 | 61.784 | 61.632 | 61.196 | 53.345 | 61.303 | |
T5 | 60.652 | 61.891 | 62.086 | 60.753 | 48.598 | 57.226 | |
K1 | 11.981 | 11.704 | 11.965 | 12.163 | 15.284 | 12.131 | |
K2 | 12.242 | 12.148 | 12.079 | 12.156 | 13.383 | 12.463 | |
K3 | 12.153 | 12.280 | 12.084 | 12.158 | 11.812 | 12.568 | |
K4 | 12.361 | 12.357 | 12.326 | 12.239 | 10.669 | 12.261 | |
K5 | 12.131 | 12.378 | 12.414 | 12.151 | 9.720 | 11.445 | |
R | 0.379 | 0.674 | 0.449 | 0.089 | 5.564 | 1.123 |
Table 1 Design, result and extreme difference of orthogonal test
Test No. | Factor | Mean extraction yield (mg∙g-1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(A) Steeped time (min) | (B) Ultrasound- microwave time (min) | (C) Microwave power (J∙s-1) | Blank | (D) Liquid to solid ratio (mL∙g-1) | (E) Ethanol concentration (%) | ||
1 | A1 16 | B1 2 | C1 50 | 1 | D1 30 | E1 50 | 14.361 |
2 | A1 16 | B2 6 | C2 100 | 2 | D2 35 | E2 60 | 13.343 |
3 | A1 16 | B3 10 | C3 150 | 3 | D3 40 | E3 70 | 12.015 |
4 | A1 16 | B4 14 | C4 200 | 4 | D4 45 | E4 80 | 10.966 |
5 | A1 16 | B5 18 | C5 250 | 5 | D5 50 | E5 90 | 9.221 |
6 | A2 24 | B1 2 | C2 100 | 3 | D4 45 | E5 90 | 9.430 |
7 | A2 24 | B2 6 | C3 150 | 4 | D5 50 | E1 50 | 9.696 |
8 | A2 24 | B3 10 | C4 200 | 5 | D1 30 | E2 60 | 15.878 |
9 | A2 24 | B4 14 | C5 250 | 1 | D2 35 | E3 70 | 14.259 |
10 | A2 24 | B5 18 | C1 50 | 2 | D3 40 | E4 80 | 11.946 |
11 | A3 32 | B1 2 | C3 150 | 5 | D2 35 | E4 80 | 12.869 |
12 | A3 32 | B2 6 | C4 200 | 1 | D3 40 | E5 90 | 11.181 |
13 | A3 32 | B3 10 | C5 250 | 2 | D4 45 | E1 50 | 10.934 |
14 | A3 32 | B4 14 | C1 50 | 3 | D5 50 | E2 60 | 9.948 |
15 | A3 32 | B5 18 | C2 100 | 4 | D1 30 | E3 70 | 15.833 |
16 | A4 40 | B1 2 | C4 200 | 2 | D5 50 | E3 70 | 9.967 |
17 | A4 40 | B2 6 | C5 250 | 3 | D1 30 | E4 80 | 15.758 |
18 | A4 40 | B3 10 | C1 50 | 4 | D2 35 | E5 90 | 12.806 |
19 | A4 40 | B4 14 | C2 100 | 5 | D3 40 | E1 50 | 12.022 |
20 | A4 40 | B5 18 | C3 150 | 1 | D4 45 | E2 60 | 11.251 |
21 | A5 48 | B1 2 | C5 250 | 4 | D3 40 | E2 60 | 11.895 |
22 | A5 48 | B2 6 | C1 50 | 5 | D4 45 | E3 70 | 10.764 |
23 | A5 48 | B3 10 | C2 100 | 1 | D5 50 | E4 80 | 9.765 |
24 | A5 48 | B4 14 | C3 150 | 2 | D1 30 | E5 90 | 14.588 |
25 | A5 48 | B5 18 | C4 200 | 3 | D2 35 | E1 50 | 13.640 |
T1 | 59.906 | 58.522 | 59.824 | 60.817 | 76.417 | 60.652 | |
T2 | 61.209 | 60.741 | 60.393 | 60.779 | 66.917 | 62.315 | |
T3 | 60.766 | 61.398 | 60.418 | 60.791 | 59.059 | 62.839 | |
T4 | 61.803 | 61.784 | 61.632 | 61.196 | 53.345 | 61.303 | |
T5 | 60.652 | 61.891 | 62.086 | 60.753 | 48.598 | 57.226 | |
K1 | 11.981 | 11.704 | 11.965 | 12.163 | 15.284 | 12.131 | |
K2 | 12.242 | 12.148 | 12.079 | 12.156 | 13.383 | 12.463 | |
K3 | 12.153 | 12.280 | 12.084 | 12.158 | 11.812 | 12.568 | |
K4 | 12.361 | 12.357 | 12.326 | 12.239 | 10.669 | 12.261 | |
K5 | 12.131 | 12.378 | 12.414 | 12.151 | 9.720 | 11.445 | |
R | 0.379 | 0.674 | 0.449 | 0.089 | 5.564 | 1.123 |
Source | Sum of squares | dƒ | Mean square | F | P | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(A) Steeped time (min) | 0.394 | 4 | 0.099 | 14.375 | 0.012 | * |
(B) Ultrasound-microwave time (min) | 1.537 | 4 | 0.384 | 56.051 | 0.001 | ** |
(C) Microwave power (J∙s-1) | 0.708 | 4 | 0.177 | 25.825 | 0.004 | ** |
Blank | 0.027 | 4 | 0.007 | |||
(D) Liquid to solid ratio (mL∙g-1) | 97.760 | 4 | 24.440 | 3564.343 | 0.0001 | ** |
(E) Ethanol concentration (%) | 3.896 | 4 | 0.974 | 142.039 | 0.0001 | ** |
Error | 0.027 | 4 | 0.007 | |||
Total | 104.323 | 28 |
Table 2 Variance analysis of orthogonal test
Source | Sum of squares | dƒ | Mean square | F | P | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(A) Steeped time (min) | 0.394 | 4 | 0.099 | 14.375 | 0.012 | * |
(B) Ultrasound-microwave time (min) | 1.537 | 4 | 0.384 | 56.051 | 0.001 | ** |
(C) Microwave power (J∙s-1) | 0.708 | 4 | 0.177 | 25.825 | 0.004 | ** |
Blank | 0.027 | 4 | 0.007 | |||
(D) Liquid to solid ratio (mL∙g-1) | 97.760 | 4 | 24.440 | 3564.343 | 0.0001 | ** |
(E) Ethanol concentration (%) | 3.896 | 4 | 0.974 | 142.039 | 0.0001 | ** |
Error | 0.027 | 4 | 0.007 | |||
Total | 104.323 | 28 |
Method | Extraction yield (mg∙g-1) | RSD (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Replicate 1 | Replicate 2 | Replicate 3 | Mean | ||
Ultrasound-microwave assisted extraction | 15.915 | 16.262 | 16.262 | 16.146 a | 0.197 |
Ultrasound assisted extraction | 15.780 | 15.453 | 14.972 | 15.402 bc | 0.401 |
Microwave assisted extraction | 15.626 | 15.357 | 15.626 | 15.536 bc | 0.154 |
Heating extraction | 15.472 | 14.952 | 15.472 | 15.299 c | 0.296 |
Table 3 Comparison of extraction yields between ultrasound-microwave assisted extraction and other extraction methods
Method | Extraction yield (mg∙g-1) | RSD (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Replicate 1 | Replicate 2 | Replicate 3 | Mean | ||
Ultrasound-microwave assisted extraction | 15.915 | 16.262 | 16.262 | 16.146 a | 0.197 |
Ultrasound assisted extraction | 15.780 | 15.453 | 14.972 | 15.402 bc | 0.401 |
Microwave assisted extraction | 15.626 | 15.357 | 15.626 | 15.536 bc | 0.154 |
Heating extraction | 15.472 | 14.952 | 15.472 | 15.299 c | 0.296 |
Figure 2 Scanning electron micrographs of Epime- dium brevicornum leaf samples processed by different extraction methods(A) Ultrasound-microwave assisted extraction; (B) Ultrasound assisted extraction; (C) Microwave assisted extraction; (D) Heating extraction; (E) Untre- ated
Figure 4 Inhibition rate of Epimedium brevicornum alkaloids on human cervical cancer HeLa cells(A) 24 h; (B) 48 h; (C) 72 h. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05).
Concentration (μg∙mL-1) | Inhibition rate (%) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Epimedium brevicornum alkaloids | Magnoflorine | Vinblastin sulfate | |||||||||
24 h | 48 h | 72 h | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | |||
0 | 0.000± 0.024 | 0.000± 0.140 | 0.000± 0.048 | 0.000± 0.015 | 0.000± 0.242 | 0.000± 0.035 | 0.000± 0.534 | 0.000± 0.101 | 0.000± 0.111 | ||
20 | 1.354± 0.048 | 1.239± 0.109 | 4.435± 0.077 | 6.150± 0.005 | 13.541± 0.504 | 15.408± 0.133 | 19.142± 0.075 | 23.967± 0.288 | 28.283± 0.316 | ||
50 | 7.472± 0.024 | 9.010± 0.298 | 11.156± 0.128 | 23.583± 0.071 | 31.737± 0.440 | 32.191± 0.105 | 30.362± 0.007 | 43.853± 0.273 | 42.140± 0.193 | ||
100 | 18.811± 0.025 | 27.799± 0.454 | 30.129± 0.162 | 42.173± 0.049 | 57.217± 0.426 | 59.882± 0.162 | 56.205± 0.102 | 67.590± 0.322 | 71.598± 0.177 | ||
200 | 28.827± 0.036 | 42.880± 0.283 | 67.410± 0.079 | 54.315± 0.094 | 72.024± 0.058 | 75.961± 0.061 | 77.961± 0.044 | 82.618± 0.061 | 91.609± 0.074 | ||
300 | 35.134± 0.084 | 67.263± 0.372 | 82.682± 0.208 | 67.496± 0.032 | 76.609± 0.181 | 88.300± 0.024 | 86.866± 0.045 | 90.539± 0.133 | 95.317± 0.100 | ||
400 | 47.724± 0.048 | 74.015± 0.058 | 94.238± 0.016 | 73.354± 0.125 | 78.255± 0.122 | 93.591± 0.011 | 89.346± 0.035 | 95.637± 0.110 | 97.515± 0.094 | ||
IC50 | >400 | 193.301 ±0.245 | 121.816 ±0.103 | 147.478 ±0.056 | 93.513± 0.282 | 77.672± 0.076 | 78.571± 0.120 | 57.159± 0.184 | 50.468± 0.152 | ||
IC25 | 130.490 ±0.041 | 71.873 ±0.245 | 56.048 ±0.103 | 48.857 ±0.056 | 31.541± 0.282 | 31.103± 0.076 | 29.803± 0.120 | 20.712± 0.184 | 18.863± 0.152 |
Table 4 Inhibitory effect of Epimedium brevicornum alkaloids on human cervical cancer HeLa cells (means±SD)
Concentration (μg∙mL-1) | Inhibition rate (%) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Epimedium brevicornum alkaloids | Magnoflorine | Vinblastin sulfate | |||||||||
24 h | 48 h | 72 h | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | |||
0 | 0.000± 0.024 | 0.000± 0.140 | 0.000± 0.048 | 0.000± 0.015 | 0.000± 0.242 | 0.000± 0.035 | 0.000± 0.534 | 0.000± 0.101 | 0.000± 0.111 | ||
20 | 1.354± 0.048 | 1.239± 0.109 | 4.435± 0.077 | 6.150± 0.005 | 13.541± 0.504 | 15.408± 0.133 | 19.142± 0.075 | 23.967± 0.288 | 28.283± 0.316 | ||
50 | 7.472± 0.024 | 9.010± 0.298 | 11.156± 0.128 | 23.583± 0.071 | 31.737± 0.440 | 32.191± 0.105 | 30.362± 0.007 | 43.853± 0.273 | 42.140± 0.193 | ||
100 | 18.811± 0.025 | 27.799± 0.454 | 30.129± 0.162 | 42.173± 0.049 | 57.217± 0.426 | 59.882± 0.162 | 56.205± 0.102 | 67.590± 0.322 | 71.598± 0.177 | ||
200 | 28.827± 0.036 | 42.880± 0.283 | 67.410± 0.079 | 54.315± 0.094 | 72.024± 0.058 | 75.961± 0.061 | 77.961± 0.044 | 82.618± 0.061 | 91.609± 0.074 | ||
300 | 35.134± 0.084 | 67.263± 0.372 | 82.682± 0.208 | 67.496± 0.032 | 76.609± 0.181 | 88.300± 0.024 | 86.866± 0.045 | 90.539± 0.133 | 95.317± 0.100 | ||
400 | 47.724± 0.048 | 74.015± 0.058 | 94.238± 0.016 | 73.354± 0.125 | 78.255± 0.122 | 93.591± 0.011 | 89.346± 0.035 | 95.637± 0.110 | 97.515± 0.094 | ||
IC50 | >400 | 193.301 ±0.245 | 121.816 ±0.103 | 147.478 ±0.056 | 93.513± 0.282 | 77.672± 0.076 | 78.571± 0.120 | 57.159± 0.184 | 50.468± 0.152 | ||
IC25 | 130.490 ±0.041 | 71.873 ±0.245 | 56.048 ±0.103 | 48.857 ±0.056 | 31.541± 0.282 | 31.103± 0.076 | 29.803± 0.120 | 20.712± 0.184 | 18.863± 0.152 |
[1] | 陈翠萍, 沙明, 杨松松, 张振学 (1996). 朝鲜淫羊藿中木兰碱的定量研究. 中国中药杂志 21, 681-682, 704. |
[2] | 高敏, 刘京晶, 孙欣光, 黄文华, 郭宝林, 肖培根 (2011). 中药淫羊藿主要资源种类木兰花碱含量的研究. 中国中药杂志 36, 16-18. |
[3] | 国家药典委员会 (2015). 中华人民共和国药典(四部). 北京: 中国医药科技出版社. pp. 57-59, 322. |
[4] | 郝淼, 张华峰, 陈乐, 李璐 (2015). 淫羊藿生物碱定量分析方法的建立与应用. 中国食品学报 15(4), 201-207. |
[5] | 李璐, 胡欢欢, 张华峰, 杨善慧, 乔春雷, 郝淼 (2016). 淫羊藿生物碱对大肠杆菌的抑菌作用. 陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版) 44(6), 74-79. |
[6] | 李艳, 杜蕾蕾, 张小灵, 刘川, 赖先荣, 张艺, 范刚 (2014). 藏药小檗花的质量标准研究. 中药与临床 5(6), 6-8, 12. |
[7] | 刘春明, 刘志强, 窦建鹏, 李丽, 刘淑莹 (2003). 朝鲜淫羊藿中生物碱类新成分的分离提取及结构鉴定. 高等学校化学学报 24, 2215-2217. |
[8] | 牛丽丽, 张华峰, 陈乐, 杨晓华, 李璐 (2014). 基于近红外漫反射光谱快速测定淫羊藿蛋白质含量. 植物学报 49, 611-617. |
[9] | 孙晨倩, 陈乐, 张华峰, 杨晓华, 杨娟 (2015). 一种快速定量分析药用植物淫羊藿生物碱的方法. 植物学报 50, 746-753. |
[10] | 薛耀碧, 张华峰, 杨晓华, 牛丽丽, 张翔, 刘冬, 李建科 (2013). 近红外漫反射光谱法快速测定药用植物淫羊藿总黄酮含量. 植物学报 48, 65-71. |
[11] | 袁航, 曹树萍, 陈抒云, 过立农, 郑健, 林瑞超 (2014). RRLC-DAD-ESI-MS2分析天平山淫羊藿中的11个化学成分. 药物分析杂志 34, 1156-1160. |
[12] | 张华峰, 杨晓华, 郭玉蓉, 王瑛 (2009). 药用植物淫羊藿资源可持续利用现状与展望. 植物学报 44, 363-370. |
[13] | Alonso-Carrillo N, De Los Ángeles Aguilar-Santamaría M, Vernon-Carter EJ, Jiménez-Alvarado R, Cruz-Sosa F, Román-Guerrero A (2017). Extraction of phenolic compounds from Satureja macrostema using microwave- ultrasound assisted and reflux methods and evaluation of their antioxidant activity and cytotoxicity. Ind Crops Prod 103, 213-221. |
[14] | Blom TJM, Sierra M, Van Vliet TB, Franke-van Dijk MEI, De Koning P, Van Iren F, Verpoorte R, Libbenga KR (1991). Uptake and accumulation of ajmalicine into isolated vacuoles of cultured cells of Catharanthus roseus(L.) G. Don. and its conversion into serpentine. Planta 183, 170-177. |
[15] | Chen FL, Zhang XL, Zhang Q, Du XQ, Yang L, Zu YG, Yang FJ (2016). Simultaneous synergistic microwave- ultrasonic extraction and hydrolysis for preparation of trans-resveratrol in tree peony seed oil-extracted residues using imidazolium-based ionic liquid. Ind Crops Prod 94, 266-280. |
[16] | Fidaleo M, Miele NA, Mainardi S, Armini V, Nardi R, Cavella S (2017). Effect of refining degree on particle size, sensory and rheological characteristics of anhydrous paste for ice creams produced in industrial stirred ball mill.LWT- Food Sci Technol 79, 242-250. |
[17] | Kou Y, Li L, Li H, Tan YH, Li B, Wang K, Du BY (2016). Berberine suppressed epithelial mesenchymal transition through cross-talk regulation of PI3K/AKT and RARα/RARβ in melanoma cells.Biochem Biophys Res Commun 479, 290-296. |
[18] | Li CM, Wang MH (2014). Potential biological activities of magnoflorine—a compound from Aristolochia debilis Sieb. et Zucc. Korean J Plant Resour 27, 223-228. |
[19] | Liew SQ, Ngoh GC, Yusoff R, Teoh WH (2016). Sequential ultrasound-microwave assisted acid extraction (UMAE) of pectin from pomelo peels.Int J Biol Macromol 93, 426-435. |
[20] | Lopez-Acevedo M, Grace L, Teoh D, Whitaker R, Adams DJ, Jia JQ, Nixon AB, Secord AA (2014). Dasatinib (BMS-35482) potentiates the activity of gemcitabine and docetaxel in uterine leiomyosarcoma cell lines.Gynecol Oncol Res Pract 1, 2. |
[21] | Luque-Garcı?a JL, De Castro MDL (2003). Ultrasound: a powerful tool for leaching.Trends Analyt Chem 22, 41-47. |
[22] | Nikoloff N, Ponzinibbio MV, Padula G, De Luca JC, Golijow CD, Seoane A (2016). Folic acid enhances the apop- totic and genotoxic activity of carboplatin in HeLa cell line.Toxicol Vitro 37, 142-147. |
[23] | Patil DM, Akamanchi KG (2017). Ultrasound-assisted rapid extraction and kinetic modelling of influential factors: extraction of camptothecin from Nothapodytes nimmoniana plant. Ultrason Sonochem 37, 582-591. |
[24] | Shitan N, Yazaki K (2007). Accumulation and membrane transport of plant alkaloids.Curr Pharm Biotechnol 8, 244-252. |
[25] | Van De Velde ME, Kaspers GL, Abbink FCH, Wilhelm AJ, Ket JCF, Van Den Berg MH (2017). Vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy in children with cancer: a systematic review.Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 114, 114-130. |
[26] | Verma P, Mathur AK, Srivastava A, Mathur A (2012). Emerging trends in research on spatial and temporal organization of terpenoid indole alkaloid pathway in Catharanthus roseus: a literature update. Protoplasma 249, 255-268. |
[27] | Vinatoru M (2001). An overview of the ultrasonically assisted extraction of bioactive principles from herbs.Ultrason So- nochem 8, 303-313. |
[28] | Zhang HF, Yang XH (2012). Asian medicine: protect rare plants.Nature 482, 35. |
[29] | Zhang HF, Yang XH, Wang Y (2011). Microwave assisted extraction of secondary metabolites from plants: current status and future directions.Trends Food Sci Technol 22, 672-688. |
[30] | Zhang HF, Yang XH, Zhao LD, Wang Y (2009). Ultrasonic- assisted extraction of epimedin C from fresh leaves of Epimedium and extraction mechanism. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 10, 54-60. |
[31] | Zhang HF, Zhang X, Yang XH, Qiu NX, Wang Y, Wang ZZ (2013a). Microwave assisted extraction of flavonoids from cultivated Epimedium sagittatum: extraction yield and me- chanism, antioxidant activity and chemical composition. Ind Crops Prod 50, 857-865. |
[32] | Zhang XD, Oh M, Kim S, Kim J, Kim H, Kim S, Houghton PJ, Whang W (2013b). Epimediphine, a novel alkaloid from Epimedium koreanum inhibits acetylcholinesterase. Nat Prod Res 27, 1067-1074. |
[33] | Zhou HY, Liu CZ (2006). Rapid determination of solanesol in tobacco by high-performance liquid chromatography with evaporative light scattering detection following microwave-assisted extraction.J Chromatogr B 835, 119-122. |
[1] | Yunyue Peng, Yongmei Luo, Zenan Xu, Tong Jin. Ecological impacts of centralized large-scale photovoltaics and wind farms: progress and prospects [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(2): 23212-0. |
[2] | Yunyue Peng, Tong Jin, Xiaoquan Zhang. Biodiversity Credits: Concepts, Principles, Transactions and Challenges [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(2): 23300-. |
[3] | Zhiye Du, Mingyu Li, Ji Chen, Jin Huang. Research Advance in Function of Stress Associated Proteins in Plant [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2024, 59(1): 0-0. |
[4] | Huang Huimei, Gao Yongkang, Tai Yuying, Liu Chao, Qu Dejie, Tang Ruiheng, Wang Youning. Research Advances in Elucidating the Function and Molecular Mechanism of the Nitrate Transporter 2 (NRT2) Proteins in Plants [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2023, 58(5): 783-798. |
[5] | Dai Ruohui, Qian Xinyu, Sun Jinglei, Lu Tao, Jia Qiwei, Lu Tianqi, Lu Mei, Rao Yuchun. Research Progress on the Mechanisms of Leaf Color Regulation and Related Genes in Rice [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2023, 58(5): 799-812. |
[6] | Yanhong Yin, Wansheng Chen, Ying Xiao. Research Progress on Catalytic Characteristics of Pinoresinol-lariciresinol Reductase in Plants [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2023, 58(4): 656-667. |
[7] | Yixin Li, Yuanyuan Li, Yangxinyi Zhang, Wenhui Liu. The progress and prospect of the financial arrangements under the Convention on Biological Diversity [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2023, 31(4): 23077-. |
[8] | Yuping Yan, Xiaoqi Yu, Deyong Ren, Qian Qian. Genetic Mechanisms and Breeding Utilization of Grain Number Per Panicle in Rice [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2023, 58(3): 359-372. |
[9] | Yongjiang Sun, Qi Wang, Qiwen Shao, Zhiming Xin, Huijie Xiao, Jin Cheng. Research Advances on the Effect of High Temperature Stress on Plant Photosynthesis [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2023, 58(3): 486-498. |
[10] | Xiang Liu, Mu Liu, Yao Xiao. The effect of foliar fungal pathogens on plant species coexistence: Progress and challenges [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2023, 31(2): 22525-. |
[11] | Yanping Wang, Minchu Zhang, Chengxiu Zhan. A review on the nested distribution pattern (nestedness): Analysis methods, mechanisms and conservation implications [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2023, 31(12): 23314-. |
[12] | Shaofan Luo, Kai Jiang, Weichang Huang. Advances in the convergent evolution of phenotypes and diversification of developmental mechanisms of floral spurs [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2023, 31(11): 23249-. |
[13] | Haidi Qi, Dinghai Zhang, Lishan Shan, Guopeng Chen, Bo Zhang. Advances in the mechanisms of entomopathogenic fungi infecting insect hosts and the defense strategies of insects [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2023, 31(11): 23273-. |
[14] | Xuan Zhang, Wei Du, Ying Xu, Yonglong Wang. Soil bacterial diversity and function in semi-arid forest parks in Baotou City [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2022, 30(7): 22245-. |
[15] | Li Cong, Qi Lijuan, Gu Xiaofeng, Li Jigang. Research Progress on TZP, a Novel Key Regulator of Light Signal Transduction in Plants [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2022, 57(5): 579-587. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||