植物学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (5): 543-549.DOI: 10.11983/CBB16123
收稿日期:
2016-06-02
接受日期:
2016-09-04
出版日期:
2017-09-01
发布日期:
2017-07-10
通讯作者:
翟衡
基金资助:
Lulong Sun, Wei Song, Yuanpeng Du, Heng Zhai*
Received:
2016-06-02
Accepted:
2016-09-04
Online:
2017-09-01
Published:
2017-07-10
Contact:
Heng Zhai
摘要: 以12个葡萄(Vitis vinifera)品种为试材, 在秋季采集叶片, 进行霜冻处理, 测定了霜冻过程中叶片光化学反射指数(PRI)的变化。提取有效参数, 采用隶属函数法比较了不同叶片的耐霜冻能力。结果表明, 随着温度的降低, 叶片光化学反射指数呈下降趋势。在-8-0°C范围内, PRI及其相对值Rt与温度都存在显著的线性关系; 叶片PRI在0°C、-8°C时的相对值R0、R-8, 以及-8-0°C范围中, Rt与温度的回归直线斜率SLP都具有品种特异性, 可以反映不同品种的耐霜冻能力。隶属函数法结合聚类分析结果显示, 在12个候选品种中, 抗霜冻能力最好的是Cabernet Sauvignon, 其R0、R-8和SLP分别为72.3%、50.19%和2.78。
孙鲁龙, 宋伟, 杜远鹏, 翟衡. 光化学反射指数在比较葡萄叶片耐霜冻能力中的应用. 植物学报, 2017, 52(5): 543-549.
Lulong Sun, Wei Song, Yuanpeng Du, Heng Zhai. Application of Photochemical Reflectance Index in Comparing Frost Resistance of Grapevine Cultivars. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2017, 52(5): 543-549.
图1 不同葡萄品种叶片低温处理温度-PRI的关系(A)-(L) 分别为葡萄种质Kyoho、Summer black、Muscat、Moldova、Tangwei Butao、Cabernet Sauvignon、Merlot、Frontenac、Vidal Blanc、Shan Butao、White Riesling和Pinot Chardonnay, 图2同。采用-8-0°C之间的数据进行回归直线拟合, 显著水平为α=0.05。
Figure 1 Temperature-PRI relationships in leaves of different grapevine cultivars (A)-(L) Indicate grapevine cultivars Kyoho, Summer black, Muscat, Moldova, Tangwei Butao, Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot, Frontenac, Vidal Blanc, Shan Butao, White Riesling and Pinot Chardonnay, respectively, the same as Figure 2. All regressions were conducted for the range of -8°C to 0°C and significant difference at 0.05 levels.
图2 不同葡萄品种叶片温度-Rt的关系(A)-(L)见图1。Rt (%)=PRIt/PRI4°C×100, t=0、-2、-4、-6、-8°C。采用-8-0°C之间的数据进行回归直线拟合, 显著水平为α=0.05。
Figure 2 Temperature-Rt relationships in different grapevine cultivars (A)-(L) See Figure 1. Rt (%)=PRIt/PRI4°C×100, t=0, -2, -4, -6, -8°C. All regressions were conducted for the range of -8°C to 0°C and significant difference at 0.05 levels.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R0 | ||||||||||||
1. Kyoho | ||||||||||||
2. Summer black | * | |||||||||||
3. Muscat | * | * | ||||||||||
4. Moldova | * | * | * | |||||||||
5. Tangwei Butao | * | * | * | * | ||||||||
6. Cabernet Sauvignon | * | * | * | * | * | |||||||
7. Merlot | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||||||
8. Frontenac | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||||
9. Vidal Blanc | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||||
10. Shan Butao | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||
11. White Riesling | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||
12. Pinot Chardonnay | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |
R-8 | ||||||||||||
1. Kyoho | ||||||||||||
2. Summer black | * | |||||||||||
3. Muscat | * | * | ||||||||||
4. Moldova | * | * | * | |||||||||
5. Tangwei Butao | * | * | * | * | ||||||||
6. Cabernet Sauvignon | * | * | * | * | * | |||||||
7. Merlot | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||||||
8. Frontenac | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||||
9. Vidal Blanc | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||||
10. Shan Butao | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||
11. White Riesling | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||
12. Pinot Chardonnay | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |
1/SLP | ||||||||||||
1. Kyoho | ||||||||||||
2. Summer black | * | |||||||||||
3. Muscat | * | n | ||||||||||
4. Moldova | * | * | * | |||||||||
5. Tangwei Butao | * | * | * | * | ||||||||
6. Cabernet Sauvignon | * | * | * | * | * | |||||||
7. Merlot | * | * | n | * | * | * | ||||||
8. Frontenac | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||||
9. Vidal Blanc | * | * | * | n | * | * | * | * | ||||
10. Shan Butao | * | * | n | * | * | * | n | * | * | |||
11. White Riesling | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||
12. Pinot Chardonnay | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * |
表1 12个葡萄品种叶片R0、R-8和1/SLP比较
Table 1 Comparison of R0, R-8, 1/SLP among 12 grapevine cultivar leaves
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R0 | ||||||||||||
1. Kyoho | ||||||||||||
2. Summer black | * | |||||||||||
3. Muscat | * | * | ||||||||||
4. Moldova | * | * | * | |||||||||
5. Tangwei Butao | * | * | * | * | ||||||||
6. Cabernet Sauvignon | * | * | * | * | * | |||||||
7. Merlot | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||||||
8. Frontenac | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||||
9. Vidal Blanc | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||||
10. Shan Butao | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||
11. White Riesling | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||
12. Pinot Chardonnay | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |
R-8 | ||||||||||||
1. Kyoho | ||||||||||||
2. Summer black | * | |||||||||||
3. Muscat | * | * | ||||||||||
4. Moldova | * | * | * | |||||||||
5. Tangwei Butao | * | * | * | * | ||||||||
6. Cabernet Sauvignon | * | * | * | * | * | |||||||
7. Merlot | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||||||
8. Frontenac | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||||
9. Vidal Blanc | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||||
10. Shan Butao | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||
11. White Riesling | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||
12. Pinot Chardonnay | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |
1/SLP | ||||||||||||
1. Kyoho | ||||||||||||
2. Summer black | * | |||||||||||
3. Muscat | * | n | ||||||||||
4. Moldova | * | * | * | |||||||||
5. Tangwei Butao | * | * | * | * | ||||||||
6. Cabernet Sauvignon | * | * | * | * | * | |||||||
7. Merlot | * | * | n | * | * | * | ||||||
8. Frontenac | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||||
9. Vidal Blanc | * | * | * | n | * | * | * | * | ||||
10. Shan Butao | * | * | n | * | * | * | n | * | * | |||
11. White Riesling | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||
12. Pinot Chardonnay | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * |
Cultivar | R0 | R-8 | 1/SLP | Means |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kyoho | 0.667 | 0.644 | 0.083 | 0.464 |
Summer black | 0.668 | 0.298 | 0 | 0.322 |
Muscat | 0.513 | 0.151 | 0.006 | 0.223 |
Moldova | 1 | 0.930 | 0.023 | 0.651 |
Tangwei Butao | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.333 |
Cabernet Sauvignon | 0.977 | 1 | 0.057 | 0.678 |
Merlot | 0.839 | 0.661 | 0.012 | 0.504 |
Frontenac | 0.772 | 0.591 | 0.041 | 0.468 |
Vidal Blanc | 0.874 | 0.713 | 0.024 | 0.537 |
Shan Butao | 0.828 | 0.623 | 0.011 | 0.487 |
White Riesling | 0.946 | 0.973 | 0.066 | 0.662 |
Pinot Chardonnay | 0.525 | 0.486 | 0.123 | 0.378 |
表2 12个葡萄品种叶片的抗寒性隶属函数分析
Table 2 Affiliation function analysis of cold hardiness in lea- ves of 12 grapevine cultivars
Cultivar | R0 | R-8 | 1/SLP | Means |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kyoho | 0.667 | 0.644 | 0.083 | 0.464 |
Summer black | 0.668 | 0.298 | 0 | 0.322 |
Muscat | 0.513 | 0.151 | 0.006 | 0.223 |
Moldova | 1 | 0.930 | 0.023 | 0.651 |
Tangwei Butao | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.333 |
Cabernet Sauvignon | 0.977 | 1 | 0.057 | 0.678 |
Merlot | 0.839 | 0.661 | 0.012 | 0.504 |
Frontenac | 0.772 | 0.591 | 0.041 | 0.468 |
Vidal Blanc | 0.874 | 0.713 | 0.024 | 0.537 |
Shan Butao | 0.828 | 0.623 | 0.011 | 0.487 |
White Riesling | 0.946 | 0.973 | 0.066 | 0.662 |
Pinot Chardonnay | 0.525 | 0.486 | 0.123 | 0.378 |
[1] | 白金风, 公芙萍, 李春华, 武峰梅, 赵贵报 (2015). 侯马市近30年霜及霜冻的气候特征分析. 中国农学通报 31(2), 257-261. |
[2] | 高振 (2014). 基于温度-伤害度关系分析葡萄抗寒性及其影响因素. 硕士论文. 泰安: 山东农业大学. pp. 19-20. |
[3] | 潘淑坤, 张明军, 汪宝龙, 马雪宁 (2013). 1960-2011年新疆初终霜日及无霜期的变化特征. 干旱区研究 30, 735-742. |
[4] | 张磊, 王静, 张晓煜, 卫建国, 段晓凤, 李红英, 肖艳红 (2014). 近50a宁夏初、终霜日基本特征及变化趋势. 干旱区研究 31, 1039-1045. |
[5] | Allen DJ, Ort DR (2001). Impacts of chilling temperatures on photosynthesis in warm-climate plants.Trends Plant Sci 6, 36-42. |
[6] | Ferguson JC, Tarara JM, Mills LJ, Grove GG, Keller M (2011). Dynamic thermal time model of cold hardiness for dormant grapevine buds.Ann Bot 107, 389-396. |
[7] | Fuller MP, Telli G (1999). An investigation of the frost hardiness of grapevine (Vitis vinifera) during bud break.Ann Appl Biol 135, 589-595. |
[8] | Gu SL (1999). Lethal temperature coefficient—a new parameter for interpretation of cold hardiness.J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 74, 53-59. |
[9] | Kovács LG, Byers PL, Kaps ML, Saenz J (2003). Dormancy, cold hardiness, and spring frost hazard in Vitis amurensis hybrids under continental climatic conditions.Am J Enol Viticult 54, 8-14. |
[10] | Maughan TL, Black BL, Drost D (2015). Critical temperature for sub-lethal cold injury of strawberry leaves.Sci Hortic 183, 8-12. |
[11] | Nakaji T, Oguma H, Fujinuma Y (2006). Seasonal changes in the relationship between photochemical reflectance in- dex and photosynthetic light use efficiency of Japanese larch needles.Int J Remote Sens 27, 493-509. |
[12] | Neuner G, Erler A, Ladinig U, Hacker J, Wagner J (2013). Frost resistance of reproductive tissues during various sta- ges of development in high mountain plants.Physiol Plant- arum 147, 88-100. |
[13] | Sun LL, Song W, Geng QW, Du YP, Zhai H, Qin WS (2016). Comparison of cold hardiness in the leaves of various grape cultivars based on photochemical reflectance index.Vitis J Grapevine Res 55, 107-112. |
[14] | Wample RL, Bary A (1992). Harvest date as a factor in carbohydrate storage and cold hardiness of Cabernet Sauvignon grapevines.J Am Soc Hortic Sci 117, 32-36. |
[15] | Wample RL, Spayd SE, Evans RG, Stevens RG (1993). Nitrogen fertilization of White Riesling grapes in Was- hington: nitrogen seasonal effects on bud cold hardiness and carbohydrate reserves.Am J Enol Viticult 44, 159-167. |
[16] | Wolf TK, Cook MK (1994). Cold hardiness of dormant buds of grape cultivars: comparison of thermal analysis and field survival.HortScience 29, 1453-1455. |
[17] | Wu CY, Niu Z, Tang Q, Huang WJ (2010). Revised photochemical reflectance index (PRI) for predicting light use efficiency of wheat in a growth cycle: validation and com- parison.Int J Remote Sens 31, 2911-2924. |
[1] | 周莹莹, 林华. 不同水热梯度下冠层优势树种叶片热力性状及适应策略的变化趋势[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(5): 733-744. |
[2] | 刘婧, 缑倩倩, 王国华, 赵峰侠. 晋西北丘陵风沙区柠条锦鸡儿叶片与土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(4): 546-558. |
[3] | 王文伟, 韩伟鹏, 刘文文. 滨海湿地入侵植物互花米草叶片功能性状对潮位的短期响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(2): 216-226. |
[4] | 刘向, 刘木, 肖瑶. 叶片病原真菌对植物物种共存的影响: 进展与挑战[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(2): 22525-. |
[5] | 叶洁泓, 于成龙, 卓少菲, 陈新兰, 杨科明, 文印, 刘慧. 木兰科植物叶片光合系统耐热性与叶片形态及温度生态位的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(10): 1432-1440. |
[6] | 林马震, 黄勇, 李洋, 孙建. 高寒草地植物生存策略地理分布特征及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(1): 41-50. |
[7] | 姚萌, 康荣华, 王盎, 马方园, 李靳, 台子晗, 方运霆. 利用15N示踪技术研究木荷与马尾松幼苗叶片对NO2的吸收与分配[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(1): 114-122. |
[8] | 李一丁, 桑清田, 张灏, 刘龙昌, 潘庆民, 王宇, 刘伟, 袁文平. 内蒙古半干旱地区空气和土壤加湿对幼龄樟子松生长的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 1077-1085. |
[9] | 李露, 金光泽, 刘志理. 阔叶红松林3种阔叶树种柄叶性状变异与相关性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(6): 687-699. |
[10] | 程思祺, 姜峰, 金光泽. 温带森林阔叶植物幼苗叶经济谱及其与防御性状的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(6): 678-686. |
[11] | 翟江维, 林馨慧, 武瑞哲, 徐义昕, 靳豪豪, 金光泽, 刘志理. 小兴安岭不同功能型阔叶植物的柄叶权衡[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(6): 700-711. |
[12] | 王广亚, 陈柄华, 黄雨晨, 金光泽, 刘志理. 着生位置对水曲柳小叶性状变异及性状间相关性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(6): 712-721. |
[13] | 吴一苓, 李芳兰, 胡慧. 叶脉结构与功能及其对叶片经济谱的影响[J]. 植物学报, 2022, 57(3): 388-398. |
[14] | 邹青青, 吴含玉, 刘东焕, 姜闯道. 植物光合作用的三维特性研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2022, 57(2): 250-258. |
[15] | 王浩, 王明, 梁婷, 姚玉新, 杜远鹏, 高振. 气温和根区温度对葡萄叶片光合荧光特性的影响[J]. 植物学报, 2022, 57(2): 209-216. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||